Loon of the moment.

Stop projecting your faults onto people who actually understand things.

feel obligated to project their own denial of reason in lieu of faith onto others.

No evidence, no data, no reason, just faith.
So obviously if someone disagrees with them, it's based off of faith too.

the global warming/climate change hoax.

But your know better, right? lololol

ExxonMobil u-turns: agrees to join oil and gas climate change alliance
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/sep/20/exxonmobil-joins-oil-gas-climate-change-alliance-global-warming

A Creationist “science writer” writing in support of the views of a dowsing climate denier! Wow, that convinces me!!

There isn't a thing he won't deny...
lmao

There are a whole bunch of credible scientists who are skeptical of the global catastrophe called global warming. One of many.

Richard Lindzen
From 1983 until his retirement in 2013, he was Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was a lead author of Chapter 7, "Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks," of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Third Assessment Report on climate change. He has criticized the scientific consensus about climate change and what he has called "climate alarmism."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen

Went from being a proponent of the scientific method to criticizing scientists and taking money from Oil companies and the Heartland institute.

His scientific paper has been pretty much laughed at for not following proper methods and procedures and overstating any claims it makes.

That's spot-on for loon candidacy.

The guy YOU cited here:

https://www.discussionist.com/?com=view_post&forum=1018&pid=34301

Got it now

Having a bad day?

Its the scientist you should be slandering, remember?

Would you say the same thing about Master Brian Thomas who writes “science” articles on Creationism for ICR? Regardless, the article you quoted has a lot of opinion not directly attributable to your Dowser scientist. Given that, let’s look at the scientific expertise of Mr Booker:

“He argues that asbestos, passive smoking and BSE have not been shown to be dangerous.”

“Booker has also argued in support of intelligent design, claiming that supporters of the theory of evolution "rest their case on nothing more than blind faith and unexamined a priori assumptions".”

“In December 2009, Christopher Booker and Richard North had published an article in The Sunday Telegraph in which they questioned whether Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), was using his position for personal gain, with a follow-up Telegraph article in January 2010. On 21 August 2010, The Daily Telegraph issued an apology, and withdrew the December article from their website having reportedly paid legal fees running into six figures. Dr Pachauri described the statements against him as "another attempt by the climate sceptics to discredit the IPCC."”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker

Your author is a militant activist in numerous whacko causes and deserves as much scrutiny as your Dowser.

Nobody needs to discredit the IPCC. They do a wonderful job of it themselves.

BTW were people drafted into service in Vietnam prior to the 1969 Draft Lottery?

You don't LISTEN

A thread in which you were pontificating as an expert on the VN draft and the impacts of the Draft Lottery on Trumpie's status. Which were absolutely NONE.