Politicspoliticscoloradospringsterrorist

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:00 AM

 

My heart goes out to the victims of Colorado Springs terror attack

May we all rally as a nation to determine what is wrong with the extremists who would take life for their radical beliefs.

88 replies, 3560 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 88 replies Author Time Post
Reply My heart goes out to the victims of Colorado Springs terror attack (Original post)
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 OP
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #1
Da Mannn Nov 2015 #2
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #4
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #9
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #3
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #5
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #6
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #7
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #8
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #10
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #12
Shredded Hedly Nov 2015 #13
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #14
Da Mannn Nov 2015 #16
JacoBukowski Nov 2015 #65
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #68
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #70
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #72
ol geezer Nov 2015 #67
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #87
His Daughter Nov 2015 #11
john262 Nov 2015 #15
Shredded Hedly Nov 2015 #19
john262 Nov 2015 #20
Shredded Hedly Nov 2015 #29
Gamle-ged Nov 2015 #40
john262 Nov 2015 #43
Shredded Hedly Nov 2015 #48
john262 Nov 2015 #54
Shredded Hedly Nov 2015 #58
john262 Nov 2015 #62
Shredded Hedly Nov 2015 #65
john262 Nov 2015 #71
WhiskeyMakesMeHappy Nov 2015 #64
john262 Nov 2015 #69
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #73
john262 Nov 2015 #74
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #75
john262 Nov 2015 #76
Shredded Hedly Nov 2015 #77
john262 Nov 2015 #85
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #46
D.Libby Nov 2015 #52
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #21
john262 Nov 2015 #24
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #26
the more you know Nov 2015 #28
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #32
saundersnorvell Nov 2015 #51
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #56
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #60
D.Libby Nov 2015 #55
Da Mannn Nov 2015 #17
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #22
Da Mannn Nov 2015 #25
Da Mannn Nov 2015 #27
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #30
the more you know Nov 2015 #34
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #35
the more you know Nov 2015 #39
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #41
MoshMasterD Nov 2015 #81
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #82
MoshMasterD Nov 2015 #88
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #38
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #42
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #44
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #45
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #50
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #53
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #59
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #61
pavulon-lives Nov 2015 #63
MoshMasterD Nov 2015 #18
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #23
the more you know Nov 2015 #31
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #33
Post removed Nov 2015 #36
MedusasRage Nov 2015 #47
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #49
meanitt Nov 2015 #57
MoshMasterD Nov 2015 #80
Heyu Nov 2015 #37
Bubba Nov 2015 #83
Dukota01 Nov 2015 #78
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #79
HerasHeaddress Nov 2015 #84
Cardinals1982 Nov 2015 #86

Response to Cardinals1982 (Original post)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:02 AM

1. Lets do that when the body count

tops that of a motorcycle rider with a passenger striking a person in the roadway. causing 3 deaths.

but hey if 3 dead people is now national policy making news that's a big change.

quite a reach, no motive yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:04 AM

2. No ID. No Motive. No timeline of events.

But lets not stop Cards from jumping to conclusions before any facts are in yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:07 AM

4. Interesting your group is so desperate to see this for something other than what it is

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #4)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:15 AM

9. its all politics now with these

once it became normal for your people to start pimping gun control before blood coagulated the response to that is naturally political.

hence, i don't give a fuck why he was there to kill "abortionists" or the ex wife. it has nothing to do with me, national level policy, and other than a feeble D attempt to get votes from fear and push shitty regs is a pointless event.

like the traffic deaths today that your people haven't capitalized on for political use. better work on that, tragic to waste a tragedy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:06 AM

3. It is a pattern of terror during recent months committed bu

 

A distinct demographic. It is sad that you are belittling lost lives because they are proof of what we've been saying for some time now about violent extremists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #3)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:08 AM

5. people die daily

again 3 dead people isn't national policy making news. bad for them sure, should the guy get the needle, sure. are you going to get votes for mee maw clinton or pass some new gun reg off of this one, not so much.

see when you guys made the first one of these political you should have expected the response you now get, meh.

you don't even know motive, he may have decided to go shoot his wife who was fucking the mail man and then the police. either way he is a dick and it changes not jack shit tomorrow am with national level politics.

good look on converting it to votes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #5)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:10 AM

6. Has nothing to do with that. We need to confront terrorists and destroy them

 

Before they strike.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #6)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:11 AM

7. guess you have some S2

care to share? i know fee fees are important these days but i see no established fact on motive.

who are you confronting?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #7)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:14 AM

8. Domestic terrorists

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #8)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:16 AM

10. linky or fee fee based?

doesn't matter either way, 3 dead people isn't much of a "terrorist" attack. more people died heating their houses with charcoal grills last night.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #10)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:18 AM

12. Apparently you see the end is near for your uncensored right wing manifestos

 

Else you wouldn't be feebly conflating accidental deaths with wanton murder for the sake of terrorizing US people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #12)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:22 AM

13. strewth

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #12)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:22 AM

14. do you plan on censoring or paying others

to attempt that with violence? people die daily, are the deaths from this event or alcohol related murder worth their continued acceptance? will you change policy?

you know the answer to all the above.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #14)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:26 AM

16. Yes. This is a question that should be answered.

what would you do Cards?
You say confront the terrorists and stop them. Who and how?
How do you plan to censor anyone? can you do this in a free society?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #12)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:27 AM

65. REE-sults

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is uncivil, off-topic, offensive, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This unwarranted broad brush attack on an entire group of people is uncivil and deserves a hide.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of Discussionist members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Nov 27, 2015, 11:25 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Frivolous alert. Perhaps the alerter still has "relative rage" from his Thanksgiving get-together, and has to work it out somehow.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Vote to HIDE. -ZimmManFan
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It really wasn't that bad and the poster deserved it. Besides, this isn't a direct insult against the poster.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Need to put this loser back in his box. He should really NEVER be allowed to roam the board without proper supervision, or a shock collar. Here is my hide.

Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Another "Frivolous alert" (tm).
The alert is more of an unwarranted broad brush attack on an entire group of people than the post being alerted on and deserves an "Report Abuse".

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JacoBukowski (Reply #65)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:29 AM

68. Not surprising

 

But thank you to the 4 reasonable jurors.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #68)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:39 AM

70. how do you plan on censoring "hate speech"

i didn't alert btw, ironic isn't it. no one likes being censored for their beliefs..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #70)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:43 AM

72. But notice how I walk it off

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #12)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:28 AM

67. Another frivolous alert

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Fri Nov 27, 2015, 11:13 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Apparently you see the end is near for your uncensored right wing manifestos
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1015&pid=640373

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is uncivil, off-topic, offensive, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This unwarranted broad brush attack on an entire group of people is uncivil and deserves a hide.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of Discussionist members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Nov 27, 2015, 11:25 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Frivolous alert. Perhaps the alerter still has "relative rage" from his Thanksgiving get-together, and has to work it out somehow.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Vote to HIDE. -ZimmManFan
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It really wasn't that bad and the poster deserved it. Besides, this isn't a direct insult against the poster.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Need to put this loser back in his box. He should really NEVER be allowed to roam the board without proper supervision, or a shock collar. Here is my hide.

Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Another "Frivolous alert" (tm).
The alert is more of an unwarranted broad brush attack on an entire group of people than the post being alerted on and deserves an "Report Abuse".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ol geezer (Reply #67)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 02:26 PM

87. Yep. Too many of these

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #6)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:17 AM

11. Foreign and Domestic

I think its a little early to call it domestic terrorism. There are some alternative theories out there that need to be shown to be wrong first. However, with what we have now, I would lean that way too..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Original post)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:26 AM

15. My heart goes out to the victims of all terror attacks worldwide, not just the

victims of one attack that might reinforce an anti-white male agenda.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #15)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:32 AM

19. wtf is this all you are worried about?

"one attack that might reinforce an anti-white male agenda."

White guy shoots eleven people, five cops and walks away unscathed and you're worried about anti-white male agenda?

In a sad way

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #19)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:36 AM

20. Edited.

The OP clarified his comments below.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #20)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:47 AM

29. ya know what 99.9% of these terrorizing nutballs of all colors and cultures

REALLY have in common? they are all MEN.

Spare me the crocodile tears for the latest mentally deranged privileged white male who had a sad and decided to terrorize a community.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #29)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:57 AM

40. Please, we would like to hear your solution to this problem as you state it...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #29)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:59 AM

43. What are you talking about? I have not given any words of support whatsoever for the shooter.

All I said was that we don't have all the facts yet.

Regarding your 99.9% figure, do you have a study to back that up? I think that figure is way too high given the attempts by ISIS and others to recruit females for suicide bombers.
The Unaddressed Threat of Female Suicide Bombershttps://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/news/2012/01/05/10992/the-unaddressed-threat-of-female-suicide-bombers/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #43)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:08 AM

48. oh pardon me...only 97% of the nutballs terrorizing the world are men



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #48)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:12 AM

54. Okay, then provide a link backing up your 97% claim.

Or if you can't back up that figure then you should retract it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #54)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:15 AM

58. are you for real?

I call on you to prove it wrong.

Stuff your "retraction".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #58)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:21 AM

62. You made the claim. The burden is on you to prove it since you made it.

Did you read the article I linked to about female terrorist recruits? Are you aware that one of the terrorists killed in that raid on the apartment after the Paris terrorist attack was a women?

Have you ever heard of the Black Widows? If not let me educate you.

The Black Widows, also known as the “Shahidkas”, are Chechen women suicide bombers. They became famous in 2002 when a hostage crisis occurred in the Moscow Theatre. A Russian journalist calls them “Brides of Allah”. Most often, these are wives of the murdered Chechen fighters, but not all of them are widows. They are 15-19-year-old girls who come from various surroundings. Some are educated with a career, others are unemployed and poor. But, their common link is hatred towards the Russians because of war in Chechnya. They are trained in camps by a combination of psychologists, explosive experts, terrorists and religious preachers.
http://arhiva.dalje.com/en-world/women-terrorists/36455

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #62)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:27 AM

65. so what?

A handful of females in the history of the world. Is that what you dredged up to make my point that the overwhelming and vast majority of terrorists of ALL kinds are men? TYVM

Dude I cant help you acknowledge what you're not willing to see.

TTFN

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #65)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:41 AM

71. You didn't say an overwhelming majority, you said 99.9% That is the figure I am disputing.

I just offered a link downthread that indicates that fully 50% of terrorist attacks committed in certain areas are committed by women. I am the one who is backing up my assertions. You are not. You have yet to provide even one link to back up your false 99.9% claim.

You see, I like to call out lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #58)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:25 AM

64. For real? YOU'RE the one making up numbers. PROVE IT, if you can.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WhiskeyMakesMeHappy (Reply #64)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:32 AM

69. I am not making up numbers. This is the made up number i am objecting to.

Ya know what 99.9% of these terrorizing nutballs of all colors and cultures

REALLY have in common? they are all MEN.
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1015&pid=640396

And actually, research indicates that since 2002 women have carried out 50 percent of suicide attacks in Sri Lanka, Turkey, and Chechnya.
Since 1985, terrorism's so-called invisible women have accounted for a quarter of fatal attacks in Iraq, Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, Chechnya, Sri Lanka, Morocco and Palestine. My research found that by mid-2008, women had acted as suicide bombers 21 times in Iraq's markets and other civilian venues patronized by Shiites.

Other research has demonstrated that since 2002 women have carried out fully 50% of suicide attacks in Sri Lanka, Turkey and Chechnya.http://articles.latimes.com/2012/apr/04/opinion/la-oe-cunningham-women-jihadists-20120404

This is according to Karla Cunningham, a political scientist at the Rand Corp. She writes regularly on female terrorism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #69)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 02:14 AM

73. I'd say in 21st century, men are FARFAR ahead of women in that dept.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #73)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 02:20 AM

74. Perhaps but it's not 99.9%. If they had just said that a majority or terrorists are men

I would have had no problem with that, but it's nowhere near 99.9%. That type of comment seems like misandry to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #74)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 02:26 AM

75. Lol. Misandry? More like exaggeration

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #75)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 02:33 AM

76. But what motivation would there be for that sort of obvious exaggeration?

Trust me. There is plenty of misandry going around. Just read the DU HOF group for example.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #76)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 02:40 AM

77. are you still crying about this?

"one attack that might reinforce an anti-white male agenda."

What's your motivation for that obvious exaggeration? White guy shoots up cops, kills three, walks away to jail and you're worried about anti-white male agenda.

Bwahahaha!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #77)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 11:22 AM

85. No, it's your attempt to blame all terrorism on men that I object to.

BTW, you still haven't backed up that lie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #29)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:04 AM

46. there must be a confederate flag in there hiding causing this to happen

privilege , i love that, its what kids get for grades and not hitting on the bus. fastest way to spot a loser is hearing that word come out of their mouths when not relating to screen time for a child.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shredded Hedly (Reply #29)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:10 AM

52. " they are all MEN. "

Nailed it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #15)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:36 AM

21. Agreed. We should fight terrorists no matter who they re

 

I support fighting ISIS, al Qaeda, Oath Keepers, white supremacist militias--any group or individual using violence and terror to advance their radical beliefs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #21)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:40 AM

24. Thank you. And in fairness to you I think you were out on suspension when the Paris attacks

happened and unable to comment on them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #24)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:41 AM

26. That would be true

 

I hope to say plenty on that and other subjects in coming days.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #21)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:47 AM

28. Did you really just lump the Oath Keepers in with ISIS and Al Qaeda?

Did I miss some large attack linked to the Oak Keepers or something? What did they do?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to the more you know (Reply #28)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:49 AM

32. I'm a precog. I'm referring to what they are ABOUT to do

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #32)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:09 AM

51. Then you will add PETA and Occupy to that eh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to saundersnorvell (Reply #51)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:14 AM

56. Nope. They are wackadoodle but they don't aim weapons at federal agents

 

Or show up uninvited and armed to riots or army recruiting offices.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #56)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:17 AM

60. guess you should change the laws

if you don't like legally allowing people to be armed you have a democratic process to address that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to john262 (Reply #15)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:13 AM

55. "reinforce an anti-white male agenda."

They surely are a problem. No doubt about it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Original post)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:29 AM

17. So, in your words, Cards: this was a RW act of terror.

do you have any evidence at all?
You words: the terrorists need to be confronted and stopped. How?
and again, your words. The RW needs to be censored. How can you do that in a free society?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #17)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:38 AM

22. I never said right wing

 

I said violent extremist

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #22)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:40 AM

25. that implies you know his motive. Do you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #22)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:42 AM

27. What did you mean by, "the end is near for your uncensored right wing manifestos"

that struck me as rather odd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #27)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:47 AM

30. I was trying to get to the bottom of another poster's anxiety

 

That this shooting might act as a catalyst for change regarding the threatening and ugly hate speech with virulent strain of violent intent that heretofore has gone unchecked when emanating from conservatives.

That poster is a conservative so I suspected his fear of conservative threats and hate speech being shut down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #30)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:50 AM

34. What about the unchecked, ugly hate speech with virulent strain of violent intent that we get daily

from the left wing, Black Lives Matter crowd? Are you hoping for a catalyst for change for them too?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to the more you know (Reply #34)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:51 AM

35. Are black lives matter leaders saying innocents should be killed for their cause?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #35)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:55 AM

39. Which leaders might those be? DeRay McKesson has been making some pretty evil statements

and ignorant tweets about killing cops and hating white people.

http://twitchy.com/2015/08/26/deray-mckesson/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #35)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:57 AM

41. yes actually

although who fucking cares what they say. if they actually do something other than stir up votes this november let me know.

https://twitter.com/cbsbaltimore/status/639243942568005632

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #35)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 03:10 AM

81. Though not entirely BLM, but 2 words

Christopher Dorner

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoshMasterD (Reply #81)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 03:21 AM

82. Not even close, dude

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #82)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 04:09 PM

88. Elaborate

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #30)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:55 AM

38. so you don't like my words and you want someone to ban them

at the point of a gun or threat of punishment metered out by government? you people are impressive, can you list a sample of the words you would like to ban?

maybe a symbol that should be banned by force of law?

i am not "conservative" i don't appreciate being fucked by either band of dipshits who control power in this country.

I am eagerly awaiting your parties campaign speaking on this event.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #38)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:57 AM

42. So no party affiliation for you. More of a lone wolf?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #42)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:59 AM

44. i'm a baad and scurry man

but I am not sitting on the internet politicking to censor others "hate speech"? like I asked earlier you going to pick up a gun and enforce this or sub contract out this work to someone else?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #44)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:02 AM

45. Extremist groups will just undergo tighter surveillance

 

And will be interdicted before they attack.

We must be vigilant.

May even need to have law enforcement engage in profiling

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #45)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:08 AM

50. Like your BLM fuckup , they already profile

the place people in groups like occupy where they got two idiots willing to bomb a bridge. You can get your jimmies rustled all you want no amount of surveillance is effectively stop your political enemies.

Not being a democrat isn't against the law, but hey I know you people would love to change that. "hate speech" is like "assault weapon" made up bullshit to cover anything you want to make illegal.

good luck with that. come on spell it out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #50)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:12 AM

53. See that's the difference between you and me

 

If they find a plot of OWS or BLM or white supremacists to bomb or kill in the name of their movement, such people should pay the price.

The first step is admitting we have a problem with home grown domestic terrorists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #53)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:16 AM

59. no one said otherwise. people who conspire to ACT

are criminals, you were pimping censorship upthread. silencing people who say stuff you don't like isn't counter terrorism. We have a problem with cholesterol and sleepy doctors. 3 dead people isn't a major traffic event, you aren't going to have a policy platform here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pavulon-lives (Reply #59)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:17 AM

61. We will. Which is why you are afraid.

 

Bare minimum we should take away tax exempt status from religions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #61)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:23 AM

63. who is we? same post sandy hook pissants

who couldn't pass gun control while frolicking in the blood of children, couldn't even line up your own party in one half of the legislative branch, are going after the church. why, because some ultra leftist prog drool? to what end?

speaking of religion this sounds like a fucking chuch, "we will" i appreciate your faith but see no value in it. You guys can't pull bare minimum. but hey blind faith is interesting.

Reality, reality is you people will exploit this for some votes, scare up the base of voters (women) if possible to make it a abortion thing, you know to be sure to vote for your non minority candidate. good luck with all that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Original post)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:30 AM

18. Sounds to me like your hoping.

Not speculating.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoshMasterD (Reply #18)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:38 AM

23. I am drawing my own conclusions

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #23)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:47 AM

31. Are you drawing with a crayon?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to the more you know (Reply #31)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:50 AM

33. Is that supposed to be discussion or brazen insult about my intelligence?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #33)


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #33)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:04 AM

47. I've giving a lot of our posters tonight the benefit of the doubt and am assuming they are drunk.

That beats thinking they are just assholes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MedusasRage (Reply #47)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:08 AM

49. That's possible. This particular one is now on time out

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MedusasRage (Reply #47)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 01:15 AM

57. Forget the benefit of the doubt part.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Reply #23)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 03:06 AM

80. More like the conclusion that you want.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Original post)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:52 AM

37. Horrific attack.

My thoughts and prayers for the victims.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Heyu (Reply #37)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 05:31 AM

83. Yes ... N/T

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Original post)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 03:00 AM

78. And when it turns out to be just a bank robbery gone bad?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dukota01 (Reply #78)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 03:01 AM

79. Really?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cardinals1982 (Original post)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 05:49 AM

84. Not much to determine.

An extremist is an extremist. Radical beliefs are radical beliefs. Fanaticism of any kind is not rational and cannot be excused when the fanatic goes on a rampage. That hasn't stopped attempted justifications for certain acts however.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HerasHeaddress (Reply #84)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 11:24 AM

86. But increased scrutiny and momitoring of certain profile should increase

 

I believe police seeing bearded, xsmo wearing men holding any type of firearm in public should treat them as suspects as they fit the profile of so many mass murderers/terrorists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticscoloradospringsterrorist