Newsnewshillaryemailscandalcherylmills

Tue May 31, 2016, 09:16 PM

Hillary`s attorney , Cheryl Mills, shows up to deposition with SEVEN lawyers.

Judicial Watch interviewed Cheryl Mills for over 5 hours last week in the ongoing e-mail scandal

Her attorneys repeatedly blocked questions concerning Bryan Pagliano, the Clinton IT guy that received immunity from the FBI.

&list=PLEtJrFWWp7uYv3kOQ7nQBgNVb3uyl8Lhq

31 replies, 1448 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 31 replies Author Time Post
Reply Hillary`s attorney , Cheryl Mills, shows up to deposition with SEVEN lawyers. (Original post)
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 OP
metroins May 2016 #1
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #5
metroins May 2016 #7
MeatSandwich May 2016 #13
metroins May 2016 #14
MeatSandwich May 2016 #15
oldenuff35 May 2016 #19
DavesNotHere Jun 2016 #30
Doctor_R May 2016 #6
metroins May 2016 #9
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #11
FORD May 2016 #2
Gamle-ged May 2016 #3
ToBeIgnoredIsWinning Jun 2016 #23
DDKick May 2016 #4
Gamle-ged May 2016 #8
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #10
It Guy May 2016 #12
Da Mannn May 2016 #16
Appalachian Man Jun 2016 #20
Da Mannn Jun 2016 #22
Appalachian Man Jun 2016 #26
Da Mannn Jun 2016 #29
Appalachian Man Jun 2016 #31
Aldar May 2016 #17
rumnrockets May 2016 #18
Phlegm Monger Jun 2016 #21
MrSlayer666 Jun 2016 #24
Grumpy Pickle Jun 2016 #25
MrSlayer666 Jun 2016 #27
Grumpy Pickle Jun 2016 #28

Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 09:50 PM

1. That's a smart woman

Don't ever talk to the authorities unless you are represented. She must be well represented.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #1)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:09 PM

5. Why would she need 7 attorneys ???

She had more attorneys than OJ Simpson had at his murder trial.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #5)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:12 PM

7. It's definitely a lot

I'd feel better with more than less though, it's just smart. I'm not saying 7 were needed, but I don't think the difference of 3 vs 20 lawyers mattered.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #7)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:51 PM

13. I don't understand. This is just another *fake* scandal, right?

A witch hunt. Why so many lawyers?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MeatSandwich (Reply #13)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:53 PM

14. Authorities

Always bring a lawyer, if you can't get a lawyer, keep your mouth shut.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #14)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:55 PM

15. But SEVEN? Me thinks she doth protest too much.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MeatSandwich (Reply #13)

Tue May 31, 2016, 11:28 PM

19. It is obvious, she needs all those lawyers because she is there to cooperate.

And she nor Hillary have anything to hide.....

That is good for a big belly laugh.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #5)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 11:13 PM

30. I wonder how many of them were "Hillary's people".

I'm sure she brought some of her own lawyers, but I'll bet anything at least one of them was there at Clinton's request, and that person's job was to make sure Clinton knew everything that was asked and what was answered.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #1)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:09 PM

6. I hope none of those lawyers were

at tax-payer expense.

This is a civil suit brought by a private, non-governmental entity.

I would hate to see ms. mills get caught using tax-payer funds for something she isn't supposed to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_R (Reply #6)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:13 PM

9. Me too

I dunno who's paying for them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_R (Reply #6)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:23 PM

11. Several of the attorneys were provided by the State Dept.

So, that would be on the taxpayers` dime.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 09:51 PM

2. Who the Hell is paying all those lawyer fees??

 


Doing "God's work" again, asshole??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FORD (Reply #2)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:06 PM

3. Everyone who pays taxes, as several were from the government...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FORD (Reply #2)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:15 AM

23. Its the Clinton Bribery fund ...err....foundation or whatever....that is paying

That massive slush fund of bribes, donations and money given for political favors has plenty of cash to defend its elite.

I'm glad its being looked into, as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:07 PM

4. Who is paying for her lawers

I think that is a legit question, I had to answer that under oath both times I have been in the hot seat. Both times my attorney objected and both times it was overruled by the arbitrator.
So only three were her attorneys but it seems like justice is playing defense also unless I misunderstood. I can see why they don't want this to go any further.
So this is a preview of what a Hillary administration version of being helpful and transparent will be like my guess is the fact there is so much effort being put into not disclosing the transcripts it can't be all good.

I wonder if they are right , that there may be a grand jury that hasn't been made public yet is that possible ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DDKick (Reply #4)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:13 PM

8. Hillary NEEDS White House occupancy so she can seek and destroy damaging stuff over a leisurely...

...few years. Absent that, she'll need to emigrate to where there is no extradition treaty with the US...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DDKick (Reply #4)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:15 PM

10. The theory is that Pagliano got immunity because a Grand Jury has been convened.

That would make 5 concurrent investigations into Hillary`s espionage activities.

Congressional Select committee on Benghazi
State Dept IG
FBI
Judicial Watch
Federal Grand Jury ( possibly )

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:46 PM

12. That's what one would call lawyered up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 10:55 PM

16. The innocent needs but one lawyer, the guilty needs SEVEN

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #16)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:15 AM

20. Trump has an entire team of lawyers representing him.

I guess that makes him guilty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Appalachian Man (Reply #20)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:24 AM

22. Sorry, but Trump isn't being investigated by the FBI for criminal acts

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #22)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:55 AM

26. He is being sued for fraud. So he must be guilty by your logic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Appalachian Man (Reply #26)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 11:01 PM

29. Law suits are civil, But Hillary is under CRIMINAL investigation

Further, lawsuits can be filed by Democrat activists for political reasons.

If the FBI was a political prosecution, Obama would have shut it down long ago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #29)

Thu Jun 2, 2016, 08:42 AM

31. Civil or criminal, a defendant can still be found guilty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 11:11 PM

17. What is she scared of?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2016, 11:13 PM

18. How many lawyers were on the other side of the table?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:53 AM

21. Always

/revision/latest?cb=20100711215100

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:57 AM

24. So?

That's generally how high powered people do things. A chief and a bunch of specialists. The number of lawyers on her team is irrelevant.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MrSlayer666 (Reply #24)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:30 AM

25. Absolutely not.....7 is ridiculous....even murderers don`t have 7 attorneys.

She must have a lot to hide.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #25)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:00 PM

27. What a ridiculous observation that is.

Where do they grow you people? Seriously.

It's as if you have absolutely no clue about how any of this works.

Oh, right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MrSlayer666 (Reply #27)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 06:00 PM

28. OJ Simpson didn`t have 7 attorneys

Neither did Nixon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Newsnewshillaryemailscandalcherylmills