Politicspolitics

Fri Nov 8, 2019, 09:53 AM

Hmmm: House Dems Subpoena Mick Mulvaney After Declining To Subpoena John Bolton?

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/08/hmmm-house-dems-subpoena-mulvaney-declining-subpoena-bolton/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curious indeed. Yesterday, House Democrats poo-poohed the idea of going through the subpoena process to get John Bolton’s testimony, claiming that they didn’t want to play Donald Trump’s delaying game. Overnight, however, NBC News reports that they now have subpoenaed Mick Mulvaney, even though it’s clear he won’t show without a court order either:

The House Intelligence Committee has subpoenaed acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney to testify Friday as part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, an official working on the probe told NBC News.

Mulvaney, one of the highest-ranking officials subpoenaed in the inquiry to date, is expected to be a no-show, falling in line with several other officials who were ordered by the president not to cooperate with the investigation.

~~snip

But why bother with a subpoena now? House Democrats made it clear yesterday that they won’t take the time to defend subpoenas in court, claiming that Trump was using executive privilege claims as “obstruction.” That argument implies that Bolton, who got fired by Trump in an acrimonious and public feud, is somehow coordinating with Trump on that alleged scheme. If that’s the case and if that’s the reason, though, why bother subpoenaing Mulvaney at this late stage, who’s so #MAGA that he’s doing three jobs or more simultaneously for Trump?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The media was saying Bolton was eager to testify against Trump...but gee...they seem to be wrong, again.

0 replies, 72 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Politicspolitics