Politicspolitics

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 04:13 PM

Ballsey Ford's lies.....

Ford testified last week that she had never revealed the details of the alleged attack until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. She said the memories percolated up as they revisited a disagreement they’d had over her insistence on installing a “second front door” when they had remodeled their Palo Alto, Calif., home. Ford never specified when the renovation took place, leaving a possible impression that it and the therapy session happened around the same time. But documents reveal the door was installed years before as part of an addition, and has been used by renters and even a marriage counseling business. “The door was not an escape route but an entrance route,” said an attorney familiar with the ongoing congressional investigation. “It appears the real plan for the second front door was to rent out a separate room.” The discrepancy raises fresh doubts about Ford’s candor and credibility amid other inconsistencies, congressional and other knowledgeable sources say, including her purported “fear of flying.” Ford initially refused to submit to an interview with the committee because of an alleged airplane phobia, but investigators established that she had taken a number of flights back East this summer, and had previously flown to Hawaii, Costa Rica, French Polynesia and other South Pacific islands.
19 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
She is a liar libs recruited
18 (95%)
I'm a Lefty and I'm nervous
0 (0%)
Kavenaugh is a sexual abuser.
1 (5%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

25 replies, 330 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 25 replies Author Time Post
Reply Ballsey Ford's lies..... (Original post)
Horsefeathers Oct 10 OP
foia Oct 10 #1
Horsefeathers Oct 10 #2
Grumpy Pickle Oct 10 #3
Horsefeathers Oct 10 #4
Grumpy Pickle Oct 10 #5
freedumb2003 Oct 10 #6
Meowmenow Oct 10 #7
Horsefeathers Oct 10 #8
Carl Oct 11 #9
Meowmenow Oct 11 #10
Carl Oct 11 #11
Meowmenow Oct 11 #13
Carl Oct 11 #14
Meowmenow Oct 11 #16
Carl Oct 11 #17
Jake Oct 11 #15
Horsefeathers Oct 11 #18
_eek Oct 11 #19
Meowmenow Oct 11 #20
_eek Oct 11 #21
Meowmenow Oct 11 #25
Carl Oct 11 #22
Steelydamned Oct 11 #23
Jake Oct 11 #12
Nostrings Oct 11 #24

Response to Horsefeathers (Original post)

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 04:44 PM

1. I don't think she's very bright (her voice is a prime indicator)

I did not find her story credible at all.

I have no idea if something ever happened to her or not but there's nowhere near enough backing up her story to think Kav did something. If this went to a jury it would take less than five minutes to get tossed out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to foia (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 04:45 PM

2. All sane & normal Americans agree*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Horsefeathers (Original post)

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 05:04 PM

3. She played the starring role in a marxist/ commie leftist " school Play "

Grassley needs to dig this up.

Ford's attorneys are refusing to give the Senate Judiciary committee the therapist's notes and records of their conversations with Feinstein's and Horono"s office.

Subpoena the materials !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 05:15 PM

4. Her social media accounts were scrubbed...

Ballsey is in on the set up*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Horsefeathers (Reply #4)

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 05:18 PM

5. Absolutely.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Horsefeathers (Original post)

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 05:44 PM

6. Time to prosecute... This was NOT a perjury trap.

Her testimony was written down and pre-vetted by her "pro bono" lawyers.

Her VERY TESTIMONY was a lie -- from start to finish.

And then she was asked simple questions about flying and lie detectors. Her responses have already been proven to be complete lies. Again, much different than the perjury traps the democrats tried unsuccessfully to lay for Justice Kavanaugh.

Time for someone to pay for their lies. Lock her ugly little-girl voice faking ass up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Horsefeathers (Original post)

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 06:00 PM

7. Find out what happened, the fake FBI "investigation" didn't look. I think that is a good idea.

 

Kavanaugh was full of shit (or beer farts), that is for sure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #7)

Wed Oct 10, 2018, 09:58 PM

8. I guess you would know about that*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #7)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 05:36 AM

9. Do you understand the difference between a background check and a criminal investigation?

Do you understand what the FBI could actually do?

Do you understand why?

Will you be honest and answer?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #9)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:11 PM

10. I understand bullshit and cover ups.

 

Do you? Will you be honest and answer?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #10)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:22 PM

11. Try answering the questions.

That was not an answer,it was trying to change the subject.

It is all the difference in the world between the two types of "investigations"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #11)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:39 PM

13. So why not do a real one, hmmm?

 

Fake limited "background" was bullshit and everybody knows it,

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #13)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:44 PM

14. There was no jurisdiction for it,they said that from the word go.

The FBI just does not open a criminal investigation on a whim.
She should have made a criminal complaint in Maryland.

The additional background was what lefties were demanding as it was all they could possibly do.
That was what was done with Justice Thomas and what Biden was saying at the time was not a real report as all they do is take statements.

You all got the only thing you could get and what you were demanding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #14)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:50 PM

16. Yep we (the majority of Americans) got what we got. A steaming pile.

 

You guys got what you wanted, a lying frat bro who showed clearly he is a partisan hack and probably worse. Putting shady assholes in high positions is a risky business, so you will just have to deal with the suspicions and ongoing questions. We still have a right to be wary of the dirty schemes repukes pull constantly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #16)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:53 PM

17. You can whine and piss and moan until eternity but it does not change any facts.

Her story was suspect,she refused to pursue it through available legal/criminal channels,she provided no corroboration or details.
A basic understanding of civics would have helped you.

In my book she is a disgusting liar.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #13)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:49 PM

15. The only bullshit in this whole thing

Was her story, and the way the dems kept it secret.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jake (Reply #15)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:59 PM

18. Everyone agrees*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #13)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 02:10 PM

19. Ok, give me the exact justification for the FBI to investigate?

Or the Maryland SP.

Can you do that?

OR are you demanding an extrajudicial and unconstitutional act by the FBI?

Simple, lay out what crime, and who should do the investigation.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #19)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 02:19 PM

20. I don't know all the legal specifics but it seems the White House WAS restricting things.

 

Despite the hairplug's claims the investigators could go where ever they needed to. How about if they could have just gone ahead and interviewed other claimants and potential witnesses, even the two subjects themselves? I suppose some writer or PI type will be looking into it and books or movies will come out eventually but those things don't have the resources and power the FBI has/had if they had actually been free to really look.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #20)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 02:24 PM

21. With her testimony being what it was

There was no "there" there.

Everything she said under oath was examined, and it was found non credible. I think Trump did her a favor, because she is on record contradicting and shifting her story.

She should be thanking the FBI for that unanswered prayer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #21)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 03:43 PM

25. Possibly, but not conclusively.

 

I hope the limited report is released (or leaked) so we can actually see what was looked at and what wasn't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #20)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 02:34 PM

22. They looked into Fords provided witnesses and Ramirez.

The train gang rape one was so ludicrous as to be dismissed out of hand.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #20)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 02:46 PM

23. Say it ain't so?

"I don't know all the legal specifics..." You probably should've just stopped there

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meowmenow (Reply #10)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 01:26 PM

12. What would you like them to investigate?

No location
No date
No physical evidence (she “waited” anywhere from 20-40 years to tell anyone)
Worse than no witnesses, her claimed witnesses either can’t corroborate or have refuted her claims in sworn statements.

And her testimony has changed multiple times.
So I ask again what would you like them to investigate.

The only thing they could investigate is her perjury.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Horsefeathers (Original post)

Thu Oct 11, 2018, 02:47 PM

24. The whole business has a deep state stench to it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics