Newsnews

Mon Dec 2, 2019, 09:22 PM

Republican Impeachment Report: Dems Have No Evidence On President Trump, No Crimes Committed

https://saraacarter.com/republican-impeachment-report-no-evidence-on-president-trump-he-did-not-commit-any-crime/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the democrats ever had anything solid it would be crowed from every rooftop.

55 replies, 512 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 55 replies Author Time Post
Reply Republican Impeachment Report: Dems Have No Evidence On President Trump, No Crimes Committed (Original post)
Da Mannn Dec 2 OP
imwithfred Dec 2 #1
Trevor Dec 2 #2
Butchie_T Dec 2 #3
Da Mannn Dec 2 #4
Butchie_T Dec 3 #6
New Deal Democrat Dec 3 #5
Charlie Mike Dec 3 #7
Carl Dec 3 #11
nolidad Dec 3 #8
New Deal Democrat Dec 3 #9
Charlie Mike Dec 3 #13
nolidad Wednesday #15
New Deal Democrat Wednesday #16
nolidad Friday #29
oldenuff35 Wednesday #20
Carl Dec 3 #12
Carl Dec 3 #10
Valishin Dec 3 #14
Trevor Wednesday #17
Valishin Wednesday #18
Trevor Wednesday #21
Valishin Thursday #23
Trevor Thursday #24
Valishin Thursday #25
Trevor Thursday #26
Valishin Thursday #27
Valishin Thursday #28
Trevor Friday #32
Valishin Friday #35
Trevor Friday #38
Valishin Friday #40
Trevor Friday #43
Valishin Saturday #44
Trevor Saturday #46
Valishin Sunday #51
Trevor Sunday #52
Trevor Friday #33
Valishin Friday #36
Trevor Friday #37
Valishin Friday #39
Trevor Saturday #45
Valishin Saturday #47
Trevor Saturday #48
Valishin Sunday #49
Trevor Sunday #50
Valishin Sunday #53
Trevor Sunday #54
Valishin Monday #55
Carl Friday #41
oldenuff35 Wednesday #19
Trevor Wednesday #22
Carl Friday #42
Salaam Friday #31
Trevor Friday #34
Salaam Friday #30

Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2019, 09:27 PM

1. They're just now finding this out?

Some of us, who'd been watching President Trump since day one, have known it since.....day one.

Too bad for the Democrats and primitives; they should've listened to us when we said there was nothing there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Mon Dec 2, 2019, 09:32 PM

2. We have a transcript and a tons of other evidence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #2)

Mon Dec 2, 2019, 09:42 PM

3. You got a mouse in your pocket spanky

Or just posturing again?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Butchie_T (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 2, 2019, 10:39 PM

4. Nah, he's just happy to see you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #4)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 07:54 AM

6. Ick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #2)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 06:22 AM

5. Their so-called report is written in Trumpian.

In other words, lies from start to finish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #5)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 08:23 AM

7. Name the crime. Be prepared to show your work.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #7)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 07:43 PM

11. I have not seen one person even try to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #5)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 11:33 AM

8. Well if asking a foreign Ho S for a favor is abuse ofpower

all presidents have abused their office.

And the Biden case has not been debunked (except by liberal news outlets). so asking Zelensky to see if anything is there, is not asking for a favor for personal reasons, but to see if the case which was suspended after they fired the old AG who was investigating it- has any merit or not.

Just because senile Joe is running for POTUS does not grant him immunity from being checked out for potential corruption or prior conflicts of interest!

If Trump did what Biden did (threaten to actually cancel approved aid) the left would all have had to have been de fibbed!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nolidad (Reply #8)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 07:28 PM

9. Looking more like Nunes was in on their treachery.

Confirmed now by phone records. Breaking news.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #9)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 07:54 PM

13. "treachery"



Now do the Steele dossier.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #9)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 03:54 PM

15. Well he was just asking to

complete the process the Obama administration expressed public concern over!

The investigation was never completed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nolidad (Reply #15)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 04:50 PM

16. Sure

What a nice guy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #16)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 12:47 PM

29. no one ever said he was a saint.

But vcompared to teh mongol hordes called the house dems- He should be canonized!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #9)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 08:16 PM

20. You made the statement, what exactly did his phone records prove? Your spouting pure BS.

Step right up, you made the statement and I'm calling it and outright lie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Trevor (Reply #2)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 07:42 PM

10. You have nothing but bizarre C/Ts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #2)

Tue Dec 3, 2019, 09:57 PM

14. That's what they said

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,”

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #14)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 07:40 PM

17. Who said that?

Whoever did probably hasn't been following the evidence. Of course, the part about an "investigation" is wrong since what they were after was a frame up job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #17)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 07:50 PM

18. Apparently it came from the report

the attribution following the quote is "the 110 page report states"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #18)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 10:02 PM

21. That's the GOP report.

I would be surprised if even anyone in the GOP took that seriously.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #21)

Thu Dec 5, 2019, 02:05 AM

23. why wouldn't they

since it agrees with them

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #23)

Thu Dec 5, 2019, 08:34 PM

24. I don't know how they can truly believe that crap.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #24)

Thu Dec 5, 2019, 10:02 PM

25. Likely because

the text of the call actually supports their position. Only by reading in assumptions that the text does not support does the opposing side's argument stand. The right doesn't accept the assumptions that the left makes about Trump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #25)

Thu Dec 5, 2019, 10:08 PM

26. Did he not say "reciprocate?"

Did he not say "favor THOUGH?"

Did he not tell a lie about Joe Biden and then try to get Zelensky to support it? No doubt about what the message was.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #26)

Thu Dec 5, 2019, 10:22 PM

27. Not in regard to

Biden. He asked for a favor regarding help investigating the 2016 election. He did not ask for a favor regarding Biden.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #27)

Thu Dec 5, 2019, 10:23 PM

28. Oh almost forgot

even if he did that too would have been ok. It is not only proper but he is obligated by treaty to work with them to investigate corruption.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #28)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:15 PM

32. It wasn't an investigation.

It was a frame up job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #32)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:17 PM

35. Please provide the

Trump quote that supports this claim.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #35)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:27 PM

38. Read into Giuliani's antics in Ukraine

"Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #38)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:40 PM

40. By all means

Expound on your logic upon which you use that quote to justify the claim that it was a frame up job.


I will give you this much, what that quote illustrate is that Trump trusts Giuliani more than he trusts the diplomats.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #40)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 11:09 PM

43. Giuliani's case rests on two Ukrainians with checkered pasts and suspect motives

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #43)

Sat Dec 7, 2019, 02:47 AM

44. But where is

the frame up? Want to be suspect of the outcome that's fine, should always let the evidence stand on its own. However that doesn't appear to be what you are doing. You are making assumptions then drawing conclusions that are founded upon said assumptions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #44)

Sat Dec 7, 2019, 04:32 AM

46. He's recruiting the most dishonest witnesses imaginable and having them make false accusations for

him. How much more of a frame up could there be? I'm not assuming anything. Its right there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #46)

Sun Dec 8, 2019, 06:44 PM

51. list them and justify you claim

Also, that's not necessarily a frame up either, but first let's deal with your claim.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #51)

Sun Dec 8, 2019, 07:01 PM

52. Giuliani's case rests on two Ukrainians with checkered pasts and suspect motives

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #27)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:16 PM

33. There was shakedown language throughout.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #33)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:18 PM

36. Quote it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #36)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:25 PM

37. Throughout

Like this statement to put pressure on:

"....because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #37)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:36 PM

39. How is that a shake down?

He is stating that Ukraine can be of benefit because they have useful information.


Perhaps the confusion is you not knowing what a shake down is. Unless you trying to declare what every nation on the planet calls diplomacy to be a shake down which would be an extremely broad interpretation of the term. Generally you need an actual threat to have a shake down, then you need an exchange of goods or services resulting from the shakedown.

Please try again

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #39)

Sat Dec 7, 2019, 04:00 AM

45. He's saying you did something bad to us so you owe us, or else.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #45)

Sat Dec 7, 2019, 07:36 PM

47. No he didn't

First off what he is saying is that we have done a lot for you so perhaps you owe us. What he did not include was an "or else."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #47)

Sat Dec 7, 2019, 08:25 PM

48. What else follows an accusation?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #48)

Sun Dec 8, 2019, 06:52 AM

49. What accusation?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #49)

Sun Dec 8, 2019, 12:32 PM

50. This one follows

I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you're surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it's very important that you do it, if that's possible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #50)

Sun Dec 8, 2019, 07:13 PM

53. That's not an accusation

that's a desire to find information that might someday lead to an accusation. But for the sake of argument let's now try to make the connection that you previously claimed. Where is the "or else."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #53)

Sun Dec 8, 2019, 07:51 PM

54. Seeking information goes something like this:

"Please find out IF..." Trump told him what Trump said happened.

The or else was set up by the previous shakedown, along with if somebody is accusing it follows that they want something in return, or will take action.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #54)

Mon Dec 9, 2019, 12:17 AM

55. In what jaded world view

does every request come with a threat of retaliation?

Not only do you not have a shakedown, you don't have an accusation nor any threat. This kind of faulty logic is what happens when you start ignoring reality and start assuming your prejudices are truth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #33)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:50 PM

41. Your bizarre conspiracy theory has no basis.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #2)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 08:14 PM

19. Prove it, any of it, all of it. You can't so you just tell more lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #19)

Wed Dec 4, 2019, 10:03 PM

22. Watch the hearings

They are probably online somewhere.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #22)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:52 PM

42. Why can't you answer the question since you claim to know all here?

It should be simple for you to do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 09:09 PM

31. but they have alternate facts.

and fearless leader Donnie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Salaam (Reply #31)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 10:17 PM

34. That they do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Original post)

Fri Dec 6, 2019, 09:08 PM

30. they wrote that report before the process started.

nice rag you got there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Newsnews