Politicspolitics

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 07:59 AM

We will give you Justice Merrick Garland if you will fund the Wall



Fully fund the wall and Trump will nominate Merrick Garland
16 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Fair Deal
1 (6%)
No Deal
15 (94%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

33 replies, 365 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 33 replies Author Time Post
Reply We will give you Justice Merrick Garland if you will fund the Wall (Original post)
Gunslinger201 Jan 11 OP
Da Mannn Jan 11 #1
Gunslinger201 Jan 11 #2
DDKick Jan 11 #8
Valishin Jan 11 #3
Charlie Mike Jan 11 #4
Gunslinger201 Jan 11 #6
Charlie Mike Jan 11 #7
foia Jan 11 #5
Dumper Jan 11 #9
spike61 Jan 11 #11
specs Jan 11 #13
spike61 Jan 12 #19
specs Jan 12 #20
spike61 Jan 12 #21
specs Jan 12 #22
spike61 Jan 12 #23
specs Jan 12 #24
spike61 Jan 12 #25
specs Jan 12 #26
spike61 Jan 13 #27
specs Jan 13 #28
spike61 Jan 13 #29
specs Jan 13 #30
spike61 Jan 14 #31
specs Jan 14 #32
spike61 Jan 14 #33
TM999 Jan 11 #10
Cynical Jan 11 #12
Nostrings Jan 11 #14
TheShoe Jan 11 #15
orson Jan 11 #16
Gunslinger201 Jan 11 #17
Pennsylvania Jan 11 #18

Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:02 AM

1. I would rather see 800,000 Democrats financially ruined

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:04 AM

2. I dont see how they could blame Trump

Nancy (the self proclaimed Master Legislator) is sitting on her hands

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:28 AM

8. Trump proves they are the issue daily.

While their cult members will blame trump , same people realize the left is being stupid.

Funny how when Obama was POTUS congress was the problem in the dmsm. Now Trump is the problem?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:07 AM

3. Add in

merit based and an end to chain immigration, I think Trump might try something like that if RBG really does retire. Although I doubt that will happen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:16 AM

4. We'll get the wall regardless. Why seat give up a SCOTUS seat?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:23 AM

6. Humanitarian, pay the Workers the Dems are Martyring

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:25 AM

7. People who run roughshod over Americans without an ouce of pity?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:20 AM

5. Garland is ancient history. And not at all relevant.

Maybe give a LITTLE on DACA - at least that is immigration-related.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to foia (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:29 AM

9. Not ONE potential D nominee will commit to making Garland his/her 1st appointment to

SCROTUS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to foia (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 09:46 AM

11. We could have had 25 billion for the wall in March by giving some on DACA

You can thank the Freedom caucus for blowing that deal. Even trump said he wanted a deal for the DACA people. As well as 70% of the country.
Of course now the Dems won't discuss going back to that because they know most of the country blames trump for the shutdown. Since the idiot said on national TV that he would gladly take the credit for it, while Chuck&Nancy laughed to themselves

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #11)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 10:45 AM

13. Lol @ the NPC for not knowing the Dems said no in the Senate and needing 60

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to specs (Reply #13)

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 10:18 AM

19. It was never voted on in the Senate, Dilbert.

Freedumb Caucus wouldn't allow a vote in the House.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #19)

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 04:18 PM

20. lol @ the NPC for not knowing that it passed the house and did not move in the Senate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to specs (Reply #20)

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 04:43 PM

21. Buttbuddy doesn't realize only 8 Senate republicans voted in favor of 25 billion for the wall

Trump could have had his money, but his own party (which he's only belonged to for 3 years) let him down.

Today, 70% of the country blame trump for the shutdown. Which makes sense, since he said on national TV he'd happily take credit for it.
The trump shutdown.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #21)

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 04:52 PM

22. lol @ the NPC for believing its regressive lefty opinionated blogs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to specs (Reply #22)

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 05:25 PM

23. LOL @buttbudddy for not researching Senate votes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #23)

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 07:11 PM

24. lol @ the NPC for still believing its regressive lefty opinionated blogs

And for thinking that I said the Senate voted because the NPC does not understand the filibuster and how it is abused this day and age.

lol @ the ignorant racist NPC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to specs (Reply #24)

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 07:38 PM

25. Ignorant buttbuddy doesnt see that only 8 GOP votes gets you jack shit.

And has NOTHING to do with a filibuster.
Trump betrayed by his own party (of 3 yrs)
Could've had 25 billion.
Now gets zip

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #25)

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 07:46 PM

26. lol @ the NPC for still not understanding how the Senate works

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to specs (Reply #26)

Sun Jan 13, 2019, 08:37 AM

27. Only 8 GOP votes; most Dems voted YES. Buttbuddy PLEASE learn how bills are passed.

NO democrat was filibustering.

Trump couldve had 25 billion! Let down by his own party!
Its the Trump shutdown whether you like it or not; he claimed it.

BIGGEST national losses since Nixon in the '18 mid-terms; all at the foot of trump. If the Dems dont run a whack job in '20, like Warren, trump loses like Dukakis

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #27)

Sun Jan 13, 2019, 11:00 AM

28. lol @ the NPC for believing his regressive lefty blogs as no democRAT has voted for 25 billion

since President Trump has been in office

lol @ left for thinking that the Supreme Court is a second place prize.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to specs (Reply #28)

Sun Jan 13, 2019, 01:22 PM

29. Almost ALL Democrats voted for the bill providing 25 billion, youre just too dense to admit it.

I never said SCOTUS was 2nd place. Look at my other posts on that, corncob.
Cant wait to see how the Dems treat a woman taking RBGs place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #29)

Sun Jan 13, 2019, 06:54 PM

30. lol @ the Homophobe NPC

Since President Trump has been President no democRAT has voted for funding for the wall NPC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to specs (Reply #30)

Mon Jan 14, 2019, 08:48 AM

31. Ahh, finally revealed yourself as a foreign troll! "homophobe" & "sexist" are totally different!

And those would be Democrats not me. Loser.
I win. AGAIN. But with you, I've gotten used to it.
"Republicans and the President could have secured funding for the President’s wall with this plan, backed by Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) – but it was opposed by most GOP Senators because of the DACA provisions."
Rounds-King Amendment. Look it up, buttbuddy.

Opposed by REPUBLICANS, voted FOR by Democrats.
Trump could have had 25 billion for the wall, but was let down by his own party.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #31)

Mon Jan 14, 2019, 10:00 AM

32. Lol @ the homophobic NPC for thinking it won

NPC humans do not read your regressive Lefty blogs not do we care about your feels.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to specs (Reply #32)

Mon Jan 14, 2019, 04:25 PM

33. Please point out anything resembling homophobia in my posts. You cant, because you're a fool.

But then I think most of DI has likely figured that out by now.
TROLL doesnt know word definitions

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 08:44 AM

10. Fuck no.

I would give up the wall before I would give up the SCOTUS seat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 10:07 AM

12. I want the wall AND a SCOTUS pick that makes Lefty scream in outrage

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 10:47 AM

14. Hell no.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 10:52 AM

15. No deal

No wall and we will simply expand the court.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 11:00 AM

16. Why would we trust Mitch McConnell

to hold up your end of the deal?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to orson (Reply #16)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 11:05 AM

17. Because he isnt Schumer

Cotton asked Schumer why he’d gone back on his word. Schumer claimed that he’d only been speaking for himself when he promised to let Pompeo through. “I said that I would not block him,” Schumer said, emphasizing the personal pronoun, according to sources who witnessed the exchange. “I never said that I could speak for 47 other Democrats.”

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2019, 11:20 AM

18. Fuck that

Enough of this pussy bullshit.

He needs to stop asking for money and go around these people.

Fuck Garland and Fuck DACA. I want everyone of those bastard kids rounded up and deported.

I didn’t vote for a pussy to make deals I voted for someone to step on throats.

And not ban gun parts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics