Newsnews

Sun May 12, 2019, 01:25 AM

Alyssa Milano calls for a 'sex strike' because Georgia made it tougher to kill babies.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7018279/Alyssa-Milano-calls-women-abstain-sex-Georgia-anti-abortion-repealed.html
Alyssa Milano calls for women across America to go on a 'sex strike' until Georgia's controversial anti-abortion 'heartbeat bill' is overturned
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FULL TITLE: Alyssa Milano calls for women across America to go on a 'sex strike' until Georgia's controversial anti-abortion 'heartbeat bill' is overturned

Alyssa Milano has called for all women to go on a 'sex strike' until a controversial anti-abortion law in Georgia has been repealed.

Milano, 46, who was instrumental in the #MeToo movement, called on her vast social media following to abstain from sex until the restrictive abortion law - dubbed the 'heartbeat bill' - is overturned.

The heartbeat bill makes it illegal for women to have an abortion after a heartbeat has been detected in the womb - which is typically at the six week mark.

The actress hit out against the bill on Twitter, urging women to abstain until they have 'bodily autonomy back'.

She wrote: 'Our reproductive rights are being erased. Until women have legal control over our own bodies we just cannot risk pregnancy.'

'JOIN ME by not having sex until we get bodily autonomy back. I'm calling for a #SexStrike. Pass it on.'

The tweet has garnered a lot of attention with over 17,000 likes and 14,000 replies, causing the hashtag to trend on the social media platform Saturday.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
so all good progressives can't have sex for the rest of time because Georgia won't back down.
Alyssa is assuming that all women want to kill their babies and always agree with her.
---Lefty has come to this. Seriously. The Puritans had a better time than Lefty does.

26 replies, 460 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 26 replies Author Time Post
Reply Alyssa Milano calls for a 'sex strike' because Georgia made it tougher to kill babies. (Original post)
Da Mannn May 12 OP
Da Mannn May 12 #1
sipow May 12 #2
Squeek May 12 #4
Boadicea May 12 #3
quad489 May 12 #5
Crazy D May 13 #8
Zuckerberg Hater May 12 #6
SatansSon666 May 13 #7
quad489 May 13 #9
SatansSon666 May 13 #10
quad489 May 13 #11
SatansSon666 May 13 #12
quad489 May 13 #13
SatansSon666 May 14 #14
quad489 May 14 #15
SatansSon666 May 14 #16
quad489 May 14 #17
SatansSon666 May 14 #18
quad489 May 14 #19
SatansSon666 May 14 #20
quad489 May 14 #21
SatansSon666 May 14 #22
quad489 May 14 #23
AmandaCMatthews May 21 #26
FreeWheelBurning May 21 #25
KittyCatIdiots May 21 #24

Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Sun May 12, 2019, 01:32 AM

1. More heartbeat abortion bans advancing in South, Midwest (Lefty will freak out!)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Sun May 12, 2019, 07:01 AM

2. Practicing abstinence as opposed to abortion?

Sounds like a move in the right direction to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sipow (Reply #2)

Sun May 12, 2019, 11:29 AM

4. Hey

makes perfect sense to me too.

No sex = no pregnancies = no abortions


What more could they want?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Sun May 12, 2019, 09:06 AM

3. I can support her on that...lol...even Mike Pence would approve..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Sun May 12, 2019, 12:08 PM

5. Alyssa Milano should have zero problems with her strike...................

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #5)

Mon May 13, 2019, 02:23 PM

8. She gives new meaning to the term don't stick it in crazy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Sun May 12, 2019, 12:50 PM

6. I support her strike

Left-wing women should not breed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Mon May 13, 2019, 01:01 PM

7. Cool. So I wonder if life insurance companies will allow moms

To take out life insurance policies in case of a miscarriage.
It's a person after all. . Right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #7)

Mon May 13, 2019, 02:42 PM

9. ''It's a person after all. . Right?''...not according to pro-abortionists...just a glob of cells...

...that suddenly becomes human upon birth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #9)

Mon May 13, 2019, 02:44 PM

10. OK. So insurance companies should have to give policies to expecting mothers..

Right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #10)

Mon May 13, 2019, 02:47 PM

11. Uh, why would insurance companies be required to give policies to expecting mothers?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #11)

Mon May 13, 2019, 02:53 PM

12. if an expecting mother fears a miscarriage she should have life insurance for that.

Can you take out a life insurance policy on your child?
Yes or no?

Is a 6 week old fetus a child
Yes or no?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #12)

Mon May 13, 2019, 06:20 PM

13. Why all the deflections from answering the simple question regarding your claim???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #13)

Tue May 14, 2019, 04:03 AM

14. deflections?

Lol.
I did answer. I'll clear it.up. insurance companies insure children right? so women should be able to insure a fetus unless you can come up with a reason they shouldn't.

Now answer my 2 simple yes or no questions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #14)

Tue May 14, 2019, 08:15 AM

15. ''I did answer''...bullshit. YOUR claim was ''So insurance companies should have to give policies to

...to expecting mothers"...to which I asked:

"why would insurance companies be required to give policies to expecting mothers?"

and YOU answered with:

"if an expecting mother fears a miscarriage she should have life insurance for that." which has nothing to do with mandating insurance companies "give policies to expecting mothers" and then proceeded with two unrelated questions...

"Can you take out a life insurance policy on your child?
Yes or no?"

"Is a 6 week old fetus a child
Yes or no?"

...so try again, "why would insurance companies be required to give policies to expecting mothers?"


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #15)

Tue May 14, 2019, 09:25 AM

16. Because they insure the lives of humans, including children.

Is it that hard to understand?
If a fetus is a human child with the same right to life as any other human, an expecting mother should be able to take out a life insurance policy as they can with a newborn infant.
If not, why not?


So.
Do insurance companies insure children?

Is a fetus a child?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #16)

Tue May 14, 2019, 09:34 AM

17. Sigh...I can see you are going to keep avoiding the question at #11...quite disappointing from you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #17)

Tue May 14, 2019, 09:43 AM

18. Your strawman arguments aren't disappointing.

They are expected.
I never said insurance compnanies should HAVE TO insure anyone.
I said I WONDER if they'll start insuring them.
They you, as usual, come in with your typical fallacious logic and accuse me of not answering your question. Accuse me of deflecting from your strawman, another logical fallacy, then double down acting like I don't want to answer your strawman.
It's the same every thread with you. No sense of logical discussion.
if it wasn't for fallacious logic, you'd have none at all.

I understand you don't want to answer mine.
Just say it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #18)

Tue May 14, 2019, 09:47 AM

19. ''So insurance companies should have to give policies to expecting mothers''..were you words, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #19)

Tue May 14, 2019, 09:54 AM

20. Not until after your strawman.

I hadn't said that when you replied with your fallacious logic.
Anything said after that has no bearing on your original fallacious logic.
It is after the fact in discussion.

So answer my questions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #20)

Tue May 14, 2019, 10:53 AM

21. Seriously...all this diarrhea drama originating from my common knowledge statement at post #9 ????

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #21)

Tue May 14, 2019, 10:57 AM

22. Stop using fallacious logic and people will take you seriously.

Still won't answer..

Seeya.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #22)

Tue May 14, 2019, 12:49 PM

23. ''Still won't answer''...what question, before my post #11 question, was not answered?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #16)

Tue May 21, 2019, 09:48 PM

26. Yes, they should get insurance. I tried when

I had my oldest. Actually, the guy signed me up for a policy and one was ‘supposed’ to kick in after she was born. (This was early 70s) A few days later I got a call from the agent and he said that he could only write a policy for me and that was because “newborns have a habit of dropping like flies”. He was talking SIDS. They don’t want to pay for shit. It’s not their status as human or not, it’s because it’s just not a money maker. The returns on the prospective ‘insureds’ are just too iffy to ‘gamble’ on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #10)

Tue May 21, 2019, 10:59 AM

25. That is up to the insurance companies

They are free to offer a "miscarriage" policy if they chose to. I wonder if it would be a lucrative market?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Newsnews