Politicspolitics

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 11:55 AM

 

Q: "Is Russia an adversary to the United States?"

Comey: "Yes"

BOOM...there it is.

No more lovey dovey/Russia talk to be accepted from any of the CONs here. That is a lie perpetrated by Trump and picked up by his blind but adoring fans. To be added to the other Trump lies, that has also been shut down during this hearing, there was no Obama directed wiretapping at Trump Tower.

CONs should stop helping the Russian's damage out Democracy....

29 replies, 269 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 29 replies Author Time Post
Reply Q: "Is Russia an adversary to the United States?" (Original post)
btw Mar 2017 OP
Konservative Mar 2017 #1
btw Mar 2017 #4
Konservative Mar 2017 #9
Billy Jingo Mar 2017 #5
Konservative Mar 2017 #7
DoDaMan Mar 2017 #2
btw Mar 2017 #6
Konservative Mar 2017 #10
TendiesForBreakfast Mar 2017 #15
btw Mar 2017 #21
TendiesForBreakfast Mar 2017 #29
Carlos W Bush Mar 2017 #3
Carl Mar 2017 #8
Troll2 Mar 2017 #17
DoDaMan Mar 2017 #11
Cyberpunk Mar 2017 #12
kevlar Mar 2017 #13
msv Mar 2017 #16
kevlar Mar 2017 #18
MumblyPeg Mar 2017 #14
bpilgrim Mar 2017 #19
Badsamm Mar 2017 #20
btw Mar 2017 #22
Badsamm Mar 2017 #23
uncledad Mar 2017 #24
btw Mar 2017 #25
uncledad Mar 2017 #26
btw Mar 2017 #27
uncledad Mar 2017 #28

Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 11:57 AM

1. Who didn't know this?

 

Romney told you this and Obama denied it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Konservative (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:01 PM

4. Trump and his sychophants here....have all said it was a new era of friendship

 

maybe you inadvertently skipped all of those convos?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:12 PM

9. No, I havent seen those convos.

 

I'm not saying they didn't occur. I would disagree with them if they did say that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Konservative (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:01 PM

5. Don't overstate it.

Romney said that Russia was our number one geopolitical foe. A bit more than a mere adversary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Billy Jingo (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:09 PM

7. I'll accept the as a fair statement.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 11:57 AM

2. Why did the Clinton Foundation accept Russian money? Why did Bill get paid $500K

for a speech to the Russians? Why did the Clintons accept this dirty money?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DoDaMan (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:02 PM

6. did they hide it and lie about it?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Reply #6)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:13 PM

10. No, they did it openly. That's how brazen they are.

 

They know they won't be held accountable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Reply #6)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:04 PM

15. Actually, the Foundation went to great lengths to hide the uranium bribes.

But I would too if I were selling nuclear material to an enemy of the United States.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TendiesForBreakfast (Reply #15)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:32 PM

21. Clearly an attempt to redirect the OP....seems like I must ressurect this:

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Reply #21)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:45 PM

29. Okay, work with me here, kiddo:

Subthread started with:

2. Why did the Clinton Foundation accept Russian money?

You replied with:

6. did they hide it and lie about it?

I replied to you and answered your question:

15. Actually, the Foundation went to great lengths to hide the uranium bribes.

Next time, if you don't want an answer, don't ask a question.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 11:58 AM

3. Shit happens.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:12 PM

8. Every damn country in the world is at one point or another an adversary to us.

That is far different then being a sworn enemy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #8)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:11 PM

17. Correct, every sovereign nation is an adversary of every other nation

People who think otherwise probably think that there are non-adversaries sitting around a poker table.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:15 PM

11. ...and obama was asleep at the helm. Was more concerned

about what bathroom to use verses protecting us against an adversary.

How about that legacy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:35 PM

12. Does the FBI set foreign policy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 12:54 PM

13. Sorry,

you folks, Democrats, progressives and liberals have done more damage in the last 6 months to our democracy, which you proved you do not support, than any "con" has.

Keep spouting those narratives knowing that you cannot discuss anything, just accuse and run away.

Pathetic.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kevlar (Reply #13)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:07 PM

16. +1

Thanks to them, there will never again be a normal election. The precedent of rioting, sabotage, and sedition has been set.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to msv (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:12 PM

18. They must believe

no one noticed, or that we would forget, or something....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:00 PM

14. this is some

sort of revelation to you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:16 PM

19. Ring, ring... the 1990s called and they want their foreign policy back.

 

President Obama, 2011.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Original post)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:30 PM

20. An establishment stooge repeats what he is told

Did anyone ask him why Hillary brokered a uranium deal with our adversary?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Badsamm (Reply #20)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:33 PM

22. do try to stay on topic...the hearing and this OP is about DerTrumpenfuhrer

 



you are of course, welcome to start your own thread and provide all the links and evidence you want.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Reply #22)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:43 PM

23. Comey is in the OP. He is an establishment stooge

Which is why he didn't investigate Hillary for the same things. Same Op, same political witch hunt, same establishment, and same liberal dipshits

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Reply #22)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:58 PM

24. Dam there's a lot of denial going round.

Trotting out the old but, but, and but.

The uranium deal was the sale of a company that owned the minerals rights to a Russian company.

The deal was vetted by the CIFUS a nine member panel, HRC sits on the panel chaired by the Sec of Treasury.

the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder.

But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.

Folks need to come up with something else.

How about her is still not POTUS. Winning.

As a side bar, I will repeat myself: I will never vote for a Clinton or a Bush.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uncledad (Reply #24)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 02:02 PM

25. There's an op with the same topic....a c & p of your info would enlighten some.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Reply #25)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 02:28 PM

26. snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal

All they need to do is paste that in their browser.

The NY times. Washington Post. Forbes. Business Insider. All have stories to back up what I found there.

It will promptly be dismissed as "fake news" or "liberal media source" or what ever.

The story they believe was a Brietbart-Infowars alt-facts account endorsed by Trump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uncledad (Reply #26)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 02:31 PM

27. well done.....I haven't even bothered to look it up. There was no hearing, so likley no issues

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to btw (Reply #27)

Mon Mar 20, 2017, 02:39 PM

28. The Department of Energy was OK with the transfer.

The companies that were in the US would fall under the inspection and regulation of the DOE.

The same DOE that controls production of US nuclear weapons.

Short version, lots of BS on the Her did it for the monies froggy meme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics