Page: 1 2 Next »

Jack Burton

Profile Information

Member since: Sun May 18, 2014, 10:44 PM
Number of posts: 14,194

Journal Archives

The complete idiots guide to Bernie Sanders.

https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/02/watch-dan-bongino-and-the-complete-idiots-guide-to-bernie-sanders
In this video, Dan Bongino responds to Robert Reich and his defense of Bernie Sanders’ Socialist political platform. Reich’s video tries do explain-away critiques of Sanders’ Socialism, but Bongino does easy work in showing how Reich and Sanders are dead wrong in their approach to American politics.

It is now okay to refer to people of color as white people "dipped in butterscotch"

The left has set a new standard for race relations.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/02/06/anthony-anderson-naacp-image-awards-stacey-dash-ann-coulter-dipped-butterscotch/
NAACP Image Awards Trash Stacey Dash: ‘She’s Just an Ann Coulter Dipped in Butterscotch’
Fox News contributor and actress Stacey Dash has responded to comedian Anthony Anderson, who described her as “Ann Coulter dipped in butterscotch” during Friday night’s 47th NAACP Image Awards in Los Angeles.

Anderson, who hosted the all-black show, used a portion of his opening monologue to joke that conservative Dash, who recently called for an end to Black History Month, would be the first presenter of the night.

“Everybody give a round of applause for Stacey Dash,” Anderson said. “What the hell is she doing here? Doesn’t she know that the Fox network is using her? She’s just an Ann Coulter dipped in butterscotch. That’s all she is. Baby, don’t let them use you! Come back to the black people.”

The Clinton rape machine

You won't see this story on the MSM.

Trayvon Martin RIP

It would have been Trayvon's 21st birthday yesterday. May the world never forget the light that was extinguished.


Climate doomertists suppress dissenting views

http://www.cato.org/blog/do-scientists-suppress-uncertainty-climate-change-debate?utm_content=buffer232e4&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Do Scientists Suppress Uncertainty in the Climate Change Debate?
Ever wonder about the neutrality (or lack thereof) of scientists investigating the subject of global warming? Does it seem that far too many of them eagerly sound alarm bells when it comes to documenting and communicating the potential consequences of human-induced climate change to the public? Well, that little voice inside your head telling you something is awry appears to be vindicated based on new research published in the journal Public Understanding of Science.

In an article that is both enlightening and damning at the same time, Senja Post (2016) set out to investigate the “ideals and practices” of German scientists in communicating climate change research findings to the public. Post accomplished her objective by conducting and analyzing a representative survey of German scientists holding the academic rank of full professor and who were actively engaged in climate change research. Altogether, 300 such scientists were identified and invited to participate in her survey, and 42 percent of them responded with a completed questionnaire in which they were queried about “various aspects of climate change, their attitudes toward publicly communicating scientific uncertainty, and their media relations.”

According to Post, the results of her survey indicated that “the more climate scientists are engaged with the media the less they intend to point out uncertainties about climate change and the more unambiguously they confirm the publicly held convictions that it is man-made, historically unique, dangerous and calculable.” Similarly, the more scientists were convinced of the alarmist narrative that rising atmospheric CO2 is causing dangerous climate change, the more they worked with the media to disseminate that narrative. Post’s survey also revealed that “climate scientists object to publishing a result in the media significantly more when it indicates that climate change proceeds more slowly rather than faster than expected,” which finding, in her words, “gives reason to assume that the German climate scientists are more inclined to communicate their results in public when they confirm rather than contradict that climate change is dramatic.”

Such findings are saddening and shameful, highlighting a near-ubiquitous bias among climate scientists (at least in Germany) who willfully suppress the communication of research findings and uncertainties to the public when they do not support the alarmist narrative of CO2-induced global warming. Such deceit has no place in science.

Okay. Global warming is getting serious now.

Now I know global warming is real. My dogs lay around and sleep all day. I just thought that is what dogs do. But now I know it is because my dog is depressed about global warming. doom doom doom we are all gonna die!

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/global-warming-could-be-causing-dogs-to-become-depressed-say-pet-behaviourists-a6854006.html
Global warming might be causing dogs to become depressed, say pet behaviourists
Leading pet behaviourists told The Independent that the number of depressed and unsettled dogs they have seen in recent months is unprecedented.

And they suggested that the spate of wet winters could be at the root of the problem, as owners cut down on the daily walks that are crucial to keeping dogs’ spirits up.“I’ve been working with dogs for more than 20 years and I can’t remember a time when they’ve been this bored. I tend to see boredom in bursts but I’m seeing it chronically this winter,” said Carolyn Menteith, a dog behaviourist who was named Britain’s Instructor of the Year in 2015.

She – like many scientists and meteorologists – puts this down to climate change and expects to see more bored dogs in the future as global warming unleashes increasingly frequent and intense bouts of winter rainfall.

Trouble in paradise?

http://askinmask.com/2016/01/michelle-obama-has-decided-to-file-for-divorce/
Michelle Obama has decided to file for divorce
American journalists learned about the serious problems of the US president. Already wife sleep in separate rooms. Michelle Obama has hired a lawyer to divorce proceedings.Michelle Obama has decided to file for divorceMarriage presidential couple has long been bursting at the seams. The couple stayed together for the sake of the daughters and his political career.

Journalists believe that the cup US first lady overwhelmed behavior at the funeral of the wife of Nelson Mandela. The American president was laughing and taking pictures with the British Prime Minister and the head of the Danish government, and Michel watched this with a straight face.travel

http://futgossip.com/president-obama-and-wife-michelle-getting-a-divorce-heres-why/#
PRESIDENT OBAMA AND WIFE MICHELLE GETTING A DIVORCE — HERE’S WHY
Michelle Obama has had enough. According to a bombshell new report, the First Lady and Barack Obama are sleeping in separate White House bedrooms. Michelle is also preparing to boot her hubby of 21 years out of their ritzy Chicago home – and seriously discussing divorce. “The smart money says the marriage is doomed,” a source told the National Enquirer. “Barack and Michelle have had a rocky go for years and mainly stayed together for their daughters and his political career.

“But now Michelle is mad AS hell. She feels violated in front of the whole world, and screamed at him, ‘I’ve had enough.’ “She’s met with divorce lawyers and told Barack that she wants a life apart from him. “Michelle will stay in the White House for the rest of Barack’s term for appearances’ sake, but she made it clear they’ll be leading separate lives.

” Michelle was left furious after Barack was photographed brazenly flirting with Denmark’s dishy female prime minister, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, during the service for former South African president Nelson Mandela. Obama, 52, laughed and whispered with the 46-year-old Danish beauty throughout the solemn ceremony, at one point cavalierly caressing her shoulder.

Putting a bow on the final stages of "hope and change".

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/04/us-layoffs-hit-75114-in-jan-surging-to-6-month-high-challenger.html
US layoffs surge to 6-month high
Layoffs surged in January to the highest levels since July as employers in the retail and energy sectors pulled out the pink slips, according to a private survey out Thursday.

U.S.-based companies announced 75,114 planned job cuts last month, up more than 200 percent from a 15-year low in December, according to global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. That figure was also 42 percent higher from a year ago.

Retailers were the biggest job cutter, despite a nearly 8 percent bump in U.S. holiday sales in 2015. The sector slashed 22,246 positions, a seven-year high.

Government IS the problem.

Why our country is falling apart at the seams.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/297946178/Smit-release-appendix-1-Feb-16

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/03/the-smith-project-a-look-at-the-new-american-insurgency/
Here are some of the many highlights from the poll, which is attached below:
70% agree that the federal government today no longer has the consent of the people
79% want to recruit and support more candidates who are ordinary citizens rather than professional politicians and lawyer
A majority of voters would join a third party if it had a chance of success
77% prefer candidates who “take on the political elites and special interests” to those who conform to a set ideology

In brief, here are the points that strong majorities are said to agree upon:
America is in decline, and the next generation may be the first that is worse off than its parents were.
The system is rigged against ordinary people, as powerful interests – corporate and political – exploit the rules for their own benefit.
Both the Democrat and Republican parties are “essentially useless” in changing this situation, with both of them dominated by well-connected special interests, and too interested in accumulating power instead of fulfilling their essential duties to the American people.
The political class is too insular, and should be infused with fresh blood from “ordinary citizens,” rather than “professional politicians and lawyers.”

America cannot succeed unless we take on and defeat the corruption and crony capitalism in our government. Seventy-six percent agree.

we must fix our broken political system before we can go about solving the other important issues, like economic growth, education, national security or immigration. Two-thirds of all voters agree.

Bernie Sanders wants to raise taxes on the rich--families who make $41K per year.

Socialist tax everything and everyone because in their mind the government is the only entity that should exist. Anyone who votes socialist should just expect to keep less of their money.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/02/03/sanders-to-voter-making-41k-a-year-you-and-people-in-middle-will-pay-more-in-taxes-for-single-payer-program/
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)16%
told a voter making $41,000 a year that he and people “in the middle of the economy” are “going to pay a little bit more in taxes” to fund his “Medicare-for-all, single-payer program,” which he maintained would save middle class families thousands a year by eliminating private health insurance premiums during Wednesday’s CNN Democratic Presidential Town Hall.

Sanders was asked by Chris Brownell, “Senator Sanders, the first thing I hear about you is that you’re going to raise taxes on the middle class. I support my family on a salary of $41,000 a year. I’m wondering if you raise my taxes, how does that help me?”

Sanders will ulimately borrow the Obamunist's lie, "You can keep your doctor. Period." "The average family will save $2500 per year. Period."
Go to Page: 1 2 Next »