Politicspoliticshillaryemailscandalstatesecrets

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:00 PM

Hillary has been heard from. She did not order people to send classified information.

No matter what her email actually said, she never did order such a thing.

https://twitter.com/nancycordes/status/685569686944268289?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Clinton camp tells @CBSNews: "It is false that Hillary Clinton asked for classified material to be sent over a nonsecure system."

Nancy Cordes of CBS news says that she's been contacted by the Coronation Committee (Clinton Campaign) and they deny that Hillary ever sent any instructions to send classified information over the email system after deleting the headers. One can presume that this is a RW plant, which means that her email was hacked and a long conversation took place without anyone noticing until now, including when they went through the emails to make sure that the "personal" ones were deleted.



Damn, that vast Right Wing Conspiracy is awesome and everywhere. Or something. You know, I would have an easier time believing that all the fiction in the Harry Potter books was true before the Hillary stories. Frankly, Harry Potter is more believable.

I wonder how long before the Clinton Coronation Committee tries to tell us that Star Wars is a Documentary?

21 replies, 1575 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 21 replies Author Time Post
Reply Hillary has been heard from. She did not order people to send classified information. (Original post)
SavannahMan Jan 2016 OP
Gunslinger201 Jan 2016 #1
Roger Cavu Jan 2016 #19
graham4anything4HC45 Jan 2016 #2
Argentina Jan 2016 #3
graham4anything4HC45 Jan 2016 #5
MountainDew Jan 2016 #12
nolidad Jan 2016 #13
Let it go Jan 2016 #4
graham4anything4HC45 Jan 2016 #6
_eek Jan 2016 #8
fools_gold Jan 2016 #17
USNRET1988 Jan 2016 #9
graham4anything4HC45 Jan 2016 #10
USNRET1988 Jan 2016 #11
Cave Dweller Jan 2016 #18
Da Mannn Jan 2016 #7
SavannahMan Jan 2016 #16
nolidad Jan 2016 #14
shortviking Jan 2016 #15
Grumpy Pickle Jan 2016 #20
AmandaMatthews Jan 2016 #21

Response to SavannahMan (Original post)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:14 PM

1. I guess the FBI can call it a day

Sure glad she cleared that up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gunslinger201 (Reply #1)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:52 PM

19. Bingo

Just when the press asked if she "wiped" her server

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SavannahMan (Original post)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:15 PM

2. talking points aren't classified info, it goes without saying

The real question is-
if Hillary was so bad, why couldn't any party come up with someone who could beat her?

That is the funniest thing of all.

Goes without saying, she is so good and there is a 40 year rightwing conspiracy as Hillary told us, and Hillary has never lied to me, so I believe her, and not those that are part of the 40 year rightwing conspiracy

No matter how much the Bush family operatives (including Roger Stone, who also works with/for Trump and the Republican party along with the Bush's) say

after all, the biggest lie was that there was any recount at all, when the one official one was called off because of an operative stopping it (some say Roger himself was in that van outside)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:19 PM

3. It's true that there has been a rightwing conspiracy. It can be seen not only in the e-mail flap and

Benghazi but also in Trump's bringing up Bill's sexual history.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Argentina (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:23 PM

5. not only that, but I bet it goes one step further than that and if so,...

thought to be continued.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Argentina (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:00 PM

12. Awww

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Argentina (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:05 PM

13. Bill's sexual history

POTUS- pervert of the United States of AMerica!

If I hadn't already given up smoking- after his cigar antics with an intern I would have given them up!

E-mail flap? Just be patient, her indictment is coming.

Benghazi? We will also find out after what the committee reports after Petraeus hearing.

Course with a screen name like yours- this kind of corruption may seem minor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:20 PM

4. Biden got scared off. Too bad for you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Let it go (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:26 PM

6. That is the ultimate conspiracy theory I ever heard. His son had cancer. Sheesh, does it ever stop?

Same as the "news" someone posted on DU that was so badly slanted as to make one laugh

(of course DU is 9 to 1 for Bernie and against Hillary so it is not surprising).

it boggles the mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:28 PM

8. It does not go without saying

What does is that you have no clue what you are selling. And No metric to judge the merit of the charges.

The Government, probably daily, puts stupid, harmless and meaningful shit in the classified bin.
I think it's stupid, my fellow service members thought it was stupid, and I am sure the Shrew from Wall Street thinks it's stupid.

Only difference is I followed orders, and my oath, and did what I was supposed to do with TS and Secret, and even Confidential classified information.

You are trying to understand a world you have never even glimpsed G and defend a person that broke at least one rule of that world.

Put simply you don't know shit about what you are saying in this case, who cares if they were talking points, or troop movements, fact is they were deemed classified.
I personally hope she is tried and convicted of these crimes, and forever left outside the power base. A sad footnote, rotting away and without an ounce of access or influence in Washington.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to _eek (Reply #8)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:19 PM

17. Well, yes and no

I agree with all that you have said. But, again, I have seen no evidence that the talking points were marked classified, only that they were to be sent via secure fax. As you noted, lots of things not classified tend t be sent via secure means, but that doesn't make them CLASSIFIED.

For instance, in my organization there was a Command Policy that the travel itineraries of those of us working on certain projects were to be considered FOUO and not to be sent via non-secure means. That meant that when I received my TDY Travel Orders they were marked, top and bottom, "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Transmit only via Secure Channels." To send them over to the Travel Agency Office to make my flight reservations and such I had to trundle downstairs to the Security Office and use their direct secure FAX line over to the Travel Office. (I had SIPRNet access, but the Travel Office didn't.) If either our secure FAX was down, or the Travel Office unit was down, I would have to get in my truck and drive 10 miles across post to the TO and deal with the crowd and riff-raff there. No fun.

Now, the talking points memo may have been the same. Not CLASSIFIED, but maybe by State Dept policy considered and marked Sensitive and not to be sent via non-secure means. In that case the SoS could waive her own policy and ask that it be sent via non-secure means. The marking would have to be removed to avoid balking by the admin staff.

As much as I would like to see a smoking gun to indict Hillary, I don't see it here. I see no evidence that the document was marked CLASSIFIED. And I know for a fact that the statement "There is no other reason to send a document via secure means unless it is classified" is false. I would need to see evidence that the document was in fact marked as such. Maybe the FBI has it. I hope so. But I haven't seen it yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #2)


Response to USNRET1988 (Reply #9)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:49 PM

10. On a discussion board, how else does one discuss? One can't use body motions like in person

so one has to converse even if it goes without saying

If Hillary were so bad, someone out there of the hundreds of eligible people who are in politics, woud have
run against her on any side.

and not be looking for a football term "Hail Mary" to defeat her.

It does go without saying, so I will say it again, it goes without saying

Sheesh, Cory Booker easily could have won and run but he didn't. If Hillary wouldn't have entered the race
Cory Booker would on the way to an historic victory.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #10)


Response to graham4anything4HC45 (Reply #2)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:23 PM

18. If they were only

talking points, why was there a question about sending them via secure fax?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SavannahMan (Original post)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:26 PM

7. Despite emails written by HRC herself, some libs will believe anything she says.

Despite all evidence to the contrary, one groundless denial is enough for the Hillarybots.
every tyrant needs her willing minions

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Da Mannn (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:15 PM

16. Actually, I'm waiting for the next one.

I'm waiting for the Coronation Committee to swear that Hillary was never the Secretary of State, and any claims otherwise are just nonsense that deserves no comment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SavannahMan (Original post)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:07 PM

14. What are you going to believe:

Your lying ears or the clear vision of your eyes???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SavannahMan (Original post)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 06:10 PM

15. "Coronation Committee"

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SavannahMan (Original post)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 07:00 PM

20. Hillary will deny anything.

She even denies that Chelsea`s real father is Web Hubble.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SavannahMan (Original post)

Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:19 PM

21. Well, if it's a Hillary spokesperson telling you that she didn't do it, then she didn't do it.

Because I was told one time right here on DI that Shillary Clinton has never told a lie. And surely that paragon of virtue would never let a spokesperson lie either, would she?

Once upon a times a lie this blatant would have been a campaign killer. From the Clintons, it's expected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticshillaryemailscandalstatesecrets