Politicspolitics

Thu Jan 10, 2019, 07:28 AM

Why magazine capacity limits are an assault on civil rights

I counted at least 10 shots fired from point-blank range before the attacker finally went down...


...that's AFTER a TASER failed to stop the attack.


4 replies, 125 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why magazine capacity limits are an assault on civil rights (Original post)
Charlie Mike Jan 10 OP
Hades Jan 10 #1
foia Jan 10 #2
Charlie Mike Jan 10 #3
foia Jan 10 #4

Response to Charlie Mike (Original post)

Thu Jan 10, 2019, 07:48 AM

1. They want the arbitrary limit for you not the police.

They say YOU shouldn’t have a gun if you can’t hit your target with X number of rounds. Cops have backup, so their argument should apply to them as well. Of course they would never apply their argument to a cop, “a cop should not have a gun, if they can’t hit their target with X number of rounds”, because limiting your bullets is not about public safety; it is about harassing you because they hate gun owners.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Original post)

Thu Jan 10, 2019, 09:08 AM

2. Congressional security teams should be limited to five rounds per team.

How many congresscritters and senators would vote yes on that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to foia (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 10, 2019, 09:10 AM

3. All LEOs should be forced to abide by the strictest standard in any area they operate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #3)

Thu Jan 10, 2019, 09:14 AM

4. No detachable mags. No "military" features.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics