Politicspolitics

Wed May 16, 2018, 08:56 AM

Once again Libs hide anything conservative , they can't let people see

anything other than the miserable life the left wants for everyone. Watching something that isn't Trump bashing would defeat that goal.

The left will not be happy until everyone is miserable and under their control. The last thing they want is people to look around and realize the left has nothing but poverty in their cities and they want to export that everywhere.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/15/abc-set-to-dial-back-political-humor-from-pro-trump-roseanne-next-season.html


17 replies, 442 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread

Response to DDKick (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 09:00 AM

1. if that is true, how does the netwirk justify its ratings to the sponsors?

i don't remember archie bunker being censored.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DDKick (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 09:21 AM

2. The show isn't actually

pushing conservatism in the first place. What makes the show outside the norm at the moment is that it presents conservative characters as normal relatively sane people who live side by side in loving caring families. In short, and what really bothered the left about the show, the show declares that its ok to be conservative even though it doesn't push it is right or wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DDKick (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 09:28 AM

3. The only way they can get their ideas to float is to ban all others.

Leftists always get their asses kicked in the marketplace of ideas. In fact, their ideas are so bad they can rarely survive even minor scrutiny, let alone hold up under serious objective analysis. Therefore, whether it's to promote an absurd, racist construct like "white privilege", or to normalize their ridiculously broad, ever-changing definition of words like "racism" and "Islamophobia" to conveniently suit whatever argument they happen to be making at any given moment, the only way they can get their patently ridiculous, vacuous and bigoted views of the world to survive at all is to censor and criminalize all others.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DDKick (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 09:43 AM

4. no no no. not whats going on here

I watch the show. It’s just TOO MUCH. It’s ridiculous. Every fucking second of every fucking episode is dealing with some “controversy”. It’s very unrealistic.

Drug addiction. Muslim neighbors. tranny kids. Give me a fucking break. It’s almost unwatchable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DDKick (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 12:27 PM

5. Sounds like the show just sucks.

But of course the right will blame "Libs"!1111

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DDKick (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2018, 02:14 PM

6. Conservatives should just start their own television networks

I've always been puzzled about why the right which has done so well with radio and controlling that media industry's market has done next to nothing with television.
Its called "free enterprise." Then conservatives won't have to be continually whining about what's on the current major broadcast networks. Another option is to buy out ABC, CBS, FOX, or NBC and install conservatives as chiefs of programming.
Gee, what a concept: capitalism!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jh4freedom (Reply #6)

Wed May 16, 2018, 02:19 PM

7. How about television without politics at all.

Can't be having that now can we.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #7)

Wed May 16, 2018, 02:23 PM

8. see OP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hamer555 (Reply #8)

Wed May 16, 2018, 02:26 PM

9. I wasn't responding to the OP.

See the post which I WAS responding to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #9)

Wed May 16, 2018, 03:20 PM

10. I saw it. But the OP is about taking politics out of a TV show, so it seems relative.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hamer555 (Reply #10)

Wed May 16, 2018, 05:11 PM

11. You do understand that there is a difference between "ALL" and 'selective', don't you?

The Op refers to the left removing/attempting to remove/silence/deplatform right leaning viewpoints on teevee and elsewhere which would be selective.

I refer to TV free of politics.

If those are close relatives in your view, that says more about you than it does about them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #11)

Wed May 16, 2018, 05:19 PM

12. Yes - yes difinitely.

Yes, I believe taking politics out of TV as a topic of discussion is related topically to taking politics out of Rosanne, which is a TV show.

No one until you mentioned all versus selective, so you can have that little argument all by yourself. Maybe you'll win.

In addition, it is the claim of the OP that the changes to Rosanne are the work of the left, but nothing in the provided link backs that claim up.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hamer555 (Reply #12)

Wed May 16, 2018, 05:34 PM

13. Thats nice, but what was happening in the real world doesn't match your delusions.

"Yes, I believe taking politics out of TV as a topic of discussion is related topically to taking politics out of Rosanne, which is a TV show. "

The OP isn't about taking politics out of roseanne, its about taking SPECIFIC politics out of the roseanne show. More specifically about the left attempting to disappear conservative viewpoints on TEVEE.

Just because it wasn't identified specifically as 'selective' for the benefit of dolts who clearly need it to be, doesn't change the fact that the thing being discussed IS selective. The OP probably gave you credit for at least minimum level of intelligence.

"No one until you mentioned all versus selective, so you can have that little argument all by yourself. Maybe you'll win."

Do you make a life long hobby out of eating lead paint chips? The very nature of the OP was about selective, and my post which did not respond to the OP was about ALL (which is why it wasn't a response to the OP, einstein)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #13)

Wed May 16, 2018, 05:44 PM

14. Thanks for the right wing snowflake lesson, but I'll pass

Lead paint chips? an attempt at a humorous insult? Its too dated. And lame. And snowflakey.

I'm sorry about Rosanne and everything else you think is controlled by the boogie man know only as the left. If there were more people with your mindset, Rosanne would not have to alter the script for ratings. But, that's capitalism for you

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hamer555 (Reply #14)

Wed May 16, 2018, 05:51 PM

15. Hahahahah.

"I'm sorry about Rosanne and everything else you think is controlled by the boogie man know only as the left."

Nope. Known as the modern day left. There are a number of left leaners here whom I have zero problem with or engaging in discussion with. But they're REAL liberals with brains and they use them, not todays mindless marxist brownshirt progressives.

I don't watch roseanne, or teevee for the most part (because it has become a political wasteland), so you are again barking up the wrong tree.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #7)

Wed May 16, 2018, 06:29 PM

16. Politics is an important part of life

Hard to avoid but there are many cable networks where politics don't show up at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jh4freedom (Reply #16)

Wed May 16, 2018, 08:23 PM

17. The definition of "part of life" varies greatly.

For the modern day left, politics seem to be more like the toenail, only a part, but an inseparable part, of the whole.

The sane definition of 'part' is more the buffet approach, where you can skip the 'politics' in favor of the drama, or the sci-fi, or the fantasy.

People like me who'd prefer entertainment be mostly unpolitical unless something is ridiculously over the top political like Team America, take a bit of offense at the change from buffet to "inseparable".


Politics should not infect everything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics