Politicspolitics

Sun May 20, 2018, 07:20 PM

A good piece by Ted Olsen, Mueller v. Trump

Is there a constitutional confrontation in the offing? Can special counsel Robert Mueller require President Trump to testify before a grand jury? It would be unprecedented, and his effort to do so could lead to a major constitutional confrontation.

The president could, of course, resist a grand jury subpoena by asserting his right under the Fifth Amendment not to be a witness against himself. However, for political reasons, he may not wish to do that. And he may not need to.

Another off-ramp for the president, which he may choose not to take, is to remove the special counsel. Mueller is an appointee of the Department of Justice, part of the executive branch. He is therefore a subordinate of the president. Trump might have to jump through some hoops to remove him—such as removing the deputy attorney general who selected Mueller—but he has the power to do so. If, that is, he’s willing to withstand the public outcry and demands for impeachment that would surely follow. Legislative measures, such as those already introduced in Congress, to shackle or impede the president’s power to remove the special counsel are almost surely unconstitutional. So the president could avoid a grand jury subpoena by removing the official who is threatening to obtain one. But this is another step with potentially grave political implications that he may not wish to risk.

The president is not “above the law”; there are many court decisions saying so. But the Constitution is part of the law, and it makes the president the sole repository of the executive power of the United States. He is therefore not just like any other citizen.

As things now stand, Mueller has not made, or even attempted to make, a record to explain why he would be justified in invoking the power of the judiciary to compel the president to show up before a grand jury—without a lawyer—and answer whatever questions Mueller and his army of prosecutors may put to him.

(And more)

https://www.weeklystandard.com/theodore-b-olson/mueller-v-trump

3 replies, 311 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply A good piece by Ted Olsen, Mueller v. Trump (Original post)
Gamle-ged May 2018 OP
Bob the Bilderberger May 2018 #1
foia May 2018 #3
rh24 May 2018 #2

Response to Gamle-ged (Original post)

Sun May 20, 2018, 08:27 PM

1. The president is not above the law

The remedy in the Constitution is impeachment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bob the Bilderberger (Reply #1)

Sun May 20, 2018, 10:25 PM

3. Impeachment is more of a political process than a legal one

Since it is limited to removal from office and/or restriction from holding future office.

The president is certainly not above the law but can only be subjected to criminal conviction resulting in fines and/or incarceration by the legal system, not Congress.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gamle-ged (Original post)

Sun May 20, 2018, 09:48 PM

2. Great analysis

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics