Politicspolitics

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 02:45 AM

rumor has it....another big name indicted by Mueller by Christmas

Will it be Jared?

God bless us every one!



85 replies, 738 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 85 replies Author Time Post
Reply rumor has it....another big name indicted by Mueller by Christmas (Original post)
buck_turgidson Dec 7 OP
Shkreli Dec 7 #1
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #2
Shkreli Dec 7 #3
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #4
Dumper Dec 7 #12
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #13
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #5
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #6
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #7
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #14
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #15
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #16
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #17
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #19
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #20
Doctor_R Dec 7 #22
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #24
Doctor_R Dec 7 #36
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #23
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #26
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #27
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #35
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #37
Carl Dec 7 #39
Will Morningstar Dec 7 #40
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #43
Will Morningstar Dec 7 #47
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #41
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #44
Gunslinger201 Dec 7 #45
Let it go Dec 7 #8
Carl Dec 7 #9
I814U2CY Dec 7 #10
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #18
I814U2CY Dec 7 #21
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #25
I814U2CY Dec 7 #28
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #30
I814U2CY Dec 7 #34
Aldar Dec 7 #31
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #32
Aldar Dec 7 #33
D26-15 Dec 7 #46
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #48
D26-15 Dec 7 #49
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #51
D26-15 Dec 7 #60
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #64
D26-15 Dec 7 #65
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #66
D26-15 Dec 7 #67
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #68
D26-15 Dec 7 #69
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #70
D26-15 Dec 7 #71
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #72
D26-15 Dec 7 #73
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #74
D26-15 Dec 7 #75
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #76
D26-15 Dec 7 #77
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #78
D26-15 Dec 7 #79
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #80
D26-15 Dec 7 #82
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #84
D26-15 Dec 7 #85
kevlar Dec 7 #81
D26-15 Dec 7 #83
kevlar Dec 7 #50
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #52
kevlar Dec 7 #53
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #54
kevlar Dec 7 #55
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #56
kevlar Dec 7 #57
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #58
kevlar Dec 7 #59
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #61
kevlar Dec 7 #62
buck_turgidson Dec 7 #63
Paradigm Dec 7 #11
Aldar Dec 7 #29
Dumper Dec 7 #38
Pennsylvania Dec 7 #42

Response to buck_turgidson (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 02:57 AM

1. I vote Hillary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shkreli (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 02:59 AM

2. then again, it might be.....



Reince Priebus

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:05 AM

3. Chatter that it's Hillary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shkreli (Reply #3)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:09 AM

4. or maybe it's....



K T McFarland

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #4)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:31 AM

12. On what ground? General area?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dumper (Reply #12)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:34 AM

13. that was not included in the rumor

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:27 AM

5. I reckon Mewler is gonna be indicted

along with his corrupt staff

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #5)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:38 AM

6. by Roy Moore D.A?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #6)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:58 AM

7. By Trey Gowdy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #7)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:36 AM

14. Who made him Attorney General?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #14)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:41 AM

15. Jeff Sessions wont do his job

Trey is gonna open the bag of worms

Even YOU have to see Mueller has no credibility at this point

Congress should tell him to fire all the Trump haters and if he refuses

HE should be fired

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #15)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:53 AM

16. Robert Mueller

A Marine officer in the Vietnam War, for which he was awarded a Bronze Star, Purple Heart and two Navy Commendation Medals
He hasn't changed.
President multiple deferments, of course, also hasn't changed.

He trashes anyone who opposes him.
So, sorry if I don't fall for the smoke and mirrors political attack on Mueller.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #16)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:57 AM

17. So Competent he stacks the deck with rabidly biased individuals

Who’ve now thrown the legitimacy of his investigation into question

Yeah, he’s fucking awesome

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #17)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:58 AM

19. name the "individuals"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #19)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:17 AM

20. Peter Strzok and Andrew Weissmann (and looks like others too)





Mueller aide fired for anti-Trump texts now facing review for role in Clinton email probe

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/03/ex-mueller-team-members-role-in-clinton-probe-under-review.html

These 2 morons just sunk Muellers investigation

🤣

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:22 AM

22. Research

Jeannie Rhee.

She's a real winner too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_R (Reply #22)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:25 AM

24. ...

An investigator involved in special counsel Robert Mueller’s team investigating President Trump served as a personal attorney for Obama administration officials, represented the Clinton Foundation, and even donated thousands of dollars to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Fox News’s Laura Ingraham revealed Tuesday night that Jeannie Rhee — whom Mueller hired over the summer to probe President Trump and his associates over charges they worked with Russian officials to steal the election from Hillary Clinton — donated the legal maximum to the former secretary of state’s presidential campaign in 2015 and again in 2016. Rhee has also donated more than $16,000 to Democrats since 2008.

Well, she seems impartial

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #24)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:47 AM

36. She also did legal work for

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:24 AM

23. Andrew Weismann praised the courageous actions of Sally Yates

Another patriot who was trashed by RIGHTY

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #23)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:30 AM

26. If Sally Yates disagreed with a lawful directive by the President

She should have resigned

Refusing to follow a lawful order from legitimate authority is a bad thing (I’m Retired Military, Trust me)

Sally Yates is an insubordinate bee-yotch who was fired for cause

Patriot?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #26)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:33 AM

27. she did not consider it to be a lawful directive....so she did the right thing

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #27)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:42 AM

35. And shes where today?

Trump won, Trump’s the President

SCOTUS says the travel ban is lawful

She fucked up, doesn’t matter what she felt about the directive

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #35)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:50 AM

37. yates is a person - the SC are people different opinions...btw they haven't said that it is lawful

some federal courts agreed with yates

The SC threw it back down to the lower courts.....it is not yet decided

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #37)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 08:21 AM

39. Give us a break.

What SCOTUS ruled the other day is the end result,they declared it lawful and pretty much told lower courts to rule wisely.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #37)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 08:25 AM

40. Don't worry. Eric Prince's secret police can arrest "Mueller and his corrupt staff":

And protect the American people from all rheir "deep state" career civil servants.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Will Morningstar (Reply #40)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:04 AM

43. Privatization cuts through that pesky red tape.....instantly.

With no messy cleanup.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #43)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 11:38 AM

47. And the Private Standing Army will report directly to your Executive Command Authority:

Bypassing all oversight from your seventeen corrupt and unreliable official government agencies. Truly the best of both worlds.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #37)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 09:32 AM

41. Some OBAMA Appointee Whacktivist Judges agreed

And the Supreme Legal Authority said “You are Morons”

But they were chosen by Obama because they WERE Morons

https://www.discussionist.com/10151554789

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #41)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:06 AM

44. Bolstering your argument with all of these technical terms like "Whacktivist" and "morons".....

isn't as convincing as you might imagine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #44)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:13 AM

45. If they werent Morons

The SUPREMES would have upheld their Ruling.

Even the Liberal Justices agree that POTUS can ban people with green eyes if he determines they are a threat to National Security.

They apologized for the internment of Japanese Americans in WWII but no one has ever said it was illegal

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:34 AM

8. I almost hope its Kushner

He’s got enough $$$ to expose it all

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to buck_turgidson (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 05:23 AM

10. Aren't you one of the ones who assured us Mewler subpoenaed Trump's Deutsches Bank records?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to I814U2CY (Reply #10)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:58 AM

18. by "assured: you mean that I posted an article saying that he did?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #18)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:21 AM

21. And then when we told you guys it wasn't what you claimed it was you dug in your heels.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to I814U2CY (Reply #21)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:28 AM

25. I waited for proof and it eventually came.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #25)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:34 AM

28. No, you rejected it because it was conservatives setting you straight...again

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to I814U2CY (Reply #28)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:37 AM

30. I've learned that conservatives often just say shit

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #30)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:41 AM

34. Hillary by a landslide!

 

Collusion!

Pee tape!

Literally Hitler!

Armageddon!

Millions will die!

Icon!

Fox News!

Racism!

Paper towels!

2 scoops!

Muslim ban!

Climate doom!

Deplorable!

Franken!

Bank records!


...not conservatives

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #25)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:37 AM

31. Yep, I told you no subpeona and you wouldn't believe it.

I was right AGAIN.

When will lefty and buck learn?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aldar (Reply #31)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:39 AM

32. I've learned to wait for proof

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #32)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:39 AM

33. I was the proof.

I don't lie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #32)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 10:42 AM

46. That's rich, buck... you convicted Roy Moore without

a shred of "proof".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #46)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:42 PM

48. not convicted......I believe them because they are credible

plus, Roy Moore's denials are NOT credible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #48)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:51 PM

49. It doesn't work that way, buck, and you know it.

You calling him a pervert means that you have convicted him... and on hearsay at that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #49)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:55 PM

51. just because you defend pedophiles

is no reason for you to laugh about it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #51)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:19 PM

60. Where have I defended a pedophile, buck?

Someone here called you a liar... you came back and said that you weren't.

I prefer to believe the one that called you a liar, and not you.

That makes you a liar... right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #60)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:24 PM

64. when you dismiss credible accusations against Moore

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #64)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:31 PM

65. Dismissing accusations is not defending him, buck. You're not very good at this.

Now back to the liar thing... you ARE, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #65)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:34 PM

66. that is the STANDARD defense against any accusation..Dismissal is how people coddle molesters

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #66)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:40 PM

67. No, it's not, just in your head.

Now back to the liar thing... using YOUR logic, you ARE one... right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #67)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:41 PM

68. no, because there are no credible allegations against me

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #68)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:45 PM

69. They were just as credible as your word...

Therefore, using YOUR logic, you are a liar... right?

You're too easy, buck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #69)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 05:42 PM

70. the only thing that you find easy is babbling gibberish

logic is a foreign concept to you

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #70)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:07 PM

71. The forum can see who is "babbling gibberish" here, buck, and

it aint me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #71)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:12 PM

72. If you need them to validate you,,,,that shows a lack of confidence

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #72)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:24 PM

73. Again, buck, you are a liar by your own opinion... you make this way too easy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #73)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:26 PM

74. you haven't made your case, but then...you never do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #74)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:38 PM

75. Yes, I did... that's what is REALLY burning you up right now...

you just keep proving that little 'liar' thingy to be true, buck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #75)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 06:46 PM

76. What did I lie about?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #76)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:00 PM

77. Doesn't matter in this discussion... you're getting REALLY weak, buck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #77)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:04 PM

78. that exposes you as being full of shit....nothing weaker than that

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #78)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:09 PM

79. Back to the question, buck... by YOUR logic,

you are a liar... RIGHT?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #79)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:11 PM

80. by my logic, you are full of shit. Right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #80)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:27 PM

82. Everyone is "full of shit" to some degree... bodily functions...

But your own opinions have indicated that you believe yourself to be a liar.

Sorry, buck.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #82)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:46 PM

84. I obviously am not a liar....but you have admitted that you are full of shit

You have a good evening.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #84)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:51 PM

85. Yes, using your logic, you are a liar...

I said that EVERYONE is FOS to a degree.

Try to keep up little feller.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to D26-15 (Reply #79)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:13 PM

81. He is just going to call you the same.

And yes he is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kevlar (Reply #81)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:34 PM

83. Yep, but the little feller is SO much fun...

you can use his own BS against him and he keeps trying to throw the hook.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #48)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:54 PM

50. No, you are a lefty hack.

Not one shred of credibility.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kevlar (Reply #50)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:55 PM

52. as if your opinion had value

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #52)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 03:58 PM

53. It is demonstrable.

Not an opinion.

( I am paid very well for my opinions.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kevlar (Reply #53)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:05 PM

54. You have yet to demonstrate it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #54)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:12 PM

55. You already did that with your posts.

You may want to get a dictionary.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kevlar (Reply #55)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:14 PM

56. should I look up "righty hack" in that dictionary

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #56)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:15 PM

57. Epicly lame.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kevlar (Reply #57)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:17 PM

58. your response is, to be sure

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #58)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:19 PM

59. No, that was your unoriginal

attempt at an insult.

Hack away lefty.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kevlar (Reply #59)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:20 PM

61. stated facts are not insults

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Reply #61)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:21 PM

62. You have stated no facts.

Plenty of lefty lies though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kevlar (Reply #62)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 04:23 PM

63. that is exactly what a righty hack would say

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 05:29 AM

11. It sounds like the next lib fake news outrage of the week getting ready to be rolled out.

Complete with multiple unnamed anonymous sources.
Can't wait. This is so much fun to witness in real time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 07:35 AM

29. Likely Hillary

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 08:15 AM

38. Rumer Willis has no qualifications in politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to buck_turgidson (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2017, 09:33 AM

42. Won't be me so I don't give a shit

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics