Politicspolitics

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:05 PM

AG Barr received and is vetting Rudys info.


?s=21

82 replies, 923 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 82 replies Author Time Post
Reply AG Barr received and is vetting Rudys info. (Original post)
Let it go Feb 10 OP
Charlie Mike Feb 10 #1
oldenuff35 Feb 10 #2
Let it go Feb 10 #3
HerasHeaddress Feb 10 #4
Let it go Feb 10 #7
Ax Crazy Feb 10 #15
Valishin Feb 10 #5
oldenuff35 Feb 10 #6
Let it go Feb 10 #8
Valishin Feb 10 #23
Trevor Feb 10 #9
Charlie Mike Feb 10 #10
Trevor Feb 10 #11
kevlar Feb 10 #12
Carl Feb 10 #14
Charlie Mike Feb 10 #16
Trevor Feb 10 #17
DavesNotHere Feb 10 #18
Trevor Feb 10 #20
Carl Feb 11 #26
Charlie Mike Feb 10 #19
Trevor Feb 10 #21
Charlie Mike Feb 10 #22
Trevor Feb 10 #24
Charlie Mike Feb 10 #25
Trevor Feb 11 #28
Charlie Mike Feb 11 #30
Trevor Feb 11 #32
Charlie Mike Feb 11 #33
Trevor Feb 11 #34
Charlie Mike Feb 11 #36
Trevor Feb 11 #37
Charlie Mike Feb 11 #42
Trevor Feb 13 #45
Charlie Mike Feb 13 #46
Trevor Feb 13 #53
Charlie Mike Feb 13 #55
Trevor Feb 13 #56
Charlie Mike Feb 13 #58
kevlar Feb 12 #44
Nostrings Feb 11 #27
Trevor Feb 11 #29
Carl Feb 11 #31
Charlie Mike Feb 11 #35
Trevor Feb 11 #39
Charlie Mike Feb 11 #41
Trevor Feb 13 #47
Charlie Mike Feb 13 #48
Trevor Feb 13 #52
Charlie Mike Feb 13 #54
Trevor Feb 13 #59
Charlie Mike Feb 13 #60
Trevor Feb 13 #66
Carl Feb 13 #68
Nostrings Feb 11 #38
Trevor Feb 11 #40
Nostrings Feb 11 #43
Trevor Feb 13 #49
Nostrings Feb 13 #57
Trevor Feb 13 #63
Nostrings Feb 13 #67
Trevor Feb 13 #50
Nostrings Feb 13 #61
Trevor Feb 13 #65
Nostrings Feb 13 #70
Trevor Feb 13 #51
Nostrings Feb 13 #62
Trevor Feb 13 #64
Nostrings Feb 13 #69
Trevor Feb 13 #73
Nostrings Feb 13 #74
Trevor Feb 13 #75
Nostrings Feb 13 #76
Trevor Feb 13 #77
Nostrings Feb 13 #78
Trevor Feb 13 #79
Nostrings Feb 13 #80
Trevor Feb 13 #81
Nostrings Feb 13 #82
kevlar Feb 13 #72
Carl Feb 10 #13
DavesNotHere Feb 13 #71

Response to Let it go (Original post)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:11 PM

1. The people of the Steele Dossier to squeal in 3...2...1...

These will be the same people who told us, "If Trump’s Ukraine investigation was legitimate he would give it to official government agencies!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Let it go (Original post)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:13 PM

2. There will be lots of liberals sweating tonight. The dems can kiss the house good bye in 2020.

After this hits the fan the Trump support will be overwhelming.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #2)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:26 PM

3. The Ukraine Papers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Let it go (Original post)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:34 PM

4. OT-

can someone tell me why I'm suddenly unable to see Tweet links here? They're fine on other sites.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HerasHeaddress (Reply #4)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:40 PM

7. Working fine for me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HerasHeaddress (Reply #4)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 07:45 PM

15. I can read them on my phone but not my tablet.

Something is afoot, but I don't know what it might be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Let it go (Original post)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:35 PM

5. Something doesn't sound right here

Information is gathered, then reported to authorities, vetted, then what?

This process is missing a SOP step. Where's the step right after gathering where's it's sent to the media?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #5)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:40 PM

6. When sent to the media first, the dem way, the media gets to attack and minimize first.

It is a tool that the democrats use to try and diminish damaging information and the effect of that information.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Valishin (Reply #5)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 04:41 PM

8. Doesnt matter what the process is...MSM will avoid avoid avoid the underlying info.

They’re going to say it’s fake. Just watch.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Let it go (Reply #8)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 10:06 PM

23. I think you guys missed my point

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Let it go (Original post)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 07:06 PM

9. The frame up job rolls on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #9)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 07:17 PM

10. Hey! Look everyone! Trevor is pulling lies out of his ass again!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #10)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 07:23 PM

11. Nope.

Its a frame up job. Giuliani is still trying to dig up evidence for lies that were debunked a year ago. Now Barr is in on it. Fascism!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #11)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 07:39 PM

12. Nope, you're just running interference for

Last edited Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:22 PM - Edit history (1)

the corrupt left, reinforcing the narratives and talking points, parroting the preferred opinions, often mis-characterizing them as facts.

Plain as day. Obvious as fuck.

Lying lefty hack.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #11)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 07:44 PM

14. Nope,it is exposing leftist coruption.

Deal with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #11)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:24 PM

16. "Fascism!" LOL

Nothing was debunked. You're lying again.

Don't worry, little fella; evidence - real evidence - is subject to discovery. Biden's attorneys will get to see all of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #16)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:28 PM

17. Using law enforcement to go after political opponents is for fascists.

I don't think the point is to get a criminal conviction. The point is a smear job. Trying to cheat the next election.

It all was debunked long ago. You won't see the MSM falling for your lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #17)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 08:37 PM

18. So if they used law enforcement to obtain invalid fisa warrants

That provided 2-hop access to an opponents presidential campaign’s communications, that’s fascist?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DavesNotHere (Reply #18)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 09:25 PM

20. Page wasn't even on the campaign then.

The two hop rule is for metadata.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #20)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 04:36 AM

26. I have shown you to be lying on this over and over.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #17)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 09:20 PM

19. So, Obama, Brennan, McCabe, Comey, Ohr, Strzok, Page, et al are fascists.

Biden is not a contender in the election. He's never placed 3rd or higher in any presidential primary.

Nothing has been debunked except your credibility.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #19)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 09:27 PM

21. Biden was the front runner when this started.

He's still viable.

Its impossible to have any of your trust unless I become a RW too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #21)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 09:39 PM

22. Hoping to gain a nomination he's never gotten close to securing doesn't make him

immune to the consequences of his corruption.



"Its impossible to have any of your trust unless I become a RW too."

Nobody cares what you think, shillboi.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #22)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 10:14 PM

24. You do.

You keep arguing with me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #24)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 10:48 PM

25. I keep refuting your lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #25)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 06:38 PM

28. Shows you care.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #28)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 07:33 PM

30. I care about refuting lie - not you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #30)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 07:52 PM

32. Mostly you just post insults.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #32)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 07:54 PM

33. Your incessant lying and citation-free blather is an insult.

You get what you earn.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #33)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 07:55 PM

34. I get the debris from your anger.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #34)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 07:57 PM

36. You get what you earn. Case in point: weaseling out of your "debunked" lies.

Thanks for giving us that to smear your nose in.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #36)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 08:05 PM

37. I didn't lie so I didn't weasel out.

Your current post, for example, doesn't refute anything. It calls me a weasel and a liar and shows your desire to smear my nose in something. No value at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #37)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 09:10 PM

42. I'm looking forward to the government investigation into Ukraine and the Durham report.

The evidence will be open to examination, not washed through complicit media hacks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #42)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:36 AM

45. Maybe all your dreams will come true.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #45)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:37 AM

46. It looks like they are. Knowing how much it irks you just makes that much more satisfying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #46)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:47 AM

53. Dunham won't be out for months.

Its all still a dream you have.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #53)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:54 AM

55. Steele, Mueller, Schiff.

Go back to sleep, little dreamer!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #55)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:00 PM

56. Leave that poor kitty alone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #56)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:01 PM

58. No

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #17)

Wed Feb 12, 2020, 08:14 AM

44. "I don't think"

is the first truthful thing you have posted.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #11)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 06:18 AM

27. Short of a government investigation, nothing has officially been debunked.

You are simply lying.

Again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #27)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 06:40 PM

29. I didn't say officially.

So you are the one lying. It doesn't have to be official to be debunked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #29)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 07:40 PM

31. What kind of bullshit lie is that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #29)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 07:55 PM

35. The feds got you for bank robbery but your mom says it couldn't possibly be you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #35)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 08:25 PM

39. I'd believe the feds.

However, if the police hadn't reached a conclusion and if the local TV station reviews the bank film from the robbery and it clearly shows the robber isn't me I'd consider your premise debunked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #39)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 09:08 PM

41. That metaphor has nothing to do with the topics at hand.

Just the opposite. We have video of the robber bragging about his exploits.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #41)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:37 AM

47. Lie

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #47)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:39 AM

48. Well, we know traitor lefty has promised videos in the past.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #48)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:45 AM

52. Most promises future evidence are bogus

That goes for any side.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #52)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:51 AM

54. Well, I know we kept hearing

"We don't know all that's in the Steele dossier! We have to keep going!"

"We don't know what Mueller has found! We have to have him testify!"

"We don't know all that Schiff's super secret hearings found! We must impeach!"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #54)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:01 PM

59. We know what Schiff's closed hearings found

He released transcripts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #59)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:03 PM

60. Not of anything criminal.

As witnessed by the fact none of the articles passed by the partisan democrats cited any crimes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Charlie Mike (Reply #60)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:14 PM

66. They were summarized by abuse of power.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #66)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:16 PM

68. A vague bullshit accusation that was meaningless.

If they had crimes they could have spelled it out,they did not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #29)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 08:17 PM

38. Unless it is official, in this case, the word debunked does not apply.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #38)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 08:25 PM

40. You made that up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #40)

Tue Feb 11, 2020, 09:37 PM

43. Its called thinking for ones self. You should try it some time.

Official debunkings can only come from official investigations.

Common sense.

Again, you should try it some time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #43)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:40 AM

49. Whether its official or not its debunked.

Personnel from the State Department debunked it. That ought to be official enough, even though there is no need for the debunking to be official.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #49)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:01 PM

57. Only in your view.

"Personnel from the State Department debunked it. That ought to be official enough, even though there is no need for the debunking to be official."

Again, only in your view.

When the DOJ finishes with it, it WILL be official.

THIS is what you're arguing against.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #57)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:06 PM

63. The DOJ has no business investigating stuff that's already debunked.

This isn't just in my view. I gave you a definition of debunked and it doesn't say a word about "official." The need for it to be official is just your view, which of course is wrong like always.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #63)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:16 PM

67. The DOJ isn't required to share your view on what has or has not been debunked.

"This isn't just in my view."

It isn't the view of the DOJ nor is it the view of the executive branch, which is in charge.

THE DOJ/EXECUTIVE VIEW is what matters here, not the views of its detractors.

THEY are in charge, not their detractors.

This is a theme you're going to see a lot of in the coming days, and you're going to have to live with it.


"I gave you a definition of debunked and it doesn't say a word about "official."

You gave me A definition of debunked. You did not give me the DOJ definition of debunked, and whats more you have to live with the DOJ definition of debunked, and do not get to replace it with your own.





"The need for it to be official is just your view, which of course is wrong like always."

It is GOING to be official trevor, like it or not, and clearly you do not.

Have I mentioned how much that makes me smile?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #43)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:42 AM

50. You aren't thinking

You are coming up with unfounded emotional reactions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #50)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:04 PM

61. I'm arguing in favor of official investigation, and you're arguing against it.

If there is anyone here who is verklempt, it is you, buddy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #61)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:11 PM

65. When it comes to Mueller and Trump or any investigation of Trump

You get all bent out of shape if you think there wasn't adequate grounds for it, which for you means absolute proof before the investigation starts. But for Democrats if its debunked or already investigated investigate away. Such a hypocrite!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #65)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:19 PM

70. I was PROVEN RIGHT, that the grounds were not adecquate.

2 illegal fisa warrants are proof.

"But for Democrats if its debunked or already investigated investigate away. Such a hypocrite!"

We have gropey joe on video, numbskull.

THATS ABSOLUTE PROOF BEFORE ANY OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION STARTS.

Take a seat and contemplate the depths of your own stupidity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Trevor (Reply #51)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:05 PM

62. The context demands officiality.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #62)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:07 PM

64. Nope

Only in your emotional reaction.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #64)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 12:17 PM

69. Yup. It needs to be official and on the record.

If it was good enough through mueller for candidate and President trump, its plenty good for gropey joe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #69)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 02:09 PM

73. So Mueller was good enough?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #73)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 02:34 PM

74. It was for you, you said so yourself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #74)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 02:42 PM

75. We were talking about you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #75)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 02:46 PM

76. No, YOU were talking about me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #76)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 03:05 PM

77. We both were.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #77)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 04:25 PM

78. Nope. YOU were. What I was or wasn't talking about is up to ME to decide.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #78)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 05:13 PM

79. I can read.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #79)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 05:35 PM

80. You asked whether mueller was good enough. You did not ask according to whom.

And the context was 'on the record'.

Read BETTER trevor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Reply #80)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 05:55 PM

81. You are the one who brought up Mueller being good enough.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #81)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 06:01 PM

82. I said if "It" was good enough THROUGH mueller.

IT being OFFICIAL investigation.

Again, read better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #64)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 01:49 PM

72. In other words, you are just a liar

and have never debunked a single thing.

Got it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Trevor (Reply #9)

Mon Feb 10, 2020, 07:43 PM

13. A debunked LW kook C/T.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Let it go (Original post)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 01:38 PM

71. You mean hes not going to just throw it all into a FISA warrant, so he can listen in

On Hunter’s calls and the calls of anyone he may call? I thought that was how this all worked now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics