Newsnewsdailycallerrbgscotus

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 07:33 PM

DailyCaller: Ruth Bader Ginsburg returned to the SCOTUS today

Do our resident conspiracy theorists believe the Daily Caller?

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg took the bench at the Supreme Court Tuesday, the first time she has heard arguments since her treatment for lung cancer in December 2018.

At 85, Ginsburg sometimes appears frail, moving at a slow shuffle with her head slumped at the shoulders. But her entrance in the courtroom Tuesday was unusually vigorous. She darted quickly to her seat beside Chief Justice John Roberts with her head aloft, cheeks locked in a broad smile.

As is often the case, Ginsburg asked the first question at Tuesday’s argument, pressing attorneys just moments after the proceedings began. Though she is usually a subdued presence — and sometimes almost inaudible — Ginsburg advanced her question Tuesday with strength and clarity.

All told, Ginsburg’s demeanor strongly suggested that she is aware of untoward speculation as to her health in recent weeks, which she sought to immediately dismiss as unfounded. The Daily Caller reported in January that “gingerly preparations” for another Supreme Court vacancy were underway at the White House and among conservative legal groups, in view of Ginsburg’s continued health struggles.

The justice has been seen twice publicly since the December procedure, called a pulmonary lobectomy, at the Sloan Kettering Memorial Cancer Center in New York. TMZ spotted Ginsburg Monday at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Virginia, where she told reporters that she is doing “just fine.”
https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/19/ginsburg-returns-supreme-court-2/


No cameras were allowed in the courtroom, but there was a sketch artist. Audio should be released later. Here's the sketch from today's hearing.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ruth-bader-ginsburg-first-day-back-on-the-bench-supreme-court/

28 replies, 455 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 28 replies Author Time Post
Reply DailyCaller: Ruth Bader Ginsburg returned to the SCOTUS today (Original post)
LavenderGirl Feb 19 OP
imwithfred Feb 19 #1
LavenderGirl Feb 19 #2
Grumpy Pickle Feb 20 #22
Muddling Through Feb 19 #3
LavenderGirl Feb 19 #16
New Deal Democrat Feb 20 #23
LavenderGirl Feb 20 #26
LavenderGirl Feb 20 #27
Daves Not Here Man Feb 20 #28
Gunslinger201 Feb 19 #4
Jack Burton Feb 19 #5
Badsamm Feb 19 #6
Gunslinger201 Feb 19 #7
Badsamm Feb 19 #9
Squeek Feb 20 #18
New Deal Democrat Feb 20 #24
Banshee 3 Actual Feb 19 #12
Squeek Feb 20 #17
msv Feb 19 #8
Squeek Feb 20 #19
quad489 Feb 19 #10
foia Feb 19 #11
Currentsitguy Feb 19 #13
LavenderGirl Feb 19 #15
Grumpy Pickle Feb 20 #21
New Deal Democrat Feb 19 #14
DillyDilly500 Feb 20 #20
New Deal Democrat Feb 20 #25

Response to LavenderGirl (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 07:36 PM

1. So.....

who's the conspiracy theorists here that you pointed to?

What were their theories? What were their conspiracies?

I've seen only the normal human curiosity.

Perhaps you're seeing things that aren't there?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to imwithfred (Reply #1)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 07:40 PM

2. Hang tight

They'll show up here shortly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #2)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 03:16 AM

22. Here I am !

I am NOT convinced.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to imwithfred (Reply #1)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 07:43 PM

3. "Perhaps you're seeing things that aren't there?"

We call that a day that ends in "Y", Frank.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to imwithfred (Reply #1)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:55 PM

16. Did you have a chance

to read some of the replies to this post? Hope that answers some of your questions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #16)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 07:45 AM

23. Boy, you called that one right!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #23)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 11:26 AM

26. This Fox News guy is doing his best to convince the RBG Truthers



Poor guy, judging by the replies to his twitter post, he has his work cut out for him.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to imwithfred (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:33 PM

28. i admire your ability to spout bullshit so sincerely.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #4)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 08:03 PM

5. another RNG pic

?resize=1200%2C800

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 08:08 PM

6. LOL. What a fucking joke. A sketch artist drew a picture? Lololol

She knows there is suspicion concerning her health, she is well enough to go to work, but won’t be caught on camera. What is she hiding?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Badsamm (Reply #6)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 08:16 PM

7. I don't think Cameras are allowed in Supreme Court

But there should have been media when she arrived

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #7)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 08:25 PM

9. Bullshit. How did she get to and from the office

Is she smuggled into the building through an underground tunnel? CNN has a camera crew outside stones house on a hunch, but no one can get a síngle picture of her

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Badsamm (Reply #9)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:13 AM

18. Did anyone manage

to get photos of any of the other justices?


Not quite getting what your point is....are you claiming that hundreds of people are involved in a huge scheme to stick a fake RBG on the bench along with other justices who have known her for decades, some of whom would be only too glad to unmask the LIBERAL conspiracy??

Please...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Squeek (Reply #18)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 07:49 AM

24. Yes, that is exactly what they are saying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Badsamm (Reply #6)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 09:17 PM

12. Typically SCOTUS allows no Cameras in Court, and RBG isnt the one who made the decision

It has NEVER allowed cameras in its courtroom

It does allow Audio

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Badsamm (Reply #6)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:08 AM

17. As someone else pointed out...

"The Supreme Court of the United States does not allow cameras in the courtroom when the court is in session, a policy which is the subject of much debate. Although the Court has never allowed cameras in its courtroom, it does make audiotapes of oral arguments and opinions available to the public.
Cameras in the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameras_in_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 08:23 PM

8. "As is often the case, Ginsburg asked the first question..."

Unfortunately, that question was, "Will President Bush be attending the luncheon this weekend?"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to msv (Reply #8)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 12:17 AM

19. Why is that....

because she's senile?

No.

One of my sons in law has met her a number of times in the course of his work for the government.

He is NOT what one would call a flaming liberal.

He has said that she's intelligent and very sharp minded.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 08:27 PM

10. ''No cameras were allowed in the courtroom''...so she just ''transported'' into the courtroom, eh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 08:39 PM

11. She's probably hopped up on meth.

j/k

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:37 PM

13. I'm not denying it

But I'd like to see a verified photo. It would either verify or put to rest questions about her state of health.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Currentsitguy (Reply #13)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:53 PM

15. If you click through the Daily Caller link in the OP

There is a recent video of her walking through Reagan Airport with her security detail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #15)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 03:13 AM

21. Fake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2019, 10:49 PM

14. Fake news.

That was Hillary in a Ginsburg disguise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #14)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 02:58 AM

20. Oh hell. Now you'll get the mouthbreathers on a new bender.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DillyDilly500 (Reply #20)

Wed Feb 20, 2019, 07:52 AM

25. I just beat them to it.

This is funny.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Newsnewsdailycallerrbgscotus