Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Jack Burton

Profile Information

Member since: Sun May 18, 2014, 11:44 PM
Number of posts: 14,194

Journal Archives

Aloha Snackbar.

He's no rocket scientist: ISIS fighter tries to fire RPG through a small hole in a wall - and appears to blow his own building up

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3341346/He-s-no-rocket-scientist-ISIS-fighter-tries-fire-RPG-small-hole-wall-does-not-end-well.html#v-2479551477495188683

It's begun: Liberal sites are already downplaying outcome of the climate conference.

COP21 has barely started, and fellow hoax conspirators are already trying to soften the blow of the harsh landing of failure that is surely the end result of this conference. Wait for the total crash and burn in two weeks.

http://www.vox.com/2015/11/30/9818582/paris-cop21-climate-talks
The Paris climate talks won't solve global warming. Here's what they'll do instead.
For the next two weeks, diplomats from more than 190 countries will gather near Paris to hammer out a new international agreement on climate change. This conference, known as COP21, is getting heavily hyped: We're already seeing chatter about whether this is our last chance to "save the world" or keep us below 2°C of global warming.

But that's ... the wrong way to think about what's going on in Paris. These climate talks, by themselves, won't fix global warming. They can't do that. They're not designed to do that. The actual goal is much more modest: to add structure and momentum to efforts that are already underway, in legislatures and laboratories and cities and boardrooms around the world, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Two realities: These pledges are plausible, and they are laughably inadequate

What counts as "success" or "failure" for these talks?
If you're expecting a Paris climate deal that will lead to a world powered by 100 percent renewables or keep global warming below 2°C ... well, you're going to be disappointed. The current pledges don't add up to 2°C, as just about everyone and their climate-modeler aunt has now pointed out. And a Paris deal will be built around those current pledges. Likewise, if you were hoping that countries would agree to a global carbon tax in Paris, as climate scientist James Hansen has been urging ... well, that's not going to happen either.

"This is it, my friends," Christiana Figueres, who chairs the UN Framework Convention of Climate Change, reportedly said last year. "I guarantee you, if we do not succeed in 2015 ... it will take 10 years to get everyone around the table again."

I feel a massive sad coming on. Doom is inevitable. Oh noes.

Cruz: "overwhelming majority of violent criminals are Democrats"

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/30/ted-cruz-overwheloming-majority-of-violent-criminals-are-democrats/
Ted Cruz: ‘Overwhelming Majority of Violent Criminals are Democrats’
GOP presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) told conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt that “the simple and undeniable fact is the overwhelming majority of violent criminals are Democrats” during an interview on Monday.

“This whole episode has really displayed the ugly underbelly of media,” stated Cruz. “Every time you have some sort of violent crime or mass killing, you can almost see the media salivating. Hoping, hoping desperately that the murderer happens to be a Republican so they can use it to try to paint their political enemies.”

“There’s a reason why the Democrats for years have been viewed as soft on crime,” Cruz continued. “The Democrats know convicted felons tend to vote Democrat.”

Challenge: can anyone find the pattern here?

If at first you don't notice a pattern keep looking and it will emerge.


The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim and Islamist
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims and Islamist
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim and Islamist
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim and Islamist
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims and Islamist
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims and Islamist
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims and Islamist
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Musiims and Islamist
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims and Islamist
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims and Islamist
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims and Islamist
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims and Islamist
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims and Islamist
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims and Islamist
The Jan 2015 Charlie Ebedo was a Muslim and Islamist
The Nov 2015 Batacalan & Paris were Muslim and Islamist

GROUPS THAT BASICALLY GET ALONG WITH EACH OTHER:
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
Hindus living with Parsis (Original from Yezdi) = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem
Roman Catholics living with Jews =No Problem
Irish Catholics living with Hindus =No Problem
Irish Catholics living with Jews =No Problem
Roman Catholics living with Hindus =No Problem
Judaism with Hindus =No Problem
Judaism with Christians =No Problem
Judaism with Bhuddist =No Problem

GROUPS THAT HAVE PROBLEMS WITH EACH OTHER:
Muslims living with Judaism =Problem
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
Muslims living with Roman Catholics = Problem
Muslims living with Gays = Problem
Muslims living with Lesbians = Problem
Muslims living with LGBT = Problem
Muslims living with Progressive Women = Problem
Muslims living with Liberal Policies = Problem
Muslims living with Secular Policies = Problem

GROUPS THAT HAVE BIG PROBLEMS WITH EACH OTHER:
MUSLIMS(Shi`ite) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Sunni) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Shi`ite) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Sufis) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Sunni) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Hazra) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Sunni) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Sufis) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Sunni) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Ahmadiyyas) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Sunni and Shi`ite) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Alawis) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Sunni and Shi`ite) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Arabs) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Wahabi Sunni ) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Arabs) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Wahabi Sunni ) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Shi`ite) = BIG PROBLEM
MUSLIMS(Wahabi Sunni ) LIVING WITH MUSLIMS(Sunni) = BIG PROBLEM

TERRORIST GROUPS:
Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
ISIS: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
JeT Jamat E Islamia :AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION

LatAm hands climate bill to rich world at summit

All you need to know about next week's global warming hoax summit. The global shake down is underway. Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson were shake down pikers compared to the doomers. The Obamunist will do his best to redistribute vast sums from the U.S. to other countries.

http://news.yahoo.com/latam-hands-climate-bill-rich-world-summit-050003973.html
Latin America will demand that the richest and most polluting countries foot the bill for reducing harmful emissions at the world climate summit starting Monday.

the big polluters should pay.

What has to be negotiated is who will contribute" to the cost of fighting climate change, said Caillaux. "It is not our countries that should contribute, but the richest and most industrialized ones."

Global Warming Godfather Maurice Strong dies

http://unep.org/newscentre/Default.aspx?DocumentID=26854&ArticleID=35597&l=en
The World Mourns One of its Greats: Maurice Strong Dies, His Legacy Lives On
Nairobi, 28 November 2015 - Founding Executive Director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) Maurice Strong passed away at age 86. Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and Executive Director of UNEP, issued the following statement: "Today the world mourns one of its greats. Maurice Strong was a visionary and a pioneer of global sustainable development.

"His courageous leadership allowed the Stockholm Conference of 1972 to make history by launching a new era of international environmental diplomacy which saw the birth of UNEP, the first UN agency to be headquartered in a developing country. Not a believer in summits as an end in themselves, he accepted the appointment to become UNEP's first Executive Director and moved to Kenya to establish UNEP's iconic global headquarters on what was then a coffee farm on the outskirts of Nairobi.

"Strong will forever be remembered for placing the environment on the international agenda and at the heart of development. He shepherd global environmental governance processes - from the original Rio Earth Summit, Agenda 21 and the Rio Declaration to the launch of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Of course others had a slightly different view of Maurice Strong
https://americanpolicy.org/2012/05/08/the-most-dangerous-man-in-the-world-2/
The Most Dangerous Man In The World
There is the point of my questions. Maurice Strong has the potential to be the most powerful and most evil dictator the world has ever known – right now – today – in our day and age – and yet, most of you have never heard of him.

The assault on property rights – in fact the entire radical environmental agenda – is being driven by the United Nations. And Maurice Strong is the number one force behind UN environmental policy. Maurice Strong is the leader of a radical contingent of Environmentalists that believe technology and modern industrialization must be stopped.

You may have heard recent reports that the United Nations is floating the ideas for global taxation to fund the UN’s activities. There has been a lot of whining that the UN can’t live on its members’ contributions and that sound economics demand that it find an independent way to sustain itself. The media is reporting these taxation ideas as just possibilities. But the plan is very well along toward implementation, and Maurice Strong is the driving force behind it.

That environmental policy calls for turning 50% of every American state into wilderness, it will destroy industry and jobs and take away private property rights. And it will tie American sovereignty directly to United National policies. It has nothing to do with preserving clean air and water. It has everything to do with Maurice Strong’s demented drive for power. Throughout history tyrants have sought to rule the world. Always their efforts to achieve that goal have brought harsh dictatorship and misery. Always men have asked how these mad escapades were possible. America was created to prevent it. Hitler, Mao and Stalin were amateurs compared to Maurice Strong – because he’s well on his way to world dictatorship without ever firing a shot.

https://conservativesonfire.wordpress.com/2012/06/21/world-enemy-no-1-_-maurice-strong/
WORLD ENEMY NO. 1 _ MAURICE STRONG?
World Enemy No. 1 _ There is a lot of competition for that title. Some names that jump to mind are Barack Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Soros, Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ban Ki-moon and, I’m sure you could add others to the list. But, probably none have had more global impact of Maurice Strong. A self-proclaimed life long socialist, he is often refered to as the father of international environmentalism and the father of the global warming scare and the father of the UN’s Agenda 21 and its goal of “sustainable living”.

Here are some quotes of Maurice Strong taken from Key.Wiki:
* "I am a socialist in ideology, a capitalist in methodology
* "The Earth Summit will play an important role in reforming and strengthening the United Nations as the centerpiece of the emerging system of democratic global governance.”
* “The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.”
* “Frankly, we may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse.”

http://canadafreepress.com/article/weird-details-of-the-united-nations-creepy-cult-like-environmental-religion
Weird Details of the United Nation’s Creepy, Cult-Like Environmental Religion
Pope of Satan’s Church?
The New York Times called Maurice Strong “Custodian of the Planet;” others—the “indispensable man” of the UN ecological movement. In fact, Strong is arguably the brains behind modern environmentalism—aka global warming, sustainable development, and the conviction mankind/ capitalism must be amputated before the earth dies. But who is Maurice Strong?

Canadian-born, multi-billionaire Maurice Strong grew up impoverished in Manitoba, Canada—his mother’s death related to her insanity. After 11th grade, dropout Strong apprenticed to the fur trade, proving a remarkable success. At 19, he became an investment analyst. By 25, he was VP of Dome Petroleum,; at 31, President of Power Corporation of Canada. He then headed both Petro Canada and Hydro Canada. Strong also worked in government, leaving at 18 for a job at the UN. He was later rewarded with a number of posts and became a special friend of the UN, and a top adviser to several secretary generals. One site notes:

His role leading the UN’s famine relief program in Africa was the first in a series of UN advisory assignments, including reform and appointment as Secretary-General of the UN Conference on Environment and Development—the 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro.

Maurice Strong’s dark side is eminently obvious from his evil ideas behind the modern environmental movement. His character was revealed by his involvement in the Iraqi oil-for-food scam. Obviously, an aged multi-billionaire doesn’t need the money—but it does illuminate one’s ethics when such activities come to light.

Maurice Strong is the most important person in the history of modern global environmentalism.

Girls Don't Poop

These commercials are funny.



The world is losing interest in global warming

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34900474
COP21: Public support for tough climate deal 'declines'
Public support for a strong global deal on climate change has declined, according to a poll carried out in 20 countries. Only four now have majorities in favour of their governments setting ambitious targets at a global conference in Paris. In a similar poll before the Copenhagen meeting in 2009, eight countries had majorities favouring tough action.

The number rating climate change as a very serious issue in richer countries declined significantly from 2009, while support for strong action at the Paris conference has only grown in three of the 20 countries polled. Canada, France, Spain and the UK are the only four with majorities in favour of their governments taking a leading role.



I predict doomers crying in their organic bean sprouts by the end of COP21. It will be a bigger failure than COP15.

Oh and you can ignore the increase shown by the poll in Russia. Putin recently called global warming a fraud. Putin doesn't give two shits what his people think.

Liberals not only want to take your guns, but your hamburgers too.

No Big Mac for you--only free range cage free tofu. What Moochelle has done for school lunches, Doomers can do for everyone. Doomers saving the planet: one hamburger at a time.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34899066
As the Paris Conference of the Parties (COP21) draws near, the international spotlight is more focused on climate change than at any time since the Copenhagen talks of 2009. But amid all the talk of decarbonising energy and transport systems, one crucial area remains in the shadows. The livestock sector produces about 15% of global greenhouse gases, roughly equivalent to all the exhaust emissions of every car, train, ship and aircraft on the planet.

A new report from the think tank Chatham House, Changing Climate, Changing Diets: Pathways to Lower Meat Consumption, argues that without concerted action to address over-consumption of meat, it will be near impossible to prevent global warming from passing the danger level of 2C.

But reining in excessive meat consumption could close the gap by as much as a quarter and will represent an attractive strategy for governments in need of credible and affordable solutions.

Focus groups carried out by Chatham House in four countries suggested that as long as the public could see a strong rationale for change, they would come to accept government intervention on diets. What's more, the public appears to expect that governments will take action in the public good. With a strong enough signal from governments and the media about why we need to change our eating habits, the public is likely to come to accept initially unpopular policies.

Remember doomers know better than you. That is why they can fly around the world, live in mansions, have fleets of limos, armed body guards, hot tubs, yachts, and private airplanes, prime rib, caviar, and champagne. You inferior masses however, need to live in 200 SF hovels, with no electricity, eat only cabbage and tofu, ride bicycles instead of driving cars, and beg your betters for the right to exist.

Only 30 Muslims show up for rally against Paris jihad attacks

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/11/france-only-30-muslims-show-up-for-rally-against-paris-jihad-attacks
That’s thirty Muslims out of around five million Muslims in France. This is not the first time that attendance at a Muslim rally against terrorism has been decidedly underwhelming. In July 2015, a Muslim rally in Ireland against the Islamic State drew fifty people. In October 2014 in Houston, a rally against the Islamic State organized by the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) drew the grand total of ten people. In August 2013 in Boston, about 25 Muslims rallied against “misperceptions” that Islam was violent. About the same number showed up in June 2013 at a progressive Muslim rally in Toronto to claim that their religion had been “hijacked.”

And back in 2005, a group called the Free Muslims Coalition held what it dubbed a “Free Muslims March Against Terror,” intending to “send a message to the terrorists and extremists that their days are numbered … and to send a message to the people of the Middle East, the Muslim world and all people who seek freedom, democracy and peaceful coexistence that we support them.” In the run-up to the event it got enthusiastic national and international publicity, but it ended up drawing about twenty-five people.

Contrast those paltry showings to the thousands of Muslims who have turned out for rallies against cartoons of Muhammad or against Israel. Here are some headlines from the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo jihad massacre of Muhammad cartoonists in January 2015:

* Chechnya: 800,000 Muslims protest Muhammad cartoons in Iran, Pakistan, Ingushetia, elsewhere
* Pakistan: 10,000 Muslims protest against Charlie Hebdo’s Muhammad cartoons
* Australia: 1,000 Muslims rally against Charlie Hebdo and the freedom of speech
* Kyrgyztsan: 1,000 Muslims rally: “I am not Charlie, I love my Prophet.”
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next »