Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Zimm_Man_Fan

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Member since: Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:49 PM
Number of posts: 6,972

About Me

The last one to serve on the last jury before this joint takes its rightful place in the land of the 404 error, be sure and turn off the lights. See yah.

Journal Archives

You're going to be in for quite a surprise if/when Muslims become the

majority in the West. That avatar of yours even more so.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Fri May 6, 2016, 07:39 PM (2 replies)

I'm not your research assistant - hie thee to Google or check out #39.

Barring that, buzz off.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Fri May 6, 2016, 07:07 PM (0 replies)

I'll take it slow, as logic eludes you: Hastert's victims DID NOT COME FORWARD during

the entire period of his Speakership, or before. Had they done so, Hastert would have been asked to step aside until the charges could be investigated by both the GOP leadership and law enforcement.

In order for someone to be investigated for a crime one of two things or both has to happen: (a) a victim has to come forward, and make the charge, or (b) some other evidence of an incriminating nature has to be brought to the attention of law enforcement in some manner.

Let me repeat that, and italicize it, as I'm pretty sure you're going to have trouble thinking your way through such a complicated thought:

In order for someone to be investigated for a crime one of two things or both has to happen: (a) a victim has to come forward, and make the charge, or (b) some other evidence of an incriminating nature has to be brought to the attention of law enforcement in some manner.

With me so far?

Let's hope.

Now, none of his victims ever opted to come forward: instead, they blackmailed him for hush money. That in and of itself is a crime, but let's put that aside. I don't really begrudge his victims hitting him up for illicit cash, but just note it would have been better had they come forward publicly.

Now, Hastert started making massive cash withdraws to pay this hush money, and it was at that point that (b) in my point above kicked in. Here, let's repeat and highlight it for your edification:

In order for someone to be investigated for a crime one of two things or both has to happen: (a) a victim has to come forward, and make the charge, or (b) some other evidence of an incriminating nature has to be brought to the attention of law enforcement in some manner.

Still with me?

Let's keep hoping.

Now, at that point the FBI hit him up with questions about why he kept withdrawing such large amounts of cash from the bank, and he lied to them just like Bill Clinton lied to Congress back in 1997-98. Both are federal crimes. It was ONLY THEN that the claims of his abusing children came to light. With me? Only at that stage did it come to law enforcement's attention and the rest of the world's knowledge that he had committed these crimes.

The difference is, that Hastert was immediately brought before the bar of justice, and will likely die a broken man in prison; Bill Clinton was given a pass for his crimes and misdeeds by his lemming-like supporters - i.e, the impeachment trial failed - and he's still running around hoping and praying Hillary loses the election so he can divorce her in 2016 rather than having to wait until 2021 or '25.

Now, did you follow me to this point, or do you need to go back and start over?

Take your time! This isn't a test! Just a little foray into reading comprehension and critical thinking.

Good luck!

Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Fri May 6, 2016, 06:26 PM (1 replies)

Yes, they can: they planted those stories in the press and social media in the

first place. It is irrelevant whether Her Majesty or any of her staffers made a public statement regarding the Birther nonsense: they were pushing that story "off the record" all over the place. Her toadies at DU were just taking their cue from her and her staff.

If I privately spread a rumor that "News2Me" once scored below 70 on an IQ test, and that explains his inability to debate issues with anything other than phony rhetorical questions like those above, and pretty soon the "Cons" here are publicly making this claim to and about you in replies and posts, then I'm the one responsible for getting that ball rolling - not that I would ever do such a thing, heavens no!

Same here with Hillary and her staff: they started this ball rolling on the birther stuff, and now they're gonna have to own it. See how that works?

Logic 101: you gotta embrace it.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Fri May 6, 2016, 05:51 PM (1 replies)

Note the parsing language^^^ She wasn't, but she sure had her toadies put the birther stuff

out there because, like the typical Clinton scum she is, she doesn't give a whit about the truth and has not a shred of integrity in her soul. OF COURSE she didn't personally believe it: but that is irrelevant.

She had her toadies plant that meme in the press, social media, and the like. They pushed that story even at DU, repeatedly.

Another dishonest post by a regular supplier of same.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Fri May 6, 2016, 05:25 PM (1 replies)

Of course they were: I lurked at DU at that time and the Hillary-bots

frequently trafficked in that meme day-in and day-out right up until their little witch-goddess folded her broom handle up and conceded. It really is hilarious to see this OP now, a desperate attempt to deny the undeniable.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Fri May 6, 2016, 05:15 PM (1 replies)

I have no "obsession" with Zimmerman: I do have an "obsession" with the 2nd amend

and the right to defend oneself with a firearm from a useless thug wannabe like Saint Skittles. That case just happens to be the most prominent one in recent memory, and the reason my screen name is what it is is summed up in my sig.

It must be a sensitive subject considering your somewhat lengthy response

This is how the typical trolling bullshit over this non-issue goes: you bring up the irrelevant subject of my screen name to dodge talking about the issue at hand. When I explain my side of that issue, you can't just say "okay, I get it," you feel the need to double-down and describe an issue you brought up as "sensitive" on MY PART. Actually, it's the other way around: you lost the debate above and, like a typical witless liberal, don't like my screen name so you try to dodge your way out of the debate you lost by talking about THAT instead of the original "subject" at hand. And then you turn around and claim I'm the one "sensitive" about a topic YOU brought up!

You do realize how silly and really rather stupid this line of attack looks, don't you?

Of course you do: you just don't care. It's a way to troll your way out of a lost debate.

And I have to ask, why do you feel it necessary to put username in quotes? One might easily suspect that it's an attempt to make me look ignorant.

Oh, good Lord: we're going to Peak Stupid now. That's just utter silliness. Buzz off.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Fri May 6, 2016, 04:54 PM (1 replies)

I always know I've won the debate when the talk turns to my "username" rather than what

I wrote - THAT is a true liberal "obsession." Why do you care what my screen name is? Why does it so bother and provoke liberals? We know why, and it's two-fold:

1. The liberal line is that any decent human being assaulted by a thug-wannabe like Saint Skittles should just lay there and take it, even unto death, rather than defend themselves.

2. You guys got nothing else, as here.

Now, it doesn't bother me a wink when you liberals start talking about my "username": it merely highlights the many egregious faults in your ideological worldviews and your seemingly shared inability to debate the issues of the day like adults. Only childish mentalities want to talk about poster's "usernames" rather than the topic under discussion.

I win, again.
Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Fri May 6, 2016, 03:45 PM (1 replies)

*Bookend* for this sub-thread of fun watching a minor ass try out for the majors...

Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 09:56 PM (0 replies)

You're just adding to your own embarrassment - and that's truly delightful.

Shows how easy it is to get under your rancid skin...









Posted by Zimm_Man_Fan | Thu May 5, 2016, 09:40 PM (2 replies)
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »