Sciencescience

Thu May 9, 2019, 05:48 AM

10 things science denying loons can't understand.

Mathematics
Biology
Chemistry
Thermodynamics
Paleontology
Cosmology
Geology
Meteorology
Physics
Archaeology

Feel free to expand on this list.

7 replies, 312 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply 10 things science denying loons can't understand. (Original post)
SatansSon666 May 2019 OP
Cold Warrior May 2019 #1
SatansSon666 May 2019 #2
Cold Warrior May 2019 #3
SatansSon666 May 2019 #4
Cold Warrior May 2019 #5
SatansSon666 May 2019 #6
rahtruelies May 2019 #7

Response to SatansSon666 (Original post)

Thu May 9, 2019, 06:35 AM

1. Now hold on there! Everyone knows that the Second Law of Thermodynamics proves

Yahweh just as certainly as 2 + 3 x 4 = 20, a significant number.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #1)

Thu May 9, 2019, 06:47 AM

2. Absolutely. Entropy means disorder and order can't come from disorder.

666 is the most significant number.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #2)

Thu May 9, 2019, 06:49 AM

3. But 1 is the loneliest number!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #3)

Thu May 9, 2019, 06:58 AM

4. Yeah, but 2 can be as bad as 1.

I haven't seen the theorem that proves it, but that's what it says.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #4)

Thu May 9, 2019, 07:00 AM

5. You should ask one of our colleagues

Many of them are geniuses at mathematics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #5)

Thu May 9, 2019, 07:07 AM

6. I know.

I don't want to bother them with silly math problems.
I think they are collaborating on a hypothesis to explain how CO2 doesn't work the way chemists have been saying it does for the last 130 years.
That, coupled with their work on thermodynamics in an open system and studying blogs by failed weathermen and activists with no scientific background, probably eats up a lot of their time.

Oops sorry, I meant Math "questions".
Glad I corrected that before someone caught it..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SatansSon666 (Original post)

Thu May 9, 2019, 09:04 AM

7. faux news alert

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Sciencescience