Politicspolitics

Wed May 16, 2018, 06:27 AM

Remember what the Left insisted inspired the Gabby Giffords shooting?


27 replies, 481 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
Reply Remember what the Left insisted inspired the Gabby Giffords shooting? (Original post)
Charlie Mike May 2018 OP
Muddling Through May 2018 #1
Gunslinger201 May 2018 #2
NavyBrat May 2018 #3
Muddling Through May 2018 #4
Charlie Mike May 2018 #5
TexMexNext May 2018 #11
Charlie Mike May 2018 #12
TexMexNext May 2018 #13
Charlie Mike May 2018 #14
TexMexNext May 2018 #15
NavyBrat May 2018 #18
Charlie Mike May 2018 #20
Charlie Mike May 2018 #19
TexMexNext May 2018 #21
Charlie Mike May 2018 #23
Ilovestx May 2018 #17
smoke check May 2018 #22
TexMexNext May 2018 #24
smoke check May 2018 #25
TexMexNext May 2018 #26
Valishin May 2018 #6
DavesNotHere May 2018 #9
NavyBrat May 2018 #10
Qukid May 2018 #16
LineReply .
Ilovestx May 2018 #7
OTSmithers May 2018 #8
JohnPoet May 2018 #27

Response to Charlie Mike (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 06:31 AM

1. If it weren't for double standards

Progressives would have no standards at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 07:02 AM

2. They only do that

To tell Conservatives to STFU

They don’t really believe any of that

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 08:44 AM

3. Yeah, and back then righty told them they were all full of shit.

 

Poor, dumb, lefty must have taken righty at his word.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NavyBrat (Reply #3)

Wed May 16, 2018, 08:52 AM

4. Tell that to the New York Times.

They dug that same stupid canard out in 2016. Palin filed a lawsuit which, IMHO, was wrongfully dismissed. A 30 second Google search would have revealed it to be bullshit but they went with it anyway; the later retraction was irrelevant.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NavyBrat (Reply #3)

Wed May 16, 2018, 09:06 AM

5. And the Left was full of it. Yet, here we have the Left going back on its own moralizing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #5)

Wed May 16, 2018, 02:22 PM

11. No, you have one post created by one person

who apologized and explained they made a mistake. When the right has been caught using similar imagery, the right claims it's harmless. So is it harmless or not Charlie?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexMexNext (Reply #11)

Wed May 16, 2018, 02:24 PM

12. "One post created by one person" is an interesting weasel metric.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #12)

Wed May 16, 2018, 02:26 PM

13. That's your answer? LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexMexNext (Reply #13)

Wed May 16, 2018, 03:08 PM

14. Explain how your weasel words are relevant.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #14)

Wed May 16, 2018, 03:17 PM

15. That chicken shit is getting mighty deep son

Charlie, you're going to need a shovel now

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexMexNext (Reply #15)

Wed May 16, 2018, 04:24 PM

18. When a simple recitation of fact belies his rhetoric, then ...

 

PRESTO! An observable fact becomes a "weasel metric".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NavyBrat (Reply #18)

Wed May 16, 2018, 04:30 PM

20. I quoted his post and asked him to explain the relevance. What facts are against me?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexMexNext (Reply #15)

Wed May 16, 2018, 04:29 PM

19. It's your statement. Why are you too cowardly to defend it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #19)

Thu May 17, 2018, 08:58 AM

21. Still waiting on your reponse

Is the imagery discussed harmful or not? You're displaying all the characteristics of a weasel, how about you man-up?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexMexNext (Reply #21)

Thu May 17, 2018, 09:27 AM

23. The OP is about leftist hypocrisy. Now stop being a weasel and explain your weasel post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexMexNext (Reply #13)

Wed May 16, 2018, 03:33 PM

17. I know right???????? LOL!!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexMexNext (Reply #11)

Thu May 17, 2018, 09:21 AM

22. It doesn't matter.

It demonstrates, once again, that the left will never subject itself to the standards it claims it holds it's perceived enemies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to smoke check (Reply #22)

Thu May 17, 2018, 09:31 AM

24. No, if the imagery is harmless, only hypocrit would complain about CNN's usage

If the imagery is dangerous then why is the right so drawn to using this targeting imagery?

This is called logic. It's not about right and wrong, it's about getting to the truth of the matter. Do you think the imagery is dangerous or not?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TexMexNext (Reply #24)

Thu May 17, 2018, 10:04 AM

25. Don't dodge.

The left went in to hysteric fits over SarahPac's pictures claiming that the mere existence of them promoted violence. So, to make this a logical statement. The Left, Democrats and their fellow travelers, believe that placing a target over someone incites violence against that person. The left then vilified the right for doing it.

Now, the left is claiming that it's okay that the left does it. Without hypocrisy, the left would have nothing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to smoke check (Reply #25)

Thu May 17, 2018, 10:12 AM

26. That's a fail, the CNN image creator already apologized for posting the image

So CNN has already acknowledged that what was posted was wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NavyBrat (Reply #3)

Wed May 16, 2018, 09:15 AM

6. He isn't calling out

the action. He is calling out the hypocrisy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NavyBrat (Reply #3)

Wed May 16, 2018, 12:41 PM

9. Exactly. Much in the same way the left convinced everyone that cheating on your wife

is a "private matter", back when Clinton was president.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavesNotHere (Reply #9)

Wed May 16, 2018, 02:07 PM

10. They didn't convince me.

 

I still think Cllnton was a decent President, but a complete shit as a man and as a husband.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NavyBrat (Reply #3)

Wed May 16, 2018, 03:31 PM

16. Sometimes righty is right

I thought it was pretty stupid of the left to try to pin that shooting on Palin. Her cross hairs were on a map, targeting districts.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Charlie Mike (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 12:11 PM

8. It shows the depths of CNNs twisted hate...

So shout it from the rooftops. Never interrupt an enemy when he is killing himself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Original post)

Thu May 17, 2018, 05:20 PM

27. I'd like to put an image like that on a teeshirt.

Maybe I can make a few bucks with it. HURRAY FOR CAPITALISM!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics