Politicspoliticskekkekistanpepereeeeedanklordfroggodshadilaychaos

Thu Oct 12, 2017, 09:34 AM

No, really.. fascists only want "comprehensive" gun laws

Anytime you see the words "common sense". or "comprehensive" coming from fascist dimocrats, you should immediately dig your heels in because you KNOW they are using deceptive language to cover their motives.

9 Gun Controls Democrats Have Supported Since Sunday

Here are 9 gun controls Democrats and surrogates have pushed since Sunday:

Ban on Bump Stocks – Sen. Dianne Feinstein is pushing this with her Automatic Fire Prevention Act. She admits that bump stocks are an accessory—that they do not convert semiautomatics into automatics—but she wants to ban them anyway. Her bill explicitly bans any accessory that allows an increase in rate of fire in short bursts but does “not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machine gun.”
Ban on Trigger Cranks – Sen. Feinstein’s bill bans trigger cranks too. Like the bump stock, trigger cranks are another novelty that gun owners can use to achieve short, rapid bursts of fire. Such cranks allow a gun owner to mimic automatic fire yet do not convert a semiautomatic gun into an automatic one.
Ban on Semiautomatic firearms – Sen. Feinstein voiced support for this ban during her appearance on Face the Nation, and the Washington Post pushed for such a ban two days later.
Implementation of Universal Background Checks – Sen. Chris Murphy used his appearance on State of the Union to stress that a bump stock ban is only the beginning for Democrats. They plan to follow that ban with the implementation of universal background checks, which means private gun sales would require a background check just like retail sales. Democrats claim these checks would save lives, yet Sen. Murphy and others ignore the fact that the Vegas attacker purchased his guns via background checks, as did so many attackers before him. The real reason Democrats want universal background checks is because such checks require a gun registry to be enforceable. Therefore, the implementation of such checks would immediately lead to one more gun control: a gun registry.
Ban on “Assault Weapons” – Sen. Murphy also mentioned an “assault weapons” ban, suggesting it would be next in line after background checks. The Los Angeles Times called for an “assault weapons” ban as well.
Ban on “High Capacity” Magazines – The Los Angeles Times also called for a ban on “high capacity” magazines, describing them as one of the most dangerous aspects of “assault weapons.” The Times points to attacks like ones on Sandy Hook, Virginia Tech, and the San Bernardino County Building as justifications for an “assault weapons” ban that contains a “high capacity” magazine ban. In so doing, the Times overlooks the fact that all three attacks—Sandy Hook, Virginia Tech, and San Bernardino—occurred in gun-free zones. This means the attackers had no threat of armed response and could take their time, reloading as often as needed. In such scenarios magazine capacity is a moot issue.
Opposition to Concealed Carry – Breitbart News reported that Sen. Feinstein took time to argue against concealed carry for law-abiding citizens during her Face the Nation appearance. Speaking of concealed carry she said, “I don’t believe it’s protected by the Constitution.”
Opposition to National Reciprocity – Sen. Feinstein also voiced opposition to the national reciprocity legislation currently pending before Congress. She said, “Well, my opinion of that bill is it’s terrible. … we want every American to feel comfortable packing a concealed weapon around the country?”
Australian-style Gun Ban – On Tuesday the Washington Post suggested it is time for such a ban.

5 replies, 93 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Reply No, really.. fascists only want "comprehensive" gun laws (Original post)
MumblyPeg Oct 12 OP
Gunslinger201 Oct 12 #1
Jack Burton Oct 12 #2
Juan Rico Oct 12 #3
def_con5 Oct 12 #4
kevlar Oct 12 #5

Response to MumblyPeg (Original post)

Thu Oct 12, 2017, 09:39 AM

1. This behavior from the Dems is par for the course

The number of spineless Republicans signing on is nauseating



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MumblyPeg (Original post)

Thu Oct 12, 2017, 09:39 AM

2. The words libs use are usually the exact opposite of reality.

For example: the AFFORDABLE Care Act.

And you are exactly right. The translation for "comprehensive" or "common sense" or "adult" when coming from the left simply means some extreme fringe marxist plan and anyone who disagrees with them is racist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MumblyPeg (Original post)

Thu Oct 12, 2017, 09:43 AM

3. Those on the left typically want at *least* Australia-style gun control, which would confiscate

at least 2/3rds of American's firearms. Many want Japan-style gun control, which would take virtually all of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MumblyPeg (Original post)

Thu Oct 12, 2017, 11:52 AM

4. Words do matter

Keep telling it like it is.

Common sense gun safety, fuck off.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MumblyPeg (Original post)

Thu Oct 12, 2017, 01:14 PM

5. At this point

what difference does it make?

It isn't like anyone is going to follow these laws if they managed to pass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticskekkekistanpepereeeeedanklordfroggodshadilaychaos