Page: 1

smoke check

Profile Information

Member since: Mon Jun 2, 2014, 04:15 PM
Number of posts: 6,034

Journal Archives

The Myth of Nazi Capitalism

During the nineteenth century, when socialism was becoming fashionable in Europe, there was no distinction between “socialism” and “communism.” There were different forms of socialism, of course, but these were not distinguished by the different terms. Different thinkers had their preference, but the terms were used interchangeably, even by Karl Marx. Mises writes, ”In 1875, in his Criticism of the Gotha Programme of the German Social Democratic Party, Marx distinguished between a lower (earlier) and a higher (later) phase of the future communist society. But he did not reserve the name of communism to the higher phase, and did not call the lower phase socialism as differentiated from communism.”

German socialism, as Mises defines it, differs from what he called “socialism of the Russian pattern” in that “it, seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange.” However, this is only a superficial system of private ownership because through a complete system of economic intervention and control, the entrepreneurial function of the property owners is completely controlled by the State. By this, Mises means that shop owners do not speculate about future events for the purpose of allocating resources in the pursuit of profits. Just like in the Soviet Union, this entrepreneurial speculation and resource allocation is done by a single entity, the State, and economic  calculation is thus impossible.

The Soviets were able to brand the Nazis as capitalists only because they had already started redefining the terms “socialism” and “communism” to fit their own political agenda. In 1912, Lenin formed his Communist Party. The members of his party, the Bolsheviks, were now distinct from the other, rival groups of socialists. The terms “communism” and “socialism” were still able to be used interchangeably, and the Soviet Union itself was just a shorthand name for the “United Soviet Socialist Republics.” But by branding his group under the title of the “Communist Party,” the title “Communist” — now meaning a member of Lenin’s party — became a way of saying that this was a “true socialist,” so to speak.

https://mises.org/library/myth-nazi-capitalism

How people could think that a political party that puts socialist right in it's name is anything other than socialist is something beyond belief.

November 4 and the death spasms of the left.

....What we are experiencing, far from a deadly revolutionary upsurge threatening everything of value, is a historically unique situation where, for the first time on record, a leftist movement is in complete and accelerating collapse within a democratic polity. The upcoming people’s revolt is simply another symptom of this.

The Democrats, America’s de facto leftist party (note how a sworn socialist, Bernie Sanders, is effectively exercising leadership of the party without anyone so much as blinking) have lost over 1,000 offices nationwide in the past year. The GOP controls nearly two-thirds of all governorships and nearly half of state governments. The left’s political presence and influence is negligible across vast areas of the heartland. They have abandoned the working class, the bedrock of any leftist movement, in favor of representing transsexuals, ball club millionaires, and noncitizen criminals, not a strategy with much of a future, on the face of it

Left-wing failure is not arguable. The international record stands for itself, having become a truism without ever quite attaining the status of a cliché. Though the academy and the media have tried their best to bury the record (while earnest and naïve types such as Anne Applebaum scratch their heads as to why it lacks the immediacy of the Nazi crimes), it’s impossible to hide failures so gargantuan as to have left mountainous piles of corpses across the entire landscape of Eurasia. (Every few years the spring thaw in Siberia and the Urals uncovers mass graves, the legacy of the Gulag, sending thousands of mummified, nearly intact corpses drifting down the rivers. This is what Weinstein, Antifa and the rest would wish on us.) The same pattern is occurring at this moment in Venezuela, a wealthy nation reduced first to pauperdom and soon to open massacre.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/10/the_lefts_last_spasm.html#ixzz4wPWb74dy
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook


A well written, well thought out article. The left has nothing left but violence, and leftists know it. Their policies stand as the naked failures they are, far too often on top of mountains of human bodies. This is why the left is trying so hard to silence people that disagree, even though that tactic only further dooms it.



Du(h) lies and whines about radio.

I normally don't go over there, no I don't care what you believe, but I saw this thread and it irked me, not because it's liberals telling lies, they do that all the time after all, but because of what they are choosing to lie about.

murielm99, get your ass over here and defend yourself, if you dare.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029734699

They are talking about K-Love. Is it the greatest music in the world, no, but they don't put dreadful or vile music up either. Their praise music is meant to be uplifting, and in that regard, it succeeds. It's probably the second radio station on my radio dial, so I listen quite a bit. I have never once heard them discuss illegal aliens, except to mention that we are all God's children. I have never heard them discuss homosexuals except in the same vein as illegal aliens. I have never heard them mention the ACLU. They may, correctly, have said that most of the founding fathers were absolutely Christian, well that's true, and I know how much that chaps the ass of the modern liberal.

As one of my favorite posters on another site says, "Dummies lie. All the time, Dummies lie."
Go to Page: 1