Politicspolitics

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 04:40 PM

"This is what another quid pro quo by the President of the United States looks like."




8 replies, 253 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply "This is what another quid pro quo by the President of the United States looks like." (Original post)
Nostrings Feb 13 OP
Charlie Mike Feb 13 #1
Solesurvivor Feb 13 #2
Gunslinger201 Feb 13 #3
Carl Feb 13 #4
His Daughter Feb 13 #5
DavesNotHere Feb 13 #6
Magoo Feb 14 #7
Lowrider1984 Feb 14 #8

Response to Nostrings (Original post)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 04:46 PM

1. Now do "Accessory After the Fact"

18 U.S. Code § 3. Accessory after the fact


Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 99–646, § 43, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3601; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, § 3502, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4921; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §§ 330011(h), 330016(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2145, 2148.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Original post)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 04:47 PM

2. Dont bring fredo lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Original post)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 06:18 PM

3. So telling someone to obey the Country's laws is a Quid Pro Quo?

Who knew?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Original post)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 08:28 PM

4. Nads has always been a partisan hack but has truly become insane now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Original post)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 09:33 PM

5. How is this a quid pro quo?

I seriously don't see this. Can someone explain to me what I am missing

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to His Daughter (Reply #5)

Thu Feb 13, 2020, 11:09 PM

6. This is Nadler, demonstrating that he doesn't actually even understand what a quid pro quo is. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to His Daughter (Reply #5)

Fri Feb 14, 2020, 01:38 AM

7. You're not the only one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nostrings (Original post)

Fri Feb 14, 2020, 12:55 PM

8. I tried to think using democrat "logic" once

but I couldn't get my head that far up my ass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspolitics