Politicspoliticsorlandoterroristguns

Thu Jun 30, 2016, 12:53 PM

good questions about Orlando,

no, this isn't about life imitating the movie Wag the Dog.
Although heads should roll at OPD for standing around with their fingers up their asses for three hours.

I don't know about the writer's explanation, but it is a good question. Of course, I would like to know how he got this information.
Sadly, I can’t find a single mention of even one of the hundreds of other people inside Pulse attempting to rush the terrorist from the side, or from behind, or when he was reloading a rifle with which he was unfamiliar, or when he put his rifle down to stuff fresh bullets into depleted magazines. Not in three long hours.

Sadly, the fact that none of the staff nor customers attacked the terrorist in the opening minutes greatly increased the body count, as research show that it is typically civilians who stop mass killings, not police.
http://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/06/28/couldnt-hundreds-gays-defeat-one-puny-islamic-terrorist-orlando/
I don't know if this study is based on only rapid mass murders in the US or if it includes other countries as well.
Before investing in any theory or propaganda, enlightened administrators and trainers should exclusively examine only successful aborts. “Stopping the killing” only occurs in slightly over half of “Rapid Mass Murder”© incidents. Significant, documented, verifiable, and repeatable research has identified what strategies and tactics work in stopping the killing. In summary, they are:
1. Citizens, mostly unarmed, perform two thirds of all “Rapid Mass Murder”© aborts.
2. In citizen aborts, initiation by a single citizen stops the killing eight out of ten times.
3. Law enforcement performs one third of all “Rapid Mass Murder”© aborts.
4. In law enforcement aborts, initiation by a single officer stops the killing seven out of 10 times.
http://www.activeresponsetraining.net/new-rapid-mass-murder-research-from-ron-borsch

5 replies, 642 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Reply good questions about Orlando, (Original post)
island4diver Jun 2016 OP
quad489 Jun 2016 #1
It Guy Jun 2016 #3
Wheninrome Jun 2016 #2
It Guy Jun 2016 #4
black rifles Jul 2016 #5

Response to island4diver (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2016, 12:58 PM

1. "Not in three long hours"...and that's another major issue on the event. WTF...was it shift change??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to quad489 (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:41 PM

3. Donut break.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to island4diver (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:36 PM

2. Asking questions like that will get you called a CTer.

You are not supposed to think just listen and believe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to island4diver (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:46 PM

4. I know how the dense amongst us like to nitpick and attack the messenger and any source

that's not libtard approved, so here's a Google search list citing the fact the FBI is directing state agencies to deny any info request about the Orlando shooting.

Most transparent administration. Ha!!!

https://www.google.com/search?q=fbi%20tells%20agencies%20not%20to%20release%20info%20on%20orlando

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to island4diver (Original post)

Wed Jul 6, 2016, 07:02 PM

5. One person with a CCW would have made

 

all the difference in the body count. So what do the grabnutz do?
I think it was a setup from the beginning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Politicspoliticsorlandoterroristguns