Culture culture

Fri Nov 22, 2019, 12:39 PM

JanetS (1,758 posts)

ACLU: Yes, Men Can Menstruate and Give Birth!

As radical and fringe ideologies continue to run rampant within the Democrat Party, the left-wing has regressed into denying basic biology. Leftists believe that referring to men as men and women as women is inherently sexist and non-inclusive. Furthermore, Democrats subscribe to the ideology that recognizing biological differences between men and women is a form of bigotry.

Unfortunately, leftist leaders and organized progressive groups are doing nothing to right the aforementioned wrongs; as a matter of fact, they’re encouraging these wrongs. This past Tuesday, on International Men’s Day, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sent out a tweet claiming that men can menstruate, get pregnant and give birth.

At this point, Democrats are just blatantly lying, ignoring facts, and painting truth as a form of hatred. The most laughable part of all is the ACLU’s attempt to brand themselves as “non-partisan” in their Twitter bio.

https://www.thepatriotbrief.com/aclu-yes-men-can-menstruate-and-give-birth/

No, they cannot.

8 replies, 237 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

8 replies	Author	Time	Post
ACLU: Yes, Men Can Menstruate and Give Birth! (Original post)	JanetS	Nov 22	OP
We are doomed....talk about science denial....	Oldgeezer	Nov 22	#1
It's all semantics. They've separated the words men, and male.	JaimeBondoJr	Nov 22	#2
Yeah...kinda.	Tovera	Nov 22	#5
I didn't say I agree with it. They do it because their low-information sycophants think there is	JaimeBondoJr	Nov 22	#6
There is a difference, those words don't mean the same thing.	SatansSon666	Nov 23	#8
ACLU legitimizing mental illness. Anyone surprised? This is the future the Left has in store.	Da Mannn	Nov 22	#3
Those ''party of science'' followers are certainly quite entertaining..............to say the least.	quad489	Nov 22	#4
Oh FFS !	Grumpy Pickle	Nov 22	#7

Response to JanetS (Original post)

Fri Nov 22, 2019, 12:47 PM

Oldgeezer (7,268 posts)

1. We are doomed....talk about science denial....

Reply to this post

Response to JanetS (Original post)

Fri Nov 22, 2019, 12:53 PM

JaimeBondoJr (9,112 posts)

2. It's all semantics. They've separated the words men, and male.

Reply to this post

Response to JaimeBondoJr (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 22, 2019, 01:31 PM

Tovera (6,467 posts)

5. Yeah...kinda.

I don't dispute that the differentiation between biological gender and social gender are real. There's no shortage of documentation of this. The thing is, in the vast majority of humans, those two types of gender are in agreement. In a VERY small percentage of cases, they are not.

Does it make sense to significantly alter our day-to-day language usage, such as using gender-neutral pronouns and such when we're not certain of a person's social gender as the default? I don't think it does. Not for a fraction of 1% of the population. Sorry (not sorry).

I also refuse to be guilt-tripped into such usage, particularly when someone's overt visual representation of themselves conforms to one gender, but they're actually the other. If I genuinely can't tell, then yeah...I'll use a gender-neutral pronoun (since I probably don't care enough to actually ask). But if someone's sending obvious "girl" signals in how they dress (etc.), and hits me with some variation of "did you assume my gender?" then I will react accordingly (that is, with derisive snark).

Reply to this post

Response to Tovera (Reply #5)

Fri Nov 22, 2019, 06:52 PM

JaimeBondoJr (9,112 posts)