Politicspoliticsobamacovereduphillaryemailserver

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:19 PM

FBI Docs: Obama Used Pseudonym To Email Hillary’s Server

But I thought he said he found out about it in the newspapers? He didn't lie to us, did he?

President Barack Obama used a pseudonym when communicating with then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by email, and at least one of those emails ended up on Clinton’s private email server, new FBI documents reveal.

The FBI dumped a large batch of documents Friday concerning its investigation into Clinton’s private email server. The heavily-redacted documents include numerous notes the Bureau made of interviews with Clinton aides and Department of State officials concerning her private email server.

One of those interviews is with Clinton aide Huma Abedin. During the interview, the FBI presented Abedin with an email exchange between Clinton and a person she did not recognize. Eventually, the FBI revealed the unknown person’s name was believed to be a pseudonym used by Obama. The revelation provoked consternation from Abedin.

“How is this not classified?” She said, before asking for a copy of the email herself.


http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/23/fbi-docs-obama-used-pseudonym-to-email-hillarys-server/

9 replies, 868 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 9 replies Author Time Post
Reply FBI Docs: Obama Used Pseudonym To Email Hillary’s Server (Original post)
U.S.Awesome Sep 2016 OP
RolandLePreux Sep 2016 #1
DoDaMan Sep 2016 #7
REALtoldYouSo Sep 2016 #2
bfox74 Sep 2016 #3
Dexter Morgan Sep 2016 #4
U.S.Awesome Sep 2016 #8
JaimeBondoJr Sep 2016 #9
DDKick Sep 2016 #5
exindy Sep 2016 #6

Response to U.S.Awesome (Original post)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:23 PM

1. I wonder what that pseudonym was

It might be amusing to see what he calls himself. Even more amusing if that same name appears on political message boards as a user ID.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RolandLePreux (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:55 PM

7. Mofo lied about not knowing about here email.

What a turd he is.

Democrats love liars.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to U.S.Awesome (Original post)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:26 PM

2. So, what's the illegality or ANYTHING else?

Maybe he wanted to know he yoga class schedule?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to REALtoldYouSo (Reply #2)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:31 PM

3. At the very least, he's caught in yet another lie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to REALtoldYouSo (Reply #2)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:38 PM

4. That he lied again or do you girls think it's another right wing conspiracy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to REALtoldYouSo (Reply #2)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:59 PM

8. "Most transparent administration in history." nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to REALtoldYouSo (Reply #2)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 05:01 PM

9. The "ANYTHING else" is that the first "ANYTHING" out of his mouth is a lie. Every fucking time.

Just like the ransom paid to Iran. "Only $400 million, and it HAD to be in cash because..." and now we know it was almost $2 BILLION and started with wire transfers.

If the first words out of this fucker's mouth were EVER the truth I think the world would end.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to U.S.Awesome (Original post)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:41 PM

5. If Huma asks isn't that classified ? It now makes sense the wouldn't charge her

It did go all the way to the top. Although no matter what the email name was , I bet if you counted the word "I" in the email and got into double digits those would be his emails.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to U.S.Awesome (Original post)

Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:53 PM

6. It isn't a matter of legal vs illegal

It is a matter of above suspicion. There should never be a case where there has been evidence of a lack of transparency that wasn't an absolute requirement for national security.

Nobody would blame a public official for having private business. No one would blame anyone with a business for having a private account anywhere.

The problem is when the line between those 2 functions is blurred. It was HER job to enforce the security of communications in her departments. It was HER job to recognize the need for security classifications and enforcing them.

SHE should be held to a higher standard because her job demanded it.

Whether legal or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticsobamacovereduphillaryemailserver