Politicsahhbiglyunfitillegitliestrumpmooreputinfoxlies

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 05:47 PM

Fox News caught in major lie, retracts, corrects lies against Moore accuser. FOX GUILTY

They have now admitted their lies in attempting to forward a false story.

The signature and salutation of Roy Moore indeed was Roy Moore written.

https://www.salon.com/2017/12/08/fox-news-deletes-misleading-headline-blaming-roy-moore-accuser-of-forgery/


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fox-news-corrects-story-claiming-roy-moore-accuser-forged-candidates-signature_us_5a2c1d58e4b0a290f051304f

27 replies, 824 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
Reply Fox News caught in major lie, retracts, corrects lies against Moore accuser. FOX GUILTY (Original post)
graham4anything4HC45 Dec 2017 OP
fszwfnj Dec 2017 #1
graham4anything4HC45 Dec 2017 #3
fszwfnj Dec 2017 #4
oldenuff35 Dec 2017 #6
_eek Dec 2017 #8
Aldar Dec 2017 #2
Carl Dec 2017 #5
bruiserboy Dec 2017 #7
okletstalk Dec 2017 #12
bruiserboy Dec 2017 #14
okletstalk Dec 2017 #16
MumblyPeg Dec 2017 #9
Muddling Through Dec 2017 #10
def_con5 Dec 2017 #18
def_con5 Dec 2017 #11
okletstalk Dec 2017 #13
def_con5 Dec 2017 #15
okletstalk Dec 2017 #17
def_con5 Dec 2017 #19
okletstalk Dec 2017 #20
Doctor_R Dec 2017 #21
def_con5 Dec 2017 #22
okletstalk Dec 2017 #23
Let it go Dec 2017 #26
batcat Dec 2017 #24
Tolk Dec 2017 #27
Let it go Dec 2017 #25

Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 05:50 PM

1. Wait you are using the Huffington Post and Salon

as sources to discredit Fox News. Oh the irony.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fszwfnj (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 05:51 PM

3. Sean Hannity should be fired, why he got his job back months ago I don't know

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #3)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 05:54 PM

4. Did he lose a job to get back? News to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #3)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:02 PM

6. and now you lie. Hannity never lost his job, but you have lost all touch with honesty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #3)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:20 PM

8. Fake news...

Looks like G is a liar now..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 05:51 PM

2. Huff post and salon.....

 

....'nuff said

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:00 PM

5. LOLing at the desperate lefty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:12 PM

7. You lose, if you want more let me know

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Reply #7)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:56 PM

12. You need more. Your video only confirms that the accuser added a date and location.

Big deal. The note and signature was from Moore. Who cares if she added a date and place?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okletstalk (Reply #12)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:01 PM

14. his supporters care, the very people who are going to put him in the winners circle,

When The grand wizard of Lawyers first held the press conference she never once said it was added, so no I don't need more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Reply #14)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:07 PM

16. Yeah, because his supporters want to believe it wasn't Moore. They're grasping.

They are willing to ignore the truth that adding a date and place doesn't make the whole thing a forgery.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:23 PM

9. wait, you are relying on Salon and HuPo to claim legitimacy?

A last ditch hail Mary to try this character assasination operation.
Sorry gramgram, it's too late. People don't like dirty dimocrats tricks, gun grabbers, communists, or baby murderers. The only choice left is Moore.
You lose

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:33 PM

10. So, to paraphrase,

if you write me a check for $140 for a job and I change the amount to $14, 000 then the check is still valid since the Payee and your signature are the same?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Muddling Through (Reply #10)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:12 PM

18. Good point

Something like this came up on 'Pawn stars". A guy bought in a letter from JFK, some anti-smoking thing.It was supposedly addressed to his grandfather.

Turns out after the document examiner, someone had added the salutation.

Rick wouldn't touch it called it a fraud. It had a genuine JFK signature.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:35 PM

11. Interpret it how you want

The date and "ye Olde hickory house" were added by the accuser. The DA after the name is not the same person as the signature.

Some would call that forgery, Alfred calls it notes.

Believe what you want to. It is indisputable Moore did not write the inscription.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to def_con5 (Reply #11)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 06:59 PM

13. Adding a date and location doesn't mean Moore didn't write the rest.

And, it doesn't mean it's a forgery.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okletstalk (Reply #13)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:02 PM

15. It does to me

I would call the document a forgery. The original presser said Moore wrote everything.

Now they are saying, she added "notes". I call that a forgery.

YMMV.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to def_con5 (Reply #15)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:10 PM

17. To be an actual forgery she would have had to written the whole thing,

not just added a date and location.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okletstalk (Reply #17)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:13 PM

19. See post 10

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to def_con5 (Reply #19)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:18 PM

20. That's not a good comparison.

A more accurate comparison would be: I write you a check for $100 and sign it. You then write in the note area of the check the date and place you received the check from me. Just because you added a date and place doesn't mean I didn't write the check.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okletstalk (Reply #20)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:32 PM

21. Until they submit the yearbook for

analysis, it's a fake.

The mere fact they haven't done so tells me all I need to know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okletstalk (Reply #20)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:33 PM

22. Don't think we're gonna

see eye to eye on this one.

But you are quite civil, I appreciate that. Too much yelling on this board.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to def_con5 (Reply #22)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 07:39 PM

23. Thank you, def_con.

I agree, there is often too much yelling, and it gets us all nowhere. Have a good day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okletstalk (Reply #20)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 08:52 PM

26. CNN keeps showing an edited version of the yearbook.

The real one has Moore, DA and the location in BLUE ink. The rest of it is in black ink.

You’re all being played.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okletstalk (Reply #13)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 08:46 PM

24. I might agree if that fact would have been pointed out initially. ...

My question now is why has the yearbook not been allowed to be examined by impartial handwriting experts. That would resolve the issue.

The timing of the allegation was questionable and the fact that the story has changed makes it even more suspicious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okletstalk (Reply #13)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 11:18 PM

27. If it's not a forgery

 

Why the refusal to have it analyzed?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Original post)

Sun Dec 10, 2017, 08:48 PM

25. Just wait....Fox knows what we all know.

She forged Roy Moore’s signature.

I can’t wait for the hearings. Will she be stupid enough to testify?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicsahhbiglyunfitillegitliestrumpmooreputinfoxlies