Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next »


Profile Information

Name: Mike
Gender: Male
Member since: Tue May 20, 2014, 11:32 AM
Number of posts: 47,673

About Me

US Navy Retired, Aerospace worker. All around good Dude. Eternal Foe of the work ethic

Journal Archives

CNN poll showing Hillary won debate sampled 41/26 Dems

How many more times are they going to be caught red handed before their credibility is par with MSLSD?
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:57 AM (7 replies)

The Pundits say Hillary the Voters say Trump

The Media seems to have had the Hillary won story written before the debates

Hillary stayed vertical, yay she won

CNN seems to be the Lone Ranger
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Tue Sep 27, 2016, 07:11 AM (12 replies)

Obama Lies, Media still swoons

FBI dump conclusively proves Obama knew about Hillarys illegal server and they both broke the law using it, Media couldn't care less

President Obama used an undisclosed pseudonym to communicate with then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on her private email server – shocking her top aide Huma Abedin when she learned of it.

“How is that not classified?” Abedin “exclaimed” to investigators when shown a copy of the 2012 exchange between Clinton and Obama, according to a trove of 189-pages of FBI documents dumped Friday night into Clinton’s use of the private server.

After learning that the president used email with a pseudonym — apparently to try to protect his identity — Abedin asked her interrogators if she could keep a copy of the email.

The FBI documents don’t reveal if they let Abedin take a copy home with her.

Although tens of thousands of Clinton’s emails have been made public since it was revealed she had exclusively used a private email server to conduct official work, emails with the president have been exempt from disclosure.

“This exchange strongly suggests Clinton and the president knowingly discussed classified material in an unclassified setting and hence broke the law,” Raj Shah, the research director at the Republican National Committee, told the Post.

But a rep for Clinton downplayed the documents significance.

“These materials further demonstrate why the Justice Department believed there was no basis to move forward with this case,” spokesman Brian Fallon said.

Cheryl Mills given immunity deal in Clinton email server probe

Cheryl Mills given immunity deal in Clinton email server probe
The documents also show IT workers for Platte River Networks — the external company that hosted Clinton’s server — referred in an internal work ticket to “the Hilary coverup operation” when their client asked for changes to email retention and archive/email cleanup. A worker later said the term was a joke.

The Trump campaign immediately seized on this, with senior communications advisor Jason Miller saying: “there was a concerted effort to systematically destroy potentially incriminating information.”

“It’s no wonder that at least five individuals tied to the email scandal, including Clinton’s top State Department aide and attorney Cheryl Mills, secured immunity deals from the Obama Justice Department to avoid prosecution,” Miller added, referring to news Friday of additional Clinton aides receiving protection from the FBI so they could speak to authorities.

Posted by Gunslinger201 | Tue Sep 27, 2016, 05:43 AM (4 replies)

Hillary Health Emergency Bingo!

Lets have fun with this. its better than a drinking game on a weeknight!
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Mon Sep 26, 2016, 03:56 PM (5 replies)

Panic in Democratland

In recent days, it has begun to dawn on a lot of people that Donald Trump really may win the election. (I, of course, have been predicting it all along…) This is causing near-hysteria in some quarters, and louder demands by Democrats for journalists in general, and the debate moderators in particular, to put their thumbs on the scale. As if they weren’t already doing so!

Last night the Democrats sent out this email, with the subject heading “we. QUIT.” Click to enlarge:

No, it isn’t a joke anymore. And with a hundred million people set to tune in to tonight’s debate, the Democrats have even more to worry about: what if millions of those viewers don’t find Trump scary or dangerous, and they see no reason to consider him a “racist, sexist bigot”? If I were a Democrat, I’d be worried too.
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Mon Sep 26, 2016, 02:27 PM (15 replies)

Voters see debate moderators helping Clinton

They better play it fair

Voters are pretty convinced the moderators at the presidential debates scheduled to begin tonight will be helping Hillary Clinton more than Donald Trump.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that a plurality (46%) of Likely U.S. Voters believes most moderators will try to help Clinton in the upcoming debates. Only six percent (6%) think they will try to help Trump instead. Just 32% say most of the moderators will try to be unbiased, while 15% are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Seventy-eight percent (78%) of voters who support Trump think the moderators will try to help Clinton. Most Clinton supporters (56%) say the moderators will try to be unbiased, but 20% say they’ll try to help their candidate. Twelve percent (12%) of Clinton voters think the moderators will try to help Trump, compared to just two percent (2%) of Trump supporters who feel that way.

Four years ago before the first debate between President Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney, 71% of Republicans and 56% of unaffiliated voters said debate moderators are biased, but Democrats by a 47% to 30% margin felt they were not biased. In 2008 before the first debate, 22% felt the first moderator, veteran PBS newsman Jim Lehrer, would try to help Obama, while six percent (6%) expected him to help GOP nominee John McCain. Forty-three percent (43%) though Lehrer would play a neutral role.
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Mon Sep 26, 2016, 01:23 PM (2 replies)

Obama’s Colossal Email Lie Final Test for Tarnished MSM

PJM: That Barack Obama communicated in 2012—under a redacted pseudonym—with Hillary Clinton on the then secretary of State’s permeable home-brew email server and then claimed he did not know of that server’s existence until it was reported in the press in 2014 is far more than the usual politician’s prevarication.

Since the fish rots from the top—and in this case it stinks to high heaven—the surfacing of this particular presidential lie calls to question the entire FBI inquiry into the Clinton server, an investigation whose credibility was paper thin in the first place and has now completely vanished.

It’s time to ask that age-old question: “What did the president know and when did he know it?”

That we do know (as of this Friday’s dump) that one of Clinton’s own IT workers referred to her then just-announced 60-day email retention policy (who does that?) as “Hillary’s coverup operation” almost (but not completely) tells the story in those three quoted words. Even though they say it’s not the crime, but the coverup, in this case, it’s both.

The seriousness of this crime/coverup—involving the national security of our country—makes Watergate seem like a minor kerfuffle at a sewing circle.
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Mon Sep 26, 2016, 10:18 AM (9 replies)

So If Hillary doesn't cough out her left eye into her glass of thickened water....

The Media declares her the winner?

Should be fun!
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Mon Sep 26, 2016, 06:55 AM (29 replies)

Real reality check:ABC WaPo D+10 weighted poll

Media polling is beyond ridiculous. The same bias exists within any media poll as reflected within all other content aspects provided by the broadcast or publication.

The timing of media polling is also well beyond predictable. To generate news-worthy headlines they always push polling results around key dates; in this example on the eve of the first general election presidential debate.

ABC/WaPo release a poll today (pdf here) containing all the previous elements found in their prior ideological agenda polls. The selection of party affiliation responses is silly.

The most current national survey of party affiliation shows Democrat party registration is D+4 –SEE HERE– nationally. However, for their needs, ABC/WaPo use D+10:

However, the good news is: even with that ridiculous +10 skew ABC/WaPo can only manage a 2 point Clinton lead: 46/44
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Sun Sep 25, 2016, 06:18 PM (5 replies)

Is Hillary Clinton losing the 2016 election?

The anxiety is palatable.  The question will not be made audible, but it remains: is she losing this election?  Is it really slipping away?  To put it in the words of Hillary Clinton:  "Why am I not winning by 50 points?"

1. Epistemological poisoning.  The depth of public outrage has been the consistent misunderstanding of all pundits trying to explain the current election.  Why is the public so mad?  Why do people seem to love Trump so much?  Those charged with telling us the truth – journalists, the federal government, politicians, academia, Hollywood, and the Church – do not.  The epistemological organs of our nation favor an illiberal anti-American view of the world, epitomized by the Jonathan Grubers and condescending Hollywood stars, that mocks the average American

Sadly, even the Republican Party thinks this way about the average American, and for that, the public burned down the RNC.  While Democrats laughed, they never thought the populist fires could touch their perfect candidate.  That was the boundless hubris of a reactionary community emboldened by the echo chamber of leftist politics emanating from American institutions taken over by Jacobins.

Americans were tired of drinking the poison, so they shattered the epistemological world painfully constructed by the left.  This is not Plato's Blue Republic; it's a democracy where people can show up and vote.

2. Democrats started losing in 2010.  Democrats forget that they won last time on the basis of a change agent named Barack Obama.  He promised to fundamentally transform America.  We were so messed up after President Bush – according to Obama and his followers – that we needed this complete political overhaul.  In fact, the more experienced and established Hillary Clinton lost rather incredibly to this unknown advocate of hope and change.  She was the insider, and he was the outsider.  McCain was the insider, and Obama was the less experienced outsider.

But by 2010, the Democratic eternal dynasty of politics was already falling apart.  The Congress and almost every elected office in America began moving sharply right.  Presently, the nation has not had so many elected Republicans since the 1920s.  That was the Tea Party and the building outrage since Obamacare.

Democrats and the elite fooled themselves with the win they scored over Romney in 2012.  President Obama received millions fewer votes in 2012 than 2008, and the shine and appeal of the unknown was gone.  Obama was largely just another politician.  Republicans continued to gain more and more congressional control in 2014.  This surge has been ongoing for the Republicans since 2010.

Was Hillary ever as popular or as persuasive as Barack Obama?  The honest answer was always no.  The hope and change of Obama is the reciprocal cry of flyover country as they mob Donald Trump.  Hillary Clinton was foolish never even to try to triangulate against President Obama.  She left the promise of change wide open and tied herself hopelessly to the establishment and status quo. 

Read more:
Posted by Gunslinger201 | Sun Sep 25, 2016, 03:42 PM (12 replies)
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next »