Politicspoliticsiranoilusurynoamchomskytulsi2020warnucleartreaty

Wed May 15, 2019, 03:10 AM

What exactly is the threat of Iran?



Over the first 75 days of the Trump administration, the White House has taken multiple steps to escalate the possibility of a U.S. war with Iran. Trump included Iran on both his first and second Muslim travel bans. Trump also dismantled the Iran nuclear agreement.

News you wont see On TV
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdVTqJAsIXLAX4EDPtIdvoQ

@TulsiGabbard: Trump says he doesn't want war with Iran, but that's exactly what he wants, because that's exactly what Saudi Arabia, Netanyahu, al-Qaeda, Bolton, Haley, and other NeoCons/NeoLibs want. That’s what he put first--not America.




#Tulsi2020
#REVOLUTION
#FUCK THE DEEP STATE

26 replies, 380 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 26 replies Author Time Post
Reply What exactly is the threat of Iran? (Original post)
Aquila May 15 OP
Aquila May 15 #1
Banshee 3 Actual May 15 #24
Tolk May 15 #2
Horsefeathers May 15 #3
Horsefeathers May 15 #4
Gunslinger201 May 15 #5
Aquila May 15 #6
Gunslinger201 May 15 #8
FreeWheelBurning May 15 #12
Badsamm May 15 #18
FreeWheelBurning May 15 #21
Banshee 3 Actual May 15 #26
Currentsitguy May 15 #17
Badsamm May 15 #19
Currentsitguy May 15 #20
_eek May 15 #22
Banshee 3 Actual May 15 #25
Jond414 May 15 #7
Gunslinger201 May 15 #9
Horsefeathers May 15 #10
Da Mannn May 15 #11
New Deal Democrat May 15 #13
quad489 May 15 #16
DDKick May 15 #14
quad489 May 15 #15
Banshee 3 Actual May 15 #23

Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 03:13 AM

1. How Dare Iran Locate Themselves Near Our Military Bases


How Dare Iran Locate Themselves Near Our Military Bases

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #1)

Wed May 15, 2019, 11:15 AM

24. LOL you bullshits long outdated Aquila We USA dont have Saudi Bases for over 18 years now

Talill? closed in 2011 for US forces

H1 Airfield on the Syrian /Jordanian Border is too close to Iran? silly grrl H1/H2/H3 havent been used since before Bush 43 was reelected (2004)

Bashur was the DZ when the 173rd parachuted in back in 2003. Again not used by US forces since 2011 (really 2006)

Even your Memes are weak lies

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 03:53 AM

2. They wouldn't be any threat at all

If they hadn't been funded and empowered by that terrorist that preceded President Trump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tolk (Reply #2)

Wed May 15, 2019, 05:02 AM

3. BOOM!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 05:03 AM

4. What?

Exactly!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 05:39 AM

5. Iran has been at War with us since 1979

We should have toppled the Mullahs back in the 80’s



They are the lynchpin of Islamic Terrorism Worldwide

I support assisting the internal opposition of Iran to take out the Theocracy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #5)

Wed May 15, 2019, 06:42 AM

6. 1979 was because of 1953

Do you not know that?

Or, do you think it doesn't matter



The difference between Iran and the US is that Iran didn't abuse the hostages, like 'Murika





'Murikans just want to help" ROFL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #6)

Wed May 15, 2019, 06:53 AM

8. I take 1979 a little personal, I was there

If we Nuked Tehran tomorrow I would consider the World a little better place

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #6)

Wed May 15, 2019, 08:42 AM

12. Everybody is aware

They just realize that it is not an excuse to hold 52 American citizens hostage for a year and half.

What a great world it would be if every country did that over past slights.

Fucking Iranian apologists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FreeWheelBurning (Reply #12)

Wed May 15, 2019, 10:12 AM

18. Slight?

Writing at the time of the Shah's overthrow, Time magazine on February 19, 1979, described SAVAK as having "long been Iran's most hated and feared institution" which had "tortured and murdered thousands of the Shah's opponents." The Federation of American Scientists also found it guilty of "the torture and execution of thousands of political prisoners" and symbolizing "the Shah's rule from 1963–79." The FAS list of SAVAK torture methods included "electric shock, whipping, beating, inserting broken glass and pouring boiling water into the rectum, tying weights to the testicles, and the extraction of teeth and nails."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Badsamm (Reply #18)

Wed May 15, 2019, 11:01 AM

21. Choose whatever word works for you

The point is that the holding American citizens hostage for over year was not justified.

I fully understand why the Iranians staged a revolution and overthrew the Shah. I also understand why they would not want normal relations with the US at that time. Those actions are both logical outcomes based on the history of the US in Iran.

Like I said, imagine if every country reacted that way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Badsamm (Reply #18)

Wed May 15, 2019, 11:23 AM

26. Oh Russia Boi, SINCE 1979 the IRGC has tortured and killed more Iranians than the Savak

Repression is worse

Women FORCED to wear veils to be subservient

Homosexuals thrown from rooftops or stoned to Death

Rape Victims hanged

Frankly I'm amazed you even tried to defend that

https://www.businessinsider.com/iran-before-the-revolution-in-photos-2015-4#despite-the-backlash-from-religiously-observant-members-of-society-the-shah-managed-to-create-a-seemingly-cosmopolitan-city-life-12

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #6)

Wed May 15, 2019, 10:00 AM

17. Reducto ad absurdum

There is always yet another historic event if you keep going back. It is irrelevant. We have to deal with the situation as it is now, and as of now the mullahs have to go.

The Iranian People deserve better particularly the youth who make up the bulk of the population and are not particularly enamored with their current government.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Currentsitguy (Reply #17)

Wed May 15, 2019, 10:19 AM

19. Maybe we deserve better than the swamp and the MIC and MSM

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Badsamm (Reply #19)

Wed May 15, 2019, 10:28 AM

20. Can't argue with much of that, but I'm not sure how it's relevant.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #6)

Wed May 15, 2019, 11:07 AM

22. The difference between Iran and the US is that Iran didn't abuse the hostages, like 'Murika

Kenneth Kraus.. Are you ignorant, or are you liar?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Kraus

Treatment of the hostages...
"The actual treatment was far different. The hostages described beatings, theft, and fear of bodily harm. Two of them, William Belk and Kathryn Koob, recalled being paraded blindfolded before an angry, chanting crowd outside the embassy. Others reported having their hands bound "day and night" for days or even weeks, long periods of solitary confinement, and months of being forbidden to speak to one another or to stand, walk, or leave their space unless they were going to the bathroom. All of the hostages "were threatened repeatedly with execution, and took it seriously." The hostage-takers played Russian roulette with their victims.

The most terrifying night for the hostages came on February 5, 1980, when guards in black ski masks roused them from their sleep and led them blindfolded to other rooms. They were searched after being ordered to strip naked and keep their hands up. They were then told to kneel down, still wearing blindfolds. "This was the greatest moment," one hostage said. Another later recalled, "It was an embarrassing moment. However, we were too scared to realize it." The guards cocked their weapons and readied them to fire, but finally ejected their rounds and told the prisoners to get dressed. The hostages were later told that the exercise had been "just a joke," something the guards "had wanted to do."

One, Michael Metrinko, was kept in solitary confinement for months. On two occasions, when he expressed his opinion of Ayatollah Khomeini, he was punished severely. The first time, he was kept in handcuffs for two weeks, and the second time, he was beaten and kept alone in a freezing cell for two weeks."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis

Again, ignorance or bald faced liar?



Some more Iranian mercy on display here...


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Reply #6)

Wed May 15, 2019, 11:18 AM

25. 1953 was because of 1941 You didn't know Mossadegh was never democratically elected

He was appointed BY the Shah (Reza Pahlevi) not a single nationwide vote was cast for Mossadegh to be PM

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 06:43 AM

7. We could get so much more

Bang for our tax dollars making things other than tomahawk missiles.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jond414 (Reply #7)

Wed May 15, 2019, 07:03 AM

9. Ok, lets make CBUs, thems Mah Faves





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #9)

Wed May 15, 2019, 08:01 AM

10. You are going to scare the libs*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 08:33 AM

11. Lefty always side with the enemy. Lefty is incapable of enemy identification.

thats why we cannot trust a Lefty to protect the nation

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 08:54 AM

13. Why else would he make John Bolton his National Security Advisor?

If you know anything at all about Bolton, you know he was a key player in PNAC, having served as one of its 4 directors. In order to further their dreams of perpetual world conquest, PNAC planned long ago to invade Iraq, then launch a military invasion of Iran from there. Iraq ended up being a long hard slog, but that was only a temporary setback.

PNAC has since morphed into the Foreign Policy Initiative, and then broke up 2 years ago. But it's clear these neocons are still around. If you don't believe me, just watch PNAC's second phase play out before you. If you thought the invasion of Iraq was a good idea, you're gonna love this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to New Deal Democrat (Reply #13)

Wed May 15, 2019, 09:36 AM

16. Uh, maybe he wanted to drastically differentiate himself from the previous ankle grabber..........

"Why else would he make John Bolton his National Security Advisor?"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 09:32 AM

14. Iran is a threat to everyone.

Iran also knowing that liberals will create tension and noise against anything Trump chose to feel emboldened.

Obama bent over and grabbed both of his ankles for Iran, they know it we know it the world knows it. The left I. This country since Vietnam have weakened our military and its standing in the world.

This post proves the left will attack Trump before attacking our enemy’s every time. Unless of course the enemy is Russia a nuclear power then they want tension over a lie about the election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 09:32 AM

15. ''Israel must be uprooted and wiped off [the pages of] history''...really, you defend that??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Aquila (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2019, 11:07 AM

23. Same Noam Chomsky who supported Pol Pot? wasnt he a Killing fields denier?

and he defended a Holocaust denier as well?


Yep he is

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticsiranoilusurynoamchomskytulsi2020warnucleartreaty