Politicsenough

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 04:58 PM

The Coalition to get Ilhan Omar off the Foreign Relations Committee



Schumer will throw New York under the Bus

A group called The Coalition to Get Ilhan Omar off the Foreign Affairs Committee is holding a rally on May 19 titled “Operation: Schumer’s Doorstep.”

The group states: “The Coalition seeks to mobilize Americans of all political, ethnic and religious backgrounds who are concerned about Rep. Ilhan Omar’s continuing presence on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. The Coalition’s first goal is to enlist (through all reasonable means of persuasion granted by the Constitution) Senator Schumer in the cause. The event will be part peaceful protest, prayer vigil, and press conference.”

The rally will be held outside Schumer’s building by Prospect Park in Brooklyn.

The group counsels, “We’d like people of faith to lead a prayer calling for Schumer to gain the courage of his convictions so that from this moment on, the senator will fight with every fiber of his being to drive Omar off the committee. We pray for him to become the Shomer he has always said he is.”

Schumer has boasted in the past that he is a “Shomer,” which is the Hebrew word for guardian. In 2010, he told a Jewish radio show, “My name, as you know, comes from a Hebrew word. It comes from the word shomer, which means guardian. My ancestors were guardians of the ghetto wall in Chortkov and I believe Hashem (God), actually, gave me name as one of my roles that is very important in the United States Senate to be a shomer for Israel and I will continue to be that with every bone in my body.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/45935/group-planning-ny-rally-urging-schumer-get-ilhan-hank-berrien

I think Omar, Tlaib and AOC are dragging the Dems under. Good

153 replies, 1192 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 153 replies Author Time Post
Reply The Coalition to get Ilhan Omar off the Foreign Relations Committee (Original post)
Gunslinger201 Saturday OP
Trevor Saturday #1
Gunslinger201 Saturday #2
Trevor Saturday #3
Gunslinger201 Saturday #4
Fred Sanford Saturday #5
D26-15 Saturday #6
Trevor Saturday #15
Gunslinger201 Saturday #16
Trevor Saturday #18
Jardinier Sunday #126
Trevor Sunday #127
Jardinier Monday #129
Trevor Monday #131
Jardinier Monday #142
Jardinier Monday #130
Trevor Monday #132
Jardinier Monday #145
Grumpy Pickle Saturday #43
Carlos W Bush Saturday #9
Muddling Through Sunday #62
Red_Nation Sunday #112
rh24 Sunday #113
Zuckerberg Hater Saturday #10
Nostrings Saturday #7
Trevor Saturday #17
Nostrings Saturday #20
Trevor Saturday #23
Nostrings Saturday #26
Trevor Saturday #27
Nostrings Saturday #30
Trevor Saturday #31
Nostrings Saturday #34
Trevor Saturday #35
Nostrings Saturday #41
Trevor Sunday #49
Nostrings Sunday #52
Grumpy Pickle Sunday #44
Trevor Sunday #45
Grumpy Pickle Sunday #47
Trevor Sunday #50
Grumpy Pickle Sunday #51
Gunslinger201 Sunday #55
Trevor Sunday #60
Grumpy Pickle Sunday #103
Trevor Sunday #104
Grumpy Pickle Sunday #105
Trevor Sunday #106
Gunslinger201 Sunday #111
Nostrings Sunday #123
Grumpy Pickle Sunday #102
Trevor Sunday #58
Nostrings Sunday #53
Trevor Sunday #59
Nostrings Sunday #70
Trevor Sunday #72
Nostrings Sunday #73
Trevor Sunday #75
Nostrings Sunday #79
Trevor Sunday #80
Nostrings Sunday #90
Trevor Sunday #91
Nostrings Sunday #95
Trevor Sunday #97
Nostrings Sunday #110
Trevor Sunday #114
Nostrings Sunday #119
Trevor Sunday #120
Nostrings Sunday #121
Trevor Sunday #122
Nostrings Sunday #124
Trevor Sunday #125
Nostrings Sunday #128
Trevor Monday #133
Nostrings Monday #134
Trevor Monday #136
Nostrings Monday #137
Trevor Monday #138
Nostrings Monday #139
Trevor Monday #140
Nostrings Monday #141
Trevor Monday #143
Nostrings Monday #144
Trevor Monday #146
Nostrings Monday #147
Trevor Monday #148
Nostrings Tuesday #149
Trevor Tuesday #150
Nostrings Tuesday #151
Trevor Wednesday #152
Nostrings Wednesday #153
Muddling Through Saturday #8
Charlie Mike Saturday #11
Trevor Saturday #19
Charlie Mike Saturday #21
Trevor Saturday #24
Charlie Mike Saturday #28
Trevor Saturday #32
Charlie Mike Saturday #36
Trevor Saturday #39
Charlie Mike Saturday #40
Trevor Sunday #46
Charlie Mike Sunday #54
Trevor Sunday #57
Charlie Mike Sunday #65
Trevor Sunday #66
Charlie Mike Sunday #68
Trevor Sunday #76
Charlie Mike Sunday #78
Trevor Sunday #81
Charlie Mike Sunday #82
Trevor Sunday #84
Charlie Mike Sunday #85
Trevor Sunday #89
Charlie Mike Sunday #92
Trevor Sunday #94
Charlie Mike Sunday #96
Trevor Sunday #98
Charlie Mike Sunday #99
Charlie Mike Sunday #100
Trevor Sunday #101
Charlie Mike Sunday #107
Trevor Sunday #108
Charlie Mike Sunday #109
Trevor Sunday #115
Charlie Mike Sunday #116
Trevor Sunday #117
Carl Sunday #56
Trevor Sunday #61
Carl Sunday #118
JaimeBondoJr Saturday #12
Muddling Through Saturday #13
Trevor Saturday #25
Charlie Mike Saturday #29
Trevor Saturday #33
Charlie Mike Saturday #37
Trevor Saturday #38
Charlie Mike Saturday #42
Trevor Sunday #63
Charlie Mike Sunday #64
Trevor Sunday #67
Charlie Mike Sunday #69
Trevor Sunday #74
Charlie Mike Sunday #77
Trevor Sunday #83
Charlie Mike Sunday #86
KittyCatIdiots Sunday #87
Trevor Sunday #88
Charlie Mike Sunday #93
TendiesForBreakfast Sunday #71
rahtruelies Saturday #14
Carl Saturday #22
DillyDilly500 Sunday #48
RCW2014 Monday #135

Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 05:11 PM

1. Bigots running wild under Trump

We now have a lying hatred culture.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 05:14 PM

2. Haha, Trump gonna win in a Landslide

Because you can’t recognize the REAL Bigots

I’m gonna enjoy Election night again

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #2)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 05:26 PM

3. Real bigots

A group called The Coalition to Get Ilhan Omar off the Foreign Affairs Committee.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 05:40 PM

4. You wont like the group I want to start either then

I want to call it the

strip Ilhan Omar of her US Citizenship for committing immigration fraud and ship her criminal ass back to Mogadishu coalition and glee club

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #4)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 05:42 PM

5. Gotta love the New Rules!*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #4)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 05:49 PM

6. (((BOOM)))

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #4)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 07:23 PM

15. Of course being a RW you spread lies about her.

Look at all the lies RWs have told about her.

https://www.factcheck.org/person/ilhan-omar/

Snopes rated the one you pushed about her marrying her brother as unproven but near the end of the article casts serious doubt on the claim.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ilhan-omar-marry-brother/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #15)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 07:28 PM

16. FOAD, its true, Been Proven

Snopes is a lying fake fact check site

New Evidence Supports Claims That Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother

Newly uncovered evidence strongly supports claims that state Rep. Ilhan Omar may have married her brother.

Since 2016, Alpha News has been following a trail of evidence that suggests Omar may have married her brother Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in order to aid Elmi in obtaining U.S. citizenship. The two were married in 2009 and later divorced in 2017. While being legally married to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, Omar has publicly identified Ahmed Hirsi as her cultural husband and father of her children.

Omar has refused to answer questions regarding her marriage history, calling the claims that she married her brother “disgusting lies.” However, new evidence uncovered by David Steinberg of PJ Media further supports the belief that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi was indeed Omar’s brother.

According to official school records from St. Paul Public Schools obtained by Steinberg, an “Ahmed N. Elmi” was enrolled as a senior at Arlington Senior High School in St. Paul, Minnesota from September 2002 to June 2003. Ahmed N. Elmi graduated in June 2003 with a diploma.

Steinberg reports that the enrollment record lists Ahmed N. Elmi’s date of birth as April 4, 1985–the same date of birth listed on Omar’s marriage documents and divorce proceedings for Ahmed Nur Said Elmi.

“After an extensive background search, I have not been able to find any other person named ‘Ahmed Nur Said Elmi,’ ‘Ahmed N. Elmi,’ or even ‘Ahmed Elmi’ with the birthdate April 4, 1985. The man Ilhan Omar married and the 17- to 18-year-old who attended Arlington Senior High School in St. Paul, MN, in 2002-2003 are one and the same,” Steinberg writes.

Federal and state law prevents St. Paul Public Schools from releasing further details about Ahmed N. Elmi, including parents/legal guardians or address. However, Steinberg contacted several members of the Class of 2003 who identified Elmi’s father as Nur Said Elmi Mohamed–the same man Omar identifies as her father.

Steinberg says the information implicates Omar in “multiple state and federal felonies.”

Omar did not respond to Steinberg’s request for comment, however, she recently tweeted that the “Republican/right-wing organized propaganda machines are strong and a big threat to our democracy.” The tweet echos Omar’s comments in a recent interview with the Associated Press where refused to answer any further questions on her marriage history, saying she chooses “not to further the narrative of those who oppose us.”

https://alphanewsmn.com/new-evidence-supports-claims-that-ilhan-omar-married-her-brother/

Dude, EVERYTHING you think you know is a lie...Wake up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #16)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 07:46 PM

18. Snopes is far more reliable than some obscure website

called alphanews.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #15)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:52 PM

126. It would be easy to disprove if the east Africans would just get a DNA test.

Of course she married her brother! Coming from a cheating lying warring culture, it was the only way they could think of to get him into this country and after all who wants to live the in the country they created back home AND surrounded by other Somalians!! At least they didn't breed, like the Pakistani's do when they marry their first cousins, as is their custom. The NHS is being brought to it's knees by looking after the children of these unions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jardinier (Reply #126)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:07 PM

127. Not that that deserves a serious reply

But Omar came here with her entire family. If her husband was her brother, he could have already gotten in as part of the family, so it wouldn't make sense to marry him to get him in.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #127)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 12:46 AM

129. It can take up to 10 yrs to get family members into U.S but getting your fianc in can happen

in mere days.

She came here when she was 12. She was the youngest of 7 children. Her older brother, whom she married, had gone to the U.K and become a citizen there. She had to marry him to get him into the U.S.

The First Lady's family didn't emigrate to the U.S. with her. They came in many years later.

"A K-1 visa – also called a fiancé Visa – allows the engaged partner of a U.S. citizen to enter the United States, as long as the couple gets married no more than 90 days later. The newly married spouse can then apply for permanent residence (a “green card”) based on marriage."




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jardinier (Reply #129)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 07:31 PM

131. Snopes

Also, if Ahmed Elmi were truly Omar’s brother, why would he have needed to take the drastic step of marrying her in order to secure a path to U.S. citizenship? U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policies qualify immigrants as eligible to apply for permanent residency status (and later become naturalized citizens) if they are the “spouse of a U.S. citizen” or the “brother or sister of a U.S. citizen.” Why would Omar commit a federal crime and risk a prison sentence (and possibly her own citizenship status) in order to provide her brother with the opportunity to apply for something he would already have been eligible to seek?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ilhan-omar-marry-brother/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #131)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 10:28 PM

142. I think I answered that before. I am a legal immigrant and it would take me many years to get a

family member into the U.S. If I were single and wanted to bring in a boyfriend I could do it in a matter of weeks and we'd have 90 days to marry in order for him to stay here - and get a green card.

We don't know why he was in a hurry to come here. And as far as Omar telling a lie, in some cultures its expected that you have to lie in order to get things done. We'd only know they were siblings if they had a DNA test done. Maybe she was pressured by male relatives to do it. Mogadishu is not known for great record keeping.

Not all cultures have the same values as we do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #127)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 12:51 AM

130. I suppose you also don't believe Pakistanis do not marry their first cousins.

Look it up. It's their culture to do so and btw they hate us and our western culture.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jardinier (Reply #130)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 07:43 PM

132. She's not Pakistani.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #132)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 10:37 PM

145. lol I know that. I was giving you an example of some of the weird shit that religion does.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #4)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:57 PM

43. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 06:16 PM

9. Fuck Omar.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carlos W Bush (Reply #9)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:49 AM

62. You first.

Then I'll have to see your medical report.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carlos W Bush (Reply #9)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 06:32 PM

112. That was....

...her brothers job

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Red_Nation (Reply #112)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 06:33 PM

113. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 06:17 PM

10. "Real bigots" follow Islam

Seriously, the entire Muslim religion is bigoted. Is it really bigoted to be bigoted towards bigots?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 05:58 PM

7. We had a lying hatred culture since before obama said you can keep your doctor and plan, trevor.

Identity politics, which the modern day left - thats your side by the way - has as the centerpiece of its existence, is THE single largest cause of hate that exists in America, and if we go back to before that was the case to a time when immigrants assimilated instead of joining identity groups, we can see that this is true.

What are you willing to do about that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #7)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 07:43 PM

17. Obama's claim was true for all but 2%.

Now, explain where the death panels are, or whatever happened to the one about a third of doctors quitting.

From what I've been told immigrants often stayed with others from their countries for years before assimilation occurred.

http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art54993.asp

https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2015/januaryfebruary/feature/what-sets-italian-americans-other-immigrants

Instead of wandering into vague attacks why not respond to the issue before us? Check out my links in post 15 and explain why the RW has told so many lies about this woman in the short time she's been in office.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #17)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 08:00 PM

20. Yet the left leaning media called it the lie of the year. 2 percent of what, trevor?

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2013/dec/12/lie-year-if-you-like-your-health-care-plan-keep-it/

"So this fall, as cancellation letters were going out to approximately 4 million Americans, the public realized Obama’s breezy assurances were wrong."

2 percent of what, trevor?


"From what I've been told immigrants often stayed with others from their countries for years before assimilation occurred."

So you don't actually know any. That explains a lot. I can imagine from whom you've been told these things.

Some of us went to schools that contained the children of many of them, and know how it went first hand.

"Instead of wandering into vague attacks why not respond to the issue before us? Check out my links in post 15 and explain why the RW has told so many lies about this woman in the short time she's been in office."

Hey, YOU are the one that brought up the lying hatred culture, I simply laid it at the feet of the left where it properly belongs, and gave a thorough explanation as to why.

Instead of deflecting, why don't you address what I actually said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #20)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 08:33 PM

23. From your own link

"Analysts estimated the number at about 4 million (and potentially higher), out of a total insured population of about 262 million.

That was less than 2 percent, but there was no shortage of powerful anecdotes about canceled coverage."

You guys think the media is so liberal but this is an example of conservative bias. 2% wrong beats out the ridiculous death panel yarn? You haven't answered about the death panels yet.

I don't know anybody from the great Irish or Italian immigration waves because they happened like 100 years ago. You brought up what you claimed was historical fact. I at least looked at some history. Did you know these people?

All you brought up was vague right wing propaganda about identity politics. The facts are that some groups have been treated unfairly. Our party looks out for them. There is nothing wrong with that.

I often address what you say. You don't return the favor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #23)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 08:56 PM

26. "You guys think the media is so liberal". I think the media leans left.

"Liberal" is a meaningless term anymore. I am a classic liberal in many senses, for example. Yet the media which leans left is nothing of the sort.

"You haven't answered about the death panels yet. "

And I'm not going to. This discussion between you and I is about the words you used in post number 1 :

"We now have a lying hatred culture."

I replied:

" We had a lying hatred culture since before obama said you can keep your doctor and plan, trevor."

Then you went off on a tangent about obamas claim as if it were the subject being discussed instead of being part of the larger point that it was.

Attempted deflection. I've told you before trevor, when you attempt this kind of nonsense, others, particularly the person you're feebly attempting to engage, can SEE it.

Dumbass.


"All you brought up was vague right wing propaganda about identity politics."

I said this:

"Identity politics, which the modern day left - thats your side by the way - has as the centerpiece of its existence, is THE single largest cause of hate that exists in America..."

Which part of that sentence is untrue?


I also said :

"and if we go back to before that was the case to a time when immigrants assimilated instead of joining identity groups, we can see that this is true."

Again which part of the above is untrue?


Propaganda my ass.

You know what division and hatred identity politics causes, you just haven't enough integrity to admit what everyone else knows fullwell.

THIS, is another example of why folks see you as a partisan hack.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #26)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 09:14 PM

27. If your point about Obama saying you can keep your doctor wasn't part of the subject

why did you make it? You are making excuses for only responding to what you think you can refute and ignoring the rest.

Defending disadvantaged groups is not racism. Yes, you were spewing vague invalid propaganda. Those divisions were there first. Like with women. Did you know there were days when they couldn't vote or own property? Did Dems backing women cause that? We aren't causing hatred. We are fighting it. If you want to see hatred look at all the lies told about a Muslim congressperson.

Trump lies six times a day according to people who keep track. This is a lying hatred culture. And you are a model hater.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #27)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 09:50 PM

30. That was a reference to "before a specific memorable event"...

"If your point about Obama saying you can keep your doctor wasn't part of the subject why did you make it?"

But it wasn't "my point about Obama saying you can keep your doctor", at all. If you think THAT was the point, then you need more practice reading. I could have as easily have said "since before 2013" and made the exact same point.

So quit the sophomoric attempts at deflection already.


"You are making excuses for only responding to what you think you can refute and ignoring the rest."

No trevor. I'm refusing to allow you to make my point about something which it clearly wasn't, and refusing to follow you down a rabbit hole that you and only you created.


"Defending disadvantaged groups is not racism."

Identity politics isn't necessary to defend the disadvantaged or defend against racism.

BZZT.


"Yes, you were spewing vague invalid propaganda."

No, I really wasn't. You have yet to say specifically which parts of what I said are untrue, and thats because you can't. I know it, you know it, everyone reading KNOWS it. This is why you continue to try to deflect, and this is why you refuse specificity.



"Those divisions were there first."

Identity politics thrives on those divisions and depends on them to exist.



"Like with women. Did you know there were days when they couldn't vote or own property?"

Yeah, how many decades ago? We aren't living in those times, we're living in MODERN times.



"We aren't causing hatred."

Yes, you are. You who support or practice or vote for those who support or practice identity politics are formenting hate and division.


"We are fighting it."

No. You aren't fighting it. You and your modern day leftist cohorts have abandoned the teachings of doctor king, and have in fact as a party and a movement embraced actual racism.


"If you want to see hatred look at all the lies told about a Muslim congressperson."




Your moral compass is so out of whack I bet you have trouble finding the refrigerator.

"Trump lies six times a day according to people who keep track. "

According to trump haters who do not understand the way he speaks, you mean.


" This is a lying hatred culture. "

This culture is a result of 8+ years of obama and far leftist democrats, dumbass, not 2 years and change of Trump.

Pull your head out of your ass for cripes sake.


" And you are a model hater."

I live here. This is MY country too, jack. I'm ALLOWED to hate the mess you thoughtless leftists have made of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #30)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 10:07 PM

31. If you could have said before 2013

and your RW propaganda about Obama wasn't relevant why didn't you just say before 2013? Your point about time is just as wrong, since the lying hatred culture came with Trump, not before.

How you defend a group against discrimination without saying who the group is? Your post makes no sense.

Women still aren't equal. We made lots of progress over the last decades. None of it because of conservatives.

Democrats don't embrace racism. That's a lie.

Nothing wrong with my compass. I posted links about all the lies. They are being repeated right here in the Discussionist.

The way Trump speaks? Is that what you call compulsive lying?

Under liberalism we've come from the Great Depression through the Second World War on to become the wealthiest and most powerful nation the world has ever known. It deplorable how some have no appreciation of that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #31)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 10:33 PM

34. It isn't right wing propaganda, it was the lie of the year in 2013 in left leaning media.

" Your point about time is just as wrong, since the lying hatred culture came with Trump, not before. "

No, it isn't wrong. That culture was here, pre-Trump, its just that they were all smiles when obama was president, and they liked and agreed with the lies he told them.

Now they call themselves 'the resistance'. Thats your culture of hate.



"How you defend a group against discrimination without saying who the group is? Your post makes no sense."

By correctly identifying specific instances as they happen and fighting against them. One needn't identify a group, race, creed, or color, to identify whether someone is being treated according to the content of their character or not. It made sense to doctor king and it makes sense to me. You indicate that it doesn't make sense to you...that IS interesting.

"Women still aren't equal."

Bullshit. Complete and utter bullshit.

"Democrats don't embrace racism. That's a lie."

Liar.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dnc-white-men-shouldnt-apply-for-tech-jobs
DNC: White men shouldn't apply for tech jobs

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2017/10/30/dnc-email-straight-white-men-need-not-apply-n2402482
DNC Email: Straight White Men Need Not Apply


By the textbook definition of disregarding the content of their character and judging ONLY by the skin color, that IS racist trevor.

You support that shit.

"Nothing wrong with my compass. I posted links about all the lies. They are being repeated right here in the Discussionist."

You're lying right now. The angle that she married her brother hasn't been disproven so you can't call it a lie.

Until you stop telling lies yourself, nothing you say means fuckall.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #34)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:11 PM

35. It was a bum article by fact check

RW propaganda is storing it up forever.

Obama wasn't known for his dishonesty. Obama said inclusive things and was in no way about hate.

Do you think you could discuss the history of Martin Luther King without mentioning blacks?

From your perspective it looks equal for women. You must be ignoring all the me too incidents. How many out of all of them were males the victims?

Your links prove nothing. One is about a woman who is only a candidate for a party leadership post in a state with few Democrats talking about trying to understand the black experience from the black perspective by listening to blacks. You think that is racism? That weird guy who came on after that thought so, but I had to switch him off when he started on the Soros conspiracy kook stuff.

Your other two links are for the same incident, which showed nothing more than the DNC looking for diversity. It wasn't even official policy and didn't come from leadership. The DNC has lots of white people working there.

Snopes called the marrying the brother claim unproven but at the bottom of the article they pretty much debunked it. I posted the link elsewhere in this thread. And that was just one of many lies about her that have been told. They include totally made up quotes.

For somebody who only posts stuff that means fuckall I sure get a lot of your time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #35)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:53 PM

41. Says far left hack trevor.

"Obama wasn't known for his dishonesty."

Not among leftists he wasn't. The rest of us however are not so ignorant.


"Obama said inclusive things and was in no way about hate

Not with his public face.


"Do you think you could discuss the history of Martin Luther King without mentioning blacks?"

Do you think you can discuss racism without touching on the textbook definition?


"From your perspective it looks equal for women. You must be ignoring all the me too incidents. How many out of all of them were males the victims? "

When we talk equality, we are talking in the eyes of the law, because thats as much power as government has, or should have. The rest of what you post is gobblygook.


"Your links prove nothing."

They show textbook racism and how very acceptable it is by the party you defend.

Thats a lot more than nothing.

"One is about a woman who is only a candidate for a party leadership post in a state with few Democrats talking about trying to understand the black experience from the black perspective by listening to blacks."

If that means shutting up others based on the color of their skin then yes, it IS racism.

Own it trevor.


"Your other two links are for the same incident, which showed nothing more than the DNC looking for diversity."

Disclusion based on skin color for any reason is textbook racism. You can't just describe it away trevor.



"Snopes called the marrying the brother claim unproven but at the bottom of the article they pretty much debunked it."

No. They did not debunk it or it would say 'disproven' instead of 'unproven'.

You're extrapolating from your own defieiencies again, thinking others don't know words and definitions better than you do.


"For somebody who only posts stuff that means fuckall I sure get a lot of your time."

Thats going to happen in life when you're wrong as much as you are trevor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #41)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:01 AM

49. You may have caught Obama saying some things that weren't true

But it was nothing like the six a day your guy gives.

Obama said lots of inclusive things. You can't honestly deny that. He ran on being a compromiser.

Once again you skip questions that prove you wrong.

My post makes complete sense. Defending woman has cultural aspects too. Its not just government.

Your links show no racism at all. You badly want to pretend its there to answer the blatantly bigoted material used on a Muslim today.

She was telling white people to listen. Listen to what she says again. Achieving diversity is the opposite of racism.

Snopes was being cautious. Here's just a little bit of what they found:

"During an interview, Omar showed a reporter cellphone photos of documents from her family’s U.S. entry in 1995 after fleeing Somalia’s civil war. She declined to provide copies of the papers, which included refugee resettlement approval forms and identification cards, but they appeared to list her father, siblings and Omar by order of birth, with Omar as the youngest of seven children. No one named Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, who is three years younger than Omar, could be seen listed in the documents."

You are the one who keeps turning out to be wrong and deficient. You never admit it though. You close your mind, which is why you never learn anything, which is why you are wrong all the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #49)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:28 AM

52. For the third time, this is about those words you wrote, not obama.

"Defending woman has cultural aspects too. Its not just government. "

If you intend to use the power of government to that end, we're talking government trevor.


"Your links show no racism at all."

Of course they do, they show the text book definition of racism, judgement by color of skin and not content of character (pick up a dictionary sometime trevor). They are evidence of the left abandoning the teachings of doctor king.


"You badly want to pretend its there to answer the blatantly bigoted material used on a Muslim today. "

You so badly want to defend the muslim anti-semite that you'll say anything.


"Snopes was being cautious. "

Bullshit. They can't disprove it, and thats that.



"You are the one who keeps turning out to be wrong and deficient."

It looks that way to you because almost everything you think you know is wrong.


"You close your mind, which is why you never learn anything, which is why you are wrong all the time."

Incorrect. I am open minded and I can read between the lines, unlike you, who will defend dems and leftists and anti-semites, the worst any of them have to offer up, to your last breath.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #35)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 12:07 AM

44. Obama strategically insulted white people in Pa. when he sneeringly referred to them as

" Bitter clingers to their guns and Bibles "

Guns and Bibles FOUNDED this country !

Not sneaky little closet muslims like Obama.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #44)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 12:35 AM

45. Obama is not a Muslim.

Obama was defending them when he said that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #45)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 12:44 AM

47. Obama had a muslim father and a muslim step-father.

His mother appears to have turned her back on her white Christian heritage.

Obama also lived in Indonesia for a large part of his childhood and attended muslim Madrasas

He's a secular muslim.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #47)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:04 AM

50. What do you mean by his mother turned her back on her white Christian heritage?

Is that what you call her having black lovers? Obama's school in Indonesia wasn't a Muslim school or even if was that wouldn't make him a Muslim. He attended a Christian church for many years.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #50)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:20 AM

51. She didn't have black lovers....she married TWO black MUSLIMS.

You really think young Barack wasn't influenced by those two men ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #51)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:47 AM

55. and a Commie named Frank Marshall Davis

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #55)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:44 AM

60. Frank Marshall Davis' son says his dad wasn't a communist.

Even if he was he didn't influence Obama into it because Obama was not, is not a communist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #60)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:16 PM

103. I disagree......he hung out with the Saul Alinsky crowd in Chicago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #103)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:19 PM

104. No. Obama was not a fan of Alinsky

And Alinsky was before Obama's time. Obama used pretty mainstream tactics and was nothing like Alinsky.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #104)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:35 PM

105. Rules for Radicals ....Obama used many of those techniques.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #105)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:39 PM

106. No. He didn't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #60)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 06:11 PM

111. Well the FBI had him under surveillance for 19 years

They say he was a Communist

The FBI first began tracking Davis in 1944 when they identified him as member of the Communist Party's Dorie Miller Club in Chicago-card number 47544.

As he was elected to the Communist Party convention that year and had to be a member for at least one year prior to that to be elected, he had been a member at least since 1943. The May 1944 convention changed the name of the Communist Party to Communist Political Association.

Earl Browder, the Party leader, would later be accused of "dissolving" the Communist Party by changing its name. In June 1945, another convention was held, Browder was removed from leadership and the Communist Party USA name was restored. In early 1945. Davis was reported by the FBI to be a member of the Carver Second Ward West of the Communist Political Association, and by 1946 a member of the Carver Club of the Communist Part

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #60)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:22 PM

123. Communist or not, he is a collectivist.

Theres no denying that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #55)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:14 PM

102. Yep.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #51)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:38 AM

58. Obama barely knew his father

Obama's father left when Obama was very young and only returned for a brief time around when Obama was twelve. Soetoro was Indonesian. Obama was mostly raised by his grandparents, who weren't Muslim.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #45)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:30 AM

53. He only needed a reporter to remind him, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #53)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:40 AM

59. Deceptively edited

At the end he corrects himself and says Christian.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #59)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 12:32 PM

70. No, not deceptively edited.

And he doesn't correct himself until he is first corrected.

Use your eyes and brain trevor. There are no breaks in that video and it has not been altered.

Smartest president ever huh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #70)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:15 PM

72. Its cut off very quickly

The reporter reminded him because its obvious to any normal person that Obama misspoke and there was nothing more to it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #72)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:20 PM

73. What makes it so obvious that he misspoke...

How do you know he hasn't lied to everyone about what religion he practices?



You don't question anything, unless its the other side.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #73)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:35 PM

75. Because there is no evidence he ever worshiped as a Muslim

And he went to a Christian church for years.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #75)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:54 PM

79. Do you suppose he worshipped as a christian in indonesia?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #79)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 02:27 PM

80. He was a little kid then.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #80)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:31 PM

90. The word 'ever' is absolute.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #90)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:34 PM

91. Ever is still OK

because it was joined by "no evidence." You haven't shown any.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #91)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:54 PM

95. That he was sent to a muslim school by at least one muslim parent...

Indicates that yes, obama practiced the muslim faith, for at least a time in his life.

Thats contrary to "ever".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #95)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 04:08 PM

97. That doesn't mean he worshiped it.

And I don't think he went to a Muslim school. That probably comes from the kook ideology birtherism.

" while Obama attended the Indonesian-language Santo Fransiskus Asisi (St. Francis of Assisi) Catholic School around the corner from their house for 1st, 2nd, and part of 3rd grade."

"Obama attended the Indonesian-language government-run Besuki School, one-and-half miles east in the exclusive Menteng administrative village, for part of 3rd grade and for 4th grade."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_life_and_career_of_Barack_Obama

The Indonesian government took over administration of the school in 1962, and has since been run by the Raden Saleh Foundation

http://www.salahfoundation.org/

You lose again. Are you a birther? Oh my!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #97)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 06:00 PM

110. Know many muslim parents that allow their children to practice christianity, do you?

"You lose again."

You wish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #110)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 06:47 PM

114. Yes. Obama's step-father did allow him to pray at the Catholic school.

I looked into is some more though and for a while Obama did go to Friday prayers with his step-father occasionally and probably had a class on Islam at the second school. I don't know how much the child Obama believed in it because he was young and getting conflicting messages. So I still don't know that he ever worshiped. From that little bit of contact its a illogical stretch to decide Obama is a Muslim.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #114)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 09:54 PM

119. I never actually claimed he was a muslim. I simply doubt your use of the word 'ever'.

And I find his need to be corrected by a reporter to be strange.

And I do recall him "taking up the cause" far more for muslims than for christians.

He never told muslims to get off their high horse, in fact.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #119)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:05 PM

120. You posted a video called "Obama admits he's a Muslim."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #120)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:17 PM

121. I did. I didn't name it though. I posted it as evidence he was corrected by a reporter, and he was.

How quick you are to forget.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #121)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:22 PM

122. You posted in response to a post by me

That said Obama is not a Muslim.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #122)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:27 PM

124. I did indeed.

Don't you find it strange that he needed to be corrected?

The so called smartest guy in the room can't remember what religion he practices when put on the spot?

He was either lying and is a muslim OR he is a whole lot dumber than you most leftists would ever admit (he was off teleprompter after all).

Re-read the above sentence and note that I leave open two possibilities.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #124)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:34 PM

125. Everybody misspeaks occasionally.

Especially people like Obama who have to talk for hours a day and under pressure too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #125)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:46 PM

128. Yeah, I'm sure smart people incorrectly state their religion all the time.



Kind of difficult, along the same lines of mis-stating your own biological sex.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #128)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 07:45 PM

133. So you do think he's a Muslim?

You never answered. Are you now or have you ever been a birther?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #133)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 09:24 PM

134. I think its questionable.

Particularly given the religious approval among muslims of lying to infidels.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #134)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 09:32 PM

136. You could be a birther then

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #136)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 09:47 PM

137. Are you saying that ones birth place is beyond question if one runs for POTUS?

But tax returns are fine to question?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #137)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 09:49 PM

138. Obama provided his birth certificate right away.

When is Trump going to release his tax returns?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #138)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 09:56 PM

139. Hmmm, I heard accusations that it was fake, seen accusations that his SS number is bad.

Are those things questionable or not?

Also, citizenship is a requirement for being POTUS.

What are tax returns a requirement for?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #139)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 10:03 PM

140. Birthers said it was fake.

Which was another one of their crazy dodges to pretend they hadn't been proven wrong. There was even an announcement of Obama's birth in two newspapers. How did they fake that?

Sure, anything is questionable but it takes a birther to refuse to see reality when its right there.

Tax returns aren't a legal or constitutional requirement but they are part of tradition and a tradition with a good reason behind it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #140)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 10:12 PM

141. "anything is questionable but it takes a birther to refuse to see reality when its right there"

So you examined the birth certificate, possessing the knowledge training and experience necessary to judge its authenticity accurately??

Or you simply took someone elses word for it.

Only in one of those two choices, can one "see reality when its right there". Anything and everything else are taking someone elses word for it. "Taking someone elses word for it" and "see reality when its right there", are mutually exclusive.


"Tax returns aren't a legal or constitutional requirement..."

Congratulations, you get an apples and oranges scratch-and-sniff sticker!


"a good reason behind it".

Subjective.


Guess we'll have to take that sticker back.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #141)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 10:31 PM

143. I know the second birth certificate came right from the records in Hawaii.

I can't be everywhere and know everything first hand. But I can get a pretty good idea of what is going on by weighing what I'm told about the possibility it is wrong. Do you think the State of Hawaii faked a birth certificate too? You still haven't explained the newspaper announcement.

The doubts you raise are so far fetched that only a crazy person could follow them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #143)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 10:35 PM

144. "The doubts you raise are so far fetched that only a crazy person could follow them."

And yet they're MUCH less far fetched than 'muh russia' for which millions have been spent investigating and a special counsel appointed.

Also, you're in no posiition to judge. You find leaker liar james comey credible.

By that standard hawaii could hypothetically have faked a birth cert and you'd buy it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #144)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 10:52 PM

146. Russia wasn't far fetched.

They did move Heaven and Earth for Trump. As soon as he was elected Trump undermined the foreign policy of the US to help Russia. In fact, as soon as they got to Washington Trumpsters were wearing out shoe leather trying to get rid of sanctions on Russia. So there was plenty to be suspicious about.

I don't think you get this. Hawaii didn't fake a birth certificate. That's just common sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #146)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 11:15 PM

147. Yes, it was far fetched.

"They did move Heaven and Earth for Trump."

The election was unaffected, and half or better of their facebook ad buys were after the fact.


"As soon as he was elected Trump undermined the foreign policy of the US to help Russia."

Thats a subjective opinion, not a fact.


"In fact, as soon as they got to Washington Trumpsters were wearing out shoe leather trying to get rid of sanctions on Russia."

Your understanding of the way things are is niave, subjective, and biased to the point of tragic comedy, trevor.


"So there was plenty to be suspicious about. "

All of it subjective, amplified or manufactured.


"I don't think you get this. Hawaii didn't fake a birth certificate. That's just common sense."

I don't think you get this. The Trump campaign didn't collude with the russians, thats just common sense.

See how that works?

In addition, you laid claim to some specific ground, namely :"see reality when its right there", and now you're moving the goalposts from "see reality when its right there" to "its just common sense".


Are you in junior high?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #147)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 11:32 PM

148. They hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign manager

Then Trump lied to cover for them. If you think that isn't suspicious you must be blind.

We don't know how it affected the election because its impossible to precisely measure. The election was close and it wouldn't have taken much to change it.

The foreign policy of the United States was that Russia was to be sanctioned. Trump had his security adviser call up and tell the Russians not to worry about it. Its not very subjective to consider that undermining the foreign policy of the United States.

Trumpsters wore out shoe leather. The Congress of the United States had to take preventive action to keep Trump from dropping sanctions. That's how things worked.

No matter how strong a case there is for something you call it subjective. Head in the sand move.

By the time we reach adulthood we should have a pretty good idea of what normally happens and what is highly unlikely. If we doubt the highly unlikely things, like Hawaii forging a birth certificate and releasing it, we are exercising common sense.

Put the goal posts at common sense or see what is right there. Either one would be a big improvement for you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #148)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 12:08 AM

149. This has not been proven.

"Then Trump lied to cover for them. "

A lie.

"If you think that isn't suspicious you must be blind."

That didn't happen except in the minds of far leftists like you.


"We don't know how it affected the election because its impossible to precisely measure."


Feel free to fire up the emergency broadcast system when you find someone who was going to vote for hillary until they saw facebook.




"The election was close and it wouldn't have taken much to change it. "

Asserted without evidence, dismissed likewise.



"The foreign policy of the United States was that Russia was to be sanctioned."

Incorrect. The foreign policy of the United States UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION was that Russia was to be sanctioned.

He is no longer in office.

POTUS decides foreign policy, not you, not obama, and not dems who lost the election fair and square.


"Trump had his security adviser call up and tell the Russians not to worry about it."

Allegedly. And obama said he'd "have more flexibility after his election". SO WHAT?



"Its not very subjective to consider that undermining the foreign policy of the United States. "


One can not undermine foreign policy of the US when that one is the individual who decides it. I saw that argument made MANY times while obama was in office. Its your turn to eat it now.


"Trumpsters wore out shoe leather. The Congress of the United States had to take preventive action to keep Trump from dropping sanctions. That's how things worked. "

Because the losers (dems and the left) want to control outcomes that are no longer their to control.

Elections have consequences, remember?


"No matter how strong a case there is for something you call it subjective."

Thats because it IS subjective. Failure to recognize that, thats your head in the sand move trevor.


"By the time we reach adulthood we should have a pretty good idea of what normally happens and what is highly unlikely."

Incorrect. So incorrect as to be stupid. Par for the course with you, I suppose.


" If we doubt the highly unlikely things, like Hawaii forging a birth certificate and releasing it, we are exercising common sense. "

Yet THAT is what makes "muh russia" far fetched: Common sense.

Our elections are too decentralized to hack. Obama said so himself.

Weren't you listening?


"Put the goal posts at common sense or see what is right there."

They're obviously the same to you, which is a stunning admission. When trevor says "see whats right there in front of you" it has nothing at all to do with what trevor actually sees with his own eyes, oh no, Its a code phrase for "someone I believe because they agree with me politically said so".
:
Please, continue, this is getting even better than I expected.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #149)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 08:16 PM

150. At the time when the undermining took place

Obama was the president and he set U.S. policy.

You, unlike me, are capable of believing anything if you want to, no matter how stupid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #150)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 09:25 PM

151. He was on his way out the door, his policies ala clinton rejected. You're grasping at straws.

"You, unlike me, are capable of believing anything if you want to, no matter how stupid."

YOU are the one that stated that Trump told flynn to lie based on nothing more than your bias, on DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #151)

Wed Apr 17, 2019, 07:12 PM

152. On that one I went out on a limb.

I usually don't. There were many good reasons for believing what I said was true.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #152)

Wed Apr 17, 2019, 07:20 PM

153. Based on nothing but bias alone.

So much for your 'good reasons'.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 06:09 PM

8. "Bigots".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 06:23 PM

11. So, you're cool with her characterization of 9/11. Got it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #11)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 07:52 PM

19. She should have used better words.

But she didn't exactly say it was insignificant either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #19)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 08:14 PM

21. It's telling how you guys have to keep covering for her.

But if she should have chosen better words ("I'm ready to go back to Somalia, now," would be a good start) then her critics are entitled to criticize her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #21)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 08:42 PM

24. "Us guys"

haven't been covering for her very well. Pelosi didn't exactly defend her. You guys have done an outrageous job of smearing her and twisting what she said, or telling flat out lies about her. You guys would be fair to criticize her for poorly chosen words. Instead, you twisted it into her saying 9/11 was nothing.

She's a citizen now. She has no more reason to go to Somalia than you do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #24)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 09:44 PM

28. How do we smear her with her own words?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #28)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 10:18 PM

32. By twisting them into something she didn't say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #32)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:21 PM

36. Nobody twisted anything except anti American lefty covering for their pet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #36)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:43 PM

39. BS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #39)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:50 PM

40. All the "chickens coming home to roost" shit after 9/11 came from lefty.

Naturally lefty loves what the brother fucker has to say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #40)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 12:38 AM

46. That comes from a sleazy guilt by association smear.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #46)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:44 AM

54. Except you're more concerned about my noticing who said it than you are with who said it.

Deal with them and you won't have to worry about me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #54)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 09:59 AM

57. I don't worry about you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #57)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:20 AM

65. Liar. You just got done declaring your determined efforts to oppose my

criticism of the incestuous terrorist sympathizing antisemite.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #65)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:22 AM

66. I didn't do that because I was worried.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #66)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:25 AM

68. There's no other reason. It's not like she's going to fuck you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #68)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:37 PM

76. There is a very good simple reason

I don't like injustice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #76)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:46 PM

78. Calling out incestuous, terror sympathizers is justice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #78)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 02:28 PM

81. Telling lies because you hate Muslims is an injustice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #81)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 02:46 PM

82. Wow. Such a sad little liar you are.

White non Muslims - such as comprises the majority of the Left - are not given a pass because of their demographics.

Stop defending incest and terrorism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #82)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 02:52 PM

84. I've never defended incest or terrorism.

You are lying by saying I did.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #84)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 02:56 PM

85. I never exempted non Muslims for incest and terrorism, but here you are

lying about me to defend a brother fucker who pleads for convicted terrorists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #85)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:12 PM

89. You are just going in circles now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #89)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:52 PM

92. I'm sticking to the facts. Something you cannot do because the facts are not on your side.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #92)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:54 PM

94. You are just repeating the same stupid things over and over again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #94)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:55 PM

96. The facts are on my side. There's no need for me to move goal posts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #96)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 04:13 PM

98. You can't defend your "facts."

You close your eyes and repeat them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #98)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 04:18 PM

99. The facts speak for themselves:

She married her brother

She claimed Jews have dual loyalties

She sought leniency for convicted terrorists

She diminished 9/11

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #100)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 04:41 PM

101. I saw that.

Other Jewish people said the same thing. I don't agree with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #101)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:49 PM

107. You don't trust them because they are Jews?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #107)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:51 PM

108. Who said I don't trust them?

You did just to annoy me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #108)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:59 PM

109. You specifically pointed out other Jews saying what Emmanuel said and then dismissed them.

Let's try an experiment:

Other black people said the same thing. I don't agree with it.

Other Muslims said the same thing. I don't agree with it.

Other Hispanic people said the same thing. I don't agree with it.



Yeah. It sounds pretty shitty each time. Kinda telling how you seem oblivious to it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #109)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 06:52 PM

115. Don't get weird on me.

I don't have to agree with anybody. If I don't that isn't dismissing them because I respect their opinions. You like to call it shitty but you disagree with people all the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #115)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 07:01 PM

116. The way you stated your case you made a point of them being Jews.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #116)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 07:13 PM

117. They are more respected as judges of what is

anti-semitic..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #24)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 09:09 AM

56. Slavery was something some people did to some people.

True or false?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Carl (Reply #56)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:47 AM

61. True

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #61)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 08:00 PM

118. And if Trump had said that you,the media and the rest of the left would scream RACIST!!!

True or false?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 06:24 PM

12. The left calls EVERYONE they disagree with a bigot.

Everyone.

The reason I don't want to send tax dollars to South America? Must be because I'm a bigot. Couldn't be because I believe tax dollars should go to American Citizens first (without regard to ethnicity), could it? Of course not. Must be because I'm a bigot.

To the left, every non-lefty HAS to be a bigot.

EVERY lefty believes that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaimeBondoJr (Reply #12)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 06:29 PM

13. This!

The Left has turned the words "Bigot", "Racist" and "Nazi" in to meaningless accusations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JaimeBondoJr (Reply #12)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 08:44 PM

25. I agree that racist and bigot are used way to much.

And most of the times they are used it isn't legitimate. But in this case its a slam dunk.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #25)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 09:49 PM

29. She'd be catching the same heat if she were lily white.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #29)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 10:19 PM

33. Would people on this thread

be telling her to go back to Mogadishu if she was white?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #33)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:22 PM

37. Why not? If someone is going to minimize Islamic violence let them go live with Muslims.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #37)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:42 PM

38. If she was white

she wouldn't even be accused of minimizing Islamic violence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #38)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 11:55 PM

42. Yeah she would. Ward Churchill was both WHITE and MALE and we wished he

would die with a cattle prod up his ass. We worked to get the piece of shit fired from his teaching job too.

So, how about you stop lying to protect your incestuous terror apologist pet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #42)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 10:52 AM

63. I'll stop defending her when you quit lying about her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #63)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:16 AM

64. She me the lie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #64)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:24 AM

67. "oppose my criticism of the incestuous terrorist sympathizing antisemite."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #67)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:27 AM

69. She married her brother.

She has begged for leniency for convicted ISIS terrorists.

She reduced Congress to weeks of controversy for spreading antisemitic canards.

These are all facts you can't deny. You will lie and try to distract, but they're all facts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #69)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:33 PM

74. Criticism of Israel or AIPAC is not antisemitism.

Those guys she asked of leniency for wanted to join ISIS but they hadn't yet carried out any terrorist attacks.

She didn't marry her brother.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #74)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 01:44 PM

77. Saying Jews hypnotize the world and have dual loyalty is as standard a racist canard

as claiming all blacks are thieves.

She did marry her brother. Deal with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #77)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 02:50 PM

83. Once again, criticism of Israel is not anti-semitism.

She didn't say Jews hypnotized. She said Israel did. And she apologized for that.

Are you talking about when she said this?

“I should not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve my country in Congress or serve on committee,”

I don't see anything there about Jews having dual loyalty.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #83)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 02:58 PM

86. Spreading lies about Jews as a people is not criticizing Israel, you racist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #86)


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #86)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:11 PM

88. Jews are all over the world.

Criticizing Israel is not slandering Jews. Here's what she said: "Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel." See? ISRAEL.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #88)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 03:53 PM

93. Thanks for proving she's a bigoted cunt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #33)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 12:55 PM

71. If she a white immigrant from Somalia, sure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 07:07 PM

14. npc alert

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #1)

Sat Apr 13, 2019, 08:33 PM

22. The irony of that statement defending a person that spews nothing but hate is hilarious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Original post)

Sun Apr 14, 2019, 12:53 AM

48. israeli firsters pulling out all their stops... Show us your passport schummie!

You know, the reel one.

?itok=TblEDlOC

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DillyDilly500 (Reply #48)

Mon Apr 15, 2019, 09:29 PM

135. snatch*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicsenough