Politicspolitics

Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:02 PM

So now Trump is promising to help pay legal fees for his staffers?

That doesn't seem appropriate to me. That should be considered witness tampering.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-promising-pay-legal-costs-white-house-staffers/story?id=50634371

19 replies, 369 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Reply So now Trump is promising to help pay legal fees for his staffers? (Original post)
swifty Oct 2017 OP
imwithfred Oct 2017 #1
quad489 Oct 2017 #2
swifty Oct 2017 #18
quad489 Oct 2017 #19
Oldgeezer Oct 2017 #3
MumblyPeg Oct 2017 #4
Daves Not Here Man Oct 2017 #12
MumblyPeg Oct 2017 #13
Daves Not Here Man Oct 2017 #14
MumblyPeg Oct 2017 #15
Daves Not Here Man Oct 2017 #16
MumblyPeg Oct 2017 #17
RATFINK_5.0 Oct 2017 #5
Oldgeezer Oct 2017 #7
bfox74 Oct 2017 #10
Tolk Oct 2017 #6
Oldgeezer Oct 2017 #8
TM999 Oct 2017 #9
Carl Oct 2017 #11

Response to swifty (Original post)

Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:03 PM

1. :yawn:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Original post)

Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:09 PM

2. So the Clintons paying the legal fees for Justin Cooper was witness tampering, eh???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #2)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 09:32 AM

18. Hehe. DailyCaller or Washington Times.

Trump can do absolutely anything, because he knows that no matter what he does, you guys will find some obscure fringe media source saying the Clintons did something.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Reply #18)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 10:02 AM

19. Your double standards are noted............

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Original post)

Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:10 PM

3. And? Apparently you don't know what tampering is....ask the stenog....he'll learn ya.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Original post)

Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:23 PM

4. seems appropriate to me seeing how the sore-loser fascist left

are abusing every legal means at their disposal to attack and try to destroy anyone and everyone who is associated with, or even works for the legitimate President of the United States of America.
I mean, gotten anyone fired lately?
The left are despicable

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MumblyPeg (Reply #4)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 07:08 AM

12. scREEEEEEEEEEch!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Daves Not Here Man (Reply #12)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 07:50 AM

13. right. well I suppose I'm supposed to be a lot smarter now because of your post or something?

Ever ask yourself why the left are the butt of every joke?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MumblyPeg (Reply #13)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 07:59 AM

14. No. I dont. Ever ask yourself why you are the butt of my jokes?

No, I didn’t think so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Daves Not Here Man (Reply #14)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 08:28 AM

15. I don't ask because I know.

And THAT, my friend, IS the joke.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MumblyPeg (Reply #15)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 08:39 AM

16. Ooooooohhhhh! Im soooooo devastated.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Daves Not Here Man (Reply #16)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 09:11 AM

17. that is a self-induced condition, my friend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Original post)

Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:30 PM

5. Laws don't apply to him. They are mere inconvencies to an Emporer Orange Twitted G-D !

Man-made laws are for mere mortals, anyway.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RATFINK_5.0 (Reply #5)

Sat Oct 21, 2017, 11:35 PM

7. What law would be violated? This will be fun.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RATFINK_5.0 (Reply #5)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 03:39 AM

10. But you were fine with anti-constitution Barry, weren't you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Original post)

Sat Oct 21, 2017, 11:18 PM

6. Does it break a precedent?

Nope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tolk (Reply #6)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 12:03 AM

8. Precedent isn't an issue...doesn't break a law period as the lefties would have ppl believe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Original post)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 03:37 AM

9. Did he break any laws?

No. Then why is it inappropriate for him to do so but it is appropriate for Clinton to pay for her staffers?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Original post)

Sun Oct 22, 2017, 04:14 AM

11. A wise rule of thumb swift.

Whatever you think about something,just accept that the exact opposite is true.

You`re welcome!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics