Politicspoliticsdojloislernerirssocalledscandal

Fri Sep 8, 2017, 11:57 PM

Trump DOJ: No plans to charge Lois Lerner in IRS scandal

This makes me smile


23 replies, 647 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 23 replies Author Time Post
Reply Trump DOJ: No plans to charge Lois Lerner in IRS scandal (Original post)
Letmypeoplevote Sep 2017 OP
Dexter Morgan Sep 2017 #1
metroins Sep 2017 #14
Letmypeoplevote Sep 2017 #15
Cave Dweller Sep 2017 #19
Oldgeezer Sep 2017 #2
Trevor Sep 2017 #3
Nostrings Sep 2017 #17
Trevor Sep 2017 #18
Dumper Sep 2017 #21
Horsefeathers Sep 2017 #4
rampartb Sep 2017 #5
bfox74 Sep 2017 #6
rampartb Sep 2017 #7
bfox74 Sep 2017 #8
MeatSandwich Sep 2017 #9
rampartb Sep 2017 #10
MeatSandwich Sep 2017 #22
Frankenvoter Sep 2017 #11
Grateful Bread Sep 2017 #12
batcat Sep 2017 #13
Letmypeoplevote Sep 2017 #16
Dumper Sep 2017 #20
The More You Know V2 Sep 2017 #23

Response to Letmypeoplevote (Original post)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 12:21 AM

1. A waste of time and money Americans know she is a crook...

Kudos to Trump for not wasting taxpayer dollars..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dexter Morgan (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 07:15 AM

14. If you broke the law

You should be prosecuted/deported. We should enforce the laws on the books.

Or so I hear a lot from people against illegal immigration.

If she broke the law, one would think she would be prosecuted...or.... She never broke the law.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dexter Morgan (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 11:13 AM

15. And yet even the corrupt Sessions DOJ cannot bring charges

This makes smile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #15)

Sun Sep 10, 2017, 09:04 AM

19. Example of corruption please.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Original post)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 12:38 AM

2. This made you happy also..how long did it last? I have your DU post about it..lay off the hard stuff

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Original post)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 12:49 AM

3. Took them long enough

The complaints against her had zero validity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #3)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 05:11 PM

17. She was just taking the fifth for fun, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #17)

Sun Sep 10, 2017, 12:04 AM

18. There are lots of good reasons for taking the fifth

I'm sure you won't pronounce Trumpsters guilty if they do it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #18)

Sun Sep 10, 2017, 09:30 AM

21. Her waiver of it, not her use, is what's at issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Original post)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 12:52 AM

4. thanks for the update...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Original post)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 02:59 AM

5. this is a non scandal

as "political groups" they never qualified for "non profit" status.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rampartb (Reply #5)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 03:10 AM

6. You mean "as conservative political groups...," right?

Because some leftwing political groups received non profit status.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bfox74 (Reply #6)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 03:20 AM

7. no political groups qualify.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rampartb (Reply #7)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 03:22 AM

8. Then what about all those 501(c)(4)'s?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rampartb (Reply #7)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 03:50 AM

9. Obama'a group sure did. Please explain that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MeatSandwich (Reply #9)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 04:47 AM

10. which "obama groups" qualified?

there is actually a list of liberal groups which were, appropriately, denied.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rampartb (Reply #10)

Mon Sep 11, 2017, 09:34 AM

22. Obama For America (OFA).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Original post)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 05:41 AM

11. I can understand trump being skittish of prosecuting

Even dildo's are scared of that ugly hag. And I mean, she is one ugly hag.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Frankenvoter (Reply #11)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 06:27 AM

12. Legal and/or political decisions

 

of course, are always based on personal appearance!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Original post)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 06:29 AM

13. The swamp protects its own. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to batcat (Reply #13)

Sat Sep 9, 2017, 11:14 AM

16. Trump and Sessions are part of the swamp now

It was sessions who made this determination

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Original post)

Sun Sep 10, 2017, 09:28 AM

20. You smile as much as my "slow" nephew.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dumper (Reply #20)

Mon Sep 11, 2017, 09:36 AM

23. Does he pretend to be an attorney too?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticsdojloislernerirssocalledscandal