Politicspolitics

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:17 PM

BREAKING: Federal Court Orders Discovery Plan in 10 Days Whether...

... Hillary’s Private Server an Intentional Attempt to Evade FOIA

Judicial Watch appeared in a DC federal court last month on a motion to compel more testimony from Hillary Clinton as well as to make public video recordings of depositions of top Clinton aides such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills.

The court ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer more questions about the setting up of her private server.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said that the court denied their request to unseal the video depositions of Clinton’s aides.

On Thursday, a federal court blasted the DOJ and State Department on Hillary Clinton’s emails and ordered a discovery plan in 10 days as to whether Hillary’s private email system was intentionally set up to evade FOIA requests and lawsuits. (we know the answer)



Full article here:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/12/breaking-federal-court-orders-discovery-plan-in-10-days-whether-hillarys-private-server-an-intentional-attempt-to-evade-foia/

54 replies, 574 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 54 replies Author Time Post
Reply BREAKING: Federal Court Orders Discovery Plan in 10 Days Whether... (Original post)
Doctor_R Dec 6 OP
LavenderGirl Dec 6 #1
Doctor_R Dec 6 #3
Charlie Mike Dec 6 #4
Carl Dec 6 #6
LavenderGirl Dec 6 #8
Muddling Through Dec 6 #10
CornFed Dec 6 #31
Magyar Heidinn Dec 6 #34
Carl Dec 6 #11
LavenderGirl Dec 6 #13
Horsefeathers Dec 6 #16
Grumpy Pickle Dec 6 #37
Solesurvivor Dec 6 #27
Da Mannn Dec 6 #50
Horsefeathers Dec 6 #14
Horsefeathers Dec 6 #12
freedumb2003 Dec 6 #17
Muddling Through Dec 6 #21
freedumb2003 Dec 6 #24
Magyar Heidinn Dec 6 #33
oldenuff35 Dec 7 #51
Muddling Through Dec 6 #9
Banshee 3 Actual Dec 6 #28
TM999 Dec 6 #29
Grumpy Pickle Dec 6 #38
MeatSandwich Dec 6 #30
Grumpy Pickle Dec 6 #39
MeatSandwich Dec 6 #41
Grumpy Pickle Dec 6 #43
MeatSandwich Dec 6 #46
Grumpy Pickle Dec 7 #52
jh4freedom Dec 6 #44
Grumpy Pickle Dec 6 #45
jh4freedom Dec 6 #48
Salaam Dec 7 #54
Horsefeathers Dec 6 #2
Jack Burton Dec 6 #5
LavenderGirl Dec 6 #7
SatansSon666 Dec 6 #18
LavenderGirl Dec 6 #19
Doctor_R Dec 6 #15
LavenderGirl Dec 6 #20
Muddling Through Dec 6 #22
Doctor_R Dec 6 #23
Gunslinger201 Dec 6 #25
jh4freedom Dec 6 #32
JaimeBondoJr Dec 6 #26
jh4freedom Dec 6 #35
Grumpy Pickle Dec 6 #40
jh4freedom Dec 6 #42
MeatSandwich Dec 6 #47
jh4freedom Dec 6 #49
swifty Dec 6 #36
Salaam Dec 7 #53

Response to Doctor_R (Original post)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:21 PM

1. Gateway pundit/Judicial Watch

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:25 PM

3. So, it isn't true?

LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:28 PM

4. Either the court issued the order or it didn't. If it did snickering

just makes you look foolish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:42 PM

6. After your embarrasing thread yesterday you have nothing to snicker about.

That was swift level posting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #6)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:46 PM

8. Oh really?



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #8)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:48 PM

10. NPC Alert.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Muddling Through (Reply #10)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 07:47 PM

34. Bad faith alert.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #8)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:48 PM

11. Keep proving your ignorance of a subject.

It is why lefty is laughed at.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #11)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:49 PM

13. Sure

Individual 1 is the one the world is laughing at.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #13)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:53 PM

16. I see an angry Mooch and

an arrogant Berry. God I hate them, so glad they are limited to dog & pony shows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Horsefeathers (Reply #16)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 08:50 PM

37. Did you see the rude and arrogant " side eye " that Michelle O gave Trump and Melania at the funeral

yesterday ?

It was a look of pure disdain.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #13)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 06:56 PM

27. Looks like another troll needs the same action another lady got not to long ago

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Solesurvivor (Reply #27)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 11:15 PM

50. Alerted, no hide. Lefty has some mighty thin skin this night

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #11)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:50 PM

14. Trump has deflowered lefties!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #8)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:49 PM

12. Lefties are now concerned about religion?

I guess Trump has effed them up more than I thought!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #8)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:53 PM

17. Just when you didn't think lefty NPC programming could not get more trite

NPCs get more trite.

Next up -- memes about President Trump's choice of socks.

Dang, programmer -- up your game.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to freedumb2003 (Reply #17)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:59 PM

21. That is her upping her game. It can't get any better, sadly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Muddling Through (Reply #21)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 06:02 PM

24. some 10 YO programming his first NPC

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #8)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 07:46 PM

33. Any evidence President Trump does not know the words?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #8)

Fri Dec 7, 2018, 05:14 PM

51. You are not in a position to know that he doesn't know those words.

You just posted another bald faced lie.

All of us know many things we do not say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #6)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:46 PM

9. NPC's are gonna NPC.

Business as usual.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 07:02 PM

28. LOL does the court order exist or not?

will Hillary's prison bitch name be ''Fisty'' or ''Gamma canyon flaps''

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 07:33 PM

29. Read this and try not to snicker.

Lamberth ruled:

… the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to plan discovery into (a) whether Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email while Secretary of State was an intentional attempt to evade FOIA; (b) whether the State Department’s attempts to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and (c) whether State has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s requests.

Terming Clinton’s use of her private email system, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” Lamberth wrote in his MEMORANDUM OPINION:

… his State and Justice Departments fell far short. So far short that the court questions, even now, whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal ? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails? And has State ever adequately searched for records in this case?

At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence. At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.

Turning his attention to the Department of Justice, Lamberth wrote:

The current Justice Department made things worse. When the government last appeared before the Court, counsel claimed, ‘it is not true to say we misled either Judicial Watch or the Court.’ When accused of ‘doublespeak,’ counsel denied vehemently, feigned offense, and averred complete candor. When asked why State masked the inadequacy of its initial search, counsel claimed that the officials who initially responded to Judicial Watch’s request didn’t realize Clinton’s emails were missing, and that it took them two months to ‘figure [] out what was going on’… Counsel’s responses strain credulity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TM999 (Reply #29)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 08:58 PM

38. People are still going to great lengths to cover up for Hillary's intentional deeds.

Why is this still going on ?

Bizarre.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 07:38 PM

30. Without JW, there is lot that would have been buried. But keep mocking them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MeatSandwich (Reply #30)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 08:59 PM

39. The plan was for Hillary to have been president....then all of this would have never seen the

light of day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #39)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 09:10 PM

41. Exactly. That was the plan all along.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MeatSandwich (Reply #41)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 09:21 PM

43. What mystifies me is that many, many people are still trying to cover up for her.

She still is exerting some kind a weird power over DC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #43)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 10:06 PM

46. I think part of that is that she knows where some of the political bodies are buried.

And, she actually helped put a few there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MeatSandwich (Reply #46)

Fri Dec 7, 2018, 07:28 PM

52. Yep

People are compromised and frightened by the Clinton Machine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #39)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 09:25 PM

44. But Hillary Clinton didn't become president

And Jeff Sessions' Justice Department kept it in the light of day it anyway and Trump appointed both Sessions and Rosenstein.
When Barack Obama was president and the Republicans screamed for the appointments of Special Counsels, Attorney General Holder continually told them to go suck eggs, which was his right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jh4freedom (Reply #44)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 09:41 PM

45. Sessions did hardly anything on this....he could have set in motion an investigation

into all of Hillary's criminal crap in Jan. 2017....but he didn't.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #45)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 10:21 PM

48. He appointed John Huber

To conduct the investigation which is what Huber is doing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 7, 2018, 07:29 PM

54. Best they can do at this point.

LOL@righty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_R (Original post)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:24 PM

2. Poor MeeMaw

Why won't they let her alone!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Horsefeathers (Reply #2)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:31 PM

5. She should be convicted. Put in one of these. And left alone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jack Burton (Reply #5)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:43 PM

7. Enjoy your kinky fantasy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #7)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:56 PM

18. bad faith alert

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #18)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:57 PM

19. I was expecting that.

Thanks!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_R (Original post)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:52 PM

15. Related:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_R (Reply #15)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 05:58 PM

20. Lol

Mueller's Investigation:
- 192 criminal charges
- 36 different entities charged
- 7 people have pleaded guilty
- 3 people have been sentenced
- The investigation has recouped 150% of their expenses
- 19 months

Benghazi:
- 0 charges, 0 guilty pleas, 0 sentences.
- 24 months

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 06:00 PM

22. NPC Alert.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 06:00 PM

23. LOL



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 06:04 PM

25. Didnt get any Collusion, just process crimes nobody else bothers with

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #25)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 07:45 PM

32. Tell that to Trump's campaign manager



At age 69 he could be spending the rest of his life in jail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 06:22 PM

26. Mueller's Investigation: ZERO Collusion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaimeBondoJr (Reply #26)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 07:55 PM

35. Of course not

The word "collusion" appears nowhere in Robert Mueller's appointment letter.

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Washington D.C. 20530
Order Number 3915-2017
APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WITH THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RELATED MATTERS
By virtue of the authority vested in me as Acting Attorney General, including 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, and 515, in order to discharge my responsibility to provide supervision and management of the Department of Justice, and to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian govemmenfs efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, I hereby order as follows:
Robert S. Mueller III is appointed to serve as Special Counsel for the United States
Department of Justice.
(b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
* (i)  any links and or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and 

* (ii)  any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and 

* (iii)  any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a). 

(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters. (d) Sections 600.4 through 600. l 0 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations are applicable to the Special Counsel.
Rod J. Rosenstein
Deputy Attorney General, May 17, 2017
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3726381/Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.pd

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jh4freedom (Reply #35)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 09:03 PM

40. So why is Mueller ONLY looking on the Trumps side ?

What about Hillary's campaign manager, John Podesta's ties to Russia and the Uranium One deal ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #40)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 09:19 PM

42. If you read the Mueller appointment letter

you'll see that it authorizes Mueller to investigate: "any links and or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump;"
There's no mention of Clinton, John Podesta or the Uranium One deal but my understanding is that the U.S. Attorney for Utah John W. Huber was authorized by Attorney General Sessions to conduct investigations into those matters and that is currently in process.
"House GOP to hold hearing into DOJ’s probe of Clinton Foundation"
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/417761-house-gop-to-hold-hearing-into-dojs-probe-of-clinton-foundation

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LavenderGirl (Reply #20)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 10:09 PM

47. Any of those for "collusion" with Russia?

Or are almost all of the guilty pleas for process crimes? That's what I thought.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MeatSandwich (Reply #47)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 10:37 PM

49. Getting guilty pleas and flipping witnesses

By convicting them of process crimes is how you build an investigation. Patience, grasshopper!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_R (Original post)

Thu Dec 6, 2018, 08:34 PM

36. Somehow I doubt Trump says a word about it. Ivanka probably already stole his phone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_R (Original post)

Fri Dec 7, 2018, 07:29 PM

53. Judicial Watch?

LOL@righty

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics