Sciencescience

Sun Feb 26, 2017, 11:59 PM

Simple rule predicts when an ice age ends

In a new study published today in Nature, researchers from UCL (University College London), University of Cambridge and University of Louvain have combined existing ideas to solve the problem of which solar energy peaks in the last 2.6 million years led to the melting of the ice sheets and the start of a warm period.

During this interval, Earth's climate has alternated between cold (glacial) and warm (interglacial) periods. In the cold times, ice sheets advanced over large parts of North America and northern Europe. In the warm periods like today, the ice sheets retreated completely.

It has long been realised that these cycles were paced by astronomical changes in the Earth's orbit around the Sun and in the tilt of its axis, which change the amount of solar energy available to melt ice at high northern latitudes in summer.

However, of the 110 incoming solar energy peaks (about every 21,000 years) only 50 led to complete melting of the ice sheets. Finding a way to translate the astronomical changes into the sequence of interglacials has previously proved elusive.

Professor Chronis Tzedakis (UCL Geography) said: "The basic idea is that there is a threshold for the amount of energy reaching high northern latitudes in summer. Above that threshold, the ice retreats completely and we enter an interglacial."

From 2.6 to 1 million years ago, the threshold was reached roughly every 41,000 years, and this predicts almost perfectly when interglacials started and the ice sheets disappeared. Professor Eric Wolff (University of Cambridge) said: "Simply put, every second solar energy peak occurs when the Earth's axis is more inclined, boosting the total energy at high latitudes above the threshold."

Somewhere around a million years ago, the threshold rose, so that the ice sheets kept growing for longer than 41,000 years. However, as a glacial period lengthens, ice sheets become larger, but also more unstable.

The researchers combined these observations into a simple model, using only solar energy and waiting time since the previous interglacial, that was able to predict all the interglacial onsets of the last million years, occurring roughly every 100,000 years.

Dr Takahito Mitsui (University of Louvain) said: "The next step is to understand why the energy threshold rose around a million years ago -- one idea is that this was due to a decline in the concentration of CO2, and this needs to be tested."

The results explain why we have been in a warm period for the last 11,000 years: despite the weak increase in solar energy, ice sheets retreated completely during our current interglacial because of the very long waiting time since the previous interglacial and the accumulated instability of ice sheets.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/02/170222131502.htm

6 replies, 176 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply Simple rule predicts when an ice age ends (Original post)
Troll2 Feb 26 OP
oflguy Feb 27 #1
rampartb Feb 27 #2
oflguy Feb 27 #3
rampartb Feb 27 #4
oflguy Feb 27 #5
Duke Lacrosse Feb 27 #6

Response to Troll2 (Original post)

Mon Feb 27, 2017, 12:18 AM

1. This begs the question

Were dinosaurs democrats or republicans?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #1)

Mon Feb 27, 2017, 01:33 AM

2. just as birds are dinosaurs, but dinosaurs are not necessarily birds

republicans are reptiles, and so are many democrats.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rampartb (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 27, 2017, 01:37 AM

3. So what does that make the GEICO Gecko?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #3)

Mon Feb 27, 2017, 01:42 AM

4. a cold blooded little lizard

who clips me for about 1400 a year.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rampartb (Reply #4)

Mon Feb 27, 2017, 02:46 AM

5. I'm still ticked off at how much my flood insurance has gone up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Troll2 (Original post)

Mon Feb 27, 2017, 03:36 AM

6. Milutin Milankovitch finds this topic interdasting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Sciencescience