Newsnewsiranterroristnation

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 10:23 AM

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Iran must pay nearly $2 Bil to Terror Victims

Obama and Kerry haz a sad!

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has upheld a judgment allowing families of victims of Iranian-sponsored terrorism to collect nearly $2 billion.

The court on Wednesday ruled 6-2 in favor of relatives of the 241 Marines who died in a 1983 terrorist attack in Beirut and other attacks that courts have linked to Iran.


Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion for the court rejecting efforts by Iran's central bank to try to stave off court orders that would allow the relatives to be paid for their losses.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/04/20/terror-victims-win-supreme-court-judgment-against-iran.html

40 replies, 2164 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 40 replies Author Time Post
Reply BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Iran must pay nearly $2 Bil to Terror Victims (Original post)
Gunslinger201 Apr 2016 OP
Grumpy Pickle Apr 2016 #1
Gunslinger201 Apr 2016 #2
Grumpy Pickle Apr 2016 #3
graham4anything4HC45 Apr 2016 #4
_eek Apr 2016 #5
Banshee 3 Actual Apr 2016 #7
Gunslinger201 Apr 2016 #8
Cyberpunk Apr 2016 #10
Argentina Apr 2016 #13
Noumenon Apr 2016 #33
Gunslinger201 Apr 2016 #24
Cyberpunk Apr 2016 #26
Gunslinger201 Apr 2016 #29
Banshee 3 Actual Apr 2016 #31
Banshee 3 Actual Apr 2016 #30
EGTrise Apr 2016 #12
Shredded Hedly Apr 2016 #14
Argentina Apr 2016 #15
EGTrise Apr 2016 #16
Shredded Hedly Apr 2016 #19
EGTrise Apr 2016 #17
Noumenon Apr 2016 #34
Banshee 3 Actual Apr 2016 #35
Noumenon Apr 2016 #36
Banshee 3 Actual Apr 2016 #37
Noumenon Apr 2016 #38
Banshee 3 Actual Apr 2016 #39
Noumenon Apr 2016 #40
Gunslinger201 Apr 2016 #25
Jaime Lannister Apr 2016 #21
U.S.Awesome Apr 2016 #6
Jaime Lannister Apr 2016 #22
BuzzClik Apr 2016 #9
Lira Apr 2016 #11
Gamle-ged Apr 2016 #18
chi38 Apr 2016 #20
Jaime Lannister Apr 2016 #23
Cyberpunk Apr 2016 #27
Jaime Lannister Apr 2016 #28
Banshee 3 Actual Apr 2016 #32

Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 10:36 AM

1. Wowzer !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 10:42 AM

2. Now we need the 9/11 Commission papers declassified

So the victims families can sue Saudi Arabia

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #2)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 10:43 AM

3. Agree.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #2)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 11:04 AM

4. Are you saying Bush and Cheney and Condie lied about 9-11?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #4)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 11:31 AM

5. Please walk me through your attempted gotcha.

I am interested how you think suing the Kingdom negates the official line.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #4)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 11:39 AM

7. As much as Bill did about OBL in 96, 98....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #4)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 11:43 AM

8. I agree, how does that change the "Official" line

Nobody has ever said Saddam did 9/11

He was taken down because Iraq was a State Sponsor of Terrorism

Acts like this:



USS Stark

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #8)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 12:06 PM

10. So why did the people who did 9/11 get a pass?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #10)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:01 PM

13. Because they're Saudis and we're addicted to Saudi oil.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Argentina (Reply #13)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:21 AM

33. Curiously the "dealer" is trying to get clean...

For anyone thoughtful that might mean something.

For conservative "coal-rollers" it doesn't mean a thing....

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-04-21/the-2-trillion-project-to-get-saudi-arabia-s-economy-off-oil

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #10)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:31 AM

24. Osama got a pass?

Osama got shot in the face by SEAL Team 6

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #24)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:47 AM

26. There's much more to it than that and you know it, not just boogeyman OBL.

Not to mention (a) where's the proof? and (b) what happened to the Seal Team 6 members in Extortion 17?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #26)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 04:44 AM

29. Tell Rob O'Neil he's a Liar

I dare you



It's pretty obvious that Obama spiking the Football got SEAL 6 marked for payback

All it took was a word (from our Afghan Allies *spit* ) when the Helo left to get it shot down

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #26)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 06:15 AM

31. Adjust tinfoil tuxedo

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #10)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 06:14 AM

30. Osama still Alive?

Sheik Mohammed still free?

Hijackers on vacation?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #8)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 07:50 PM

12. Horse. Fucking. Shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EGTrise (Reply #12)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:02 PM

14. some people hate the truth and need to try to revise history

On Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:52 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Horse. Fucking. Shit.
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=258997

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is uncivil, off-topic, offensive, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Obscene personal attack

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of Discussionist members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:59 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Grow up
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Are you fucking serious? Get out of here.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I've seen worse that wasn't hidden.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Poster seems to be describing their own sexual preferences; DADT.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #14)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:05 PM

15. I was on that jury and voted with the majority.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #14)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:10 PM

16. I've noticed that the more obvious the lies, the more sensitive some folks are when confronted with

Truth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EGTrise (Reply #16)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 09:16 PM

19. some people here are truly delusional

And spew the same delusions day after day. Dead end.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #14)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:13 PM

17. Looks like alert swarm time. Somebody has hurt fee fees.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EGTrise (Reply #17)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 04:25 AM

34. Say it ain't so!

Time after time, I get on juries where the alerter is simply hoping for a partisan result to hide something they don't want to read.

Everybody does it, but recently it's been 4:1 cons trying to hide things they don't want to read.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Noumenon (Reply #34)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 05:37 AM

35. ''4:1 cons bla bla bla'', yeah gonna call bullshit on that unless you can prove it

just more imagination otherwise...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Reply #35)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 05:58 PM

36. Call bullshit all you like...doesn't change that it is what it is.

I suppose I could cut and paste all the emails and show you the idiotic alerts, but frankly it's Friday night and I got better things to do.

Hope you do too!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Noumenon (Reply #36)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:01 PM

37. So thats a ''no I can't back my claim with anything like evidence or sources''

Thanks

about what I expected

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Reply #37)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:03 PM

38. Haha.

It is what it is.

The way you're all worked up, it begs the question how much you might be using the alert button as a way to sooth hurt fee fees.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Noumenon (Reply #38)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 06:06 PM

39. Sorry not worked up at all, just love showing up such inanities

Nice try though, maybe next time

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Reply #39)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 09:13 PM

40. You misspoke...

you don't "show up" inanities....you spout them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EGTrise (Reply #12)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:42 AM

25. Wikipedia?

theres a reason its free

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #8)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:08 AM

21. you have to be kidding if you're claiming people didnt manipulate the feelings of 9/11 to help along

public sentiment for the iraq war...

"WASHINGTON (AP) — Nearly seven in 10 Americans believe it is likely that ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, says a poll out almost two years after the terrorists' strike against this country.
Sixty-nine percent in a Washington Post poll published Saturday said they believe it is likely the Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks carried out by al-Qaeda. A majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents believe it's likely Saddam was involved.

The belief in the connection persists even though there has been no proof of a link between the two. "

.....

and even years later:
http://themoderatevoice.com/why-im-afraid-of-americans/

"Even today, more than four years into the war in Iraq, as many as four in 10 Americans (41 percent) still believe Saddam Hussein's regime was directly involved in financing, planning or carrying out the terrorist attacks on 9/11, even though no evidence has surfaced to support a connection. A majority of Americans were similarly unable to pick Saudi Arabia in a multiple-choice question about the country where most of the 9/11 hijackers were born. Just 43 percent got it right and a full 20 percent thought most came from Iraq."

boy, a lot of people sure thought he was involved, eh? despite "nobody saying so"...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 11:38 AM

6. Why does making sure American families receive justice *always* take so long?

30 some-odd years? What the ever-loving hell?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to U.S.Awesome (Reply #6)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:11 AM

22. tell me how any justice has actually been done. this is a symbolic ruling. as if they'll just cough

up the dough to those families...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 11:46 AM

9. The check is in the mail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 06:57 PM

11. Strange bedfellows...

Chief Justice Roberts and Associate Justice Sotomayor joined in dissent.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 08:41 PM

18. Regarding the dissenting view, I hadn't seen the word "bespoke" used in decades!...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:36 AM

20. Shows the 9/11 bill to hold Saudi Arabia liable is constitutional & valid

Yet Obama still tries to block the 9/11 bill, so 9/11 families can't be compensated by Saudi Arabia. That's just BS right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to chi38 (Reply #20)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:13 AM

23. are you suggesting these countries will cough up cash to these families because our own court says

so? it's like trump claimig he'll get mexico to pay for his wall... they'll pay just cause he said so...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jaime Lannister (Reply #23)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:50 AM

27. So how did the USG get $150 billion off Iran previously? It isn't that difficult to enforce.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #27)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 03:00 AM

28. hey, if they get the money somehow, good. i admittedly did zero research into my answer...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jaime Lannister (Reply #23)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 06:16 AM

32. IF a suit is successful the Courts can seize Iranian Assets in the USA

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Newsnewsiranterroristnation