Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 178 Next »


Profile Information

Name: Mike
Gender: Male
Member since: Tue May 20, 2014, 12:32 PM
Number of posts: 35,678

About Me

US Navy Retired, Aerospace worker. All around good Dude. Eternal Foe of the work ethic

Journal Archives

Media Desperation dialed to 11

The Washington Post published an article on Monday complaining that President Trump posed next to a biker wearing a “sexist” patch on his vest.

Trump met with supporters in the “Bikers For Trump” group over the weekend and posed for photos with some of the group’s members at the Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.

The bikers typically wear vests with dozens of various patches on them, and the Washington Post zoomed in on the photos of the bikers with the president to see what the patches said.

One of the patches seemed to ruffle the feathers of one reporter, who called it “sexist.” The patch in question features an image of a topless woman with guns covering her breasts and the caption, “I guns and t***ies.”

Posted by Gunslinger201 | Tue Aug 14, 2018, 03:13 AM (1 replies)

Shows Starting, Strozk Fired,Soon Fake FISA Warrant Declassified

Lots of People from Obama’s DOJ will be exposed

Loretta Lynch accepted the promise of a SCOTUS Apointment to let Hillary off

Trump has all the evidence!

Posted by Gunslinger201 | Mon Aug 13, 2018, 12:16 PM (16 replies)

Ascending: Legacy Media Spotlight Propels QAnon Movement

Over the last week the Washington Post, New York Times, CNN. NBC News, CBS News, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Vox, and the Daily Beast have all written a plethora of over 20 articles on the Qanon Movement all using highly similar talking points to marginalize the movement.

Instead it’s just pushing it into the cultural mainstream– the Streisand Effect. The liberal mainstream media will never learn.

The Washington Post published three articles in the last four days. Crazytown– clearly the mainstream media and their deepstate handlers see the movement as a threat coming up to the midterms.

Such a coordinated major media barrage of negative coverage hasn’t been seen since Wikileaks published The Podesta Emails.

Into the Cultural Mainstream

Over the course of the last week, the cultural and political phenomenon known as the QAnon Movement has been categorically attacked by nearly every major legacy media organization in the US in what appears to be a coordinated effort to mischaracterize and discredit it in rapid succession.

Notable left-leaning publications from the Washington Post, NY Times, USA Today, Bloomberg, to magazines like The New Yorker, Newsweek, and Fortune, to national and cable news outlets such as NBC News, CNN, CBS News, and MSNBC, and even national broadcasting services such as PBS and the BBC have all shined in concert a glaringly critical spotlight on the movement.

Other than the consistently negative media coverage of President Trump, such a barrage of coordinated mainstream media attacks has not been seen since Wikileaks published The Podesta Emails in the final weeks before the 2016 US Presidential Election.

The coverage’s common denominator is the use of shared descriptives including “fringe, far-right, false, deranged, insane, bizarre, cult, and conspiracy theory” in an attempt to marginalize the movement. The media blitz reached a zenith after President Trump’s rally in Tampa, Florida on July 31, where a contingency of attendees sported “Q” t-shirts and raised homemade placards directing viewers to #QAnon and to, the website that re-publishes QAnon’s 8chan content.

By all objective standards, the popularity of the movement is on the rise. Yet, QAnon remains by design inherently mysterious. No one knows QAnon’s actual identity, as the information is exclusively published on the anonymous forum 8chan. In an age increasingly characterized by big tech profiteering from the sale of users’ private metadata and algorithm-based censorship, 8chan remains one of the last online vestiges that values freedom of thought, speech, and information.

I am a follower of Q. I have seen enough to convince me it’s real. The total panic of the media trying to convince me it’s fake ...well you get the idea

Posted by Gunslinger201 | Mon Aug 13, 2018, 11:14 AM (0 replies)

The Media IS the Enemy of the American People

The Media Are Hiding Their Knowledge and Duplicity – Buzzfeed, WaPo and New York Times Had Unredacted FISA Application For Over A Year…

We shared a discussion thread several months ago about how the media are enmeshed within the story of the DOJ and FBI corruption. However, only recently did we discover the media engagements were not just pervasive, they were/are participatory.

As a consequence the same media cannot reasonably report on any aspect of the story without exposing their own duplicity; their only choice is to double down on lies they helped create and promote.

In preparation for explosive developments soon to reach critical mass CTH strongly urges everyone to think carefully about these recently discovered empirical truths:

#1) The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence had the full, unredacted, FISA application on Carter Page since March 17th, 2017. Think carefully about that. Think about what every member of that committee has said since March 17, 2017.

#2) With the leak of the Top Secret FISA application, by James Wolfe to Ali Watkins, Buzzfeed, The Washington Post and New York Times have had the full, unredacted, FISA application in their possession since March 17th, 2017. Again, think carefully about that. Think about all of their reporting since March 17, 2017.

#3) As a direct consequence of #1 and #2 – The media have deliberately, and with specific intent, falsified their reporting and kept the truth hidden which would undermine their false reporting. Again, think very carefully about the ramifications.

The media’s role in the DOJ/FBI corruption scandal is not only pervasive, it’s participatory.

The media has known since 2017 there was no legitimate reason to spy on Trump but they won't report that.
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Mon Aug 13, 2018, 03:19 AM (6 replies)

Serious Question for Democratic Party Voters

Democrat Voters,

If (Hypothetically) Audio existed of Bill Clinton offering Loretta Lynch a SCOTUS Appointment in Exchange for calling the Hillary Classified Material and Illegal Server Scandal a "Matter" and Making it "Go Away" would that Affect your Vote?

The National Security Agency (NSA) blocked the release of a purported tape of Bill Clinton and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s private airplane talk with a rare legal justification used to protect top national security secrets.

The NSA’s block of the release of this information — citing one of President Obama’s executive orders — undercuts Hillary Clinton’s claim that her husband and Lynch had a “purely social” conversation about grandkids and golf on June 27, 2016, two weeks before Lynch dropped the Department of Justice investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.

Posted by Gunslinger201 | Sat Aug 11, 2018, 06:29 AM (15 replies)

Famed Astronaut Buzz Aldrin Loves the Space Force!

That's Good Enough for Me

Former astronaut Buzz Aldrin called President Donald Trump’s Space Force proposal “one giant leap in the right direction” on Friday.

Aldrin, the second man to step on the moon in 1969, announced on Twitter his support for the president’s potential extension of the military.

One giant leap in the right direction. #SpaceForce

— Buzz Aldrin (@TheRealBuzz) August 10, 2018

Watch Buzz Handle a Moon Landing Disbeliever!
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Fri Aug 10, 2018, 05:34 PM (0 replies)

Hey Shkreli, Google this Guy

Posted by Gunslinger201 | Fri Aug 10, 2018, 11:33 AM (9 replies)

If Music Gives You Goosebumps, Theres Something Special About Your Brain

Since we’re talking about Music.....

It’s one of those special sensations we couldn’t quite explain — until now.

I’ll never forget the moment I first felt a shiver down my spine while listening to music. My skin burst into goosebumps, as if the temperature had suddenly dropped 35 degrees.

But the room temperature was steady.

I think I was 13 years old, plunging into classical geekdom headfirst. And like most things at the time, I had no idea what was happening to my body.

Later that week, my French Horn teacher laughed. It’s just a feeling that’s hard to describe to most people, he explained.

Little did I know, he was completely right. But it turns out there’s scientific research to back it up.

According to a scientific study, getting goosebumps from music is a pleasure experienced only by a certain percentage of the population.

In fact, a substantial percentage of people will never experience it — simply because their neurons aren’t linked to create the sensation.

So who’s part of the lucky group?

Matthew Sachs first started studying the phenomenon as an undergraduate at Harvard. According to Sachs, reactions like goosebumps in response to music indicate a completely different brain structure. Basically, these people have a denser volume of fibers connecting their auditory cortex to areas associated with emotional processing. Others lacking that density simply won’t register such a strong reaction.

At this stage, it’s unclear why these connections exist. But the groundbreaking discovery is that they do exist.

“Our findings provide the first evidence for a neural basis of individual differences in sensory access to the reward system, and suggest that social–emotional communication through the auditory channel may offer an evolutionary basis for music making as an aesthetically rewarding function in humans.”

Here’s how Der Sarkissian, a research assistant at USC’s Brain and Creativity Institute, described the sensation to Nueroscience News.

“I sort of feel that my breathing is going with the song, my heart is beating slower and I’m feeling just more aware of the song — both the emotions of the song and my body’s response to it.”

This happens to me, I thought it happens to everyone.

Does it happen to you?

Posted by Gunslinger201 | Fri Aug 10, 2018, 09:57 AM (25 replies)

What would the intelligence community's 'insurance policy' against Trump look like?

Let’s begin in the realm of the fanciful.

Assume, for the sake of argument, that powerful, connected people in the intelligence community and in politics worried that a wildcard Trump presidency, unlike another Clinton or Bush, might expose a decade-plus of questionable practices. Disrupt long-established money channels. Reveal secret machinations that could arguably land some people in prison.
What exactly might an “insurance policy” against Donald Trump look like?

He would have to be marginalized at every turn. Strategies would encompass politics, the courts, opposition research and the media. He’d have to become mired in lawsuits, distracted by allegations, riddled with calls for impeachment, hounded by investigations. His election must be portrayed as the illegitimate result of a criminal or un-American conspiracy.

To accomplish this, bad actors in the intel community could step up use of surveillance tools as a weapon to look for dirt on Trump before his inauguration. They could rely on dubious political opposition research to secretly argue for wiretaps, plant one or more spies in the Trump campaign, then leak to the press a mix of true and false stories to create a sense of chaos.

Once Trump is in office, a good insurance policy would call for neutralizing the advisers seen as most threatening, including his attorney general. The reigning FBI director could privately send the implicit message that as long as Trump minds his own business, he won’t be named as a target. When the president asks the FBI director to lift the cloud and tell the public their president isn’t under investigation, the FBI director could demur and allow a storm of innuendo to build. Idle chatter benefits the plot. There would be rampant media leaks, both true and false, but none of them would benefit Trump.

All would be well unless the president removes the FBI director. Then, a rider on the insurance policy would kick in. After months of assuring Trump he’s not under investigation, he must now become a focus to keep him away from the Justice Department and the FBI; once an investigation opens, all of Trump’s attempts to affect policy or to dig into allegations against the intelligence community could be portrayed as obstruction of justice.

How to open an investigation after all these months? Appoint a special counsel. (Easy to get the right one, with Trump’s attorney general out of the way.) How to get public and congressional support for a special counsel? Through a partnership between the fired FBI director and the media; he could secretly leak to the New York Times anti-Trump versions of memos he wrote, inventing the pretext for a special counsel probe. The chosen special counsel should be an insider with his own legacy to protect. Anti-Trump FBI officials who secretly vowed to “stop” Trump could be assigned to the investigation.

As crazy as it all sounds, it becomes slightly more plausible when we examine the record and find self-described conspiracies to develop “insurance policies.”

Drip drip drip
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Fri Aug 10, 2018, 06:31 AM (1 replies)

Surprise, he's a Communist who hates America!

And a Finalist for "Most Punchable Face Evah!"
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Fri Aug 10, 2018, 03:06 AM (6 replies)
Go to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 178 Next »