Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next »

smoke check

Profile Information

Member since: Mon Jun 2, 2014, 04:15 PM
Number of posts: 6,011

Journal Archives

Redonkulous - Zombie Apocalypse / The prison doors open

It's worth the watch, and I think even liberals will agree with much of what he is saying, even if they don't like the conclusions.

Feminism Switzerland and California

Now, stop. Reasonable child support is one thing, but why should a man have to pay for a woman he isn't currently having sex with. It's the 21st century ladies. You need to get a job. You also need to admit if the kid isn't his, he shouldn't be held responsible for that either.

That's right, California can arbitrarily say a man is the father of a child of a woman he has never even met, much less had intercourse with. Now, feminists claim to want equality so this seems like a home run. Feminists would support fairness, right? Don't make me laugh.

The Ant and the Grasshopper


This one is a little different…
Two Different Versions…
Two Different Morals

The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed.

The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.

Be responsible for yourself!

The ant works hard in the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while he is cold and starving.

CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.
America is stunned by the sharp contrast.

How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?

Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper and everybody cries when they sing, ‘It’s Not Easy Being Green…’

ACORN stages a demonstration in front of the ant’s house where the news stations film the SEIU group singing, We shall overcome.

Then Rev. Jeremiah Wright has the group kneel down to pray for the grasshopper’s sake, while he damns the ants.

President Obama condemns the ant and blames President Bush 43, President Bush 41, President Reagan, Christopher Columbus, and the Pope for the grasshopper’s plight.

Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid exclaim in an interview with Larry King that the ant has gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.

Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer.

The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the Government Green Czar and given to the grasshopper.

The story ends as we see the grasshopper and his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ant’s food while the government house he is in, which, as you recall, just happens to be the ant’s old house, crumbles around them because the grasshopper doesn’t maintain it.

The ant has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again.

The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and peaceful, neighborhood.

The entire nation collapses, bringing the rest of the free world with it.

When the ethic and value of hard work and personal responsibility are removed from society, the result is not a good one.

Years of wage garnishment. 5 years in jail.

Lives ruined. And guess what....

Will paternity fraud be charged? Will the child support money be ordered to be returned? Will five years of this man life be returned? LOL, of course not. She's a woman and therefore protected by the law from such consequences.

Further, take a long look at the end. The woman is incensed that she was caught. No remorse, none at all.

The results I am talking about are around 14:50.

Popp explains his motivation

Much of what the man says I agree with.

Redonkulas - Women in combat.

Okay, there are some images in the first minute and a half or so, but he also explains why they are, fair warning is given.

This is about as fair and researched a take on women in combat as you are going to find. Simple facts can tell you that generally speaking, it is a very bad idea. What would be an even worse idea is to lower the standards so that more women can be in combat.

The Question Only You Can Answer:

And the tastiest bits:

“The end result, which we want to avoid, is the concentration camp. The gulag. The gas chamber. The Spanish Inquisition. All of those things. If you are in a death camp, no one would fault you for resisting. But when you’re being herded towards the gas chamber, naked and seventy pounds below your healthy weight, it’s too late. You have no chance. On the other hand, no one would support you if you started an armed rebellion because the government posts speed limits on open roads and arrests people for speeding. So when was it not too late, but also not too early?”

“A woman’s confronted by a big, strong, stranger. She doesn’t know what he’s planning, and she’s cautious. Getting away from him’s not possible. They’re in a room and he’s standing in front of the only way out, or she’s in a wheelchair—whatever. Leaving the area’s not an option.

“How do you spot the precise point where a society is standing at the back of the van and the State has the handcuffs out?”

This is a fair enough question.

A monument to victims of progressivism

This monument in Prague is for the victims of progressivism (what the communists said they were doing). Notice how each step up, each progress, he is left more and more shattered, until at last he has no head and more significantly, no torso.

However, just like a good cinematic monster, communism and progressivism didn't die. At least no one found a corpse. Look at how anything masculine is pathologized by progressivists and feminists as agressive and inherently bad. It's the same monster. It's just found a way to make itself appealing to a large segment of western women and more than a few disaffected minorities in America.

UVA Rape Victim not actually raped. Anna Merlan, feminist, calls it a bad day.

The mounting evidence shows that "Jackie" likely was not raped. To a rational mind, this is cause for relief. An alleged horrific gang rape that involved nine men and featured the alleged victim being force to lay on broken glass as she was raped, seems not to have happened. Personally, a day where no one hurts anyone else, much less commits sexual assault would seem to be good day.

Rational and Anna Merlan, feminist journalist, apparently have not ever met. It is a horror that "Jackie" was not raped. In fact, it's a "bad day" that no gang rape seems to have occurred.

This a bad and shitty day, and it'll remain bad and shitty for a long time. - Anna Merlan

Rape culture is nothing more than a meme being used to paint all men as rapists and justify laws that no moral person can honestly support.

Feminists admit their 1 in 5 statistic is a gross distortion; now claim the number is 1 in 3.

They even have the government of Quebec saying as much. As Goebbels said, the bigger the lie, the easier it is for people to believe it.

Those enterprising Quebecois feminists have even set up a Facebook page where women can anonymously (engage in a witch hunt) make accusations against men. They place being slapped on the butt as the same level as penetrative rape, claiming that it is the gravity of the event is in the mind of the victim. Attempts to point out that fallacy are viewed as supporting the patriarchy and the rape culture.

They even manage to blame the patriarchy for lesbian rape in one ain't that some shit.

Two House of Commons members (Liberals) have been accused anonymously and pretty boy, son of Pierre Trudeau, and current leader of the Liberals Justin Trudeau suspended them pending an investigation. Read that again. They have effectively been punished based on unproven anonymous claims, until what? This is presumed guilt. Whatever happened to presumed innocence? The benefit of the doubt does not belong to the accuser.

The best information available indicates that half or more of all rapes reported to the authorities are either unfounded or false. What is the likelihood of an anonymous posting of such on the web being true?

(Yes it's in French, I was practicing last night and came across this.)
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next »