Politicspoliticsoregonterrorists

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:50 PM

Let's be honest . ....

If the terrorists in Oregon were muslim, they'd all be dead right now.

These RWers in Oregon are terrorists. .. and should be treated as such. Bring in the snipers and shoot them all the first chance they get.

No mercy for terrorists. ... right RWers?

102 replies, 5582 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 102 replies Author Time Post
Reply Let's be honest . .... (Original post)
daemons Jan 2016 OP
Cyberpunk Jan 2016 #1
daemons Jan 2016 #2
Cyberpunk Jan 2016 #4
daemons Jan 2016 #19
Cyberpunk Jan 2016 #21
GiovanniJones Jan 2016 #33
D.Libby Jan 2016 #35
KayDog Jan 2016 #52
smalllivingeddy Jan 2016 #64
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #3
fools_gold Jan 2016 #6
Gamle-ged Jan 2016 #18
Attila Gorilla Jan 2016 #8
fools_gold Jan 2016 #22
Attila Gorilla Jan 2016 #39
screenstar Jan 2016 #82
Rephleshed Jan 2016 #17
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #53
Rephleshed Jan 2016 #67
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #69
Valishin Jan 2016 #77
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #73
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #79
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #80
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #83
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #84
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #86
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #92
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #85
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #81
kcci Jan 2016 #74
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #94
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #95
Da Mannn Jan 2016 #5
daemons Jan 2016 #20
Da Mannn Jan 2016 #25
daemons Jan 2016 #28
Da Mannn Jan 2016 #30
daemons Jan 2016 #31
Valishin Jan 2016 #78
Strange Luck Jan 2016 #7
Argentina Jan 2016 #10
screenstar Jan 2016 #16
D.Libby Jan 2016 #37
.30M1 Jan 2016 #9
oldenuff35 Jan 2016 #11
Rephleshed Jan 2016 #15
oldenuff35 Jan 2016 #26
Rephleshed Jan 2016 #34
oldenuff35 Jan 2016 #40
Rephleshed Jan 2016 #41
screenstar Jan 2016 #32
Argentina Jan 2016 #12
oldenuff35 Jan 2016 #29
metroins Jan 2016 #46
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #54
metroins Jan 2016 #55
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #56
metroins Jan 2016 #59
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #68
metroins Jan 2016 #70
oldenuff35 Jan 2016 #57
metroins Jan 2016 #58
oldenuff35 Jan 2016 #60
metroins Jan 2016 #62
oldenuff35 Jan 2016 #63
metroins Jan 2016 #65
oldenuff35 Jan 2016 #66
kcci Jan 2016 #75
Frankenvoter Jan 2016 #36
Ajax Jan 2016 #13
Rephleshed Jan 2016 #14
Gamle-ged Jan 2016 #23
Gamle-ged Jan 2016 #24
Sassyspop Jan 2016 #27
Da Mannn Jan 2016 #45
Sassyspop Jan 2016 #49
kcci Jan 2016 #76
Sassyspop Jan 2016 #87
kcci Jan 2016 #88
Sassyspop Jan 2016 #89
kcci Jan 2016 #90
Sassyspop Jan 2016 #91
It Guy Jan 2016 #38
screenstar Jan 2016 #43
Doctor_R Jan 2016 #42
Roger Cavu Jan 2016 #44
Slayer Jan 2016 #47
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #71
swifty Jan 2016 #48
Sassyspop Jan 2016 #51
liberalguy Jan 2016 #50
Whiskey Jim Jan 2016 #61
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #72
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #93
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #96
maxrobes3 Jan 2016 #97
Jenny Fromdablock Jan 2016 #98
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #99
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #100
Conservative Voice Jan 2016 #101
Letmypeoplevote Jan 2016 #102

Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:51 PM

1. It's a set up for just the talking points you're using.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #1)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:52 PM

2. So Bundy is working with the President? Good one.

Buy a roll of tinfoil on the way to your shrink.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:01 PM

4. The agenda is to demonize white conservatives

and make Americans scared of each other instead of noticing other issues like what Isis is doing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:13 PM

19. How did they get the white supremacists to do this for them?

You're delusional. Seek help.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Reply #19)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:16 PM

21. The guy could be an informer. It's pretty easy to set up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Reply #19)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:27 PM

33. The same way they get anyone to do anything...

$$$

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:34 PM

35. "The agenda is to demonize white conservatives"

They do it to themselves. They make my skin crawl

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cyberpunk (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:18 PM

52. I wouldn't say demonize

 

But conservatives have a unique ability to make asses of themselves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to KayDog (Reply #52)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:14 PM

64. It's not unique to "conservatives."

However, it is much more common among them in this day and age--likely because the "liberal media" doesn't usually take then to task for their stupid comments.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:58 PM

3. These so-called terrorists are arguing about cows....yes, cows.

Did they kill anyone ?
Did they blow anything up ?
Did they take hostages ?

This doesn`t fit into the category of terrorism.

Well, maybe the cows are terrified....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:02 PM

6. But, but .... cows are a HUGE political and social issue

aren't they?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fools_gold (Reply #6)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:12 PM

18. METHANE PRODUCERS! BBQ them all!...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:03 PM

8. They're arsonists.

People who start forest fires go to jail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Attila Gorilla (Reply #8)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:16 PM

22. BURN IT DOWN! BURN IT ALL DOWN

Didn't I hear that somewhere recently?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fools_gold (Reply #22)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:43 PM

39. And...

The one who did is now in prison.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fools_gold (Reply #22)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:42 AM

82. We might as well face the truth

that burn it down is inevitable, or we could part ways peacefully with as little violence and bloodshed as possible.
America is too big a country to be competently administered from remote bureaucracies in Washington DC stealing our families blind.
Whatever can't go on won't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:10 PM

17. They've threatened to use force against law enforcement if law enforcement attempts to remove them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rephleshed (Reply #17)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:21 PM

53. Remove them ?

Why do they need to be removed ?

Are they blocking traffic ?
Shutting down stores ?
Blocking highways ?
Tearing up train tracks ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #53)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:00 PM

67. Its a place they have no right to be occupying while armed to the teeth.

It is not their personal property.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rephleshed (Reply #67)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:27 PM

69. They are allowed to be there.

Why wouldn`t they be allowed ?

It`s not a nuclear power plant or an Air Force base.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rephleshed (Reply #67)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:11 AM

77. I thought

it was entirely acceptable for protesters to take up residence at any location they so desired regardless of property rights. That's what the left has been telling us for years.

With that said, these guys are morons and will end up in jail but that isn't the point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #53)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:57 AM

73. For this thread

:large

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #73)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:44 AM

79. Who is trying to overthrow the government ???

This is pure BS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #79)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 05:33 PM

80. Do you tire of being wrong?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #80)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 10:51 AM

83. YOUR interpretation is wrong.

The protesters want the Feds to change some of the laws about land management.

They NEVER said that they want to take OVER the government.

Stop spreading a false meme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #83)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:07 AM

84. No, you are wrong

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #84)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:19 AM

86. Whatever....you are misinformed and deliberately

exaggerating the issue.

Go bother someone else.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #86)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 04:27 PM

92. Twitter Trolls Oregon Militia

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #83)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:08 AM

85. Here are some facts for the conservatives to ignore or not be able to understand

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #79)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:30 AM

81. Do you tire of being wrong?

:large

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 09:49 AM

74. Let's just look at the definition of the word, shall we?

 

ter·ror·ism
ˈterəˌrizəm/
noun
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 12:19 AM

94. Really?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #94)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 12:25 AM

95. I don`t think that they have harmed any of the birds either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:02 PM

5. They're not terrorists silly. Obama policy is to ARM terrorists. These guys had to buy their own.

Besides, these guys have killed no one. terrorists kill people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #5)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:14 PM

20. Threatening to kill someone is terrorism too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Reply #20)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:17 PM

25. Calm down and buy them a Pizza already

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #25)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:18 PM

28. I'm sure your reaction would be the same if muslims had

"Occupied" a govt building and threatened to kill anyone who tried to eradicate them.

Right?

You're supporting terrorists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Reply #28)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:22 PM

30. Wait...You're afraid of refugees?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #30)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:24 PM

31. What are you blabbering about now?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Reply #20)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:15 AM

78. Threatening authority figures

does not fit the current usage of the term, it is much more accurately applied to creating fear among the general populace.

Not that the definition couldn't be used to refer to this situation just that this isn't normally how it is applied.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:03 PM

7. ....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Strange Luck (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:04 PM

10. Great cartoon. I LOL'ed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Strange Luck (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:09 PM

16. That's awesome

laughed my ass off

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Strange Luck (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:36 PM

37. It's not at all funny...just true

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:04 PM

9. BLM homers have burned, looted, and terrorized more than these guys ever will.

You'll ignore that truth of course.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:05 PM

11. Terrorists attack something or attack people

Who have they attacked?

This is much more like occupy so I guess they were terrorists as well.

This is nothing more than an occupy with guns.

Put a fence around them, put a few guards out, and let them stay.... Sooner or later they will run out of food and fuel to run their generator.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #11)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:09 PM

15. They've made threats that if law enforcement attempts to remove them, there will be a fight.

Thats enough to warrant terrorism. I'm pretty sure if you objectively applied the Patriot Act to this crew in Oregon, they are in violation of all kinds of anti-terrorism laws.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rephleshed (Reply #15)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:17 PM

26. Wow then we need to go after Farrakhan like last week

That old "terrorist", (by your standards) has been making threats for years.....

If the feds are met with lethal violence then they are justified in utilizing deadly force.

Threats alone do not make the threshold of violence, not per the law, or accepted social standards.

So BS to your attempt to pour gas on this fire by posting irrational and untrue crap.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #26)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:34 PM

34. Did The Nation of Islam seize control of a government owned area and then make threats?

If so, then they should all be in jail.

Its not threats alone. They took this place over, armed to the teeth and are daring law enforcement to try and do anything about it.

So BS to your failed attempt to refute my point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rephleshed (Reply #34)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:43 PM

40. Your words, "They've made threats"

Farrakhan makes threats of violence and death all the time. Your left wing hero is no better than these guys are.

There is a difference, he calls on others to do his dirty work while these guys have the gonads to do it themselves.

A threat is a threat. If the threat makes them guilty of something the it also applies to the hero of the left, Farrakhan.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #40)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:47 PM

41. First off, I can't stand Farrakhan. So you can consider yourself shut down on that nonsense.

Secondly, yes I said they made threats.... threats that were made while, heavily armed, taking hostage property that doesn't belong to them and daring law enforcement to try and remove them. If the Nation of Islam ever goes to that extent, then I'll be the first to call for them to be put down to the fullest extent of the law.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rephleshed (Reply #15)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:26 PM

32. It's most definitely enough

to willingly draw attention to oneself/group from the authorities, in most cases not a good thing. Especially under these provisions.
I think these guys are looking at some decades-long hard time in lock down and significant fines in the tens and hundreds-of-thousands of dollars range, per criminal charge.
Life as they knew it before this is over for them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:06 PM

12. They can't be terrorists. They're white, Christian, and right-wing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Argentina (Reply #12)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:19 PM

29. Actually they can

But first they have to do something that is actually "terrorist" and not just an occupy thing.

So far they have attack no person or no thing, they are just an occupy movement.

Notice also that there have been no rapes or murders in their camp.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #29)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:17 PM

46. Heavily armed and threatening

Last edited Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:29 PM - Edit history (1)

Occupying while threatening force is intimidation.

Definition of Domestic Terrorism:

Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;

Appear intended
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/terrorism/terrorism-definition

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #46)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:25 PM

54. LOL...exactly what are they " occupying ?

The Pentagon ?...nope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #54)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:30 PM

55. Who said the Pentagon?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #55)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:44 PM

56. People are acting like they are occupying some

high-value military installation or something.

It`s just a bunch of pasture land, for crying out loud !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #56)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:04 PM

59. Dude

People are seizing our federal land.

The news reporters were told they cannot go onto the land.

The militia is acting like they're liberating the land but in reality they're not.

You're ok with people stealing our federal property, setting up shop and threatening our officials with force?

Wrap your head around what they're actually doing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #59)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:23 PM

68. How did they " steal " the Federal land ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #68)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:28 PM

70. Way to ignore everything relevant

And choose one word.

Have a good night.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #46)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:58 PM

57. Farrakhhan an meets that threshold to a "T"

With his calls for thousands to attack Washington DC.
So have to think the same of him and admit it too.
Just to keep from being a hypocrite and all that.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #57)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:01 PM

58. Lock him up

I don't think you'll find anybody backing Farrah.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #58)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:07 PM

60. He said what he did

He called for "thousands" to give their lives attacking Washington DC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #60)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:08 PM

62. I don't really like to prosecute words

Actions, such as seizing land. Yes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #62)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:11 PM

63. Then prosecute occupy for their actions

Of taking over and destroying public and private property.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #63)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:18 PM

65. I'm ok with that

I don't know where you're coming from with this stuff.

Are you expecting me to back those movements?

These guys seizing the land should be in jail. They are a threat to citizens.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to metroins (Reply #65)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:41 PM

66. But there have been no rapes or murders

As there were in occupy camps.

What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

I'm a strong equality type of guy.

Occupy was not arrested when they occupied public property.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldenuff35 (Reply #29)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 09:53 AM

75. I don't have my English-to-oldenough35 dictionary handy.

 

So why don't we just stick to the actual definitions of words?

ter·ror·ism
ˈterəˌrizəm/
noun
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Argentina (Reply #12)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:36 PM

36. I'm not sure why you labeled that as sarcasm

I read it, and read it again, and read it again, and all I saw was a true statement. "They can't be terrorists, they're white, christian, and right wing." That sounds true to me, and I still cant see a joke anywhere, but you said it is a joke of some sort? Maybe I DONT get sarcasm after all these years of ASSuming I did.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:07 PM

13. Jury Results

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:56 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Let's be honest . ....
http://www.discussionist.com/1015682474

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is uncivil, off-topic, offensive, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Advocating violence for peaceful civil protesters is beyond the pale. Perhaps if they were Baltimore thugs then the OP would have some human respect?!

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of Discussionist members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:05 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Silly alerter makes silly alert. What else is new?
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I for one am not gonna hide for some PC nonsense as advocated by the alerter.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: RW buttercup needs to toughen up. DI's dumbest alert to date.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:08 PM

14. If Muslims did something like this, the armed people inside that refuge would instead be outside....

....still armed to the teeth and ready to slaughter everyone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rephleshed (Reply #14)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:16 PM

23. Exactly, these folks are patriots, ready to defend America against infiltrating Islamists!...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:17 PM

24. You produce some of the FUNNIEST OPs! Kudos...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:18 PM

27. What terroristic acts have been perpetrated....

 

"Occupying" an empty building in a refuge?
Occupy Wall Street occupied a ton of public places....I didn't call them terrorists...I called them idiots... like these mutants in Oregon....and there were way more of the Occupy wingnuts than there are the freak jobs in Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.

Who are they terrorizing in a refuge....some ducks...deer....
"Bring in the snipers and shoot them all the first chance they get. " Waco or Ruby Ridge ring a bell? When MOVE got burned down in Philly...
Glad to see the left "pulling the trigger" of escalating some idiots into martyrs....by the way...won't happen.

Obama is not going to have a Waco on his watch

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sassyspop (Reply #27)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:16 PM

45. They didn't meekly obey orders from the govt.

thats all it takes to be a terrorist today

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #45)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:44 PM

49. Yep.....seen that before...

 

1776 comes to mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sassyspop (Reply #27)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 09:55 AM

76. Is English not understood on DI?

 

ter·ror·ism
ˈterəˌrizəm/
noun
the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcci (Reply #76)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:20 PM

87. Apparently not and you illustrate it...."..violence and intimidation.."

 

What violence or intimidation...these snot lickers walked in w/out violence or intimidation, into a an empty building on a preserve.....if either had happened why didn't the Feds or locals dust them instantly.

Where was the violence or intimidation...there have been no reports of either that I can find...

Serious question..... were you this torqued off as THIS happened...do you believe none of these fine upstanding protesters were armed?

OR this....


Or is your anger just at a pack of assholes hunkered down in an empty building on a preserve?
Rhetorical...I know the answer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sassyspop (Reply #87)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 01:51 PM

88. They are holding the building through force of arms.

 

Any reasonable person would consider the threat of being shot as "intimidation"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcci (Reply #88)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:12 PM

89. Has ANY of these jelloheads brandished "arms" or aimed at a citizen or LEO?

 

Have you seen pics of these paste eaters set up in sniper perches displaying a rifle?
Can you show a picture of any of the turd blossom snot lickers displaying a firearm....

All the pics I've seen.....Oregon being an OCC state....I haven't seen intimidating pictures...have you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sassyspop (Reply #89)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:22 PM

90. They are holding the building with force of arms.

 

They have also said they are willing to kill.
Reasonable people (clearly not you) would find an armed gang that is defending and holding a govt building through arms and threats of killing as "intimidation".

Your laughable "but but display" is as inane as it is irrelevant.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kcci (Reply #90)

Tue Jan 5, 2016, 02:49 PM

91. I'll ask again....have you seen the arms? OR is it just words that wad your knickers?

 

I have NO problem locking these fuckwaddles up for being on Federal property w/out permission....my point is ONLY this pack of freaks in Oregon.. have done NOTHING that compares to these freaks....
?ve=1&tl=1

or this upstanding citizen...


or this gathering of peaceful protesters...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:37 PM

38. Why not just give them the space they need to destroy?

This idiotic thinking worked great in Baltimore. Maybe the militias and all the whites will be happy with burning, destroying, looting and then shitting on the American flag.

Then Obama can send out all of his white race baiters and blame the blacks for all the white man's problems.

Just trying to think like a liberal makes me ill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to It Guy (Reply #38)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:01 PM

43. I forgot about "space to destroy"

There's a double standard if the government authorities overlook certain people burning and looting supposedly civilized areas and then this case, where other people are seeking out no people to victimize and steal from and there isn't much property to destroy?

How else to fundamentally transform America than by allowing the space for its destruction?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:55 PM

42. Wow.

The ignorance about this whole thing is astounding.

These LWers in Pittsburgh were terrorists too, and it took a court decision to get rid of them:

Judge Says Occupy Pittsburgh Movement Must Leave Mellon Green Camp

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — Occupy Pittsburgh protesters will have to pack up their tents and vacate their premises downtown within three days’ time, as ordered by an Allegheny County judge.

Since October 15, the downtown open parklet owned by BNY Mellon has been home to as many as 100 protestors.

But now, a judge has decided that their time is up, saying, “There is no law that permits a group of people to take over someone else’s private property.”

Allegheny County Sheriff William Mullen says his office will enforce the order, but that it could be a long legal process if the protestors decide not to vacate.

http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2012/02/02/judge-says-occupy-pittsburgh-movement-must-leave-mellon-green-camp/

They were trespassing on private property.

I know the name Mellon has a bad reputation among the LWNJ's, but, you can't invade private property no matter how much you hate the "banksters."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:12 PM

44. FAIL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:18 PM

47. Send in the drones.

 

Screw them....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Slayer (Reply #47)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:37 PM

71. LOL

Drones ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:36 PM

48. Starve them out. Arrest anyone who comes to help them.

Republicans need to stop inciting people to hate the United States, its duly elected government, and its established laws. I am curious what the Republican candidates will have to say about these greasy little pissants and their movie toys.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to swifty (Reply #48)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:51 PM

51. "Republicans need to stop inciting people to hate the United States,.."

 

What incitement to "hate" the U.S.?
".. its duly elected government, and its established laws"..........

It's established laws have been stepped on a few times by The Executive Branch currently in office...SCOTUS has repudiated them, Federal Courts have...just YOUR sides views on established laws....those you like?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:46 PM

50. Sieze their assets and their sources of revenue.

 

They'll leave when they realize that their ammo stockpile is being siezed by the court.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:07 PM

61. BLM and occupy occupy

Did the same thing but they were given space to destroy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:50 AM

72. Y'All Qaeda

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 12:18 AM

93. For this thread

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:42 PM

96. For this thread

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #96)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:51 PM

97. Let, some day we should give you a medal just for keeping up our spirits. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 12:18 AM

98. Yeah...they tend to blow themselves up. You're right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 08:16 PM

99. ISIS wants to talk to these idiots

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 08:17 PM

100. The only reason why they are not being called terrorists

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 08:19 PM

101. can you please leave this garbage where it belongs at DU

Thank you

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to daemons (Original post)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 08:19 PM

102. One more cartoon

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticsoregonterrorists