Newsisisdouchebagspublishingsoldiersnames

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:58 AM

ISIS publishes "Kill List" online of 100 US Soldiers with addresses

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3005939/ISIS-publishes-kill-list-military-members-online.html

"Behead them in their own Homes"

If it was my family I'd move them.

54 replies, 6382 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 54 replies Author Time Post
Reply ISIS publishes "Kill List" online of 100 US Soldiers with addresses (Original post)
Gunslinger201 Mar 2015 OP
_eek Mar 2015 #1
Satanica Mar 2015 #3
brew9876 Mar 2015 #5
Satanica Mar 2015 #9
brew9876 Mar 2015 #15
Satanica Mar 2015 #17
brew9876 Mar 2015 #20
_eek Mar 2015 #22
_eek Mar 2015 #7
Satanica Mar 2015 #12
_eek Mar 2015 #14
Satanica Mar 2015 #16
_eek Mar 2015 #19
Satanica Mar 2015 #24
_eek Mar 2015 #25
Tovera Mar 2015 #27
_eek Mar 2015 #32
Satanica Mar 2015 #35
_eek Mar 2015 #40
Tovera Mar 2015 #36
Satanica Mar 2015 #43
_eek Mar 2015 #44
Tovera Mar 2015 #45
Satanica Mar 2015 #28
_eek Mar 2015 #30
Tepid Mar 2015 #49
Smoke Mar 2015 #46
Post removed Mar 2015 #26
762Justice Mar 2015 #8
Smoke Mar 2015 #48
_eek Mar 2015 #50
Smoke Mar 2015 #51
_eek Mar 2015 #52
Smoke Mar 2015 #53
Satanica Mar 2015 #2
Gunslinger201 Mar 2015 #4
Satanica Mar 2015 #10
Gunslinger201 Mar 2015 #34
Satanica Mar 2015 #37
Gunslinger201 Mar 2015 #39
joefriday6 Mar 2015 #11
Satanica Mar 2015 #13
nolens volens Mar 2015 #21
JoePolitics Mar 2015 #6
Daves Not Here Man Mar 2015 #18
Gunslinger201 Mar 2015 #23
Daves Not Here Man Mar 2015 #29
Gunslinger201 Mar 2015 #31
Daves Not Here Man Mar 2015 #33
Satanica Mar 2015 #38
graham4anything4HC45 Mar 2015 #41
_eek Mar 2015 #42
Gecko10 Mar 2015 #54
Jaime Lannister Mar 2015 #47

Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:18 AM

1. If a single family member is harmed by this

Then a town in ISIS controlled territory is burned to the ground. Liberal use if Napalm and Willy Pete. Let the world see the cost

Target the known members of Isis and their families...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:24 AM

3. What you just described

 

Are war crimes

Take a bow

We are at war with Isis, and the targeting of soldiers is perfectly legitimate in a time of war, but using white phosphorous on humans is not

The scenario in which you describe has the United States committing war crimes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #3)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:32 AM

5. So now we are at war with ISIS.

But we won't fight it like a war. If what you say is true, then why not use every resource we have to annihilate the enemy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brew9876 (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:49 AM

9. Because

 

The resource described in the post is a war crime using chemical weapons that are banned

You are now insisting that the United States commit war crimes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #9)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:02 AM

15. What?

You said we are at war with ISIS. My coment was that if we are at war with ISIS then we should use our resources to get rid of the people we are at war with. Not sure what the hell you are talking about. No comment about chemical weapons in my post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brew9876 (Reply #15)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:08 AM

17. Of course you are confused

 

I made a post about how using chemical weapons is a war crime, you responded to that post saying we should use all our resources

You didn't mention chemical weapons in your post, but you did reply to a post that brought up chemical weapons, and you said we should use all our resources

Take a bow

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #17)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:22 AM

20. Not confused. I basically was responding to "war with ISIS".

When I say resources, I mean legal resources to fight a conventional war. Yes I know using napalm and willie petes would be illegal as those weapons have been banned by international law. Confused no, but maybe you are right about slipping in a discussion and not commenting on the context of the discussion. I focused on something different. Sorry.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #17)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:30 AM

22. WP is not a "chemical weapon"

"The assumption white phosphorous is considered chemical weapon and thus constitute a violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention, is false. "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus

There are calls to define it as such, or to limit it's uses by treaty and international law, but it is only addressed under the (silly) issue of proportionality of response.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #3)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:42 AM

7. WP is great as an obscurant and against buildings.

We maintain felt wedge and WP for a reason..

"We are at war with Isis, and the targeting of soldiers is perfectly legitimate in a time of war.."




Hostis Humani Generis,
Rules of war apply to nations and uniformed combatants.

I choose to follow the tenants of this guy


"War is a remedy that our enemies have chosen, and I say let us give them all they want."

"War is cruelty. there is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over."

"Every attempt to make war easy and safe will result in humiliation and disaster."

"This war differs from other wars, in this particular. We are not fighting against armies but a hostile people, and must make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war."


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #7)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:51 AM

12. "War is a remedy that our enemies have chosen, and I say let us give them all they want."

 

Kind of like Iraq, where the "enemy" chose war and made us invade his country

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #12)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:59 AM

14. So, you have nothing?

Western armies will always destroy the Arabs in war, we just need to learn to leave, and not try and rebuild their shattered lives. Let them live in the burnt ruins.

The hearts and minds of stone aged savages are not worth dealing with, burn 'em and salt the earth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #14)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:05 AM

16. I am pointing the finger at you

 

Because you are waiving the hypocrisy flag again

You insist that the United States commit war crimes

Then you demand that they not be held accountable for it

It's no wonder the World Trade Center's came crashing down

Bin Laden wrote a letter to the American people explaining that the towers came down because of their hypocrisy

We reap what we sow

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:21 AM

19. What War Crimes.

First I wager you know nothing about the Hague and Genevas..
Second, parse my posts, and tell me where any of that is a war crime.

It is the ignorant and shrill cry of the uninformed dreamer.

Your pacifism, and blindness to the realities of global national interactions mean nothing, war is a simple exercise of killing the fuck out of your enemy.
Pie in the sky dreams of "civilized" behavior and soft heartedness are laughable and the refuge of the morally bankrupt. War is a part of humanity, always has been and always will be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #19)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:33 AM

24. Lol

 

Using white phosphorous on humans is a war crime

Using a palm on humans is a war crime

Get a clue already

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #24)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:39 AM

25. I said villages, and it is not.

Area denial is a valid and useful tool on war...

You really are just speaking from emotion, and have no clue about war at all.
nothing, not it's laws, conventions, purpose and how it is effectively waged and with what weapons.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #25)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:38 AM

27. It can be, actually.

Use of white phosphorus munitions in an area with a concentration of civilians is very probably a violation of the 1980 Protocol III on Incendiary Weapons, part of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (to which the US is a signatory, although we only accepted Protocol III in 2009). The only point which might be argued is whether or not WP is "primarily designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons through the action of flame, heat, or combination thereof, produced by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target."

Regardless of international law on this point, I'd oppose use of WP on IS-controlled villages because I am not at all convinced that a large percentage of the civilians in these villages aren't essentially under occupation. They may or may not support the aims of IS to varying degrees, but the upshot is that they have no choice as to whether or not there are large concentrations of IS soldiers in their village.

Concentrations of those soldiers "in the clear," away from significant numbers of civilians? Bombs away...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tovera (Reply #27)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:05 PM

32. I can agree your point is worth considering.


But I also think they give aid and comfort, as well as allegiance, therefore they are part of the "government and society". Therefore, by ISIS own logic and moral precepts are targets and a pressure point.. Simple, kick out ISIS, or watch your cities burn.

There are more historical precedents for waging war directly against the population base than I can name. Fact it is and will remain a legitimate martial aim to force "civilians" in a targeted population to suffer for the combatants in their midst.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #32)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:23 PM

35. Lol

 

"Fact it is and will remain a legitimate martial aim to force "civilians" in a targeted population to suffer for the combatants in their midst."

That's exactly what Osama bin laden said

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #35)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 01:21 PM

40. So?

I fail to see any point you are trying to make..

I never claimed anything about OBL, you're attempts at linkage are juvenile, and show a complete lack understanding of the world, or of military philosophy or practice.

Do you even have a POV, or are you just going to natter on and fling about non sequiturs?





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #32)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:23 PM

36. Several good points.

Actions against supporting (willing or otherwise) civilian populations as a way of weakening enemy forces is as old a methodology as warfare itself. I don't much like it...but it's a reality of warfare. I'm not at all sure that there would be much of a motivational effect on civilians in IS-controlled areas (who are either supportive and would be made even more so by such attacks...or who oppose IS but lack any legitimate capacity to expel or even resist them).

But that still leaves the very important matter of compromising IS' s material, logistic support, an important military consideration. IS is dangerous and relatively effective because they go well beyond the usual capacity of terrorist organizations to wage war. They have a more military type of organization, armaments well beyond the usual collection of AKs and RPGs, and so forth. Turning them back into just a bunch of fanatical, Bronze Age dipshits with rifles and a few mags worth of reloads is the obvious first step in eliminating the threat they represent.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tovera (Reply #36)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:27 PM

43. Collective punishment

 

Is the reason behind 9-11

Strange you would agree with bin laden

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #43)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:34 PM

44. "Collective punishment Is the reason behind 9-11"

It was far more than that, and if that is all you took away from either side's actions...

Wow..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #43)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:35 PM

45. Actually, I reject that principle.

Attacks on civilians/civilian infrastructure, if carried out for the purpose of deterring support for IS, would not only be spectacularly counterproductive, they'd be unethical in my estimation. However, I recognize that such attacks aren't likely to be ordered as "punishment," but as attempts to destroy material/logistic support of enemy combatants. The motivations and state-of-mind of the civilians involved wouldn't be a significant consideration. Destroying enemy resources and support would be.

I don't much care for such situations (war sucks...), but I understand the pragmatic necessity of that sort of rationale.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #25)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:43 AM

28. WTF

 

You are now implying that villages do not contain people

Republicans will say anything to justify war crimes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #28)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:00 PM

30. I have never voted for a Republican.

So.. you were saying..

And as for if they contain villagers... Not my problem, clean your house, or lose it.

Time for half measures is over.

If this is a war, then wage it like one.

Democrats, contrary to some popular opinion are very good at waging war to win..Until pacifist dreamers and cowards try and hop in with their "ideas".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #24)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:57 PM

49. You would prefer this instead?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:20 PM

46. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message



On Mon Mar 23, 2015, 01:39 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I am pointing the finger at you
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=120995

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is uncivil, off-topic, offensive, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Spitting in the face of 3.000 dead Americans.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of Discussionist members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Mar 23, 2015, 01:50 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Lame but not hideworthy.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This cuckoo will be back on vacation again soon but this post is his wacko opinion so doesn't get a vote to hide from me.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Skirts the edge but not hide-worthy
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's a direct answer to the poster. It's certainly NOT spitting in the face of dead Americans
. Leave it. Smoke

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #3)


Response to _eek (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:44 AM

8. Every action against ISIS so far,

has been in "nice" mode.

Letting the armed forces do what they do best for a little while will let them know what savage actually looks like.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:57 PM

48. I think we'd be better off working on hardening our posts here

We are facing an enemy that has stated over and over that they intend to attack America on American soil and our military bases are essentially unarmed targets.

(IMO)At a minimum there should be an armed reaction force on every post

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Smoke (Reply #48)

Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:14 AM

50. Agreed,

But as a dependent growing up, I always lived off post, dad was an NCO, so made enough to live on economy.

And families are soft targets, on post housing is a gun free zone ... brilliant..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #50)

Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:30 AM

51. I don’t know if this is still the case (probably is)

but when I was assigned to 4th ID at Ft. Carson in the early 90s everyone E4 and below was prohibited from having firearms in their (off post) quarters by the Division Commander. So any married E4 (assuming he followed the rules) who lived off post would be a sitting duck.

If it were up to me I’d arm all Squad leader and assistant squad leaders and up as well as the CQ and SDNCO and their runners. I’d also make it policy that any unit going down range would take small arms ammunition with them and no weapons would leave post without an armed guard but the Army is never going to do that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Smoke (Reply #51)

Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:36 AM

52. I always hated the SOP on personal weapons, it's asinine and hypocritical.

I get sent overseas, at 17-18 years old, with enough firepower to level a small town, single handed, but cant be trusted to have a pistol in my apartment or home..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #52)

Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:47 AM

53. When I was in the Army officers were held accountable for anything their troops did

Even if it was completely beyond the officer’s control. For instance when I was at Ft. Carson a soldier decided to go home to Texas over a long weekend. On his way back to Colorado he fell asleep at the wheel and wrecked his car and killed himself.

Even though he had left post without a pass and wasn’t supposed to have been that far away from post and there was no way that his chain of command could have anticipated or prevented the accident they had to account for why the accident happened.

My experience has been that this leads to a culture in which the chain of command takes as many choices as they can away from the lower EM in an effort to keep their stupidity from jeopardizing the NCOs and Officers careers

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:23 AM

2. The United States

 

Also produces kill list for their wars

But when US puts out a kill list, not all of them are soldiers

Any American citizen criticizing Isis for putting out kill lists should also do the same to the United States

The Iraq he most wanted deck of playing cards comes to mind

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:25 AM

4. Then we need to say it's a war

And use the required force, not pussy foot and treat it like crime

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:50 AM

10. But

 

Should we commit war crimes fighting Isis ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #10)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:18 PM

34. We fight in accordance with the law of armed conflict

They don't

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #34)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:24 PM

37. That's a lie

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #37)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:30 PM

39. Hmmm really

And you witnessed this or heard it from a Guy in 2nd Platoon whose Sergeant said a Guy from Delta Company heard from his Cousin last tour.......

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:51 AM

11. Until we get a big p President that's not going to happen. If the situation

were not so dangerous with what this poseur is doing, it would be almost funny. Is the US still a country?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to joefriday6 (Reply #11)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:52 AM

13. At least you admit it

 

That the United States will only come at war crimes when a republican president is in office

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #13)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:26 AM

21. War Crimes

are war crimes burning women and children in their homes?

Civilians die in every war. The one war that was won decisively by the US was WW2 a war in which the two CinCs were both Democrats.

We set fire to entire cities using magnesium bombs in wave one of the bombing followed by napalm in wave two of the bombing to create firestorms. We killed more people with fire bombing than we ever did with the two nukes we dropped. The reason Nagasaki and Hiroshima were chosen if because most of the other major urban areas had already been destroyed through the firebombing campaign.

Some enemies only understand unconditional surrender and don't negotiate in good faith prior to arriving at an outcome where the only option is unconditionally surrendering your troops, your people, and your nation.

Morality is what the winners define it is, nothing more. Pretending otherwise is to ignore the history of mankind.

We were vicious killers when we needed to be and magnanimous victors when we could be. When the latter is forgotten it's sometimes appropriate to remind people of the former with actions equal to the task.

Having said that, I'm no fan of engaging in any war with no long range occupancy plan and it's clear whether the current administration likes it or not they disengaged entirely too soon.

Part of that was due to the previous administration not declaring war on Iraq but merely getting an authorization for the use of force and part of it was Obama's campaign promise. Anyone studying Iraq for more than a week would realize in a vacuum there was opportunity for a couple of outcomes, devolve into three provinces similar in nature to the Ottoman Empire's version of Iraq or find a suitably oppressive regime to force unity at the point of a gun. That latter option works for ISIS or any other violent actor to take control.

Under the reality of those circumstances stabilization and unification of the three separate Iraqi entities would never take place in 10 or even 20 years. Once Bush started the whirlwind the US needed to occupy Iraq for at least 50 years to stabilize the nation and attempt to create a unified nation without using brutal oppression to achieve the result.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:34 AM

6. We better bomb Iran, STAT!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:17 AM

18. I doubt anything is gonna happen.

there are far more dangers in America than an ISIS hit list. The police for example. They know all of our addresses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Daves Not Here Man (Reply #18)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:30 AM

23. Hands up, don't shoot!

The Police are a bigger threat than ISIS?

Then why aren't you speeding to the Airport Screaming, to get a flight out of here to Syria where it's safer for you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #23)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:59 AM

29. You mighta missed the part where I said "in America"

Im not afraid of ISIS at all, currently. I'll go about daily life never thinking about them. The police on the other hand.....

Which is why it'll nothing will happen to those soldiers.

Repeating "Hands up, Don't Shoot" doesn't mean much to me as I never jumped on that band wagon. I've been hating the pigs long before that shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Daves Not Here Man (Reply #29)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:05 PM

31. We weren't afraid of Al Queda

Till the World Trade Center

I know you didn't miss that

Police don't scare me. A bit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #31)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:09 PM

33. Stastically still more dangerous to be around cops.

And I'm not in the habit of pointing to bad guys and invoking 9/11. It's bad form. I'm not scared of police. I avoid the police. I realize they are far more dangerous than some imagined threat thousands of miles away.

I guess we just differ. I see the true enemy here at home.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:27 PM

38. Really ?

 

"If it was my family I'd move them."

So, you would cut and run ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #38)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 01:52 PM

41. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Satanica (Reply #38)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:05 PM

42. Disperse, relocate, re-engage

not "cut and run"..

Again, you show how little you know about this kinda thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #42)

Tue Mar 24, 2015, 05:16 PM

54. You can't

 

argue with the naive, inexperienced and foolish _eek. Save your breath.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:47 PM

47. maybe some A-10's should make an unpublished kill list...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Newsisisdouchebagspublishingsoldiersnames