Politicspoliticsrcwrtneoconsisraelapartheid

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:13 PM

Venezuela Refuses to Become the 68th Sovereign Government Overthrown By America

--clip

Let's remind ourselves of previous false flags and invented lies which have been used as the pretext for illegal and immoral interventions in the past. The Gulf of Tonkin incident in August 1964 was presented as an "unprovoked attack" on two US warships which justified a quick and massive response against North Vietnam. Hellfire was released from the sky with 64 bombing sorties causing incredible destruction and loss of lives and that retaliation was the green light for the launching of a 500,000 US army invasion force over the three years which followed. The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a manufactured lie to allow the US to justify what they were itching and planning to do anyway. Over 2 million civilians in North and South Vietnam perished as a result of that war, over 1 million Vietcong fighters died and over 58,000 American soldiers were killed. All that death and incredible destruction initiated by a manufactured lie.

The American led invasion of Iraq in March 2003 was based on reliable ‘intelligence' that Saddam Hussain possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD's) and probably nuclear weapons. He refused to cooperate with arms inspectors and the US was left with no alternative but to invade and disarm him in the name of human rights and democracy. ‘Shock and awe' was unleashed and the world was encouraged to cheer lead the invasion to save us from the misuse of these WMD's. Over one million Iraqi lives were extinguished. The vast majority were innocent civilians. There were no WMD's. The US Government knew there were no WMD's. It was all a manufactured lie.

In 2011 the UK and France were encouraged and militarily supported by the US to bomb and intervene in the formerly prosperous North African nation of Libya to defend the population from human rights abuses and alleged atrocities perpetrated by Libya's President Muammar Gaddafi. Hundreds of thousands were killed, millions were displaced and forced to seek refuge in other countries and a once modern nation state with abundant resources and wealth was reduced to the status of a basket case with the literal return of slavery, human being traded for sale in markets and villages controlled by brutal militias and tribes. Let me quote from the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Report of September 2016 which examined this military intervention:

intervention:

"In March 2011, the United Kingdom and France, with the support of the United States, led the international community to support an intervention in Libya to protect civilians from attacks by forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi. This policy was not informed by accurate intelligence. In particular, the Government failed to identify that the threat to civilians was overstated and that the rebels included a significant Islamist element. By the summer of 2011, the limited intervention to protect civilians had drifted into an opportunist policy of regime change. That policy was not underpinned by a strategy to support and shape post-Gaddafi Libya. The result was political and economic collapse, inter-militia and inter-tribal warfare, humanitarian and migrant crises, widespread human right violations, the spread of Gaddafi regime weapons across the region and the growth of ISIL* in North Africa".

Please read and re-read this Report Summary compiled by a Committee comprising 6 Tories, 4 Labour and 1 SNP MPs. Note in particular the words I have highlighted. "Not informed by accurate intelligence", the threat to civilians was "overstated", the exercise became an "opportunist policy of regime change" that resulted in "economic collapse" and a "humanitarian and migrant crises". That was what the UK was led into in Libya by the US in 2011. The illegal, immoral and undemocratic overthrow of the Gaddafi government was based on a pack of lies.

---clip
Think about the revulsion which was generated by the mass media when we were informed about the Assad Government chemical weapons attack on Douma, inside Syria, last April 2018. Do you recall the pictures relayed into our living rooms in bulletin after bulletin of the hospital ward and the coughing and spluttering children desperately trying to draw a breath? That attack was the basis upon which the Trump administration justified powerful bombing missions against Syrian government targets in Damascus. Brave and respected journalists on the ground like Robert Fisk cast severe doubts on the authenticity of these chemical weapons attacks but was ignored and derided in equal measure from mainstream media sources and pompous politicians thousands of miles away in comfortable TV Studios. Now it is confirmed by a BBC Syria reporter who investigated the incident in detail over several months that the chemical weapons attack was indeed "staged", a lie manufactured to justify American bombing.
Lie after manufactured lie is deployed by the US to dupe the public into believing military interventions are based on humanitarian grounds when in actual fact the only concern the US ever has in mind is the corporate arms and oil company interests and their strategic desire to ensure easy access to allow American exploitation of targeted nation's wealth and materials. The war unleashed against Venezuela has absolutely nothing to do with human rights and everything to do with American corporate interests. They despise what the Bolivarian governments have being doing to redistribute wealth and power in Venezuela and they are terrified it will spread to other nations and hamper their ability to exploit and usurp the regions mineral wealth and oil.

How much of a fool do you have to be to believe that a country which supports, trades with and militarily arms regimes like Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt, Israel, Honduras, Israel and the UAE actually gives a toss about human rights? Come on waken up and smell the oil. That's what the Venezuela intervention and attempted coup is all about.

More...

https://sputniknews.com/columnists/201902261072744543-venezuela-overthrow-attempt-usa/

19 replies, 591 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Reply Venezuela Refuses to Become the 68th Sovereign Government Overthrown By America (Original post)
RCW2014 Feb 2019 OP
imwithfred Feb 2019 #1
TM999 Feb 2019 #2
imwithfred Feb 2019 #7
Post removed Feb 2019 #10
imwithfred Feb 2019 #12
RCW2014 Feb 2019 #15
imwithfred Feb 2019 #16
Banshee 3 Actual Feb 2019 #6
imwithfred Feb 2019 #8
oldenuff35 Feb 2019 #3
Da Mannn Feb 2019 #4
Aquila Feb 2019 #9
TM999 Feb 2019 #11
imwithfred Feb 2019 #13
MumblyPeg Feb 2019 #18
Da Mannn Feb 2019 #5
spike61 Feb 2019 #14
cologeek Feb 2019 #17
MumblyPeg Feb 2019 #19

Response to RCW2014 (Original post)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:18 PM

1. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but based upon the posts you make,

I get the impression you really like to see people suffer and starve and die, don't you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to imwithfred (Reply #1)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:19 PM

2. He s a Russian bot who posts nothing but

pro-Russian, pro-Marxist propaganda.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TM999 (Reply #2)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:36 PM

7. So.....this guy isn't real?

Curious, I just went and looked up something.

Bot: A bot is a fake social media account under the control of an organization or government seeking to influence the online community. For instance, a Twitter bot set to retweet certain hashtags and phrases in such volumes that it amplifies the specific topic. Another example is Reddit bots downvoting views disagreeing with the bot controller opinion (while upvoting those that do agree). Bots require volume for success on certain platforms, while at other times only a few can begin to shape the direction of a conversation. And anyone can create a social media bot using Python.

Shill: A shill is different. Shills are real people actively engaging in the shaping of online (in this instance) discussion and opinion—while receiving payment in exchange for their presence. Shills promote companies, governments, public figures, and much more, for personal profit, essentially engaging in propaganda.
Depending on the organization or government, shills can work in conjunction with large bot networks to create intense vocal online movements. And while the combined efforts of shills and bots shape online opinion, these efforts are increasingly affecting more than just social media users.

https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/spot-russian-bot-social-media/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to imwithfred (Reply #7)


Response to Post removed (Reply #10)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:43 PM

12. Odd; I was told that RCW was the "purveyor" primitive on Skins's island.

But if this "member"'s fake, then no way should one get into trouble for whatever he says about him.

He's fake; he can't be harrassed, humiliated, or his "feelings" hurt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to imwithfred (Reply #12)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:55 PM

15. Don't forget I was RCW2001 at "Rimjobs" FR site. Can't leave that out!!!



BrianS over at Sally's(RIP and sorry I called you a cunt) LibertyPost.

Yeah, I've made my rounds, indeed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RCW2014 (Reply #15)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:56 PM

16. I don't think you're real, so I have no response.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to imwithfred (Reply #1)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:31 PM

6. Paid russian lackeys are like that

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Reply #6)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:40 PM

8. Based upon the definitions of "bot" and "shill," I'd just assumed

this guy was a living-and-breathing human shill, not a computer-generated bot.

If he's just a creation of a computer, I guess he has no feelings that can be hurt, so one is free to call him anything one wishes to call him, no matter how denigratory.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RCW2014 (Original post)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:22 PM

3. The art of this deal is the head dictator has no choice in the matter. He is going down

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RCW2014 (Original post)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:22 PM

4. Another America hating Lefty supports a dictator.

great job RC

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #4)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:41 PM

9. I'm guessing you fell for this too



How many more times can the masses be suckered by the same lies?

Apparently many more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #9)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:42 PM

11. You do a wonderful job of proving your own assertion.

So how many more times are you going to be suckered by the Marxist propaganda from various dictatorships from around the world?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #9)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:46 PM

13. Excuse what might seem unduly inquisitive, madam, but

are you a real person?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #9)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 11:21 PM

18. reverse propaganda analogy and you know it.



If someone claimed a rainstorm went over, would you tend to believe them? why wouldn't we? happens all the time. if you were being lied to about it, you most certainly would not be a "sucker".

you don't think those 3rd century ingrates over there are capable of committing savagery like this on a regular basis?
Because they do.
Headline: "Dirty muslim jihadi blows up himself and 50 other people in a nightclub" is believable, and anyone who believed the story is most certainly not a "sucker".
Headline: "Dirty muslim jihadi beheads journalist" is believable, and anyone who believed the story is most certainly not a "sucker".
Headline: "Dirty muslim jihadi flies airplane into skyscraper and kills 2000" is believable, and anyone who believed the story is most certainly not a "sucker".
Headline: "Dirty muslim jihadi murders wife for shaming him for getting raped" is believable, and anyone who believed the story is most certainly not a "sucker".
Headline: "islam is a religion of peace", however, is not believable. If you believe that, you deserve scorn for being so disconnected an gullible, and one would also be a "sucker" for believing it.

I have a quite different definition of a person who is a "sucker".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RCW2014 (Original post)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:26 PM

5. RC told me we can't give food to starving people because we might be smuggling guns

amid the food. This his rational for watching people die.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RCW2014 (Original post)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 10:54 PM

14. why is this guy not tossed from here yet?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #14)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 11:17 PM

17. Because it's so entertaining to watch him spin his wheels with his obvious agitprop.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to spike61 (Reply #14)

Tue Feb 26, 2019, 11:22 PM

19. didn't know he was till here. put him on ignore like a year ago

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticsrcwrtneoconsisraelapartheid