Newsnews

Sat Dec 1, 2018, 01:59 PM

Lawyer: Corsi poised to 'end Mueller's reign of terror'

https://www.wnd.com/2018/11/lawyer-corsi-poised-to-end-muellers-reign-of-terror/
Lawyer: Corsi poised to 'end Mueller's reign of terror'
Target of Russia probe to ask court to remove special counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A lawsuit set to by filed Monday puts journalist Jerome Corsi in a unique position to legally end special counsel Robert Mueller’s “reign of terror,” contends attorney Larry Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch.

Klayman, who is representing Corsi, said in a WND column Friday night he will file a complaint against Mueller with acting Attorney General Mathew Whittaker and the heads of the Office of Professional Responsibility and Inspector General of Justice Department.

The special counsel is probing a theory that Corsi and Trump operative Roger Stone had a WikiLeaks contact who previewed hacked emails of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and informed Trump or his associates about the forthcoming release.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The lawsuit, Klayman said, alleges obstruction of justice, witness tampering and witness intimation by the special counsel and his prosecutorial staff.

If the special counsel gets tossed out by a court of law, Trumps off the hook, right?

37 replies, 526 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 37 replies Author Time Post
Reply Lawyer: Corsi poised to 'end Mueller's reign of terror' (Original post)
Da Mannn Dec 1 OP
Gunslinger201 Dec 1 #1
tikal Sunday #36
Gunslinger201 Sunday #37
Fireant16 Dec 1 #2
Trevor Dec 1 #3
oflguy Dec 3 #5
Trevor Dec 3 #6
oflguy Dec 4 #7
Trevor Dec 4 #8
oflguy Dec 4 #9
Trevor Dec 4 #10
oflguy Dec 4 #11
Trevor Dec 5 #13
oflguy Dec 5 #14
Trevor Dec 5 #16
oflguy Dec 5 #17
Trevor Dec 5 #19
oflguy Dec 6 #21
Trevor Dec 6 #22
oflguy Dec 6 #24
Trevor Dec 7 #25
oflguy Dec 7 #26
Trevor Sunday #35
bfox74 Dec 5 #12
Trevor Dec 5 #15
bfox74 Dec 6 #20
Trevor Dec 6 #23
oflguy Dec 7 #27
bfox74 Dec 8 #28
Trevor Dec 8 #31
bfox74 Sunday #32
Trevor Sunday #33
bfox74 Sunday #34
Salaam Dec 8 #30
fuel Dec 3 #4
outside Dec 5 #18
Salaam Dec 8 #29

Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Sat Dec 1, 2018, 02:08 PM

1. If Trump doesnt beat him to it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 9, 2018, 11:22 AM

36. If Cadet Bonsespurs

ever grabber a man like Mueller like that, he'd be picking his fat ass off the ground after a three bounce.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tikal (Reply #36)

Sun Dec 9, 2018, 11:31 AM

37. Time for the Left to stop pretending they have anything impeachable

And pray you win in 2020

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Sat Dec 1, 2018, 02:49 PM

2. Hopefully Corsi's efforts plus the link below will put an end to the mad

hatter tea party 'investigation' Mueller has be entertaining for the last
17 months while spending millions of dollars. The text below is the entirety
of the article:


EXCLUSIVE: FBI RAIDS HOME OF WHISTLEBLOWER ON CLINTON FOUNDATION, LAWYER SAYS

**The FBI raided the home of a whistleblower who was in possession of documents regarding the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One, according to the whistleblower’s lawyer, Michael Socarras.
**The whistleblower, Dennis Nathan Cain, had turned the documents over to the Department of Justice’s inspector general and both the House and Senate Intelligence committees, according to the lawyer.
**The FBI rummaged through Cain’s home for six hours, even after the whistleblower handed over the documents, according to Socarras.

The Justice Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, a document reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation alleges.

The delivered documents also show that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election.

—————–

If the implications outlined in the above report prove true the ramifications would be significant and perhaps signal the true rollout of President Trump’s push-back against the Deep State attacks that have pummeled his administration since its beginnings. Earlier today D.C. Whispers outlined a new media push to have Robert Mueller indict Donald Trump Jr. And earlier this week D.C. Whispers suggested it might be Mueller himself who will soon face an investigation into his multiple alleged abuses of power. Some have suggested the removal of the docs by the FBI is an attempt to protect the Clintons. If true it would be highly unlikely said removal would then be leaked to the press. No, this appears to be a hard presidential punch to the nose of Robert Mueller delivered by President Trump himself, especially if you consider the likelihood the White House already had the docs BEFORE today’s FBI raid.

GAME ON.


Read more at http://dcwhispers.com/trump-fights-back-fbi-raids-home-of-clinton-foundation-whistleblower/#GM1jhbDVwavOpQsb.99

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fireant16 (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 1, 2018, 10:47 PM

3. This whole yarn makes no sense

because the Uranium One hoax was debunked long ago. Of course Mueller wouldn't have pursued it because it was debunked. They are careful in these articles to call what the alleged whistleblower had evidence of "POTENTIAL" criminal activity.

There was a similar hoax a ways back about a guy who was a whistleblower who was going to blow the lid off Uranium One. The witness went to Capital Hill and Republicans tried to keep Democrats away from him but they couldn't forever. The witness made a total fool of himself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 3, 2018, 05:28 PM

5. Debunked by who?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #5)

Mon Dec 3, 2018, 11:35 PM

6. Debunked by facts

Hillary had no involvement in the approval of Uranium One so they who conspiracy theory falls apart on that. Even if she had tried to get involved she would have had only one of nine votes so it wouldn't make sense for the Russians to put up significant bribe money/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 4, 2018, 05:09 AM

7. That is wrong

Any ONE negative vote would have nixed the deal, and she had a say-so, but I think you already knew that since we have discussed this before.

A simple "I don't know who debunked it" would have sufficed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #7)

Tue Dec 4, 2018, 08:22 PM

8. Not exactly right

A single member can object but cannot stop the deal. If there is an objection it goes to the president to decide.

For that, and an example of who debunked it:

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #8)

Tue Dec 4, 2018, 09:48 PM

9. She had the power to stop it

But she was on the take

She and others need to go to jail

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/358339-uranium-one-deal-led-to-some-exports-to-europe-memos-show

FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355749-fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #9)

Tue Dec 4, 2018, 10:03 PM

10. The plot you are talking about had nothing to do with

Uranium One or Hillary. It was kickbacks with a trucking company for a Rosatom subsidiary that wasn't involved in anything you are interested in

The FBI informant in that case was William Campbell, who the FBI had to drop as a witness along with the case he was a center of because he was a liar. Campbell was the last right wing hoax that was supposedly going to blow the lid off Uranium One.

Democrats: Uranium One whistleblower provided no evidence against Clintons

https://wtvr.com/2018/03/08/democrats-uranium-one-whistleblower-provided-no-evidence-against-clintons/

Hillary did not have the power to stop the deal. I sent you a link on that already. What's more, she made no attempt to get the deal approved.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #10)

Tue Dec 4, 2018, 11:04 PM

11. You should read my links

She was taking bribes while selling her country out

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #11)

Wed Dec 5, 2018, 07:07 PM

13. I read your links

I didn't see what you claim is there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #13)

Wed Dec 5, 2018, 07:09 PM

14. No you didn't

Don't lie

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #14)

Wed Dec 5, 2018, 07:12 PM

16. Then cut and paste where it says:

"She was taking bribes while selling her country out"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #16)

Wed Dec 5, 2018, 08:11 PM

17. Just read it for yourself

Its all there

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #17)

Wed Dec 5, 2018, 09:26 PM

19. Sure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #19)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 09:21 AM

21. Courage, girl, courage

You can do it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #21)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 04:14 PM

22. I told you I read them.

You can't cut and paste though because what you say is there isn't there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #22)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 08:26 PM

24. Ok then

Who tried to ingratiate themselves with the Clintons even though agents had gathered documents showing the transmission of millions of dollars from Russia’s nuclear industry to an American entity that had provided assistance to Bill Clinton’s foundation?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #24)

Fri Dec 7, 2018, 12:05 AM

25. Agents didn't have documents showing the transmission

of millions of dollars to an American entity that provided assistance to Bill Clinton's foundation. You are are reading an old report from the right wing hack John Solomon. Its all been debunked since then. I explained that to you in reply 10. There is much more out there about what a crock this all was.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/doubts-surface-key-witness-uranium-one-probe-clinton-203614558.html

This was supposed to all be the bombshell that took out Hillary. It fizzled into nothing. If all that you think is out there is really out there why did nothing come of it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #25)

Fri Dec 7, 2018, 01:28 AM

26. I knew you didn't read it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oflguy (Reply #26)

Sun Dec 9, 2018, 08:46 AM

35. I read anything I got from you

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #6)

Wed Dec 5, 2018, 04:44 AM

12. So the $500,000 into the joint Clinton bank account didnt exist?

Got proof of that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bfox74 (Reply #12)

Wed Dec 5, 2018, 07:10 PM

15. Was it a joint account?

If you are talking about the speaking fee from the bank that bank often hired speakers for big money. They also have only a very minor connection to Rosatom. What is missing here is what they would have bribed the Clintons for, since the Clintons took no action on Uranium One.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #15)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 01:58 AM

20. Hilliary signed the Uranium One deal.

Do you really not know what a joint bank account is? Do you know what a check book is? It's pretty basic.

Bill got the money, but It was put into an account that both Bill and Hilliary share, thus a joint account.

Here, let Dick Morris explain it for you:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bfox74 (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:23 PM

23. I don't bother with Dick Morris

because I don't believe a word he says.

Hillary had no involvement at all in the Uranium One deal. I don't know what is giving you the idea that she did.

I didn't ask you WHAT a joint account is. I asked you WAS it a joint account, since I hadn't heard that before.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #23)

Fri Dec 7, 2018, 07:05 AM

27. Maybe you could testify for the Clintons in court since you are so knowledgeable

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #23)

Sat Dec 8, 2018, 01:57 PM

28. Well, I dont believe anything from a person who doesnt even know what a

joint bank account is.

Perhaps you could post proof that Hilliary was not on the committee that approved the deal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bfox74 (Reply #28)

Sat Dec 8, 2018, 11:51 PM

31. I know what a joint bank account is.

Why are you saying I don't?

Hillary did not take part in the Uranium One deliberations of CFIUS.

"Jose Fernandez, who was the assistant secretary of state for economic, energy and business affairs when the Uranium One deal was approved, told the Times that Clinton “never intervened with me on any matter."

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-uranium-one-deal-russia-explainer-244895

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #31)

Sun Dec 9, 2018, 02:17 AM

32. I dont bother with politico.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bfox74 (Reply #32)

Sun Dec 9, 2018, 08:38 AM

33. Politico is Gospel compared to Dick Morris.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #33)

Sun Dec 9, 2018, 08:42 AM

34. Nope. Morris worked with the Clntons for years.

He knows how their finances work, and he knows on what committees Hilliary participated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fireant16 (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 8, 2018, 05:51 PM

30. LOL@righty

Reads like bad fiction.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2018, 09:23 PM

18. So Mueller

could be removed and our President would have nothing to do with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Sat Dec 8, 2018, 05:50 PM

29. LOL@righty

This made me spit up my covfefe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Newsnews