Sciencescience

Fri Feb 22, 2019, 05:43 PM

Who was Mitochondrial Eve OR Thats the Way Creationists Roll

Those secular EVILutionists are pretty clear in their definition of Mitochondrial Eve:

“In human genetics, the Mitochondrial Eve (also mt-Eve, mt-MRCA) is the matrilineal most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of all currently living humans, i.e., the most recent woman from whom all living humans descend in an unbroken line purely through their mothers, and through the mothers of those mothers, back until all lines converge on one woman.”
- Wiki

“In the field of human genetics, the name Mitochondrial Eve refers to the matrilineal most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of all currently living anatomically modern humans...”
- National Center for Science Education

“Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam — two individuals who passed down a portion of their genomes to the vast expanse of humanity — are known as our most recent common ancestors, or MRCAs”
- Stanford University

“For example, ‘mitochondrial Eve’ is the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) when ancestry is defined only through maternal lines”
- Yale University

But those EVILutionists clearly don’t know what they’re talking about! Clearly, Mitochondrial Eve and Biblical Eve must be the same, the FIRST, not MOST RECENT (whatever that means) Ancestor of mankind. This is easy to prove:

1. The Bible says so
2. They are both named Eve

Take that, EVILutionists!

But how can we Creationists convince the scientifically and Biblically illiterate of this self-evident proposition? Here’s how!!!

1. Redefine the EVILutionists’ definition to something more suitable to our argument. For example, we could change the EVILutionist definition to “the FIRST (what is with that ‘most recent’ crap, anywho) fully hominid woman.”

2. When the EVILutionists object to this changed definition come back with this is the competing definition that many EVILutionists themselves hold.

3. When the EVILutionists ask for proof of that, cut-and-paste lots of UNCITED text from a Creationist website that talk about EVILutionists’ views on Mitochondrial Eve in contexts not related to the definition. Minimally, the word count of these uncited quotes should be 90% Creationist and 10% EVILutionist, but the closer you can approach 95% Creationist, the better.

4. When you are constructing (3), be sure to tag the text with a phrase like “From the EVILutionists’ own mouths:”

5. Once you have thereby established your own definition of Mitochondrial Eve, it becomes easy to argue against that definition.

What, you say, “Isn’t that dishonest?” Hey, that’s the way we Creationists roll!!

2 replies, 122 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Who was Mitochondrial Eve OR Thats the Way Creationists Roll (Original post)
Cold Warrior Feb 22 OP
nolidad Feb 22 #1
SatansSon666 Feb 23 #2

Response to Cold Warrior (Original post)

Fri Feb 22, 2019, 06:16 PM

1. Well mt Eve aqnd Biblical Eve are one and the same!

When algorithms were used to just measure mtRNA they go back approx 6,500 years! But this poeer reviewed, peer approved and published in evolutionist respected journals!

But of course that had to be attacked! So they made a new algorithm to count the mutations needed to find mtEve also using chimp RNA and voila problem solved for them!

And to repeat again I have no problem at all with any of those definitions you put up! Do you??? You know, for a bunch of ignorant goatherders many on your side love to call the ancinets- they certainly had a real talent for writing great genealogies and interesting accounts that match up with science when it is not tampered with to avoid aligning with biblical dates!

But justy think- they wanted to find the mother of all humans- so using human genetics they come back with 6500 years! and these were by no means YEC adherents!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nolidad (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 23, 2019, 05:21 AM

2. WRONG. As usual.

MtEve lived about 200,000 years ago.

Creationist loons picked your number out of their asses and you happily run with it, looking like you don't have 10 seconds to research it.

Poor nolidad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Sciencescience