Politicsdailykoslwterroristobamahillaryberniedemocrats

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 09:52 AM

Daily Kos* source arrested by FBI

“Where do you think would be best, near the firefighters or the crowd?” the informant asked.

Goldberg egged him on.

“Good thinking, akhi (brother). Put the backpack near the crowd,” he allegedly wrote, adding that nails in the bomb should be soaked in rat poison to maximize their lethality.

Goldberg also had another alter ego, Tanya Cohen, whom he attacked using Michael Slay on the Daily Stormer. Cohen was evidently a parody of far-left social justice activists. Slay called her "a Jew b#tch who specializes in writing about how the US needs to ban 'hate speech' and any other speech that goes against the Jewish cultural Marxist agenda." An email in Tanya Cohen's name was linked to Goldberg's IP address, and articles in her name appeared on Thought Catalog, Daily Kos, and Feministing's community site.

SOURCES- http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/11/terrorist-troll-pretended-to-be-isis-white-supremacist-and-jewish-lawyer.html

*http://www.dailykos.com/user/TanyaCohen1

11 replies, 1278 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Original post)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 09:57 AM

2. I honestly believe that the Internet is killing liberalism. It's too hard to hide the

inconsistencies and lack of common sense in any ideology when everything can be instantly fact checked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to goodwords (Reply #2)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 10:07 AM

3. It's also killing alleged 'conservatism' for the same reason.

It's also why left or right you don't trust the media. They have their own agenda.

Now Opinion has been disguised as N.E.W.S.,
& too many RWCons use that misleading opinion as fact.

The original poster alleges to be a soldier. If he is he can 'go to ground' & get his own facts.

Everyone should do it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RATFINK_5.0 (Reply #3)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 10:12 AM

5. Where did I post an untruth RF? unlike another, Daily Kos is a FACT in the article

I even provided a Daily Kos link to the Profile

Sorry if you don't like inconvenient truth

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Reply #5)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 10:22 AM

6. I didn't. I said as a soldier, go to ground & find out for yourself.

So you believe everything the RW Media tells you, B3A ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RATFINK_5.0 (Reply #6)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 10:28 AM

7. Are you seriously claiming this OP article is false? If so refute it with Facts

Not your usual music video rebuttals

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Reply #7)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 10:41 AM

8. Apparently, you're parsing facts.

Source also was used by Breitbart.

Continue on ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RATFINK_5.0 (Reply #8)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 10:55 AM

9. Apparently I am not as the article does not mention Breitbart but does mention Daily Kos

I've re read it twice and find not one Breitbart mention in the article. Daily Kos is mentions and has a link to his Daily Kos profile. can you provide the breitbart mention in the article?

I find it interesting your outraged at this thread, yet the dearth of your posts outraged in the other thread?

I wonder why that is?

Well not really I know why

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RATFINK_5.0 (Reply #3)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 12:05 PM

10. You spelled it wrong when replying to that...

 

piece of hosiery...It's spelled with a "K" to him...!!!
I had decided to let him "run his course" but when he insulted the memory of one of the greatest humans that ever lived, by using his image as an identity symbol, he went over the line...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to goodwords (Reply #2)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 10:09 AM

4. The Left tends to take the path away from macro freedom of expression...

Supreme Court Response to Campaign Finance Laws

In 1976, in one of its seminal campaign finance decisions, the Supreme Court struck down federal limits on campaign expenditures in Buckley v. Valeo because such limits restrain “the quantity and diversity of political speech.” Yet it upheld limits on individual contributions to a candidate, finding that Congress had determined that contributions above a certain amount raised the specter (or appearance) of quid pro quo corruption. The Court pointed out that contribution and expenditure limitations “both implicate fundamental First Amendment interests” and that “iscussion of public issues and debate on the qualifications of candidates are integral to the operation of the system of government established by our Constitution.” Indeed, the First Amendment affords the broadest protection to such political expression to guarantee an “unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people.”

More recently, in 2010, the Supreme Court threw out a federal ban on independent political speech by corporations, unions, and associations in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. In holding that this law was “a ban on speech,” the Court noted that the First Amendment “has its fullest and most urgent application to speech uttered during a campaign for political office…. , political speech must prevail against laws that would suppress it, whether by design or inadvertence.”11] Free speech is “an essential mechanism of democracy” because it is “the means to hold officials accountable to the people.” Therefore, “it is our law and our tradition that more speech, not less, is the governing rule.”

The Left has demonized the Citizens United decision—even rising to the level of President Barack Obama’s condemnation of the decision in his 2010 State of the Union Address—and is driving the current movement to amend the Constitution.

The Supreme Court again drew the ire of many on the Left when it struck down a federal law limiting the total amount a donor can contribute to all candidates and committees (“aggregate limits”) in McCutcheon v. FEC. The maximum individual donation to a federal candidate (currently $2,600 per election) was not at issue in the case; rather, the Court addressed the constitutionality of the aggregate limit on the total amount one person may contribute to all candidates in the two-year federal election cycle (currently set at $48,600). The Court recognized that an individual’s choosing to contribute money to a candidate constitutes an exercise of that individual’s right to participate in the electoral process through both political expression and political association. Restricting the number of candidates and committees that an individual may help through his contributions therefore limits that individual’s First Amendment rights.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Original post)

Sun Sep 13, 2015, 01:25 PM

11. Hah, okay, fair enough . . . nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicsdailykoslwterroristobamahillaryberniedemocrats