Politicspolitics

Tue Mar 13, 2018, 03:18 PM

Richard Dawkins suggests eating human flesh

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/03/13/richard-dawkins-suggests-eating-human-flesh-to-overcome-cannibalism-taboo/
The sickness in this society is reaching a new low

18 replies, 267 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 18 replies Author Time Post
Reply Richard Dawkins suggests eating human flesh (Original post)
bruiserboy Mar 2018 OP
Argentina Mar 2018 #1
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #4
GoldwatersSoul Mar 2018 #10
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #11
GoldwatersSoul Mar 2018 #12
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #13
nolidad Mar 2018 #2
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #6
USNRET1988 Mar 2018 #3
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #5
bruiserboy Mar 2018 #7
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #8
bruiserboy Mar 2018 #9
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #15
orson Mar 2018 #14
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #16
orson Mar 2018 #17
Will Morningstar Mar 2018 #18

Response to bruiserboy (Original post)

Tue Mar 13, 2018, 03:43 PM

1. There was a post on this a couple of days ago. That is sick.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Argentina (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 12:58 AM

4. They love to hang Dawkins around people's necks.

Dawkins is an Atheist Evangelist shock-jock.

Next they'll call him a liberal. And call me a cannibal.

That's why I gave a recipe for force-feeding Rush Limbaugh with acorns and making tasty bacon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Will Morningstar (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 08:59 AM

10. Then again...

He is a supporter of the British Labour Party and he was involved with the anti-war activist organizations when he was at Berkeley in the 1960's. Being anti-war doesn't make you a liberal exactly but the anti-Vietnam activism, especially after Nixon was elected tended to be anti-right rather than anti-war.

His professed beliefs put him on par with modern liberal thought. I tend to think he says a lot of things because he is an attention whore more than anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoldwatersSoul (Reply #10)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 09:19 AM

11. British Labour is the antithesis and opposite and Enemy of all things Liberal.

Professor, I know you've read my many posts on What Liberals Are, and on What Liberals Are Not. (I quite literally wrote the book on the subject.)

We haven't defended our brand, so despite the lateness of the hour, I'm just taking back my rightful name from the posers and wannabes, identity-thieves and enemies who would ignorantly or maliciously define me.

I had no idea how misunderstood the word Liberal had become in America. I won't derail this thread by going into detail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Will Morningstar (Reply #11)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 09:31 AM

12. Difference between practical and theoretical...

It comes down to the theoretical concept of liberalism which I suspect your argument derives and the practical application of such which has been presented in the United States. The Labour party is most closely aligned with the American Democratic party.

The concept of Liberalism has been perverted, the inclusion of several social issues has shifted what a democrat looks like in the eyes of the general public. The re-branding of liberal ideas to the term "progressive," is even more problematic to those who understand who classic progressives were and what they advocated.

As a result of these deleterious inclusions the concept of Liberalism has become something that it is theoretically not meant to be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GoldwatersSoul (Reply #12)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 09:37 AM

13. You are correct, but it's more than theoretical.

The way out of the wilderness is to take back our name.

And the way to do that is to do it, not talk about it. In half a year, just by behaving like an actual Liberal on an American site, people see, know, and respect the difference.

Have to defend our brand here or we'll lose it north of the border too, in this increasingly virtual world.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Original post)

Tue Mar 13, 2018, 04:06 PM

2. He proves the bible right!

The more one rails against god- the worse their mind gets!

Romans 1: 16-28

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nolidad (Reply #2)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 01:22 AM

6. Dawkins' "moral relativism" is clearly Satanic.

Dawkins is not content to unbelieve. He wants you to unbelieve too.

If we believe in the personification of good (God) then by necessity we cannot deny the absence and negation of good. "Moral relativists" like Dawkins don't like the word "evil". Fine. Satan, then.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Original post)


Response to bruiserboy (Original post)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 01:13 AM

5. Dawkins speaks for nobody but Dawkins. Cares only about Dawkins.

Dawkins is NO Liberal.

When Dawkins and Nazis "support" Liberals and Trump...

...Donald Trump and I call bullshit.

Donald Trump and I do not accept the "support" of Nazis and Dawkins.

I am not an Athiest. Donald's not a Nazi. And I am not a Cannibal.

Breitbart is sick for using Dawkins to start trouble and make hatred like evil devils they are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Will Morningstar (Reply #5)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 08:29 AM

7. This paticular article has been in other publications

Not just Breitbart, exactly what is the point of your post?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Reply #7)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 08:40 AM

8. To "head 'em off at the pass!", pardner.

I cut Satanist And Not-a-Liberal Dawkins to pieces on this very subject 48 hours ago when Righty was saying see these Liberal Cannibals' Moral Corruption Liberals Cannibal Liberals! See these Immoral Liberals? See?

That's why I laughed it off and wrote a recipe for turning Rush Limbaugh into Long-Bacon, and Squeek's Grandpa-on-a-Bun with Mirepoix Gravy.

See the long Liberals are Cannibals thread in News Forum.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Will Morningstar (Reply #8)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 08:52 AM

9. I will speak for myself will,

I simply pointed out that there is a sickness in society, anyone who would suggest cannibalism in my book needs to be taken out of society and put in a rubber room, and I may be missing something from the article but I didn't see it written where anyone suggested that this was a liberal problem, I am not suggesting I am stating this guy needs to be locked up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Reply #9)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 02:56 PM

15. "Now Liberals Want Us To Eat Human Meat To Overcome Our Taboo...

...Against Cannibalism", 77 Posts, DI News Forum, Page One.

All Liberals including me were accused of our evil desire to rob society of all moral codes.

So I force-fed acorns to Rush Limbaugh and made bacon out of him, and I cooked Squeek's Grandpa Jim and served him on a bun with gravy. (For actual recipes, see the Liberal Cannibals OP in News.)

And I asked Americans to practice safe procedures when hunting our mountain sheep.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bruiserboy (Original post)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 11:11 AM

14. Let's start with bankers

Plump, tender and easily caught.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to orson (Reply #14)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 03:03 PM

16. See Morningstar's

Long-Bacon recipe in the Now Liberals Want Us To Eat Human Meat OP, DI News Forum, Page One.

Banker Long-Pork Bellies yield three full Limbaughs of Long-Bacon in just over one full Scaramucci of pickling and smoking time.

And the rarefied banker diet makes it less necessary to capture them in advance and force-feed them with acorns for 3-5 Scaramuccis to improve their flavour.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Will Morningstar (Reply #16)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 04:50 PM

17. I wouldn't eat a Limbaugh

if it were served on a bed of truffles in a port wine sauce. Too greasy and gamey and probably rancid, not to mention the chemical residue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to orson (Reply #17)

Wed Mar 14, 2018, 07:14 PM

18. That's why we have traditionally turned our Short-Pigs loose in stands of Oak trees...

...as the organic acids in the acorns they willingly consume permeate the flesh and fat and improve the flavour of the pork.

Mr. Limbaugh might not willingly consume acorns; consequently he would need to be restrained and force-fed on acorns, much as Provimi Veal is restrained and force-fed milk solids to produce tbe pale flesh which makes Provimi Veal a delicacy (and a consequent concern of the Animal Rights constituency).

A potential trouble spot might be identified in the possible rise of a Limbaugh Rights pressure group among the Dittoheads, who might object to the confinement and force-feeding of Mr. Limbaugh with acorns as inhumane.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics