Politicspoliticshumaabedinemailscandal

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:58 PM

Huma on the hot seat.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI has interviewed Huma Abedin, a close aide to Hillary Clinton, as part of a federal investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state, a person familiar with the probe said Thursday.

It is not known how much longer the investigation will take. FBI Director James Comey has said there is no timetable for finishing the probe and it's being done thoroughly.

A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment Thursday, and a spokesman for the FBI did not return messages seeking comment.

http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/c82d21be40b6487fb4c46b20e57f9595/ap-source-clinton-aide-interviewed-email-investigation

29 replies, 1929 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 29 replies Author Time Post
Reply Huma on the hot seat. (Original post)
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 OP
Boston May 2016 #1
Gamle-ged May 2016 #20
Letmypeoplevote May 2016 #2
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #3
Tolk May 2016 #4
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #11
Tolk May 2016 #14
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #16
Tolk May 2016 #17
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #18
RATFINK_5.0 May 2016 #7
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #9
NavyBrat May 2016 #19
Letmypeoplevote May 2016 #22
Tex May 2016 #25
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #28
JK1987 May 2016 #6
Letmypeoplevote May 2016 #24
JK1987 May 2016 #27
Boston May 2016 #8
_eek May 2016 #15
It Guy May 2016 #5
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #10
travelman90069 May 2016 #12
Grumpy Pickle May 2016 #13
BenHereB4 May 2016 #21
travelman90069 May 2016 #23
Banshee 3 Actual May 2016 #26
It Guy May 2016 #29

Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:52 PM

1. In 2008 Hillary had her PUMAs

PUMA = Party Unity My Ass

Now we've got the HUMAs

HUMA = Hillary Unity My Ass

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Boston (Reply #1)

Fri May 6, 2016, 01:59 PM

20. Nice meme recycle job!...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:05 PM

2. Officials: Scant evidence that Clinton had malicious intent in handling of emails

I trust the Washington Post over the rather lame fox new sources being used on this board by the silly conservatives https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-prosecutors-in-virginia-assisting-in-clinton-email-probe/2016/05/05/f0277faa-12f0-11e6-81b4-581a5c4c42df_story.html

Prosecutors and FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server have so far found scant evidence that the leading Democratic presidential candidate intended to break classification rules, though they are still probing the case aggressively with an eye on interviewing Clinton herself, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

FBI agents on the case have been joined by federal prosecutors from the same office that successfully prosecuted 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui — and who would handle any Edward Snowden case, should he ever return to the country, according to the U.S. officials familiar with the matter. And in recent weeks, prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia and their FBI counterparts have been interviewing top Clinton aides as they seek to bring the case to a close.

CNN reported Thursday that longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin was among those interviewed. A lawyer for Abedin did not immediately return an email seeking comment.

The involvement of the U.S. Attorney’s Office is not indicative that charges are imminent or even likely. One official said prosecutors are wrestling with the question of whether Clinton intended to violate the rules, and so far, the evidence seemed to indicate she did not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #2)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:09 PM

3. Guess you missed my 12 other posts to you....

NO ONE has officially let Hillary off the hook...no matter how many `anonymous` sources you try to post.

Only the FBI Director Comey can make that call.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Thu May 5, 2016, 10:08 PM

4. It's a lose / lose for Clinton regardless

 

Either she's a criminal or she's grossly incompetent.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tolk (Reply #4)

Fri May 6, 2016, 07:37 AM

11. She`s a freakin` criminal.

The tech dude that set up the server had to be granted immunity...you don`t ask for immunity if you haven`t been doing something shady.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #11)

Fri May 6, 2016, 10:46 AM

14. ok

 

She's a grossly incompetent criminal!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tolk (Reply #14)

Fri May 6, 2016, 01:04 PM

16. She asked to have the stinkin` server installed at her house so she could by-pass the

prying eyes of the State Dept.

She is hardly incompetent....she intended to sneak around.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #16)

Fri May 6, 2016, 01:22 PM

17. But she got caught

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tolk (Reply #17)

Fri May 6, 2016, 01:24 PM

18. Well, she sort of got caught.

The real question is : will she suffer any consequences from it ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Fri May 6, 2016, 12:17 AM

7. How is the Washington Post anonymous ?

Oh that's right, it's more relevant than when FOX shows twitter feeds of Trump eating a cheap taco bowl from Trump Towers Grill.

BTW, both Taco Bueno & Taco Mayo have better looking taco bowls ... Taco Mayo has the best one.

They cost about $5 !

Uh-oh, I guess that means Trump is already slumming ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RATFINK_5.0 (Reply #7)

Fri May 6, 2016, 07:33 AM

9. The article in the washpo quotes anonymous " officials "...that`s not a solid

story.

Only FBI director Comey can report the definitive answer on this question....and so far he hasn`t.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RATFINK_5.0 (Reply #7)

Fri May 6, 2016, 01:58 PM

19. Trump CLAIMED the bowl was from the Trump Towers Grill, but ...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #3)

Fri May 6, 2016, 04:42 PM

22. Since you are always wrong and yet to be right on anything, this makes me smile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #22)

Fri May 6, 2016, 04:53 PM

25. And your results are in...

 

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Fri May 6, 2016, 04:44 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Since you are always wrong and yet to be right on anything, this makes me smile
http://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1015&pid=817237

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is uncivil, off-topic, offensive, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Always with the personal attacks and Smarmyness

TOS Violation

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of Discussionist members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri May 6, 2016, 04:52 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Admins should look into the continued stalking of this poster.
Leave.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Taunting
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Flippant and rude. Attack the idea, not the person.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Don't be a grumpy pickle!

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #22)

Fri May 6, 2016, 09:53 PM

28. ???

Wrong about what ?

The FBI has NOT cleared her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #2)

Thu May 5, 2016, 11:45 PM

6. Prepare for tears Goth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JK1987 (Reply #6)

Fri May 6, 2016, 04:53 PM

24. Hillary Clinton is going to be exonerated on the email controversy. It won’t matter.

Ronald/Lois/Knock-do you every tire of being wrong? You are never right on anything (including any past lives). https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/05/06/hillary-clinton-is-going-to-be-exonerated-on-the-email-controversy-it-wont-matter/

That point about her intending to break classification rules is important, because in order to have broken the law, it isn’t enough for Clinton to have had classified information in a place where it was possible for it to be hacked. She would have had to intentionally given classified information to someone without authorization to have it, like David Petraeus did when he showed classified documents to his mistress (and then lied to the FBI about it, by the way). Despite the enormous manpower and time the Justice Department has devoted to this case, there has never been even a suggestion, let alone any evidence, that Clinton did any such thing.....

Just to be clear: I’m not defending Clinton’s decision to use her own email for work, and house it on a private server. That was a mistake. It violated State Department policy. She shouldn’t have done it. But acknowledging that is very different from saying she broke the law or jeopardized national security. As of now there is zero evidence that she did either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #24)

Fri May 6, 2016, 05:51 PM

27. Goth... clueless from day one. Unable to argue your way out of a paper bag.

Pathetic and sad is no way to go through your life.

Did your home get swept away by the floods?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #2)

Fri May 6, 2016, 04:41 AM

8. Nice bumper sticker

Not malicious, just stupid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Letmypeoplevote (Reply #2)

Fri May 6, 2016, 10:51 AM

15. Dance, now wave, and... Prestidigitation!!!

I love silly receptionists commenting on security matters..

This should be fun to watch...

How was the bar for you? get a Bellini or a julep..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 11:41 PM

5. Her feigned ignorance and the erroneous application of intent won't get her off.

As an attorney, she knows how to play the ignorant card and the Feds won't buy it. She took the required class to handle and see classified info and signed the form accepting responsibility. She's got no wiggle room and there are at least a half dozen felony level laws she broke and tens if not hundreds of felony counts. Each mishandled doc is a count unto itself. The same goes for her sycophants. Each count carries a decade or two in federal prison.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to It Guy (Reply #5)

Fri May 6, 2016, 07:35 AM

10. Yeah...I noticed that the Clintonistas are really hitting that " she didn`t mean to do it " angle

pretty hard.

The fact that the private server was actually IN HER HOUSE is proof of intent right there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grumpy Pickle (Reply #10)

Fri May 6, 2016, 08:28 AM

12. Gee what a surprise! 2 9/11 conspiracy theorists agree with each other on another fake theory!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to travelman90069 (Reply #12)

Fri May 6, 2016, 08:47 AM

13. Those of us that have critical thinking skills always look behind the curtain.

...but I guess it`s just easier for you to be spoon-fed and hypnotized by the media.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to travelman90069 (Reply #12)

Fri May 6, 2016, 04:00 PM

21. Make that 3

I hope she goes to jail where she belongs. And yes, 9/11 was an inside job. Planes fall apart on impact except the ones used on 9/11 that were able to tear through steel and concrete like they were paper without ANY resistance. But you believe in fairy tales, so laugh all you want. We'll get the last laugh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BenHereB4 (Reply #21)

Fri May 6, 2016, 04:44 PM

23. Good to know. I'll now ignore anything you say since it cannot be trusted.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BenHereB4 (Reply #21)

Fri May 6, 2016, 05:17 PM

26. Planes fall apart on impact? ever hear of a Kamikaze madam?

The Kinetic energy of several tons of mass coming into contact with something at speeds of several hundred miles per hour would say you have no clue what you opined on.
Small sample of Kamikaze aircraft crashes -

USS J. William Ditter (DM-31)


USS Intrepid (CV-11)


USS Franklin(CV-13)


Then add the blast furnace effect of wind at those heights from burning fuel


Here, let me educate you-



This is the result of a B-25 Mitchell Light Bomber weighing 19,480 lbs @ 230MPH hitting the Empire State Building on 28 July,1945. Note the ESB was mostly Concrete and Block with Steel girder frame, the WTC was mostly a steel exoskeleton type construction. It ripped a 18X20 Foot hole

One engine shot through the entire building, blasted through to the outside fell 900 feet through a building roof and started another fire

In 1946 a C-45 weighing 6,175lbs crashed into 40 Wall Street, blasting a 20X10 foot hole through the masonry

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Banshee 3 Actual (Reply #26)

Mon May 9, 2016, 04:10 AM

29. Your post was a fail. The boat still floats, the building still stands and the Kamikaze planes

we're packed with explosives. No, it wasn't just a plane going a couple hundred, if that, that caused damage to ships. The Empire State bldg. had a respectable hole and damage and was what one would expect.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamikaze


Kamikaze aircraft were essentially pilot-guided explosive missiles, purpose-built or converted from conventional aircraft. Pilots would attempt to crash their aircraft into enemy ships in what was called a "body attack" (体当たり; 体当り, taiatari) in planes laden with some combination of explosives, bombs, torpedoes and full fuel tanks; accuracy was much better than a conventional attack, the payload and explosion larger. A kamikaze could sustain damage which would disable a conventional attacker and still achieve its objective. The goal of crippling or destroying large numbers of Allied ships, particularly aircraft carriers, was considered by the Empire of Japan to be a just reason for sacrificing pilots and aircraft.

If this is comparative "evidence" that you think qualifies for debunking 911, you're sadly mistaken.
Airliners are not built to take impacts of any kind. They are essentially then sheet aluminum tubes with just enough structural rigidity to do the job. The only part of the plane with significant mass and weight that could do more damage than light aluminum components would be the turbine shafts made from titanium. I'm not talking about the jet fuel. Just impacting mass.


Take notice on how easily this machine dismantles and pulls apart these planes, then imagine the same machine trying to take apart the massive steel structure of the towers. The machine would absolutely fail. The fictitious planes going into the towers was done by CGI.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticshumaabedinemailscandal