Tue Mar 28, 2017, 11:44 AM

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.


The proof came out of Hillary being a Putin Puppet a few years ago. Putin helped her win the popular vote by meddling in the election. Putin has total control over the Clinton's. Since Obama was Clinton's lap dog, Putin in essence controlled our gov for the past 8 years. Obama did say that he wanted to "fundamentally transform the U.S" and he offered Russia "more flexibility" in their transformation once he was elected.

Clinton's need investigated for their ties to Putin.

4 replies, 543 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal (Original post)
DoDaMan Mar 2017 OP
News2Me Mar 2017 #1
DoDaMan Mar 2017 #2
DavesNotHere Mar 2017 #4
Banshee 3 Actual Mar 2017 #3

Response to DoDaMan (Original post)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 12:04 PM

1. It's time for some facts.

Snopes says: False

Politifact says: Mostly False

FactCheck says: No Veto Power for Clinton on Uranium Deal

CNBC says: Donald Trump claims — falsely — that Hillary Clinton gave Russia 20% of US uranium

Vox says: No, Hillary Clinton did not "give Russia 20 percent of the uranium” in the US

Fortune says:
Here's what Trump said:
"Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20% of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while 9 investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation."
Here's the truth:
In 2010, while Clinton was Secretary of State, the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment approved the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian Company, to Rosatom, a Russian state-owned enterprise. The reason the feds needed to approve the deal was because Uranium One owned a significant amount of Uranium, which is considered by the U.S. government to be an asset important to national security.
While Clinton, as Secretary of State, sat on the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment, so do the heads of many other agencies like the attorney general, as well as the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy. Therefore, the decision to approve this sale cannot be chalked up to Clinton alone. Furthermore, the approval of the sale does not mean that the Russians can remove the uranium from the United States. Without a separate approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, uranium cannot be exported from the United States. This undercuts the insinuation Trump makes that somehow Clinton alone undermined American security interests.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to News2Me (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 12:07 PM

2. SO we need to get to the bottom of all that cold hard cash flowing to the Clinton family. If

it was not due to the uranium deal, then it must have been to meddle in elections.

The fact that Clinton's accepted a shit ton of cash from agents of Putin are there for all to see.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to DoDaMan (Reply #2)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 01:22 PM

4. Yes, but you can't PROVE a quid pro quo, and you'd have to do that or you have nothing...

unless it's Trump, in which case associates with REPORTED contacts with SUSPECTED Russian agents to POTENTIALLY discuss matters that COULD have influenced the election, all as reported by unnamed sources close to the intelligence community should be sufficient.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to News2Me (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 12:21 PM

3. So the New York Times is Lying?

the money was never given to the foundation by the CEO?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink