Politicspolitics

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 10:49 AM

Lisa Page will not comply w/subpoena from House Judiciary and Oversight committees.

Wow...you can actually do that?

Sweet.

"A former FBI attorney known for her anti-Trump bias and who the president said recently was getting “cold feet” about testifying on Capitol Hill, will not comply with a subpoena from the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees.

Lisa Page, who was having an extramarital affair with FBI agent Peter Strzok, announced via her attorney Tuesday evening that she will not appear before the joint committees Wednesday morning — 24 hours before Strzok is slated to testify publicly before the same two panels.

Strzok sat for closed door interviews — lasting nearly 11 hours — with the committees last month."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lisa-page-defies-house-subpoena

40 replies, 424 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 40 replies Author Time Post
Reply Lisa Page will not comply w/subpoena from House Judiciary and Oversight committees. (Original post)
Fred Sanford Jul 11 OP
Carl Jul 11 #1
bfox74 Jul 11 #3
Troll2 Jul 11 #5
Carl Jul 11 #6
Fred Sanford Jul 11 #7
Gunslinger201 Jul 11 #2
Trevor Jul 11 #27
Gunslinger201 Jul 11 #30
Trevor Jul 11 #32
Gunslinger201 Jul 12 #35
Trevor Jul 12 #36
Gunslinger201 Jul 12 #37
Trevor Jul 12 #38
Gunslinger201 Jul 13 #39
Trevor Jul 13 #40
rahtruelies Jul 11 #4
Billy Jingo Jul 11 #8
Real-life karma Jul 11 #11
Billy Jingo Jul 11 #17
Real-life karma Jul 11 #21
Carl Jul 11 #22
Ilovestx Jul 11 #24
Real-life karma Jul 11 #26
Phlegm Monger Jul 11 #12
Ruby Jul 11 #15
Billy Jingo Jul 11 #18
specs Jul 11 #28
nolens volens Jul 11 #9
MumblyPeg Jul 11 #10
Phlegm Monger Jul 11 #13
Billy Jingo Jul 11 #19
Carl Jul 11 #20
MumblyPeg Jul 11 #23
Cave Dweller Jul 11 #14
batcat Jul 11 #16
Boston Jul 11 #31
batcat Jul 11 #34
Doctor_R Jul 11 #25
Trevor Jul 11 #29
Doctor_R Jul 11 #33

Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 10:51 AM

1. Charge her with contempt and arrest her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #1)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 11:02 AM

3. The problem is that the liberal DC courts won't enforce anything that makes their side look bad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #1)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 11:12 AM

5. Doesn't happen. The contempt citation goes to a DA who empanels a Grand Jury.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Troll2 (Reply #5)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 11:14 AM

6. I know,but there is a chance and it spotlights her trying to take the 5th.

Another thing that makes the entire thing look like the charade it is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #6)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 11:15 AM

7. Agreed, Carl...and America needs to see that happening.*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 10:57 AM

2. You can, but its more proof she was involved

In the Biggest Political Crime in History

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #2)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 07:11 PM

27. Trump is hiding from questions

Doesn't that prove he's guilty?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #27)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 07:22 PM

30. They are trying for a Scooter Libby Perjury trap

Trump was being set up

Illegal Spying

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #30)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 08:18 PM

32. Page can say its a perjury trap too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #32)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 04:35 AM

35. Strozk and Page broke the fucking Law

I was just following orders didn’t work at Nuremberg and it won’t work here either

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #35)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 05:08 PM

36. Neither one broke the law

and you have zilch evidence that they did.

Nuremberg tried Nazis who killed six million Jews. That has nothing to do with this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #36)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 05:18 PM

37. How about a small charity wager?

$100 to the charity of the winners choice?

This time next year Strozk and Page will be under indictment and Trump will not

Bet?

Here’s my charity:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #37)

Thu Jul 12, 2018, 11:23 PM

38. That's three different issues

So a result wouldn't have to be one way or another. Suppose none of them are under indictment? Who wins?

I like your charity. If we bet I'll pick the same charity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #38)

Fri Jul 13, 2018, 04:06 AM

39. My Daughter is their Office Manager

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #39)

Fri Jul 13, 2018, 04:25 PM

40. How nice.

Your daughter is doing a wonderful thing then.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 11:03 AM

4. arrest her and confine her in solitary until she talks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 11:20 AM

8. Good for her. Tell that Putin fellating cuck to #sand

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Billy Jingo (Reply #8)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 02:34 PM

11. Alerted as being "graphic content."

Yes, the same Righty who posts endless about a bag of dicks is saying that your reply is "graphic content."

Oh Righty - tell us again how you're winning and tell us more about who's looking for a safe-space!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Real-life karma (Reply #11)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 03:29 PM

17. Really? I'm just trying to communicate in a language the Cheeto Cult understands

Maybe they don't like it when you refuse to bow down to the Great Spraytan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Billy Jingo (Reply #17)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 03:50 PM

21. Oh they definitely don't like anyone who breaks from the cult of Trump!

One must not be critical of their brilliant, best ever, smartest, greatest leader guy after all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Real-life karma (Reply #21)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 03:56 PM

22. The irony of this from a leftist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Real-life karma (Reply #11)


Response to Ilovestx (Reply #24)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 05:02 PM

26. Yes, I can believe it.

Righty targets posters based on their posting history in an effort to drive any but the most loyal from their side off the board. They somehow think this is "winning."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Billy Jingo (Reply #8)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 02:37 PM

12. Also alerted as bigoted

They're after you today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phlegm Monger (Reply #12)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 02:42 PM

15. Geezus. How many alerts did they send?

I was on the jury for NSFW.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phlegm Monger (Reply #12)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 03:30 PM

18. I'll tone it down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Billy Jingo (Reply #8)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 07:11 PM

28. Obama has not been occupying the White House for 2 years, and hillary lost ;)

lol @ regressive lefty

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 11:31 AM

9. Yes you can

for those "strict" constitutionalists Congress has no authorized power to investigate, issue subpoenas or hold any member of the public in contempt and punish. Those powers were granted to Congress by Congress in their own rules packages.

Of course you refuse at your own peril, as you can be jailed and fined...she could just plead the fifth to avoid responding.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 02:06 PM

10. the whole method is bullshit, there is NO excuse for these being private or off the record

interviews.
That is how this shit was propagated in the first damned place.
I want this shit opened up wide for EVERYONE to see and stop with the fucking games.
And this skank WILL testify or be held in contempt.
Typical fucking fascist lefty... plead the fifth with a wink and a smile. filthy anti-American fucks should be expelled from our land

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MumblyPeg (Reply #10)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 02:40 PM

13. Why do you hate the 5th amendment of our Constitution?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phlegm Monger (Reply #13)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 03:35 PM

19. Maybe he just stopped reading after he got to the 2nd

… and is unaware of its existence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phlegm Monger (Reply #13)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 03:39 PM

20. She is essentially taking the 5th.

She ought to have the courage to go there and say it.

Btw,the left was all up in arms over any suggestion that Trump take the 5th.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phlegm Monger (Reply #13)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 04:02 PM

23. why do you have to make shit up like that to start an irrelevant argument? Ever ask why I

hate you people as much as I do?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 02:41 PM

14. So, What Napalotano

explained this morning is a subpoena only compels you to appear. You can sit there and say absolutely nothing, or sing like a bird, but you have to be there. It is essentially an order from a court to appear. Absent hospitalization, death, you know something that really precludes you going out for the morning paper and appearing in front of a judge you got to be there.

The good judge wonders what kind of legal advice she is getting, and he noted that she is an attorney also.

So remember this day. Anyone now has the ability to tear up a congressional subpoena and have nothing to fear about doing it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cave Dweller (Reply #14)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 03:28 PM

16. No. Everyone cant tear up congressional subpoenas. Just certain people. ...

It’s like negligently handling calassifed information. Hillary can do that and walk away scot-free and even get to run for President.

If you or I did that and were caught we would be in big trouble and likely end up behind bars.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to batcat (Reply #16)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 07:56 PM

31. If you or i mishandled ONE PIECE, let alone the hundreds that Hillary did.

and probably Obama, who didn't learn about Hillary's server "on tv just like everyone else" ... he had sent Hillary email on her private server.

She claims she didn't know the (C) meant classified.

She got caught having ordered people to "make plain paper" from classified info to send illegally

Her mishandling resulted in classified info on the virus-infested laptop of kiddie pervert Weiner!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Boston (Reply #31)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 09:25 PM

34. Huma probably would tell you that she also did not know what ...

the portion mark (C) means on a document.

It means the paragraph following is Confidential.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 04:43 PM

25. ::::::::::::::::

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 07:16 PM

29. Page has a legal right to the information she requested.

I agree with her refusing to testify until she gets it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanford (Original post)

Wed Jul 11, 2018, 08:21 PM

33. ::::::::::::::::

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics