Sciencescience
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 07:31 AM
SatansSon666 (8,685 posts)
Loon of the moment.
Christopher Booker.
Christopher Booker is a journalist with no scientific credentials to back up any of his loony claims. He is a science denier in every sense of the word, the perfect mix for loon-lovers everywhere. He's a climate science denier, obviously. Doing all the same things the other loons do. Misquoting scientists and data. Making shit up in the right way for the loon-lovers to gobble it up. Not content with being a climate science denier, he is also an intelligent design creationist, because, well, he believes the bible over scientific evidence, like the other loons. He denies asbestos is a health risk because another loon says so. He has claimed that it is chemically identical to talcum powder, because, well, he doesn't know a fucking thing about chemistry or chemical structures. Of course, the loon-lovers will quote this loon and claim he knows what he is talking about because they don't understand much of anything to begin with and prefer to be spoon-fed lies instead of actually reading and understanding what the real research says.
|
23 replies, 647 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
SatansSon666 | Jun 2019 | OP |
Da Mannn | Jun 2019 | #1 | |
SatansSon666 | Jun 2019 | #3 | |
Cold Warrior | Jun 2019 | #5 | |
SatansSon666 | Jun 2019 | #6 | |
bfox74 | Jun 2019 | #10 | |
TexMexNext | Jun 2019 | #7 | |
Cold Warrior | Jun 2019 | #2 | |
SatansSon666 | Jun 2019 | #4 | |
def_con5 | Jun 2019 | #8 | |
SatansSon666 | Jun 2019 | #9 | |
oflguy | Jun 2019 | #11 | |
Cold Warrior | Jun 2019 | #12 | |
oflguy | Jun 2019 | #13 | |
Cold Warrior | Jun 2019 | #14 | |
oflguy | Jun 2019 | #15 | |
Cold Warrior | Jun 2019 | #16 | |
oflguy | Jun 2019 | #17 | |
Cold Warrior | Jun 2019 | #18 | |
oflguy | Jun 2019 | #19 | |
Cold Warrior | Jun 2019 | #20 | |
oflguy | Jun 2019 | #21 | |
Independent.mind | Jun 2019 | #22 | |
KittyCatIdiots | Jul 2019 | #23 |
Response to SatansSon666 (Original post)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 07:35 AM
Da Mannn (27,430 posts)
1. The cult of Global Warming rails against the infidel!
Response to Da Mannn (Reply #1)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 07:37 AM
SatansSon666 (8,685 posts)
3. nope.
Stop projecting your faults onto people who actually understand things.
|
Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #3)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 07:48 AM
Cold Warrior (14,115 posts)
5. Amazing that the Acolytes of the worlds largest cult
feel obligated to project their own denial of reason in lieu of faith onto others.
|
Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #5)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 07:50 AM
SatansSon666 (8,685 posts)
6. It's all they've got.
No evidence, no data, no reason, just faith.
So obviously if someone disagrees with them, it's based off of faith too. ![]() |
Response to SatansSon666 (Reply #3)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 10:11 AM
bfox74 (16,204 posts)
10. You obviously dont understand the science proving
the global warming/climate change hoax.
|
Response to Da Mannn (Reply #1)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 08:04 AM
TexMexNext (1,962 posts)
7. Funny how even oil producers acknowleged global warming and climate change
But your know better, right? lololol
ExxonMobil u-turns: agrees to join oil and gas climate change alliance https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/sep/20/exxonmobil-joins-oil-gas-climate-change-alliance-global-warming |
Response to SatansSon666 (Original post)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 07:36 AM
Cold Warrior (14,115 posts)
2. A double whammy!
A Creationist “science writer” writing in support of the views of a dowsing climate denier! Wow, that convinces me!!
![]() |
Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #2)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 07:39 AM
SatansSon666 (8,685 posts)
4. Yeah, he is in the upper echelons of loondom.
There isn't a thing he won't deny...
lmao |
Response to SatansSon666 (Original post)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 09:05 AM
def_con5 (13,106 posts)
8. Here's another loon
There are a whole bunch of credible scientists who are skeptical of the global catastrophe called global warming. One of many.
Richard Lindzen From 1983 until his retirement in 2013, he was Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was a lead author of Chapter 7, "Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks," of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Third Assessment Report on climate change. He has criticized the scientific consensus about climate change and what he has called "climate alarmism." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lindzen |
Response to def_con5 (Reply #8)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 09:23 AM
SatansSon666 (8,685 posts)
9. Yes, like many once knowledgable scientists, he has ventured into loondom.
Went from being a proponent of the scientific method to criticizing scientists and taking money from Oil companies and the Heartland institute.
His scientific paper has been pretty much laughed at for not following proper methods and procedures and overstating any claims it makes. That's spot-on for loon candidacy. |
Response to SatansSon666 (Original post)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 10:33 AM
oflguy (20,796 posts)
11. Christopher who?
Response to oflguy (Reply #11)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 10:41 AM
Cold Warrior (14,115 posts)
12. Christopher Booker!
Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #12)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 10:44 AM
oflguy (20,796 posts)
13. Oh, you mean the writer Christopher Booker
Got it now
|
Response to oflguy (Reply #13)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 10:47 AM
Cold Warrior (14,115 posts)
14. Can't remember where you post, can't remember what you post
Having a bad day?
|
Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #14)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 11:36 AM
oflguy (20,796 posts)
15. The writer is irrevelant, no need to slander him
Its the scientist you should be slandering, remember?
|
Response to oflguy (Reply #15)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 11:57 AM
Cold Warrior (14,115 posts)
16. Are you seriously suggesting that the writer does not impact the bias of the content?
Would you say the same thing about Master Brian Thomas who writes “science” articles on Creationism for ICR? Regardless, the article you quoted has a lot of opinion not directly attributable to your Dowser scientist. Given that, let’s look at the scientific expertise of Mr Booker:
“He argues that asbestos, passive smoking and BSE have not been shown to be dangerous.” “Booker has also argued in support of intelligent design, claiming that supporters of the theory of evolution "rest their case on nothing more than blind faith and unexamined a priori assumptions".” “In December 2009, Christopher Booker and Richard North had published an article in The Sunday Telegraph in which they questioned whether Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), was using his position for personal gain, with a follow-up Telegraph article in January 2010. On 21 August 2010, The Daily Telegraph issued an apology, and withdrew the December article from their website having reportedly paid legal fees running into six figures. Dr Pachauri described the statements against him as "another attempt by the climate sceptics to discredit the IPCC."” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker Your author is a militant activist in numerous whacko causes and deserves as much scrutiny as your Dowser. |
Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #16)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 11:58 AM
oflguy (20,796 posts)
17. Blah blah blah
Nobody needs to discredit the IPCC. They do a wonderful job of it themselves.
|
Response to oflguy (Reply #17)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 12:02 PM
Cold Warrior (14,115 posts)
18. Great response when one has no facts to support a position
BTW were people drafted into service in Vietnam prior to the 1969 Draft Lottery?
![]() |
Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #18)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 12:04 PM
oflguy (20,796 posts)
19. I said they were
You don't LISTEN
|
Response to oflguy (Reply #19)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 12:18 PM
Cold Warrior (14,115 posts)
20. AFTER it was shown that you did not know that and figured it out mid-thread
A thread in which you were pontificating as an expert on the VN draft and the impacts of the Draft Lottery on Trumpie's status. Which were absolutely NONE.
|
Response to Cold Warrior (Reply #20)
Sun Jun 23, 2019, 12:19 PM
oflguy (20,796 posts)
21. Blah Blah Blah
Response to oflguy (Reply #17)
Thu Jun 27, 2019, 07:21 AM
Independent.mind (7,015 posts)
22. The always impressive Blah Blah Blah response!!!
Response to SatansSon666 (Original post)
KittyCatIdiots This message was self-deleted by its author.