Politicslegaltobanmuslims

Wed Oct 25, 2017, 03:02 AM

The Supreme Court Just Killed The Refugee Ban Challenge



The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the second and final challenge to President Donald Trump’s executive order on refugees and migrants Tuesday, concluding that the expiration of a 120-day ban on refugee resettlement ended the controversy.

The dismissal ends a protracted round of litigating around the president’s order that was replaced in late September by a new round of travel sanctions against eight countries. Those sanctions have been challenging in separate litigation which is still ongoing.

The justices dismissed the first travel ban case Oct. 10. That case arose in Maryland and concerned the order’s 90-day ban on the entry of migrants from six countries with high instances of terrorism. The justices concluded that the ban’s expiration effectively “mooted” the case. Federal courts are only empowered to hear ongoing controversies where their action can affect an outcome. When the controversy concludes and renders further court action irrelevant, the case is considered moot and is thereafter dismissed.

The second case arose in Hawaii, and challenged both the migrant entry ban and the 120-day ban on refugee resettlement. The Court’s Oct. 10 decision left little suspense as to how the justices would dispense with the Hawaii case — as in the Maryland case, the justices said the termination of the 120-day refugee ban mooted the controversy, warranting dismissal.

A legal rule called the Munsingwear doctrine requires the vacatur of all lower court rulings in a case that is mooted while awaiting Supreme Court review. In each case, the Court wiped out lower court rulings from the 4th and 9th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal that concluded Trump’s order was unlawful. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the court’s vacatur order in each case, but agreed that the challenges should be dismissed.

The order is a victory for the administration, which asked the justices to dismiss the cases in September. The vacatur of lower court rulings limiting the president’s authority is a similarly positive development for the president, who has struggled to defend his executive orders in federal courts.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/24/the-supreme-court-just-killed-the-refugee-ban-challenge/

The President of the United States may ban people with green eyes from entering if he determines them to be a National Security Threat. FDR's internment of Japanese Americans was totally legal. They did apologize for it later but he was within his authority when he did it. The WORLD needs a Muslim ban. Lets start here

4 replies, 315 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply The Supreme Court Just Killed The Refugee Ban Challenge (Original post)
Gunslinger201 Oct 2017 OP
Letmypeoplevote Oct 2017 #1
Carl Oct 2017 #2
I814U2CY Oct 2017 #4
uncledad Oct 2017 #3

Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Wed Oct 25, 2017, 09:20 AM

1. That is because the case is moot

Trump had to absndon his first two failed Muslm bans and start over. There was no ruling on the merits

Trump's current Muslim ban has been enjoined

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 25, 2017, 09:25 AM

2. No he didn't.

The earlier one had expired,it was not abandoned and was upheld by SCOTUS.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/26/politics/trump-travel-ban-decision/index.html

Why did you lie or do you simply not understand the legalities involved?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 25, 2017, 09:36 AM

4. Either the traitor judge is a shitty jurist who couldn't anticipate the obvious or

 

He did and this was all just a stunt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Wed Oct 25, 2017, 09:32 AM

3. Does this mean the tens of thousands of Muslims you worry about will not be entering the US ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicslegaltobanmuslims