Politicspolitics

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:06 AM

John Podesta has unreported stock in Russia funded business

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman, John Podesta, may have broken federal law by not disclosing his 75,000 shares in a Russia financed organization when the joined Obama’s White House in 2014.

Joule Unlimited Technologies — financed in part by a Russian firm — originally awarded Podesta 100,000 shares of stock options when in 2010 he joined that board along with its Dutch-based entities: Joule Global Holdings, BV and the Stichting Joule Global Foundation.

http://www.trunews.com/article/john-podesta-has-unreported-stock-in-russia-funded-business#sthash.Alj78yL6.dpuf


What was this Putin Puppet doing in the Obama White House? Russian spy. Now we see that Podesta, Obama, and Hillary are the original Putin spies.

"More Flexibility" said the Putin Puppet when he was begging the Russians.

21 replies, 979 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 21 replies Author Time Post
Reply John Podesta has unreported stock in Russia funded business (Original post)
DoDaMan Mar 2017 OP
NeoKhan Mar 2017 #1
archives Mar 2017 #2
NeoKhan Mar 2017 #3
archives Mar 2017 #7
NeoKhan Mar 2017 #12
DoDaMan Mar 2017 #5
News2Me Mar 2017 #18
GordieG Mar 2017 #10
archives Mar 2017 #4
DoDaMan Mar 2017 #6
archives Mar 2017 #9
DoDaMan Mar 2017 #13
Doctor_R Mar 2017 #15
GordieG Mar 2017 #8
archives Mar 2017 #11
GordieG Mar 2017 #14
bruiserboy Mar 2017 #16
News2Me Mar 2017 #19
GordieG Mar 2017 #21
saspamco Mar 2017 #17
DavesNotHere Mar 2017 #20

Response to DoDaMan (Original post)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:07 AM

1. The whole investigation against Trump is a smoke screen

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NeoKhan (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:11 AM

2. Doubtful, but regardless, it ain't going anywhere soon,

 

and with the clumsy actions and rebuttals offered by the Don's apologists, it only gets juicier by the day. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to archives (Reply #2)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:13 AM

3. Is that your clumsy apology for the guy whose personal email

 

prove the DNC tried to rig the election?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NeoKhan (Reply #3)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:16 AM

7. Thick as a brick, for the umpteenth time, last decades talk radio scapegoats don't apply anymore,

 

it is now the Don's show, besides, who in the hell is so gulable that they are going to openly swallow something put out there by a website calling itself " trunews," it don't even sound legitimate

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to archives (Reply #7)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:26 AM

12. Your in denial of DWS and Donna Brazille resigning.

 

Or did LW TV tell you that never happened?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NeoKhan (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:14 AM

5. Yep. Libs and progs are going to get a rude awakening.

Trump would have went along quietly on Hillary, Hillary's lap dog Obama and the ones withing the Obama admin if they all would have blended into the scenery/wallpaper.

Gloves are off now, and unlike the democrats, Trump has the full power of the U.S controlled by the right.

I'll say it again like I have been saying for months:

The democrats who were not pardoned by Obama should be worried.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DoDaMan (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 11:10 AM

18. That full control of the right didn't help him much with Trumpcare. What makes you think that

career politicians, many of whom are up for election soon, will be willing to stick their necks out for someone who is proving to be so unpopular and inefficient?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NeoKhan (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:18 AM

10. A smoke screen? To protect Podesta?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DoDaMan (Original post)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:13 AM

4. What in the hell is "trunews?"

 

and the best if can offer is a false equivalency employing Podesta?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to archives (Reply #4)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:15 AM

6. Less lies than CNN or MSNBC

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DoDaMan (Reply #6)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:18 AM

9. And how do you know, do you read "trunews" on a regular basis, too funny

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to archives (Reply #9)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:26 AM

13. Don't like the source? Have I seen you questioning CNN or MSNBC?

You know they have been caught up in lies.

I think that instead of the source, you are afraid of the message.


The truth shall set you free. I'll be waiting on you to call Podesta a traitor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to archives (Reply #4)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:41 AM

15. LOL

EXCLUSIVE: John Podesta May Have Violated Federal Law By Not Disclosing 75,000 Stock Shares

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/26/exclusive-john-podesta-may-have-violated-federal-law-by-not-disclosing-75000-stock-shares/


WikiLeaks: Podesta Continued Ties to Russian Firm After He Said He Divested

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/WikiLeaks-podesta-russian-firm/2016/10/30/id/756044/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DoDaMan (Original post)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:17 AM

8. Glad you people have come on board that this kind of activity needs close scrutiny.

 

Podesta is not immune. Nor is Trump or anyone in his campaign.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GordieG (Reply #8)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:19 AM

11. Maybe the House can start a ninth investigation into BenghaziGate

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to archives (Reply #11)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:29 AM

14. That would please the Trumpons. They could gather and chant, "Lock her up!"

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GordieG (Reply #14)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:56 AM

16. If it's proven she guilty, yes lock her up,

Or anyone else who is Guilty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Reply #16)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 11:14 AM

19. Proven guilty of what? Lying?

If lying to the American public is an offense that demands locking someone up, your fearless leader should probably be heading for a country without extradition agreements with the US, pronto.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Reply #16)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 11:31 AM

21. What do you think the odds are she committed in crime in dealing with Benghazi?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DoDaMan (Original post)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 10:59 AM

17. Getting desperate, right-wingers? Good.

If I had to choose between trump and the Tea Party segment of congress, I'd be desperate, too. Happy landings, losers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to saspamco (Reply #17)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 11:20 AM

20. By "losers", of course you mean the party that holds both houses of congress and the white house.

I wonder if the problem the Dems have is that it's full of people who can't tell the difference between a win and a loss.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics